fix(cleanup): invalidate sandbox_dirs_cache after purge (#7527) #11091
Merged
HAL9000
merged 10 commits from 2026-06-12 16:23:52 +00:00
fix-invalidate-sandbox-dirs-cache-after-purge-7527 into master
Labels
Clear labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#11091
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "fix-invalidate-sandbox-dirs-cache-after-purge-7527"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Adds
SandboxDirsCacheto track filesystem paths of sandbox-created directories (e.g., worktree, overlay) indexed by plan_id.The cache is purged in
SandboxManager.cleanup_all(),cleanup_abandoned()(when a plan becomes fully cleaned),clear_sandbox_dirs_cache(), and the at-exit handler_cleanup_on_exit_handler()-- matching the invalidation already performed byclear_boundary_cache().A new
record_sandbox_dir()method lets callers register a path at creation time, andpurge_sandbox_dirs()removes all paths for a plan in one atomic step. This prevents stale path references from returning after a sandbox's filesystem artifacts have been removed.Changes:
src/cleveragents/infrastructure/sandbox/dirs_cache.py--SandboxDirsCacheclasssrc/cleveragents/infrastructure/sandbox/__init__.py-- exports SandboxDirsCachesrc/cleveragents/infrastructure/sandbox/manager.py-- integrates dirs cache into sandbox lifecyclefeatures/sandbox_dirs_cache.feature-- 10 scenariosfeatures/steps/sandbox_dirs_cache_steps.pyCHANGELOG.mdandCONTRIBUTORS.mdCloses #7527
Code Review — PR #11091: fix(cleanup): invalidate sandbox_dirs_cache after purge (#7527)
Review Summary
This PR adds a
SandboxDirsCacheclass and wires it intoSandboxManager. The code quality for the new class is generally good — thread-safe, well-documented, and readable. However, there are several blocking issues that must be resolved before this PR can be approved.🔴 BLOCKING Issues
1. Fix does not address the reported bug (Wrong class/location)
Issue #7527 describes a bug in
CleanupService._get_sandbox_dirs()and_purge_sandboxes()atsrc/cleveragents/application/services/cleanup_service.py. The_purge_sandboxes()method deletes sandbox directories but does NOT invalidateself._sandbox_dirs_cacheafterward — meaning subsequent calls toscan()return stale paths that no longer exist.This PR fixes
SandboxManagerinsrc/cleveragents/infrastructure/sandbox/manager.py, which is a completely different class. The originalCleanupService._purge_sandboxes()is unchanged and the original bug still persists. The fix is in the wrong location.Required: Either (a) add the cache invalidation to
CleanupService._purge_sandboxes()as described in the issue, or (b) clarify whether the PR intentionally solves a different problem and update the issue accordingly.2. Commit footer missing
ISSUES CLOSED: #7527The commit
f9c5625abody is:No
ISSUES CLOSED:footer is present. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every commit footer must includeISSUES CLOSED: #Nfor the issues it closes.Required: Add
ISSUES CLOSED: #7527to the commit footer.3. PR has no milestone and no
Type/labelThe PR has zero labels and no milestone assigned. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every PR must have exactly one
Type/label (Type/Bug,Type/Feature, orType/Task) and must be assigned to the same milestone as the linked issue (v3.5.0 in this case).Required: Add
Type/Buglabel and assign milestonev3.5.0.4. CI failures:
lint,unit_tests, andbenchmark-regressionare failingThe CI status for commit
8dc37d66shows three required checks failing:CI / lint— Failing after 1m12sCI / unit_tests— Failing after 3m18sCI / benchmark-regression— Failing after 1m1sCI / status-check— Failing (aggregate gate)All required CI gates must pass before a PR can be merged. Per company policy, PRs with failing CI will not be approved.
Required: Fix the lint violations, unit test failures, and benchmark regression before requesting re-review.
5. Branch name does not follow naming convention
The PR branch is
fix-invalidate-sandbox-dirs-cache-after-purge-7527. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, bug fix branches must follow the formatbugfix/mN-<descriptive-name>whereNis the milestone number (milestone v3.5.0 →m6). The correct format would bebugfix/m6-sandbox-dirs-cache-invalidationor similar.Note: While this cannot be changed after PR submission without disruption, it should be corrected for future PRs.
🟡 Non-Blocking Issues (Suggestions)
6. BDD scenarios do not cover
ValueErrorvalidation pathsSandboxDirsCache.record()and.get()both raiseValueErrorfor emptyplan_idordir_path— but the feature file has no scenario testing these error paths. Good test coverage should include the error/failure cases.Suggestion: Add scenarios such as "Recording with empty plan_id raises ValueError" and "Getting with empty dir_path raises ValueError".
7. Step definitions access private
_dirsattribute directlySeveral
thensteps insandbox_dirs_cache_steps.pyaccesscontext._sdc._dirsdirectly (the private internal dict). This breaks encapsulation and ties test assertions to implementation details rather than the public API.Suggestion: Use the public
plan_countanddir_countproperties, or add aget_all_dirs(plan_id)accessor, rather than reaching into_dirsdirectly.8.
SandboxManageris 705 lines — exceeds the 500-line limitPer CONTRIBUTING.md, files should be under 500 lines and should be broken into focused modules when approaching the limit.
manager.pywas 655 lines on master and is now 705 lines after this PR adds 50 more lines.Suggestion: The sandbox dirs cache–related methods (
record_sandbox_dir,purge_sandbox_dirs,clear_sandbox_dirs_cache,sandbox_dirs_cache_size) could be extracted to a mixin or moved to a separateSandboxDirsManagerhelper class.9. No TDD companion test exists for this bug fix
Issue #7527 is
Type/Bug. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every bug fix must have a companionType/TestingTDD issue with@tdd_expected_failtags that proves the bug exists. Issue #7527 notes "a corresponding Type/Testing issue will be created" but none was found. If the TDD workflow was not followed, a regression test with@tdd_issue_7527tag should be added.Suggestion: Verify whether a TDD companion issue was created and whether the BDD regression test uses the appropriate
@tdd_issue_7527tag.10.
CONTRIBUTORS.mdhas unintended whitespace formatting changeThe diff for
CONTRIBUTORS.mdshows that two existing lines lost their flush-left formatting and gained a leading space. This appears to be an unintentional reformatting side effect. The new entry is correct, but the previous two entries should not be indented.✅ What Works Well
SandboxDirsCacheclass design is clean, well-documented, and thread-safe (usesRLock).__contains__dunder support for tuple membership checks is a nice touch.SandboxManager(cleanup_all, cleanup_abandoned, _cleanup_on_exit_handler) are wired correctly.Required Before Re-Review
CleanupService._purge_sandboxes()cache invalidation bug (the actual reported issue)ISSUES CLOSED: #7527to the commit footerType/Buglabel and assign milestonev3.5.0to the PRAutomated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
@@ -29,2 +32,4 @@* HAL 9000 has contributed the git_tools TOCTOU race condition fix (PR #8255 / issue #7619): eliminated the Time-Of-Check-To-Time-Of-Use race in `_get_base_env()` by adding double-checked locking with a module-level `threading.Lock`, preventing concurrent threads from writing conflicting environment snapshots.* HAL 9000 has contributed the mandatory PR compliance checklist to `implementation-supervisor.md` (#9824): added an 8-item checklist to the worker prompt body with concrete items covering CHANGELOG.md, CONTRIBUTORS.md, commit footer, CI verification, BDD tests, Epic reference, labels, and milestone assignment to eliminate systemic PR merge blockers.* HAL 9000 has contributed the PlanResult.success derivation fix (PR #8214 / issue #7501): replaced the incorrect `error_message is None` heuristic with a dedicated `result_success` column in the plans table, ensuring plans with historical build errors are not incorrectly marked as failed after a successful apply.* HAL 9000 has contributed the mandatory PR compliance checklist to `implementation-pool-supervisor.md` (#9824): created a new agent definition with an embedded 8-item checklist ensuring workers always update CHANGELOG.md, CONTRIBUTORS.md, include commit footers (`ISSUES CLOSED: #N`), verify CI passes, add BDD tests, reference the parent Epic, apply labels via forgejo-label-manager, and assign milestones before creating PRs. Includes concrete examples for each subsection and compliance verification pseudocode.Suggestion — Unintentional whitespace formatting change
The diff shows that the two existing entries before the new one had leading spaces added (changed from flush-left to indented). This appears to be an unintentional reformatting side effect — the new entry is correct but the two preceding lines should not be indented.
Please revert the whitespace change on those two existing lines so only the new entry is added.
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Suggestion — Missing error/validation path scenarios
SandboxDirsCache.record()and.get()both raiseValueErrorwhenplan_idordir_pathis empty, but no scenario exercises these error paths. Good BDD coverage includes both happy paths and failure/error scenarios.Consider adding:
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Suggestion — Avoid accessing private
_dirsattribute in testsThis assertion reaches into the private
_dirsdict directly (context._sdc._dirs.get(plan_id, set())). This breaks encapsulation and makes the test brittle — if the internal data structure changes, all these assertions break even if the public behaviour is unchanged.Consider using the public
plan_countanddir_countproperties instead, or exposing aget_all_dirs(plan_id) -> set[str]public method that tests can use without touching internals.Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
BLOCKING — Original Bug Not Fixed
The issue #7527 describes the bug here in
_purge_sandboxes(): after removing stale sandbox directories,self._sandbox_dirs_cacheis NOT invalidated. A subsequent call toscan()returns the old (now-deleted) paths.This PR adds
SandboxDirsCachetoSandboxManagerbut does not touchCleanupService. The cache invalidation fix belongs here:Without this line, the reported bug still exists —
scan()called afterpurge()on the sameCleanupServiceinstance will continue to return stale paths.Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review Summary
This PR introduces
SandboxDirsCacheand integrates it intoSandboxManager— the implementation is clean, thread-safe, and well-documented. However, there are several blocking issues that must be resolved before this can be approved.Critical: Fix Does Not Address the Issue
Issue #7527 describes a bug in
CleanupService._get_sandbox_dirs()insrc/cleveragents/application/services/cleanup_service.py— specifically that_purge_sandboxes()deletes directories but never resetsself._sandbox_dirs_cache = None, causing stale entries to be returned on subsequentscan()calls.This PR instead introduces
SandboxDirsCachewired intoSandboxManager(infrastructure layer), which is a different cache in a different class in a different layer. Checking master confirms the original bug is still present:cleanup_service.py._purge_sandboxes()still does not invalidateself._sandbox_dirs_cacheafter deletion.Additionally, PRs #8257 and #10989 (same title, same author) are also open for this same issue. All three PRs are unmerged and targeting the same issue — this duplication needs to be resolved.
CI Failures (Blocking)
The following CI gates are failing:
CI / lint— failing after 1m27sCI / unit_tests— failing after 4m22sCI / status-check— failing (aggregate gate)CI / benchmark-regression— failingAdditionally,
CI / coveragehas status"success"with description"Has been skipped", meaning coverage was not measured for this commit. Per company policy, all CI gates must pass before a PR can be approved.Commit Footer Missing (Blocking)
The commit message does not contain the required
ISSUES CLOSED: #7527footer. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every commit closing an issue must include this footer.PR Metadata Incomplete (Blocking)
Type/label applied. Exactly oneType/label is required (e.g.,Type/Bug).Non-Blocking Observations
CONTRIBUTORS.mdreferencesPR #10989in the new entry, but this is PR #11091. The wrong PR number will confuse history readers.SandboxDirsCacheclass itself is well-implemented: thread-safe via RLock, clean public API, good docstrings, properValueErrorguards.SandboxManagerintegration is logically sound —purge_sandbox_dirs()is correctly called incleanup_all(),cleanup_abandoned()(when a plan is fully cleaned),clear_sandbox_dirs_cache(), and_cleanup_on_exit_handler().What Must Be Fixed
self._sandbox_dirs_cache = Noneat the end of_purge_sandboxes()insrc/cleveragents/application/services/cleanup_service.py, as described in the issue and as already attempted by PRs #8257 and #10989.lintandunit_testsfailures before requesting re-review.ISSUES CLOSED: #7527in the commit message.v3.5.0milestone andType/Buglabel to this PR.PR #10989toPR #11091in the new entry.Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Suggestion — Wrong PR number referenced.
The new entry reads:
But this is PR #11091, not #10989. Please update the PR number to
#11091.Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
@@ -0,0 +65,4 @@@then('the cache should contain one path for plan "{plan_id}"')def step_then_one_path_for_plan(context, plan_id):BLOCKER — Step definitions access private internals directly.
_dirsis a private implementation detail ofSandboxDirsCache. BDD steps should test behaviour through the public API only. Accessing_dirsdirectly couples the tests to the internal data structure — if the implementation changes (e.g., to a different container type), these steps break even though the behaviour is unchanged.Use the public
plan_count,dir_count, andget()methods to make assertions:This applies to all
@thensteps that read_dirsdirectly (lines ~68, ~74, ~88, ~94, ~140, ~148).Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
BLOCKER — Root cause not fixed here.
Issue #7527 identifies the bug as being in this file — specifically that
_purge_sandboxes()deletes directories but never resetsself._sandbox_dirs_cache = None, so subsequent calls to_get_sandbox_dirs()return stale deleted paths.This PR does not touch this file at all. The fix described in the issue (and attempted in PRs #8257 and #10989) is a one-line change:
The
SandboxDirsCacheclass added ininfrastructure/sandbox/dirs_cache.pyis a well-designed addition, but it tracks a separate concern (infrastructure-layer sandbox directory paths by plan_id) and does not address the application-layer cache invalidation bug described in #7527.Please add the cache invalidation in
_purge_sandboxes()(or wherever the issue describes) AND, ifSandboxDirsCacheis intended as a supplementary improvement, keep it — but both must be present for the issue to be closed.Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Suggestion —
_cleanup_on_exit_handlercallspurge_sandbox_dirsthencleanup_all, butcleanup_allalso callspurge_sandbox_dirsinternally.This results in
purge_sandbox_dirs(plan_id)being called twice for each plan — once explicitly here, and once insidecleanup_all(). The second call is a no-op (the entries are already purged), but it is redundant and slightly misleading. Consider removing the explicitself.purge_sandbox_dirs(plan_id)call from_cleanup_on_exit_handlersincecleanup_allalready handles it.This is non-blocking — the double-call is harmless — but worth cleaning up.
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.
(check
no_duplicates, categoryno_duplicates)PR #11091 has identical title and closes the same issue (#7527) as PRs #8257, #11040, #10989, and #11010. All share the title "fix(cleanup): invalidate sandbox_dirs_cache after purge (#7527)". This constitutes clear duplication. PR #8257 (383 add/1 del/5 files) appears canonical with focused, reasonable scope. PR #11091 (4520 add/1081 del/52 files) is significantly larger, suggesting bundled or accumulated changes beyond the core fix.
📋 Estimate: tier 1.
Multi-file change: new SandboxDirsCache class, updated sandbox manager lifecycle integration, new BDD feature + step definitions. Two CI gates fail: lint (single unused import, trivially fixable) and unit_tests (31 errored scenarios — likely import/setup errors in new test files requiring investigation). Thread-safety considerations (threading import) and atomic purge semantics add modest reasoning complexity. Standard tier-1 cross-file engineering work.
- Remove unused typing.Any import from dirs_cache.py (ruff lint) - Collapse multiline expressions without trailing commas (ruff format) - Rename ambiguous behave step "the result should be {True,False}" to "the dir membership result should be {True,False}" — resolves conflict with existing step @then('the result should be {expected}') in cli_steps.py that caused all 31 feature workers to crash on load - Add self._sandbox_dirs_cache = None invalidation to CleanupService._purge_sandboxes() — the actual fix for issue #7527; without this, subsequent scan() calls return stale deleted paths - Fix CONTRIBUTORS.md PR reference from #10989 to #11091 ISSUES CLOSED: #7527(attempt #6, tier 2)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
resolved.Pushed 1 commit:
1ef9780.Files touched:
CONTRIBUTORS.md,features/sandbox_dirs_cache.feature,features/steps/sandbox_dirs_cache_steps.py,src/cleveragents/application/services/cleanup_service.py,src/cleveragents/infrastructure/sandbox/dirs_cache.py.(attempt #7, tier 1)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
blocked.Blockers:
4b6892cc11but dispatch base was3fce8431e9. The implementer pushed from inside the worktree (forbidden by the git contract) OR a third party pushed during the attempt. Re-dispatch will re-prefetch and pick up the new head.(attempt #8, tier 2)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
rebase-failed.Blockers:
4b6892cc11toe6c20cad2f(attempt #10, tier 2)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
verified-clean.✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
3f29361.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 685761) until2026-06-12T17:38:11.145247+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
3f29361ad4to3e34c5a5fcApproved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 466).