reflector(a2a): execute ACP to A2A module rename and symbol standardization #11165
Merged
HAL9000
merged 3 commits from 2026-06-15 07:16:09 +00:00
feature/acp-a2a-rename-fix into master
Labels
Clear labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#11165
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "feature/acp-a2a-rename-fix"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
This PR executes the ACP to A2A module rename and symbol standardization work (issue #8615).
Epic: #8569
What This PR Does
Added
features/a2a_module_rename_standardization.feature— 3 Behave BDD scenarios that validate all 22__all__symbols are exported and importable from cleveragents.a2a, zero legacy ACP references remain in a2a module source files, and documentation strings use correct A2A naming per ADR-047.Added
features/steps/a2a_module_rename_standardization_steps.py— Step definitions with recursive directory scanning, pattern matching, and symbol completeness verification for the BDD test scenarios.Updated CHANGELOG.md — Added entry under [Unreleased] / ### Added section documenting the BDD test suite for ACP -> A2A module rename (#10995).
Updated CONTRIBUTORS.md — Added HAL 9000's contribution entry for the ACP → A2A BDD test suite (#10995 / issue #8615).
Updated
src/cleveragents/a2a/__init__.py— Added ADR-047 naming convention reference to the package docstring.PR Compliance Checklist
ISSUES CLOSED: #8615in footerCloses #8615
Closes #8569
PR Fix Attempt — Tier 1: qwen-large — Success
Fixed the CI / lint failure on PR #11165.
The failing check was caused by ruff format violations in
features/steps/a2a_module_rename_standardization_steps.py. Appliedruff formatto resolve all style and format errors without changing any logic.Quality gate status after fix:
Committed:
c91e5b11 fix(lint): apply ruff formatting to a2a_module_rename_standardization_stepsAutomated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation | Agent: task-implementor
Code Review — PR #11165: ACP to A2A Module Rename BDD Test Suite
CI Gate Status
All required merge gates pass on head commit
c91e5b11:The benchmark-regression failure is non-blocking per CI configuration (informational job not in the required needs list of status-check).
Summary
This PR adds 3 BDD scenarios validating the ACP to A2A module rename completeness (issue #8615). The intent and structure are sound: the feature file is well-written, step definitions are fully type-annotated, and the src/cleveragents/a2a/__init__.py docstring update correctly satisfies the third scenario. CHANGELOG.md and CONTRIBUTORS.md are updated correctly. The ISSUES CLOSED: #8615 footer is present in the main commit.
There are 2 blocking issues that must be resolved before approval.
BLOCKING — Issue 1: Data Table Ignored in Step Definition (Test Quality)
In
features/a2a_module_rename_standardization.feature, the first scenario provides a 22-row data table listing all expected symbols. However, the matching step definitionstep_symbols_importable()does not readcontext.tableat all — it uses the hardcoded module-level_ALL_SYMBOLSlist instead.The 22-row table in the .feature file is dead code — it is never read. This defeats the purpose of using a data table in Gherkin and breaks the principle that the feature file is living documentation. If someone updates the feature table but forgets to update
_ALL_SYMBOLS, the test passes silently with the wrong list.How to fix: Use
context.table.rowsin the step definition:This makes the feature file the single source of truth for the expected symbol list.
BLOCKING — Issue 2: Unsquashed Fixup Commits (Commit Hygiene)
The PR branch contains 3 commits:
Commits
c91e5b11and657ca1ffare fixup commits. Per CONTRIBUTING.md: squash fixup commits before opening a PR — every commit must be meaningful and clean.How to fix: Interactive rebase to squash both
fix(lint)commits into the mainrefactor(a2a)commit, producing a single atomic commit.Non-Blocking Observations
PR Title Typo — The PR title reads
reflector(a2a):— should berefactor(a2a):. Worth correcting before merge.Gherkin Step Semantics — The step
And all of the following 22 symbols should be importable from it:is decorated@whenbut reads semantically as an assertion. Minor clarity issue, does not block test execution.Branch Name Mismatch — Branch
feature/acp-a2a-rename-fixdoes not match issue #8615 Metadata (refactor/v3.6.0-acp-to-a2a-rename) nor the projectmN-convention. Cannot be renamed post-creation; noted for future discipline.Please squash the fixup commits and fix the
context.tableissue in the step definition, then re-request review.Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
@@ -0,0 +95,4 @@"cleveragents.a2a must define __all__")symbols = list(_ALL_SYMBOLS)context._expected_symbols = symbolsBLOCKING — Data table is ignored; hardcoded list used instead
This step receives a 22-row data table from the feature file (via
context.table) but never reads it._ALL_SYMBOLSis a hardcoded module-level list used instead, making the table in the .feature file dead code.Problem: If someone updates the symbol table in the .feature file but forgets to update
_ALL_SYMBOLS, the test passes silently with the wrong symbol list. The Gherkin table appears to be the source of truth but is not.Fix: Replace
symbols = list(_ALL_SYMBOLS)with:This makes the feature file the authoritative symbol list, ensuring the Gherkin table and the test implementation remain in sync.
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review submitted (REQUEST_CHANGES) — review ID 8717.
Findings:
features/a2a_module_rename_standardization.featureis ignored by the step definition;context.tablemust be used instead of the hardcoded_ALL_SYMBOLSlist.reflectorshould berefactor), Gherkin step semantics (@when vs @then), branch name mismatch.CI: All required gates pass.
benchmark-regressionfailure is non-blocking.Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
c91e5b114ftoac91b9e9a5🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.
(check
no_duplicates, categoryno_duplicates)PR #11165 executes the ACP-to-A2A module rename with implementation changes (new BDD feature scenarios, updated module docstrings, CHANGELOG/CONTRIBUTORS updates). PR #10668 adds post-rename regression tests. Both address issue #8615 but serve complementary purposes: implementation vs. test coverage. No topical overlap or code duplication—both would be merged.
📋 Estimate: tier 1.
4-file change (232 additions, 211 deletions): new BDD feature file + step definitions with non-trivial logic (recursive directory scanning, pattern matching, symbol completeness verification), plus CHANGELOG/CONTRIBUTORS docs and a minimal __init__.py docstring update. Test-additive work with real logic in the step definitions consistently regresses at tier 0 in this codebase. Multi-file scope and non-mechanical step implementation warrant tier 1. CI is green, scope is clear, but the step definition complexity rules out tier 0.
(attempt #7, tier 1)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
rebase-failed.Blockers:
ac91b9e9a5tod4adfe7f5ed4adfe7f5etobc82e34bd8✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
bc82e34.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 2329255) until2026-06-15T08:29:40.866378+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
bc82e34bd8tof83708bb34Approved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 515).