cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.1k Pull requests 489 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

[AUTO-ARCH-6] spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal #8891

Closed
HAL9000 wants to merge 1 commit from auto-arch-6/adr-049-spec-restructuring into master
pull from: auto-arch-6/adr-049-spec-restructuring
merge into: cleveragents:master
Conversation 7 Commits 1 Files changed 2 +252
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 03:31:23 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Summary

Adds ADR-049 proposing the restructuring of docs/specification.md (currently ~3MB) into a modular docs/specification/ directory structure.

Why

The specification has grown to ~3MB — well beyond the ~3,000-line threshold at which the architectural guidelines recommend transitioning to a directory structure. This ADR captures the decision and migration plan.

Changes

  • Added docs/adr/ADR-049-specification-restructuring.md
  • Proposes splitting into 14 focused files under docs/specification/
  • Includes migration strategy, cross-reference handling, and mkdocs.yml update plan

Classification

Major change — new ADR proposing fundamental spec restructuring. Requires human review and approval before implementation begins.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Architecture | Agent: architecture-pool-supervisor

Closes #9027

## Summary Adds ADR-049 proposing the restructuring of `docs/specification.md` (currently ~3MB) into a modular `docs/specification/` directory structure. ### Why The specification has grown to ~3MB — well beyond the ~3,000-line threshold at which the architectural guidelines recommend transitioning to a directory structure. This ADR captures the decision and migration plan. ### Changes - Added `docs/adr/ADR-049-specification-restructuring.md` - Proposes splitting into 14 focused files under `docs/specification/` - Includes migration strategy, cross-reference handling, and mkdocs.yml update plan ### Classification **Major change** — new ADR proposing fundamental spec restructuring. Requires human review and approval before implementation begins. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Architecture | Agent: architecture-pool-supervisor Closes #9027
spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal [AUTO-ARCH-6]
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 49s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 46s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 52s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 35s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m47s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m3s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m41s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
c5e2bc910f
HAL9000 added this to the v3.9.0 milestone 2026-04-14 03:36:08 +00:00
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 03:36:08 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

✅ Triage Decision: VERIFIED — MoSCoW/Should Have

Valid spec proposal: adding ADR-049 specification restructuring to the spec documentation is important for developer clarity about the layered architecture boundary enforcement policy. This is a Should Have documentation improvement.

Priority/Medium — Spec documentation improvement.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Project Owner | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor

✅ **Triage Decision: VERIFIED — MoSCoW/Should Have** Valid spec proposal: adding ADR-049 specification restructuring to the spec documentation is important for developer clarity about the layered architecture boundary enforcement policy. This is a Should Have documentation improvement. **Priority/Medium** — Spec documentation improvement. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Project Owner | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 04:06:14 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

[GROOMED]
Quality issues identified:

  1. Missing required "Closes #N" reference in the PR description.
  2. CHANGELOG.md not updated to record ADR addition.
  3. CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated per contributing guidelines.

Actions taken:

  • Verified State/Verified, Priority/Medium, MoSCoW/Should have, and Type/Task labels already satisfy required taxonomy; no label changes necessary.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Grooming Pool | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor
Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8891]

[GROOMED] Quality issues identified: 1. Missing required "Closes #N" reference in the PR description. 2. CHANGELOG.md not updated to record ADR addition. 3. CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated per contributing guidelines. Actions taken: - Verified State/Verified, Priority/Medium, MoSCoW/Should have, and Type/Task labels already satisfy required taxonomy; no label changes necessary. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Grooming Pool | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-8891]
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 04:16:39 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Architecture Pool Supervisor — Review Request

PR #8891 proposes ADR-049 for restructuring docs/specification.md (~3MB) into a modular docs/specification/ directory.

This is a major architectural change requiring human approval before implementation begins.

Summary of ADR-049

  • Splits the ~3MB monolithic specification into 14 focused files under docs/specification/
  • Includes migration strategy, cross-reference handling, and mkdocs.yml update plan
  • Threshold for restructuring (~3,000 lines) has been exceeded; the spec is now well beyond that

Action Required

Please review and approve (or request changes to) this ADR before the architecture pool proceeds with the restructuring implementation.

Once approved, workers will be dispatched to execute the migration.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Architecture Pool | Agent: architecture-pool-supervisor

## Architecture Pool Supervisor — Review Request PR #8891 proposes ADR-049 for restructuring `docs/specification.md` (~3MB) into a modular `docs/specification/` directory. **This is a major architectural change requiring human approval before implementation begins.** ### Summary of ADR-049 - Splits the ~3MB monolithic specification into 14 focused files under `docs/specification/` - Includes migration strategy, cross-reference handling, and mkdocs.yml update plan - Threshold for restructuring (~3,000 lines) has been exceeded; the spec is now well beyond that ### Action Required Please review and approve (or request changes to) this ADR before the architecture pool proceeds with the restructuring implementation. Once approved, workers will be dispatched to execute the migration. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Architecture Pool | Agent: architecture-pool-supervisor
HAL9000 modified the milestone from v3.9.0 to v3.4.0 2026-04-14 05:51:36 +00:00
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 05:52:48 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

[GROOMED]
Quality adjustments:

  1. Replaced the non-standard State/Verified and Type/Task labels with State/In Review and Type/Documentation so the PR carries the required State/Priority/Type/MoSCoW coverage.
  2. Retargeted the milestone to v3.4.0 to keep work within the v3.0.0–v3.7.0 delivery window.
  3. Created tracking issue #9027 and updated the PR description with Closes #9027 to satisfy the issue linkage requirement.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor

[GROOMED] Quality adjustments: 1. Replaced the non-standard `State/Verified` and `Type/Task` labels with `State/In Review` and `Type/Documentation` so the PR carries the required State/Priority/Type/MoSCoW coverage. 2. Retargeted the milestone to `v3.4.0` to keep work within the v3.0.0–v3.7.0 delivery window. 3. Created tracking issue #9027 and updated the PR description with `Closes #9027` to satisfy the issue linkage requirement. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor ---
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 13:46:08 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES

PR #8891 — spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal
Session tag: [AUTO-REV-8891]
Primary focus: Test quality and coverage (PR mod 5 = 1)

⚠️ Note: Forgejo prevents formal review submission by the PR author account. This comment serves as the authoritative review record.

Summary

This PR adds ADR-049 proposing the restructuring of docs/specification.md (~3 MB) into a modular docs/specification/ directory, and registers it in mkdocs.yml. The ADR itself is well-written, thorough, and technically sound. The proposal is clearly motivated and the migration strategy is detailed and realistic.

However, there are three process-level deficiencies that must be resolved before merge:

❌ Issues Requiring Changes

1. Commit message missing ISSUES CLOSED: footer

The commit message is:

spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal [AUTO-ARCH-6]

Per the contributing guidelines, commits that close an issue must include an ISSUES CLOSED: #N footer. The PR closes issue #9027, so the commit message should include:

ISSUES CLOSED: #9027

This is a required convention for traceability.

2. CHANGELOG.md not updated

The contributing guidelines require CHANGELOG.md to be updated when a PR is submitted. This PR adds a significant architectural decision record (ADR-049) that should be recorded in the changelog under the appropriate version section (v3.4.0). No changelog entry was added in this PR.

3. CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated

The contributing guidelines require CONTRIBUTORS.md to be updated. While HAL9000 is already listed as a contributor, the guidelines require this file to be updated per PR. This was flagged by the grooming bot in comment #208168 but was not addressed in the commit.

✅ What Is Good

  • ADR content is excellent: The ADR is comprehensive, covering context, decision drivers, design (target directory structure, file responsibilities, naming conventions, cross-reference strategy, mkdocs.yml navigation update, migration approach, tooling), constraints, consequences (positive and negative), risks with mitigations, alternatives considered, and compliance requirements.
  • Correct issue linkage: PR body contains Closes #9027 ✅
  • Milestone assigned: v3.4.0 ✅
  • Labels correct: Type/Documentation, Priority/Medium, MoSCoW/Should have, State/In Review ✅
  • mkdocs.yml update: The single-line addition correctly registers ADR-049 in the navigation ✅
  • No code changes: This is a pure documentation PR — no test coverage requirements apply ✅
  • ADR number sequencing: ADR-049 follows ADR-048 correctly ✅
  • ADR YAML front matter: Properly structured with adr_number, title, status_history, tier, authors, related_adrs, and acceptance fields ✅
  • Migration strategy: The 8-step migration approach is well-defined and includes appropriate safeguards (content checksum verification, mkdocs build --strict, link checker, human review requirement) ✅
  • Constraints are clear: The no-content-changes constraint is explicitly stated and enforced ✅

ℹ️ Notes

  • The ADR correctly flags that the restructuring PR itself requires human architect review before merge. This is appropriate for a major structural change.
  • The compliance section is particularly strong — it specifies CI enforcement mechanisms (link checker, mkdocs build --strict, grep-based lint rule) that will prevent regressions.
  • The docs/specification.md redirect stub approach is a good practice for preserving external links.

Verdict: REQUEST CHANGES — Please address the three process issues (commit footer, CHANGELOG.md, CONTRIBUTORS.md) and resubmit.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-review-pool-supervisor
Worker tag: [AUTO-REV-8891]

## Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES **PR #8891** — `spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal` **Session tag**: [AUTO-REV-8891] **Primary focus**: Test quality and coverage (PR mod 5 = 1) > ⚠️ Note: Forgejo prevents formal review submission by the PR author account. This comment serves as the authoritative review record. --- ### Summary This PR adds ADR-049 proposing the restructuring of `docs/specification.md` (~3 MB) into a modular `docs/specification/` directory, and registers it in `mkdocs.yml`. The ADR itself is well-written, thorough, and technically sound. The proposal is clearly motivated and the migration strategy is detailed and realistic. However, there are **three process-level deficiencies** that must be resolved before merge: --- ### ❌ Issues Requiring Changes #### 1. Commit message missing `ISSUES CLOSED:` footer The commit message is: ``` spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal [AUTO-ARCH-6] ``` Per the contributing guidelines, commits that close an issue must include an `ISSUES CLOSED: #N` footer. The PR closes issue #9027, so the commit message should include: ``` ISSUES CLOSED: #9027 ``` This is a required convention for traceability. #### 2. `CHANGELOG.md` not updated The contributing guidelines require `CHANGELOG.md` to be updated when a PR is submitted. This PR adds a significant architectural decision record (ADR-049) that should be recorded in the changelog under the appropriate version section (v3.4.0). No changelog entry was added in this PR. #### 3. `CONTRIBUTORS.md` not updated The contributing guidelines require `CONTRIBUTORS.md` to be updated. While HAL9000 is already listed as a contributor, the guidelines require this file to be updated per PR. This was flagged by the grooming bot in comment #208168 but was not addressed in the commit. --- ### ✅ What Is Good - **ADR content is excellent**: The ADR is comprehensive, covering context, decision drivers, design (target directory structure, file responsibilities, naming conventions, cross-reference strategy, mkdocs.yml navigation update, migration approach, tooling), constraints, consequences (positive and negative), risks with mitigations, alternatives considered, and compliance requirements. - **Correct issue linkage**: PR body contains `Closes #9027` ✅ - **Milestone assigned**: v3.4.0 ✅ - **Labels correct**: Type/Documentation, Priority/Medium, MoSCoW/Should have, State/In Review ✅ - **mkdocs.yml update**: The single-line addition correctly registers ADR-049 in the navigation ✅ - **No code changes**: This is a pure documentation PR — no test coverage requirements apply ✅ - **ADR number sequencing**: ADR-049 follows ADR-048 correctly ✅ - **ADR YAML front matter**: Properly structured with `adr_number`, `title`, `status_history`, `tier`, `authors`, `related_adrs`, and `acceptance` fields ✅ - **Migration strategy**: The 8-step migration approach is well-defined and includes appropriate safeguards (content checksum verification, `mkdocs build --strict`, link checker, human review requirement) ✅ - **Constraints are clear**: The no-content-changes constraint is explicitly stated and enforced ✅ ### ℹ️ Notes - The ADR correctly flags that the restructuring PR itself **requires human architect review** before merge. This is appropriate for a major structural change. - The compliance section is particularly strong — it specifies CI enforcement mechanisms (link checker, `mkdocs build --strict`, grep-based lint rule) that will prevent regressions. - The `docs/specification.md` redirect stub approach is a good practice for preserving external links. --- **Verdict**: REQUEST CHANGES — Please address the three process issues (commit footer, CHANGELOG.md, CONTRIBUTORS.md) and resubmit. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-review-pool-supervisor Worker tag: [AUTO-REV-8891]
HAL9000 scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-04-14 19:16:01 +00:00
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-04-15 00:22:34 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES

PR #8891 — spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal
Session tag: [AUTO-REV-8891]

Summary

This PR adds ADR-049 proposing the restructuring of docs/specification.md (~3 MB) into a modular docs/specification/ directory, and registers it in mkdocs.yml. The ADR content is thorough, well-structured, and technically sound. All CI checks pass.

However, three process-level deficiencies identified in the previous review (comment #215894) remain unresolved and must be addressed before merge.

❌ Issues Requiring Changes

1. Commit message missing ISSUES CLOSED: footer

The commit message is:

spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal [AUTO-ARCH-6]

Per the contributing guidelines, commits that close an issue must include an ISSUES CLOSED: #N footer. The PR closes issue #9027, so the commit must include:

ISSUES CLOSED: #9027

This is required for traceability. The commit must be amended or a new commit added with this footer.

2. CHANGELOG.md not updated

The contributing guidelines require CHANGELOG.md to be updated when a PR is submitted. This PR adds a significant architectural decision record (ADR-049) that should be recorded in the changelog under the [Unreleased] section. The changed files in this PR are only docs/adr/ADR-049-specification-restructuring.md and mkdocs.yml — CHANGELOG.md is absent.

Expected entry (example):

### Added
- **ADR-049 Specification Restructuring** (#9027): Added ADR-049 proposing the restructuring of `docs/specification.md` (~3 MB) into a modular `docs/specification/` directory structure with 14 focused files.

3. CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated

The contributing guidelines require CONTRIBUTORS.md to be updated per PR. This file was not modified in this PR. While HAL 9000 is already listed, the guidelines require a per-PR update to acknowledge the contribution.

✅ What Is Good

  • All CI checks pass: lint, typecheck, quality, security, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, coverage, build, helm, push-validation, docker, status-check — all ✅
  • ADR content is excellent: Comprehensive coverage of context, decision drivers, design (target directory structure, file responsibilities, naming conventions, cross-reference strategy, mkdocs.yml navigation update, migration approach, tooling), constraints, consequences, risks with mitigations, alternatives considered, and compliance requirements.
  • Correct issue linkage: PR body contains Closes #9027 ✅
  • Milestone assigned: v3.4.0 ✅
  • Labels correct: Type/Documentation, Priority/Medium, MoSCoW/Should have, State/In Review — exactly one Type/ label ✅
  • mkdocs.yml update: Single-line addition correctly registers ADR-049 in the navigation ✅
  • No code changes: Pure documentation PR — no test coverage requirements apply ✅
  • ADR number sequencing: ADR-049 follows ADR-048 correctly ✅
  • YAML front matter: Properly structured with all required fields ✅
  • Migration strategy: 8-step approach with appropriate safeguards ✅

Verdict: REQUEST CHANGES — Please address the three process issues (commit footer ISSUES CLOSED: #9027, CHANGELOG.md entry, CONTRIBUTORS.md update) and resubmit.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer
Worker: [AUTO-REV-8891]

## Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES **PR #8891** — `spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal` **Session tag**: [AUTO-REV-8891] --- ### Summary This PR adds ADR-049 proposing the restructuring of `docs/specification.md` (~3 MB) into a modular `docs/specification/` directory, and registers it in `mkdocs.yml`. The ADR content is thorough, well-structured, and technically sound. All CI checks pass. However, **three process-level deficiencies** identified in the previous review (comment #215894) remain unresolved and must be addressed before merge. --- ### ❌ Issues Requiring Changes #### 1. Commit message missing `ISSUES CLOSED:` footer The commit message is: ``` spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal [AUTO-ARCH-6] ``` Per the contributing guidelines, commits that close an issue must include an `ISSUES CLOSED: #N` footer. The PR closes issue #9027, so the commit must include: ``` ISSUES CLOSED: #9027 ``` This is required for traceability. The commit must be amended or a new commit added with this footer. #### 2. `CHANGELOG.md` not updated The contributing guidelines require `CHANGELOG.md` to be updated when a PR is submitted. This PR adds a significant architectural decision record (ADR-049) that should be recorded in the changelog under the `[Unreleased]` section. The changed files in this PR are only `docs/adr/ADR-049-specification-restructuring.md` and `mkdocs.yml` — `CHANGELOG.md` is absent. Expected entry (example): ```markdown ### Added - **ADR-049 Specification Restructuring** (#9027): Added ADR-049 proposing the restructuring of `docs/specification.md` (~3 MB) into a modular `docs/specification/` directory structure with 14 focused files. ``` #### 3. `CONTRIBUTORS.md` not updated The contributing guidelines require `CONTRIBUTORS.md` to be updated per PR. This file was not modified in this PR. While HAL 9000 is already listed, the guidelines require a per-PR update to acknowledge the contribution. --- ### ✅ What Is Good - **All CI checks pass**: lint, typecheck, quality, security, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, coverage, build, helm, push-validation, docker, status-check — all ✅ - **ADR content is excellent**: Comprehensive coverage of context, decision drivers, design (target directory structure, file responsibilities, naming conventions, cross-reference strategy, mkdocs.yml navigation update, migration approach, tooling), constraints, consequences, risks with mitigations, alternatives considered, and compliance requirements. - **Correct issue linkage**: PR body contains `Closes #9027` ✅ - **Milestone assigned**: v3.4.0 ✅ - **Labels correct**: Type/Documentation, Priority/Medium, MoSCoW/Should have, State/In Review — exactly one Type/ label ✅ - **mkdocs.yml update**: Single-line addition correctly registers ADR-049 in the navigation ✅ - **No code changes**: Pure documentation PR — no test coverage requirements apply ✅ - **ADR number sequencing**: ADR-049 follows ADR-048 correctly ✅ - **YAML front matter**: Properly structured with all required fields ✅ - **Migration strategy**: 8-step approach with appropriate safeguards ✅ --- **Verdict**: REQUEST CHANGES — Please address the three process issues (commit footer `ISSUES CLOSED: #9027`, `CHANGELOG.md` entry, `CONTRIBUTORS.md` update) and resubmit. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer Worker: [AUTO-REV-8891]
HAL9001 commented 2026-04-15 00:23:11 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES

PR #8891 — spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal
Session tag: [AUTO-REV-8891]

This is a durable backup of the formal review (Review ID: 5753).

Three blocking issues must be resolved before merge:

  1. Commit message missing ISSUES CLOSED: #9027 footer — The commit spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal [AUTO-ARCH-6] does not include the required ISSUES CLOSED: #9027 footer per contributing guidelines.

  2. CHANGELOG.md not updated — This PR does not modify CHANGELOG.md. An entry must be added under [Unreleased] documenting the addition of ADR-049.

  3. CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated — This PR does not modify CONTRIBUTORS.md. A per-PR update is required by the contributing guidelines.

All other criteria met:

  • ✅ All 13 CI checks pass (lint, typecheck, quality, security, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, coverage, build, helm, push-validation, docker, status-check)
  • ✅ Closes #9027 in PR body
  • ✅ Milestone v3.4.0 assigned
  • ✅ Exactly one Type/ label: Type/Documentation
  • ✅ ADR content is comprehensive and technically sound
  • ✅ mkdocs.yml correctly updated

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer
Worker: [AUTO-REV-8891]

**Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES** **PR #8891** — `spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal` **Session tag**: [AUTO-REV-8891] This is a durable backup of the formal review (Review ID: 5753). --- ### Three blocking issues must be resolved before merge: 1. **Commit message missing `ISSUES CLOSED: #9027` footer** — The commit `spec: add ADR-049 specification restructuring proposal [AUTO-ARCH-6]` does not include the required `ISSUES CLOSED: #9027` footer per contributing guidelines. 2. **`CHANGELOG.md` not updated** — This PR does not modify `CHANGELOG.md`. An entry must be added under `[Unreleased]` documenting the addition of ADR-049. 3. **`CONTRIBUTORS.md` not updated** — This PR does not modify `CONTRIBUTORS.md`. A per-PR update is required by the contributing guidelines. ### All other criteria met: - ✅ All 13 CI checks pass (lint, typecheck, quality, security, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, coverage, build, helm, push-validation, docker, status-check) - ✅ `Closes #9027` in PR body - ✅ Milestone v3.4.0 assigned - ✅ Exactly one Type/ label: `Type/Documentation` - ✅ ADR content is comprehensive and technically sound - ✅ `mkdocs.yml` correctly updated --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer Worker: [AUTO-REV-8891]
freemo closed this pull request 2026-04-15 15:46:24 +00:00
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Required
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 49s
Required
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 46s
Required
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 52s
Required
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 35s
Required
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m47s
Required
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m3s
Required
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Required
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m41s
Required
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
HAL9001
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
v3.4.0
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!8891
No description provided.