feat(lsp): implement get_hover and get_definitions for LSP runtime #1240
Labels
Clear labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
hamza.khyari
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#1240
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "feature/lsp-epic-completion"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
Implements
get_hoverandget_definitionsonLspClientandLspRuntime, wires them into the tool adapter.Changes
LspClient.get_hover()— sendstextDocument/hover, returns Hover dict or NoneLspClient.get_definitions()— sendstextDocument/definition, handles Location/LocationLink responsesLspRuntimewrappers — input validation, file reading, language detection, 1→0 coordinate conversion,try/finallyfordid_close()safetylsp_tool_adapter_coverage.feature— HOVER → REFERENCES for unimplemented capability testCloses #1243
b1307e5b46toee7d69d0c9ee7d69d0c9to8f99250aba8f99250abato46a5f71b9e🔒 Claimed by pr-reviewer-3. Starting independent code review.
Code Review — PR #1240: feat(lsp): implement get_hover and get_definitions for LSP runtime
Overall Assessment: ✅ Code Approved — ⚠️ Merge Blocked by Conflict
The implementation is well-structured, spec-aligned, and thoroughly tested. However, the PR cannot be merged due to a merge conflict in
CHANGELOG.md. The branch needs to be rebased onto currentmaster.Specification Alignment ✅
The implementation correctly adds
get_hoverandget_definitionsto bothLspClientandLspRuntime, matching the spec's LSP integration design (LSP Capability Exposure, lines 20695–20741). The tool adapter correctly wires HOVER and DEFINITIONS capabilities to the runtime, bringing the working capability count from 2 to 4 as described in the issue.Code Quality ✅
LspClient methods:
get_hover()correctly sendstextDocument/hoverand handles dict, None, and unexpected return typesget_definitions()correctly sendstextDocument/definitionand handles single Location (dict), Location[], LocationLink[], and null responsesLspRuntime methods:
try/finallyfordid_close()safety — this is an improvement over the existingget_completionsandget_diagnosticspatterns which lack this safety netTool adapter:
Test Quality ✅
21 Behave scenarios covering:
lsp_tool_adapter_coverage.featurecorrectly updated (HOVER → REFERENCES for unimplemented capability test)Minor note: The CHANGELOG entry says "10 Behave BDD scenarios" but the feature file contains 21 scenarios. The PR description correctly states 21.
Consistency Observation (non-blocking)
The new runtime methods use
try/finallyfordid_close()safety, which is an improvement. The existingget_completions()andget_diagnostics()methods don't have this safety pattern. Consider a follow-up issue to retrofittry/finallyto those methods for consistency.Security ✅
No secrets, proper input validation, no injection vectors.
⚠️ Merge Conflict
The branch is based on
2fdac4b4but master has advanced to0db70b95. Both the PR and master added new entries at the top ofCHANGELOG.md's## Unreleasedsection, creating a textual conflict. All source code files (client.py, runtime.py, tool_adapter.py) have no conflicts.Action required: Rebase the branch onto current
masterto resolve the CHANGELOG.md conflict, then this PR is ready to merge.46a5f71b9eto05000bddca✅ Code Review — PR #1240: Approved & Merge-Ready
Rebase & Conflict Resolution
The branch was rebased onto current master (
0db70b95) resolving the CHANGELOG.md conflict by keeping both sets of entries:All source code files were conflict-free. The rebased commit is
05000bdd.Code Review Summary (confirming prior review)
Specification Alignment ✅ —
get_hoverandget_definitionscorrectly implement the LSP integration design per spec lines 20695–20741.Code Quality ✅
LspClient: Proper LSP protocol methods with correct response type handling (dict/None for hover, Location/Location[]/LocationLink[]/null for definitions)LspRuntime: Fail-fast input validation, 1→0 coordinate conversion,try/finallyfordid_close()safety (improvement over existing methods)tool_adapter: Clean HOVER and DEFINITIONS dispatch following established COMPLETIONS patternTest Quality ✅ — 21 Behave BDD scenarios covering method existence, all response paths, input validation, and tool adapter wiring.
Security ✅ — No secrets, proper input validation, no injection vectors.
PR Metadata ✅
Closes #1243✓Type/Featurelabel ✓needs feedbacklabel ✓mergeable: true✓✅ PR #1240 merged via rebase.
Actions taken:
feature/lsp-epic-completiononto current master (0db70b95)46a5f71b→05000bdd)feature/lsp-epic-completiondeleted after merge05000bddcatob7ac4a03e9b7ac4a03e9tob330958605New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
Review claimed by reviewer pool instance reviewer-pool-1. Dispatching independent code review.
✅ Independent Code Review — PR #1240: APPROVED
Reviewer: reviewer-pool-1 (independent review)
Specification Alignment ✅
The implementation correctly adds
get_hoverandget_definitionsto bothLspClientandLspRuntime, matching the spec's LSP integration design (LSP Capability Exposure, lines 20695–20741). The tool adapter correctly wires HOVER and DEFINITIONS capabilities to the runtime, bringing the working capability count from 2 to 4 as described in issue #1243.The
initialize()method inLspClientcorrectly advertises hover (contentFormat: ["plaintext", "markdown"]) and definition (linkSupport: false) capabilities to the server — this is necessary for servers to enable these features.Code Quality ✅
LspClient methods (client.py):
get_hover()correctly sendstextDocument/hoverand handles: dict → return dict, None → return None, unexpected type → return Noneget_definitions()correctly sendstextDocument/definitionand handles: None → [], single Location (dict) → [dict], Location[] → list, unexpected → []get_completions()patternLspRuntime methods (runtime.py):
line - 1,column - 1)try/finallyfordid_close()safety — improvement over existingget_completionsandget_diagnosticspatternsOSError→LspErrorwith contextTool adapter (tool_adapter.py):
"hover","definitions") are consistent with the capability namesTest Quality ✅
21 Behave BDD scenarios in
lsp_hover_definitions.featurecovering:LspClientandLspRuntimeexpose the new methodsStep definitions use
MagicMockappropriately (unit tests only, per CONTRIBUTING.md). TheLspRuntime.__new__()pattern for validation-only tests is clean.The existing
lsp_tool_adapter_coverage.featurewas correctly updated: HOVER → REFERENCES for the "unimplemented capability" test, since HOVER is now implemented.Correctness ✅
try/finallyensuresdid_close()is always called even if the LSP request failsfrom exc)Security ✅
No secrets, proper input validation, no injection vectors.
PR Metadata ✅
Closes #1243✓Type/Featurelabel ✓needs feedbacklabel ✓mergeable: true✓Non-blocking Observations
Consistency opportunity: The new runtime methods use
try/finallyfordid_close()safety, which is an improvement. The existingget_completions()andget_diagnostics()methods lack this safety pattern. Consider a follow-up issue to retrofittry/finallyto those methods.Minor docstring gap: The new
get_hover()andget_definitions()runtime methods don't includeRaisessections in their docstrings, whileget_completions()does. Non-blocking but worth noting for consistency.CHANGELOG count: The CHANGELOG entry mentions "10 Behave BDD scenarios" but the feature file contains 21 scenarios. The PR description correctly states 21. Minor documentation inaccuracy.
✅ PR #1240 merged via squash by reviewer-pool-1.
Actions taken:
force_merge: truefeature/lsp-epic-completiondeleted after merge