test(integration): workflow example 8 — cloud infrastructure management (supervised profile) #1231

Merged
freemo merged 1 commit from test/int-wf08-cloud-infra into master 2026-04-02 16:51:47 +00:00
Member

Summary

Integration test for Specification Workflow Example 8: Cloud Infrastructure Management with the supervised automation profile.

Closes #772

Changes

New Files

  • robot/wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.robot — Robot Framework test suite (6 test cases)
  • robot/helper_wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.py — Python helper with 6 subcommands
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform-state.yaml — Custom resource type definition
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform.tfstate.json — Mock Terraform state (3 AWS resources)
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/cloud-metrics.json — Mock CloudWatch metrics
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/main.tf — Sample Terraform HCL configuration

Test Cases

  1. Register Terraform Resource Type — Registers local/terraform-state via YAML fixture with copy_on_write sandbox strategy, validates CLI args and resource instance creation
  2. Register Terraform Skill With Tool Composition — Creates local/terraform-ops with 3 anonymous tools and includes: [local/file-ops] skill composition
  3. Supervised Profile Gating Behavior — Verifies create_tool=1.0 and select_tool=1.0 gate both phase transitions via should_auto_progress()
  4. Create Infra Optimize Action With Invariants — Action with supervised profile, typed args (STRING + FLOAT), invariants propagated to plan
  5. Infrastructure Analysis Produces Optimization Recommendations — Mocked Terraform/CloudWatch analysis produces right-sizing recommendations, skips critical resources
  6. Invariant Enforcement Blocks Critical Resource Deletion — Invariants block modifications to critical: true resources while allowing non-critical changes

Approach

Follows established integration test patterns from wf07_cicd_integration.robot and int_wf05_db_migration.robot:

  • Robot → Python helper subcommand dispatch
  • Real service layer (PlanLifecycleService, ResourceRegistryService, SkillService, AutomationProfileService) with in-memory SQLite
  • Mock AI via CLEVERAGENTS_TESTING_USE_MOCK_AI environment variable
  • Deterministic mock Terraform operations returning fixture data

Quality Gates

All 11 nox sessions pass:

  • lint, format, typecheck, security_scan, dead_code
  • unit_tests (509 features, 12989 scenarios)
  • integration_tests (1862 tests, 0 failed)
  • e2e_tests
  • docs, build, benchmark
  • coverage_report (97.0% ≥ 97% threshold)
## Summary Integration test for Specification Workflow Example 8: Cloud Infrastructure Management with the **supervised** automation profile. Closes #772 ## Changes ### New Files - `robot/wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.robot` — Robot Framework test suite (6 test cases) - `robot/helper_wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.py` — Python helper with 6 subcommands - `robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform-state.yaml` — Custom resource type definition - `robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform.tfstate.json` — Mock Terraform state (3 AWS resources) - `robot/fixtures/wf08/cloud-metrics.json` — Mock CloudWatch metrics - `robot/fixtures/wf08/main.tf` — Sample Terraform HCL configuration ### Test Cases 1. **Register Terraform Resource Type** — Registers `local/terraform-state` via YAML fixture with `copy_on_write` sandbox strategy, validates CLI args and resource instance creation 2. **Register Terraform Skill With Tool Composition** — Creates `local/terraform-ops` with 3 anonymous tools and `includes: [local/file-ops]` skill composition 3. **Supervised Profile Gating Behavior** — Verifies `create_tool=1.0` and `select_tool=1.0` gate both phase transitions via `should_auto_progress()` 4. **Create Infra Optimize Action With Invariants** — Action with supervised profile, typed args (STRING + FLOAT), invariants propagated to plan 5. **Infrastructure Analysis Produces Optimization Recommendations** — Mocked Terraform/CloudWatch analysis produces right-sizing recommendations, skips critical resources 6. **Invariant Enforcement Blocks Critical Resource Deletion** — Invariants block modifications to `critical: true` resources while allowing non-critical changes ## Approach Follows established integration test patterns from `wf07_cicd_integration.robot` and `int_wf05_db_migration.robot`: - Robot → Python helper subcommand dispatch - Real service layer (PlanLifecycleService, ResourceRegistryService, SkillService, AutomationProfileService) with in-memory SQLite - Mock AI via `CLEVERAGENTS_TESTING_USE_MOCK_AI` environment variable - Deterministic mock Terraform operations returning fixture data ## Quality Gates All 11 nox sessions pass: - ✅ lint, format, typecheck, security_scan, dead_code - ✅ unit_tests (509 features, 12989 scenarios) - ✅ integration_tests (1862 tests, 0 failed) - ✅ e2e_tests - ✅ docs, build, benchmark - ✅ coverage_report (97.0% ≥ 97% threshold)
test(integration): workflow example 8 — cloud infrastructure management (supervised profile)
All checks were successful
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m56s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m5s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m3s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m5s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m44s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m50s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 20m39s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 55m7s
c3cdb7d9e1
Robot Framework integration test for Specification Workflow Example 8:
Cloud Infrastructure Management with the supervised automation profile.

Test suite exercises:
- Custom resource type registration (local/terraform-state) via YAML
  fixture with copy_on_write sandbox strategy and CLI args validation
- Custom skill creation (local/terraform-ops) with 3 anonymous tools
  (terraform_plan, terraform_show, cloud_metrics) and skill composition
  via includes (local/file-ops)
- Supervised profile gating: verifies both strategize-to-execute
  (create_tool=1.0) and execute-to-apply (select_tool=1.0) transitions
  require explicit human approval via should_auto_progress()
- Action creation with supervised profile, typed arguments (STRING,
  FLOAT), and invariant propagation to plans via InvariantSource.ACTION
- Mocked infrastructure analysis producing right-sizing recommendations
  for over-provisioned resources while skipping critical instances
- Invariant enforcement blocking modifications to resources tagged
  critical:true while allowing non-critical changes

Fixture files provide deterministic mock Terraform state (3 AWS
resources), CloudWatch metrics (CPU at 12% avg on m5.2xlarge), and
sample HCL configuration.

ISSUES CLOSED: #772
brent.edwards added this to the v3.6.0 milestone 2026-03-31 15:08:51 +00:00
freemo approved these changes 2026-04-02 04:21:36 +00:00
Dismissed
freemo left a comment

Review: APPROVED

PR #1231 — test(integration): workflow example 8 — cloud infrastructure management (supervised profile)

What was reviewed

  • robot/wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.robot — 6 Robot Framework test cases
  • robot/helper_wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.py — Python helper with 6 subcommands (672 lines)
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform-state.yaml — Custom resource type definition
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform.tfstate.json — Mock Terraform state (3 AWS resources)
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/cloud-metrics.json — Mock CloudWatch metrics
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/main.tf — Sample Terraform HCL configuration

Assessment

  • Spec alignment: Tests map to Specification Workflow Example 8 (cloud infrastructure management)
  • Test quality: Comprehensive
    • Custom resource type registration (local/terraform-state) with YAML fixture
    • Skill registration with tool composition (3 anonymous tools + includes)
    • Supervised profile gating at both transitions (strategize→execute AND execute→apply)
    • Action with typed args (STRING + FLOAT) and invariant propagation
    • Mocked infrastructure analysis with deterministic Terraform/CloudWatch fixtures
    • Invariant enforcement: critical resources blocked, non-critical allowed
  • Code quality:
    • Follows established integration test patterns
    • Deterministic mock operations using fixture files
    • Proper typing throughout
    • No # type: ignore suppressions
    • Command dispatch consistent with other helpers
  • Fixtures: Well-structured JSON/YAML with realistic data
  • Quality gates: All 11 nox sessions pass (97% coverage)

Thorough integration test suite with excellent fixture design for deterministic testing.

## Review: APPROVED ✅ **PR #1231 — test(integration): workflow example 8 — cloud infrastructure management (supervised profile)** ### What was reviewed - `robot/wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.robot` — 6 Robot Framework test cases - `robot/helper_wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.py` — Python helper with 6 subcommands (672 lines) - `robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform-state.yaml` — Custom resource type definition - `robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform.tfstate.json` — Mock Terraform state (3 AWS resources) - `robot/fixtures/wf08/cloud-metrics.json` — Mock CloudWatch metrics - `robot/fixtures/wf08/main.tf` — Sample Terraform HCL configuration ### Assessment - **Spec alignment**: ✅ Tests map to Specification Workflow Example 8 (cloud infrastructure management) - **Test quality**: ✅ Comprehensive - Custom resource type registration (local/terraform-state) with YAML fixture - Skill registration with tool composition (3 anonymous tools + includes) - Supervised profile gating at both transitions (strategize→execute AND execute→apply) - Action with typed args (STRING + FLOAT) and invariant propagation - Mocked infrastructure analysis with deterministic Terraform/CloudWatch fixtures - Invariant enforcement: critical resources blocked, non-critical allowed - **Code quality**: ✅ - Follows established integration test patterns - Deterministic mock operations using fixture files - Proper typing throughout - No `# type: ignore` suppressions - Command dispatch consistent with other helpers - **Fixtures**: ✅ Well-structured JSON/YAML with realistic data - **Quality gates**: All 11 nox sessions pass (97% coverage) Thorough integration test suite with excellent fixture design for deterministic testing.
freemo self-assigned this 2026-04-02 06:15:12 +00:00
Owner

🔒 Claimed by pr-reviewer-3. Starting independent code review.

🔒 Claimed by pr-reviewer-3. Starting independent code review.
freemo approved these changes 2026-04-02 08:16:13 +00:00
Dismissed
freemo left a comment

Code Review — APPROVED

Review Summary

Independent review of integration test for Workflow Example 8: Cloud Infrastructure Management (supervised profile).

What Was Reviewed

6 new files (951 lines):

  • robot/wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.robot — Robot Framework test suite (6 test cases)
  • robot/helper_wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.py — Python helper with 6 subcommands
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform-state.yaml — Custom resource type definition
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform.tfstate.json — Mock Terraform state (3 AWS resources)
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/cloud-metrics.json — Mock CloudWatch metrics
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/main.tf — Sample Terraform HCL configuration

Criteria Assessment

Criteria Status Notes
Spec alignment Tests custom resource types, skill composition, supervised profile, invariants — all per spec Example 8
Test quality 6 meaningful test cases covering resource registration, skill composition, profile gating, action creation, analysis, and invariant enforcement
Correctness Assertions are thorough with descriptive messages; both positive and negative cases tested
Code quality Clean structure, proper type hints, descriptive docstrings, follows established wf05/wf07 patterns
API consistency Uses same Robot→Python helper dispatch pattern as existing workflow tests
Security No secrets, no credentials, fixture data is clearly mock/test data
Commit format Single atomic commit, Conventional Changelog format, ISSUES CLOSED footer
PR metadata Closes #772, Type/Testing label, v3.6.0 milestone

Key Observations

  1. PlanLifecycleService is correctly used without unit_of_work, falling back to in-memory storage — no database isolation needed (consistent with int_wf05_db_migration.robot pattern).
  2. Supervised profile gating is properly verified: create_tool=1.0 and select_tool=1.0 both gate should_auto_progress() to False.
  3. Invariant enforcement test correctly verifies both that critical resources are blocked and non-critical resources are allowed.
  4. Fixture files are well-structured and realistic (Terraform state v4 format, CloudWatch-style metrics).
  5. Helper file is 672 lines — within established norms (existing helpers range up to 769 lines).

No blocking issues found.

## ✅ Code Review — APPROVED ### Review Summary Independent review of integration test for Workflow Example 8: Cloud Infrastructure Management (supervised profile). ### What Was Reviewed **6 new files (951 lines):** - `robot/wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.robot` — Robot Framework test suite (6 test cases) - `robot/helper_wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.py` — Python helper with 6 subcommands - `robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform-state.yaml` — Custom resource type definition - `robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform.tfstate.json` — Mock Terraform state (3 AWS resources) - `robot/fixtures/wf08/cloud-metrics.json` — Mock CloudWatch metrics - `robot/fixtures/wf08/main.tf` — Sample Terraform HCL configuration ### Criteria Assessment | Criteria | Status | Notes | |----------|--------|-------| | Spec alignment | ✅ | Tests custom resource types, skill composition, supervised profile, invariants — all per spec Example 8 | | Test quality | ✅ | 6 meaningful test cases covering resource registration, skill composition, profile gating, action creation, analysis, and invariant enforcement | | Correctness | ✅ | Assertions are thorough with descriptive messages; both positive and negative cases tested | | Code quality | ✅ | Clean structure, proper type hints, descriptive docstrings, follows established wf05/wf07 patterns | | API consistency | ✅ | Uses same Robot→Python helper dispatch pattern as existing workflow tests | | Security | ✅ | No secrets, no credentials, fixture data is clearly mock/test data | | Commit format | ✅ | Single atomic commit, Conventional Changelog format, ISSUES CLOSED footer | | PR metadata | ✅ | Closes #772, Type/Testing label, v3.6.0 milestone | ### Key Observations 1. **PlanLifecycleService** is correctly used without `unit_of_work`, falling back to in-memory storage — no database isolation needed (consistent with `int_wf05_db_migration.robot` pattern). 2. **Supervised profile gating** is properly verified: `create_tool=1.0` and `select_tool=1.0` both gate `should_auto_progress()` to `False`. 3. **Invariant enforcement** test correctly verifies both that critical resources are blocked and non-critical resources are allowed. 4. **Fixture files** are well-structured and realistic (Terraform state v4 format, CloudWatch-style metrics). 5. Helper file is 672 lines — within established norms (existing helpers range up to 769 lines). No blocking issues found.
Owner

Review claimed by reviewer pool instance reviewer-pool-1. Dispatching independent code review.

Review claimed by reviewer pool instance reviewer-pool-1. Dispatching independent code review.
freemo approved these changes 2026-04-02 16:51:32 +00:00
freemo left a comment

Independent Code Review — APPROVED

Reviewer: reviewer-pool-1 (independent review)

Scope of Review

All 6 new files (~951 lines total):

  • robot/wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.robot — 6 Robot Framework test cases
  • robot/helper_wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.py — Python helper with 6 subcommands
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform-state.yaml — Custom resource type definition
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform.tfstate.json — Mock Terraform state (3 AWS resources)
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/cloud-metrics.json — Mock CloudWatch metrics
  • robot/fixtures/wf08/main.tf — Sample Terraform HCL configuration

Assessment

Criteria Status Notes
Spec alignment Tests map to Specification Workflow Example 8 — custom resource types (local/terraform-state), skill composition (local/terraform-ops with 3 tools + includes), supervised profile gating, invariant propagation and enforcement
Test quality 6 meaningful test cases with thorough assertions and descriptive error messages. Both positive paths (non-critical allowed) and negative paths (critical blocked) tested. Deterministic fixture-based mocking.
Correctness Supervised profile correctly verified at both transitions (strategize→execute via create_tool=1.0, execute→apply via select_tool=1.0). Invariant propagation verified via InvariantSource.ACTION. Full plan lifecycle exercised through terminal APPLIED state.
Code quality Clean structure following established wf05/wf07 patterns. Proper type annotations throughout. No # type: ignore suppressions. Descriptive docstrings. Standard command dispatch pattern.
API consistency Robot→Python helper dispatch pattern matches existing workflow tests. Service layer usage (PlanLifecycleService, ResourceRegistryService, SkillService, AutomationProfileService) consistent with codebase.
Type safety All function signatures fully typed. Return types explicit. Dict type annotations present (dict[str, Any], list[dict[str, str]]).
Security No secrets, credentials, or sensitive data. Fixture data is clearly mock/test data.
Commit format Single atomic commit, Conventional Changelog format, ISSUES CLOSED: #772 footer.
PR metadata Closes #772, Type/Testing label, v3.6.0 milestone.

Key Observations

  1. _NoClose wrapper in _setup_db() correctly keeps in-memory SQLite alive across session.close() calls — consistent with established integration test pattern.
  2. Fixture files are well-structured: Terraform state v4 format, CloudWatch-style metrics with realistic values (CPU 12.3% avg / 28.7% peak on m5.2xlarge → right-sizing recommendation to m5.large).
  3. Supervised profile gating properly verified: should_auto_progress() returns False at both phase transitions, requiring explicit execute_plan() and apply_plan() calls.
  4. Invariant enforcement test correctly verifies both directions: critical resources (aws_instance.api, critical: "true") are blocked, non-critical resources (aws_instance.web, critical: "false") are allowed.
  5. Helper file at 672 lines — within established norms for integration test helpers (existing helpers range up to 769 lines).

Minor Note (Non-blocking)

The helper file exceeds the general 500-line guideline, but this is consistent with the established pattern for integration test helpers in this codebase and is not a blocking concern.

No blocking issues found. Approving for merge.

## ✅ Independent Code Review — APPROVED **Reviewer**: reviewer-pool-1 (independent review) ### Scope of Review All 6 new files (~951 lines total): - `robot/wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.robot` — 6 Robot Framework test cases - `robot/helper_wf08_cloud_infra_supervised.py` — Python helper with 6 subcommands - `robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform-state.yaml` — Custom resource type definition - `robot/fixtures/wf08/terraform.tfstate.json` — Mock Terraform state (3 AWS resources) - `robot/fixtures/wf08/cloud-metrics.json` — Mock CloudWatch metrics - `robot/fixtures/wf08/main.tf` — Sample Terraform HCL configuration ### Assessment | Criteria | Status | Notes | |----------|--------|-------| | **Spec alignment** | ✅ | Tests map to Specification Workflow Example 8 — custom resource types (`local/terraform-state`), skill composition (`local/terraform-ops` with 3 tools + includes), supervised profile gating, invariant propagation and enforcement | | **Test quality** | ✅ | 6 meaningful test cases with thorough assertions and descriptive error messages. Both positive paths (non-critical allowed) and negative paths (critical blocked) tested. Deterministic fixture-based mocking. | | **Correctness** | ✅ | Supervised profile correctly verified at both transitions (strategize→execute via `create_tool=1.0`, execute→apply via `select_tool=1.0`). Invariant propagation verified via `InvariantSource.ACTION`. Full plan lifecycle exercised through terminal APPLIED state. | | **Code quality** | ✅ | Clean structure following established wf05/wf07 patterns. Proper type annotations throughout. No `# type: ignore` suppressions. Descriptive docstrings. Standard command dispatch pattern. | | **API consistency** | ✅ | Robot→Python helper dispatch pattern matches existing workflow tests. Service layer usage (PlanLifecycleService, ResourceRegistryService, SkillService, AutomationProfileService) consistent with codebase. | | **Type safety** | ✅ | All function signatures fully typed. Return types explicit. Dict type annotations present (`dict[str, Any]`, `list[dict[str, str]]`). | | **Security** | ✅ | No secrets, credentials, or sensitive data. Fixture data is clearly mock/test data. | | **Commit format** | ✅ | Single atomic commit, Conventional Changelog format, `ISSUES CLOSED: #772` footer. | | **PR metadata** | ✅ | Closes #772, `Type/Testing` label, v3.6.0 milestone. | ### Key Observations 1. **`_NoClose` wrapper** in `_setup_db()` correctly keeps in-memory SQLite alive across `session.close()` calls — consistent with established integration test pattern. 2. **Fixture files** are well-structured: Terraform state v4 format, CloudWatch-style metrics with realistic values (CPU 12.3% avg / 28.7% peak on m5.2xlarge → right-sizing recommendation to m5.large). 3. **Supervised profile gating** properly verified: `should_auto_progress()` returns `False` at both phase transitions, requiring explicit `execute_plan()` and `apply_plan()` calls. 4. **Invariant enforcement** test correctly verifies both directions: critical resources (`aws_instance.api`, `critical: "true"`) are blocked, non-critical resources (`aws_instance.web`, `critical: "false"`) are allowed. 5. **Helper file at 672 lines** — within established norms for integration test helpers (existing helpers range up to 769 lines). ### Minor Note (Non-blocking) The helper file exceeds the general 500-line guideline, but this is consistent with the established pattern for integration test helpers in this codebase and is not a blocking concern. No blocking issues found. Approving for merge.
freemo merged commit 85f8970d00 into master 2026-04-02 16:51:47 +00:00
freemo deleted branch test/int-wf08-cloud-infra 2026-04-02 16:51:48 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!1231
No description provided.