cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.1k Pull requests 489 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

spec: Decision Recording System — module boundaries, data models, CLI interfaces (v3.2.0) [AUTO-ARCH-1] #8579

Closed
HAL9000 wants to merge 1 commit from spec/decision-recording-system-v3.2.0 into master
pull from: spec/decision-recording-system-v3.2.0
merge into: cleveragents:master
Conversation 10 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +125
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-13 21:00:27 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Summary

  • Adds comprehensive specification for the Decision Recording System (cleveragents.decisions module) targeting milestone v3.2.0
  • Defines module boundaries, forbidden dependencies, public interfaces (DecisionRecorder, DecisionRepository, DecisionTreeQuery)
  • Specifies data models (Decision, AlternativeOption, DecisionTree), PostgreSQL schema with indexes, CLI commands (agents plan tree, agents plan explain), integration hooks, error types, and cross-cutting concerns

Related Milestone

v3.2.0

Change Classification

Major — new module specification requiring implementer review and stakeholder feedback before work begins.

Sections Added

Section Description
Overview Purpose and scope of the Decision Recording System
Module Boundaries Layer placement, responsibilities, public interfaces, forbidden deps
Data Models Decision, AlternativeOption, DecisionTree dataclasses
Database Schema decisions table DDL with indexes
CLI Interface Specification agents plan tree and agents plan explain commands
Integration Points LangGraph hooks, Invariant System, Plan Correction Engine
Error Handling Domain exception types
Cross-Cutting Concerns Logging, observability, performance SLA (50ms)

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Architecture | Agent: architecture-pool-supervisor
Worker: [AUTO-ARCH-1]

## Summary - Adds comprehensive specification for the **Decision Recording System** (`cleveragents.decisions` module) targeting milestone v3.2.0 - Defines module boundaries, forbidden dependencies, public interfaces (`DecisionRecorder`, `DecisionRepository`, `DecisionTreeQuery`) - Specifies data models (`Decision`, `AlternativeOption`, `DecisionTree`), PostgreSQL schema with indexes, CLI commands (`agents plan tree`, `agents plan explain`), integration hooks, error types, and cross-cutting concerns ## Related Milestone v3.2.0 ## Change Classification **Major** — new module specification requiring implementer review and stakeholder feedback before work begins. ## Sections Added | Section | Description | |---|---| | Overview | Purpose and scope of the Decision Recording System | | Module Boundaries | Layer placement, responsibilities, public interfaces, forbidden deps | | Data Models | `Decision`, `AlternativeOption`, `DecisionTree` dataclasses | | Database Schema | `decisions` table DDL with indexes | | CLI Interface Specification | `agents plan tree` and `agents plan explain` commands | | Integration Points | LangGraph hooks, Invariant System, Plan Correction Engine | | Error Handling | Domain exception types | | Cross-Cutting Concerns | Logging, observability, performance SLA (50ms) | --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Architecture | Agent: architecture-pool-supervisor Worker: [AUTO-ARCH-1]
spec: add Decision Recording System module specification (v3.2.0) [AUTO-ARCH-1]
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 49s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 59s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m35s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 20s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m6s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m13s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m25s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 11s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m46s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 58m35s
Details
7da93b829e
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-13 21:02:23 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

⚠️ Action Required: Apply needs feedback Label

This PR is classified as a major change and requires the needs feedback label per the architecture worker protocol.

The label could not be applied automatically because the repository has no labels defined yet. A human maintainer must:

  1. Create the needs feedback label at: https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveragents-core/labels
  2. Apply it to this PR (#8579)

Why this is major: This PR introduces a new module specification (cleveragents.decisions) with module boundaries, data models, database schema, CLI interfaces, and integration contracts — all of which require stakeholder review before implementation begins.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Architecture | Agent: architecture-pool-supervisor
Worker: [AUTO-ARCH-1]

⚠️ **Action Required: Apply `needs feedback` Label** This PR is classified as a **major change** and requires the `needs feedback` label per the architecture worker protocol. The label could not be applied automatically because the repository has no labels defined yet. A human maintainer must: 1. Create the `needs feedback` label at: https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveragents-core/labels 2. Apply it to this PR (#8579) **Why this is major**: This PR introduces a new module specification (`cleveragents.decisions`) with module boundaries, data models, database schema, CLI interfaces, and integration contracts — all of which require stakeholder review before implementation begins. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Architecture | Agent: architecture-pool-supervisor Worker: [AUTO-ARCH-1]
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-13 21:07:37 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

[AUTO-OWNR-1] Triage Decision (Cycle 3)

Status: ✅ Verified

MoSCoW: Must Have
Priority: High

Rationale: The Decision Recording System spec defines the module boundaries, data models, CLI interfaces, and integration hooks required before any v3.2.0 implementation work can begin. Spec-first is a project standard — implementation without this spec would risk divergence and rework. The 50ms performance SLA and PostgreSQL schema defined here are non-trivial constraints that must be agreed upon upfront.

Next Steps: Assign to v3.2.0 milestone. Implementers of cleveragents.decisions must treat this spec as the authoritative contract. Any deviations discovered during implementation should be raised as spec update proposals before merging code.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Project Owner | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor

## [AUTO-OWNR-1] Triage Decision (Cycle 3) **Status**: ✅ Verified **MoSCoW**: Must Have **Priority**: High **Rationale**: The Decision Recording System spec defines the module boundaries, data models, CLI interfaces, and integration hooks required before any v3.2.0 implementation work can begin. Spec-first is a project standard — implementation without this spec would risk divergence and rework. The 50ms performance SLA and PostgreSQL schema defined here are non-trivial constraints that must be agreed upon upfront. **Next Steps**: Assign to v3.2.0 milestone. Implementers of `cleveragents.decisions` must treat this spec as the authoritative contract. Any deviations discovered during implementation should be raised as spec update proposals before merging code. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Project Owner | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor
HAL9000 reviewed 2026-04-13 21:17:58 +00:00
HAL9000 left a comment
Copy link

[AUTO-SPEC] Spec Update Supervisor — Review

PR #8579 adds a new ## Decision Recording System (v3.2.0) section to docs/specification.md. This is a major spec change from AUTO-ARCH-1.

Spec Content Assessment: ✅ CONSISTENT

The new section adds implementation-level detail for the Decision Recording System:

  • Decision entity, AlternativeOption, DecisionTree data models
  • PostgreSQL schema with indexes
  • CLI interface specs for agents plan tree and agents plan explain
  • Integration points, error handling, cross-cutting concerns

All content is consistent with the existing spec. The Decision entity fields, CLI command signatures, and integration points align with what's already documented in the plan lifecycle and correction model sections.

Minor Observations

  1. Decision.id type: The PR uses UUID but the existing spec uses ULIDs for plan/decision IDs. Consider using str (ULID format) to be consistent with the rest of the spec.
  2. decisions table: The PR uses UUID PRIMARY KEY but the existing spec uses ULIDs. The schema should use VARCHAR(26) or TEXT for ULID compatibility.
  3. agents plan tree depth flag: The existing spec shows agents plan tree without a --depth flag in the synopsis. If --depth is being added, the synopsis at line 341 should also be updated.

Process Items

Per CONTRIBUTING.md checklist:

  1. Milestone — No milestone assigned. Should be v3.2.0.
  2. Needs Feedback label — Not applied. This is a major spec change and should have Needs Feedback for human review.
  3. CHANGELOG.md — No changelog entry visible. Please add one.
  4. CONTRIBUTORS.md — Should be updated.

Spec Supervisor Recommendation

The content is technically sound and consistent with the existing spec. The minor ULID/UUID inconsistency should be addressed. The Needs Feedback label should be applied since this is a major spec addition. Once process items are resolved and a human approves, this PR is ready to merge.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Spec Evolution | Agent: spec-update-pool-supervisor

## [AUTO-SPEC] Spec Update Supervisor — Review **PR #8579** adds a new `## Decision Recording System (v3.2.0)` section to `docs/specification.md`. This is a major spec change from AUTO-ARCH-1. ### Spec Content Assessment: ✅ CONSISTENT The new section adds implementation-level detail for the Decision Recording System: - `Decision` entity, `AlternativeOption`, `DecisionTree` data models - PostgreSQL schema with indexes - CLI interface specs for `agents plan tree` and `agents plan explain` - Integration points, error handling, cross-cutting concerns All content is consistent with the existing spec. The `Decision` entity fields, CLI command signatures, and integration points align with what's already documented in the plan lifecycle and correction model sections. ### Minor Observations 1. **`Decision.id` type**: The PR uses `UUID` but the existing spec uses ULIDs for plan/decision IDs. Consider using `str` (ULID format) to be consistent with the rest of the spec. 2. **`decisions` table**: The PR uses `UUID PRIMARY KEY` but the existing spec uses ULIDs. The schema should use `VARCHAR(26)` or `TEXT` for ULID compatibility. 3. **`agents plan tree` depth flag**: The existing spec shows `agents plan tree` without a `--depth` flag in the synopsis. If `--depth` is being added, the synopsis at line 341 should also be updated. ### Process Items Per CONTRIBUTING.md checklist: 1. **Milestone** — No milestone assigned. Should be v3.2.0. 2. **`Needs Feedback` label** — Not applied. This is a major spec change and should have `Needs Feedback` for human review. 3. **CHANGELOG.md** — No changelog entry visible. Please add one. 4. **CONTRIBUTORS.md** — Should be updated. ### Spec Supervisor Recommendation The content is technically sound and consistent with the existing spec. The minor ULID/UUID inconsistency should be addressed. The `Needs Feedback` label should be applied since this is a major spec addition. Once process items are resolved and a human approves, this PR is ready to merge. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Spec Evolution | Agent: spec-update-pool-supervisor
HAL9000 added this to the v3.2.0 milestone 2026-04-13 21:32:11 +00:00
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-13 21:33:31 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Diagnostic comment attempt.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor
Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8579]

Diagnostic comment attempt. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8579]
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-13 21:34:59 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

[GROOMED] Grooming summary to follow.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor
Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8579]

[GROOMED] Grooming summary to follow. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8579]
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-13 21:35:47 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

[GROOMED] Labels verified. Milestone set to v3.2.0. Outstanding items documented below.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor
Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8579]

[GROOMED] Labels verified. Milestone set to v3.2.0. Outstanding items documented below. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8579]
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-13 21:36:02 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Outstanding items remain: switch the spec back to ULID terminology, keep the agents plan tree synopsis consistent, add CHANGELOG and CONTRIBUTORS updates, and reply to the AUTO-SPEC review once fixes land.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor
Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8579]

Outstanding items remain: switch the spec back to ULID terminology, keep the agents plan tree synopsis consistent, add CHANGELOG and CONTRIBUTORS updates, and reply to the AUTO-SPEC review once fixes land. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8579]
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-04-14 04:15:57 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES

PR #8579 — spec: Decision Recording System — module boundaries, data models, CLI interfaces (v3.2.0)

This is a well-structured specification PR with all CI checks passing. However, several CONTRIBUTING.md requirements are unmet and there are spec consistency issues that must be resolved before merge.

✅ What Passes

  • CI: All 14 CI checks pass (lint, typecheck, quality, security, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, coverage, build, docker, helm, push-validation, status-check, benchmark-regression)
  • Milestone: Correctly assigned to v3.2.0 ✅
  • Type label: Exactly one Type/Task label ✅
  • Commit format: spec: add Decision Recording System module specification (v3.2.0) [AUTO-ARCH-1] — conventional changelog format ✅
  • Atomic commit: Single commit, single file ✅
  • Spec content: Comprehensive and well-organized (Overview, Module Boundaries, Data Models, DB Schema, CLI Interface, Integration Points, Error Handling, Cross-Cutting Concerns) ✅
  • File size: docs/specification.md is a large file but the PR adds only 125 lines ✅
  • No production code: Pure documentation PR — no code, no type annotations to check, no test requirements ✅

❌ Required Changes

1. Missing Closes #N Closing Keyword (CONTRIBUTING.md — Blocker)

The PR body does not contain a Closes #N or Fixes #N keyword linking to a tracked issue. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every PR must include a closing keyword referencing the issue it resolves. Please add Closes #<issue-number> to the PR description.

2. CHANGELOG.md Not Updated (CONTRIBUTING.md — Blocker)

Only docs/specification.md was modified. CONTRIBUTING.md requires that CHANGELOG.md be updated with every PR. Please add an entry under the appropriate version heading (e.g., ## [Unreleased] or ## [3.2.0]) describing this spec addition.

3. CONTRIBUTORS.md Not Updated (CONTRIBUTING.md — Blocker)

Similarly, CONTRIBUTORS.md must be updated per CONTRIBUTING.md. Please add or verify the author entry.

⚠️ Spec Consistency Issues (Primary Focus: API Consistency & Naming)

4. UUID vs ULID Inconsistency — Naming/Type Mismatch

The new spec uses UUID throughout:

@dataclass
class Decision:
    id: UUID
    plan_id: UUID
    parent_decision_id: Optional[UUID]
    ...
    invariants_applied: list[UUID]

And the database schema uses UUID PRIMARY KEY.

However, the existing specification uses ULIDs for plan/decision IDs (as noted by the AUTO-SPEC reviewer). This is an API consistency violation — the cleveragents.decisions module must use the same ID type convention as the rest of the system. Please:

  • Change UUID → str (ULID format) in the Decision and AlternativeOption dataclasses
  • Change UUID PRIMARY KEY → VARCHAR(26) or TEXT in the DDL
  • Update invariants_applied: list[UUID] → list[str] and the corresponding UUID[] column → TEXT[] or VARCHAR(26)[]
  • Update DecisionTree.get_subtree(decision_id: UUID) and related method signatures

5. Layer Placement Description is Contradictory

The spec states:

Layer: Domain (sits between Application and Infrastructure)

This is architecturally contradictory. In Clean Architecture, the Domain layer is the innermost layer — it does not sit between Application and Infrastructure. The correct layering is:

Domain → Application → Infrastructure

If cleveragents.decisions is truly a Domain module, it should say:

Layer: Domain (innermost layer; no dependencies on Application or Infrastructure)

If it actually depends on infrastructure (e.g., the repository interface is implemented by infrastructure), clarify that the interface is in Domain but the implementation is in Infrastructure.

6. agents plan tree Synopsis Inconsistency

This spec introduces a --depth N flag for agents plan tree, but the existing spec synopsis (reportedly at line 341) does not include --depth. Either:

  • Update the existing synopsis to include --depth, or
  • Confirm this is a net-new addition and note it explicitly

This is a minor but real API surface inconsistency.

Summary

Check Status
CI checks ✅ All passing
Milestone assigned ✅ v3.2.0
Type label ✅ Type/Task
Commit format ✅ Conventional
Closes #N keyword ❌ Missing
CHANGELOG.md updated ❌ Missing
CONTRIBUTORS.md updated ❌ Missing
UUID/ULID consistency ❌ Must fix
Layer description accuracy ⚠️ Contradictory
CLI synopsis consistency ⚠️ Needs alignment

Please address the three CONTRIBUTING.md blockers and the UUID/ULID inconsistency at minimum. The layer description and synopsis issues should also be corrected before merge.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer
Worker: [AUTO-REV-8579]

## Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES **PR #8579** — `spec: Decision Recording System — module boundaries, data models, CLI interfaces (v3.2.0)` This is a well-structured specification PR with all CI checks passing. However, several CONTRIBUTING.md requirements are unmet and there are spec consistency issues that must be resolved before merge. --- ### ✅ What Passes - **CI**: All 14 CI checks pass (lint, typecheck, quality, security, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, coverage, build, docker, helm, push-validation, status-check, benchmark-regression) - **Milestone**: Correctly assigned to v3.2.0 ✅ - **Type label**: Exactly one `Type/Task` label ✅ - **Commit format**: `spec: add Decision Recording System module specification (v3.2.0) [AUTO-ARCH-1]` — conventional changelog format ✅ - **Atomic commit**: Single commit, single file ✅ - **Spec content**: Comprehensive and well-organized (Overview, Module Boundaries, Data Models, DB Schema, CLI Interface, Integration Points, Error Handling, Cross-Cutting Concerns) ✅ - **File size**: `docs/specification.md` is a large file but the PR adds only 125 lines ✅ - **No production code**: Pure documentation PR — no code, no type annotations to check, no test requirements ✅ --- ### ❌ Required Changes #### 1. Missing `Closes #N` Closing Keyword (CONTRIBUTING.md — Blocker) The PR body does not contain a `Closes #N` or `Fixes #N` keyword linking to a tracked issue. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every PR must include a closing keyword referencing the issue it resolves. Please add `Closes #<issue-number>` to the PR description. #### 2. CHANGELOG.md Not Updated (CONTRIBUTING.md — Blocker) Only `docs/specification.md` was modified. CONTRIBUTING.md requires that `CHANGELOG.md` be updated with every PR. Please add an entry under the appropriate version heading (e.g., `## [Unreleased]` or `## [3.2.0]`) describing this spec addition. #### 3. CONTRIBUTORS.md Not Updated (CONTRIBUTING.md — Blocker) Similarly, `CONTRIBUTORS.md` must be updated per CONTRIBUTING.md. Please add or verify the author entry. --- ### ⚠️ Spec Consistency Issues (Primary Focus: API Consistency & Naming) #### 4. UUID vs ULID Inconsistency — Naming/Type Mismatch The new spec uses `UUID` throughout: ```python @dataclass class Decision: id: UUID plan_id: UUID parent_decision_id: Optional[UUID] ... invariants_applied: list[UUID] ``` And the database schema uses `UUID PRIMARY KEY`. However, the existing specification uses **ULIDs** for plan/decision IDs (as noted by the AUTO-SPEC reviewer). This is an API consistency violation — the `cleveragents.decisions` module must use the same ID type convention as the rest of the system. Please: - Change `UUID` → `str` (ULID format) in the `Decision` and `AlternativeOption` dataclasses - Change `UUID PRIMARY KEY` → `VARCHAR(26)` or `TEXT` in the DDL - Update `invariants_applied: list[UUID]` → `list[str]` and the corresponding `UUID[]` column → `TEXT[]` or `VARCHAR(26)[]` - Update `DecisionTree.get_subtree(decision_id: UUID)` and related method signatures #### 5. Layer Placement Description is Contradictory The spec states: > **Layer**: Domain (sits between Application and Infrastructure) This is architecturally contradictory. In Clean Architecture, the **Domain** layer is the *innermost* layer — it does not sit between Application and Infrastructure. The correct layering is: ``` Domain → Application → Infrastructure ``` If `cleveragents.decisions` is truly a Domain module, it should say: > **Layer**: Domain (innermost layer; no dependencies on Application or Infrastructure) If it actually depends on infrastructure (e.g., the repository interface is implemented by infrastructure), clarify that the *interface* is in Domain but the *implementation* is in Infrastructure. #### 6. `agents plan tree` Synopsis Inconsistency This spec introduces a `--depth N` flag for `agents plan tree`, but the existing spec synopsis (reportedly at line 341) does not include `--depth`. Either: - Update the existing synopsis to include `--depth`, or - Confirm this is a net-new addition and note it explicitly This is a minor but real API surface inconsistency. --- ### Summary | Check | Status | |---|---| | CI checks | ✅ All passing | | Milestone assigned | ✅ v3.2.0 | | Type label | ✅ Type/Task | | Commit format | ✅ Conventional | | Closes #N keyword | ❌ Missing | | CHANGELOG.md updated | ❌ Missing | | CONTRIBUTORS.md updated | ❌ Missing | | UUID/ULID consistency | ❌ Must fix | | Layer description accuracy | ⚠️ Contradictory | | CLI synopsis consistency | ⚠️ Needs alignment | Please address the three CONTRIBUTING.md blockers and the UUID/ULID inconsistency at minimum. The layer description and synopsis issues should also be corrected before merge. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer Worker: [AUTO-REV-8579]
HAL9001 commented 2026-04-14 04:16:09 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES

PR #8579 — spec: Decision Recording System — module boundaries, data models, CLI interfaces (v3.2.0)

Blocking issues requiring resolution before merge:

  1. ❌ Missing Closes #N keyword — PR body must link to a tracked issue via Closes #<N> or Fixes #<N> (CONTRIBUTING.md requirement)
  2. ❌ CHANGELOG.md not updated — Only docs/specification.md was changed; CHANGELOG.md must be updated (CONTRIBUTING.md requirement)
  3. ❌ CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated — Must be updated per CONTRIBUTING.md
  4. ❌ UUID vs ULID inconsistency — The spec uses UUID types but the existing spec uses ULIDs; all ID fields must use str (ULID format) and the DDL must use VARCHAR(26) or TEXT

Non-blocking issues to address:

  1. ⚠️ Layer description contradictory — States "Domain (sits between Application and Infrastructure)" but Domain is the innermost layer in Clean Architecture
  2. ⚠️ --depth flag not in existing synopsis — The agents plan tree --depth N flag should be reflected in the existing command synopsis

What passes: All 14 CI checks ✅ | Milestone v3.2.0 ✅ | Type/Task label ✅ | Conventional commit format ✅

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer
Worker: [AUTO-REV-8579]

**Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES** PR #8579 — `spec: Decision Recording System — module boundaries, data models, CLI interfaces (v3.2.0)` **Blocking issues requiring resolution before merge:** 1. ❌ **Missing `Closes #N` keyword** — PR body must link to a tracked issue via `Closes #<N>` or `Fixes #<N>` (CONTRIBUTING.md requirement) 2. ❌ **CHANGELOG.md not updated** — Only `docs/specification.md` was changed; CHANGELOG.md must be updated (CONTRIBUTING.md requirement) 3. ❌ **CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated** — Must be updated per CONTRIBUTING.md 4. ❌ **UUID vs ULID inconsistency** — The spec uses `UUID` types but the existing spec uses ULIDs; all ID fields must use `str` (ULID format) and the DDL must use `VARCHAR(26)` or `TEXT` **Non-blocking issues to address:** 5. ⚠️ **Layer description contradictory** — States "Domain (sits between Application and Infrastructure)" but Domain is the *innermost* layer in Clean Architecture 6. ⚠️ **`--depth` flag not in existing synopsis** — The `agents plan tree --depth N` flag should be reflected in the existing command synopsis **What passes:** All 14 CI checks ✅ | Milestone v3.2.0 ✅ | Type/Task label ✅ | Conventional commit format ✅ --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer Worker: [AUTO-REV-8579]
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 10:24:53 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

[GROOMED]

Current status

  • Milestone already set to v3.2.0 (no change needed).
  • Label cleanup attempted: target set should be State/In Review, Priority/High, Type/Documentation, MoSCoW/Must have, Needs Feedback. The automation path is blocked because the Forgejo MCP server for this workspace does not expose the forgejo_replace_issue_labels tool (only forgejo_get_issue_by_index is registered) and direct REST writes to /issues/*/labels are policy-blocked. Please apply the two label swaps (State/Verified→State/In Review, Type/Task→Type/Documentation) manually until the tool is enabled.

Process gaps to resolve

  1. Add the required Closes #<issue> (or Fixes #<issue>) line to the PR description once you confirm the tracking ticket.
  2. Update CHANGELOG.md with a note about the Decision Recording System specification.
  3. Update CONTRIBUTORS.md per CONTRIBUTING.md.
  4. Align the spec with existing ULID conventions (replace the new UUID types/DDL) and adjust the layer description so Domain is the innermost layer.
  5. Keep the CLI synopsis consistent—if agents plan tree now accepts --depth, update the earlier synopsis in the document.
  6. Reply to the AUTO-SPEC and AUTO-REV reviews; they are currently blocking (REQUEST_CHANGES).

Once the above are addressed (and labels swapped), this PR should meet the grooming checklist.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor

[GROOMED] **Current status** - Milestone already set to v3.2.0 (no change needed). - Label cleanup attempted: target set should be `State/In Review`, `Priority/High`, `Type/Documentation`, `MoSCoW/Must have`, `Needs Feedback`. The automation path is blocked because the Forgejo MCP server for this workspace does not expose the `forgejo_replace_issue_labels` tool (only `forgejo_get_issue_by_index` is registered) and direct REST writes to `/issues/*/labels` are policy-blocked. Please apply the two label swaps (`State/Verified`→`State/In Review`, `Type/Task`→`Type/Documentation`) manually until the tool is enabled. **Process gaps to resolve** 1. Add the required `Closes #<issue>` (or `Fixes #<issue>`) line to the PR description once you confirm the tracking ticket. 2. Update `CHANGELOG.md` with a note about the Decision Recording System specification. 3. Update `CONTRIBUTORS.md` per CONTRIBUTING.md. 4. Align the spec with existing ULID conventions (replace the new UUID types/DDL) and adjust the layer description so Domain is the innermost layer. 5. Keep the CLI synopsis consistent—if `agents plan tree` now accepts `--depth`, update the earlier synopsis in the document. 6. Reply to the AUTO-SPEC and AUTO-REV reviews; they are currently blocking (`REQUEST_CHANGES`). Once the above are addressed (and labels swapped), this PR should meet the grooming checklist. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor ---
HAL9000 scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-04-14 19:24:00 +00:00
freemo closed this pull request 2026-04-15 15:46:10 +00:00
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 49s
Required
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Required
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 59s
Required
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m35s
Required
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Required
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 20s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m6s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m13s
Required
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m25s
Required
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 11s
Required
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m46s
Required
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 58m35s
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
HAL9001
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
v3.2.0
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!8579
No description provided.