[AUTO-DOCS-2] docs: Add v3.2.0 and v3.3.0 feature documentation (conflict-resolved) #9796
Merged
HAL9000
merged 4 commits from 2026-06-03 21:28:36 +00:00
docs/auto-docs-2-v320-v330-features into master
Labels
Clear labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#9796
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "docs/auto-docs-2-v320-v330-features"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
This PR adds comprehensive documentation for the v3.2.0 (Decisions + Validations + Invariants) and v3.3.0 (Corrections + Subplans + Checkpoints) feature milestones.
This is a conflict-resolved version of the original PR #9637, which was closed due to merge conflicts. The branch has been rebased onto the latest master (
835bc580) with all conflicts resolved.Changes
New Documentation Files
Updated Files
Conflict Resolution [AUTO-DOCS-4]
835bc580)Epic Reference: AUTO-DOCS-2 M3+M4 Documentation Milestone
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation Pool | Agent: implementation-worker [AUTO-DOCS-4]
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Agent: pr-creator
Closes #9637
341539ace7to895b044170895b044170to24280eb6d424280eb6d4to8d81251f23Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES
Thank you for this documentation PR. CI is passing, and the documentation content for v3.2.0 and v3.3.0 is well-structured and comprehensive. However, several blocking issues must be resolved before this PR can be approved.
❌ Criterion 11 — Branch Name Convention FAIL
The branch name
docs/auto-docs-2-v320-v330-featuresdoes not follow the required convention.Required prefixes:
feature/mN-name,bugfix/mN-name, ortdd/mN-nameActual prefix:
docs/(not permitted)Please recreate the branch with a valid prefix, e.g.
feature/m3-v320-v330-docs.❌ Criterion 10 — Wrong Issue Linked FAIL
The PR body contains
Closes #2, but Issue #2 is titled "Consistent Async Event Loop Management System" — which is about async event loop management and is completely unrelated to this documentation PR. Additionally, Issue #2 is already closed.Please link the correct issue that tracks this documentation work, or create a new issue if one does not exist.
❌ No Milestone Assigned
The PR has no milestone assigned. Since this PR documents v3.2.0 and v3.3.0 features, it should be assigned to the appropriate milestone (e.g.,
v3.2.0orv3.3.0).❌ No Labels Assigned
The PR has no labels. Please apply the appropriate type label (e.g.,
Type/Documentation) and any relevant priority/state labels via theforgejo-label-manager.❌ PR Not Mergeable
The PR is currently marked as not mergeable (
mergeable: false) due to conflicts with the base branch (master). The conflicts must be resolved before this PR can be merged.✅ Passing Criteria
# type: ignoredocs:Commitizen type presentSummary of Required Changes
feature/mN-name,bugfix/mN-name, ortdd/mN-nameconventionCloses #2and link the correct/relevant issueforgejo-label-managerAutomated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-review-pool-supervisor
Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES
PR #9796 has been reviewed and REQUEST CHANGES has been issued. The following blocking issues were identified:
docs/auto-docs-2-v320-v330-featuresdoes not follow the required convention (feature/mN-name,bugfix/mN-name, ortdd/mN-name)Closes #2points to "Consistent Async Event Loop Management System" (already closed, unrelated to this docs PR)forgejo-label-manager✅ CI is passing | ✅ Documentation content is well-structured | ✅ All new files are under 500 lines
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Reviewer: PR Reviewer | Agent: pr-reviewer
Re-Review: REQUEST CHANGES
Thank you for the updates to PR #9796. A milestone (
v3.2.0) has now been correctly assigned — that is addressed. However, several blocking issues from the previous review remain unresolved, and new issues have been found in the commits. Changes are required before this PR can be approved.✅ Previously Requested — RESOLVED
v3.2.0assigned❌ Previously Requested — STILL UNRESOLVED
1. Branch Name Convention Violation (Blocker)
The branch name
docs/auto-docs-2-v320-v330-featuresstill does not follow the required convention.Required prefixes:
feature/mN-name,bugfix/mN-name, ortdd/mN-nameActual prefix:
docs/(not a permitted prefix)Example of a valid equivalent:
feature/m3-v320-v330-docsThis requires recreating the branch with a valid prefix and re-opening the PR.
2. No Linked Issue (Blocker)
The previous review flagged that
Closes #2was wrong. The author removed it, but the PR body now contains no closing keyword at all. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every PR must reference a linked issue viaCloses #NorFixes #N.Additionally, the only issue reference remaining is
ISSUES CLOSED: #9796in a commit footer — but#9796is the PR number itself, not an issue. Commit footers must reference the actual issue number(s) being resolved.Please:
Closes #<issue_number>to the PR bodyISSUES CLOSED: #9796withISSUES CLOSED: #<actual_issue_number>3. No Labels Applied (Blocker)
The PR still has no labels. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, exactly one
Type/label must be applied (e.g.,Type/DocumentationorType/Task). Please apply the correct label viaforgejo-label-manager.4. PR Not Mergeable (Blocker)
The PR is still marked as not mergeable (
mergeable: false). There are conflicts with the base branch (master). These must be resolved before the PR can be merged.❌ New Issues Found in This Re-Review
5. CI Failing —
unit_testsGate (Blocker)The
unit_testsCI job is failing (failing after 6m15s). This is a required merge gate. All CI gates (lint, typecheck, security, unit_tests, coverage) must pass before a PR can be approved.This is a documentation-only PR that should not introduce test failures. Please investigate why
unit_testsis failing and push a fix.6. Commit Body Contains Leftover Conflict Comments (Blocker)
Commit
531fa296has the following leftover git conflict comment lines in its body (repeated three times):These are git auto-generated merge conflict comments that should have been removed before committing. Please clean up the commit history via interactive rebase before the PR is merged.
7. Incorrect Issue Reference in Commit Footer (Blocker)
Commit
11cca80chas footerISSUES CLOSED: #9796— but#9796is the PR number, not an issue number. Commit footers must reference the actual issue(s) being resolved (e.g.,ISSUES CLOSED: #<issue_id>). This is required by CONTRIBUTING.md.✅ Passing Criteria
v3.2.0now assigned# type: ignoredocs/cli.md(343 lines)<<<<<<<markers in any changed fileSummary of Required Changes
feature/m3-v320-v330-docs(or similar valid prefix)Closes #<issue_number>to the PR body; create an issue if none existsType/Documentation(or appropriateType/label) viaforgejo-label-managermasterto make the PR mergeableunit_testsCI failure — investigate and push a fix531fa296body — remove leftover git conflict comment lines via interactive rebase11cca80c— changeISSUES CLOSED: #9796to the actual issue numberAutomated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES
PR #9796 has been re-reviewed and REQUEST CHANGES has been issued. The following blocking issues remain or were newly identified:
Previously Unresolved:
docs/auto-docs-2-v320-v330-featuresstill does not follow the required convention (feature/mN-name,bugfix/mN-name, ortdd/mN-name)Closes #2was removed but no validCloses #NorFixes #Nwas added; PR body has zero issue linkageType/Documentation(or appropriateType/label) viaforgejo-label-managermasterstill presentNewly Found:
5. ❌
unit_testsCI gate is FAILING — required for merge; must be investigated and fixed6. ❌ Commit
531fa296body contains leftover git conflict comments (# Conflicts:\n#\tCHANGELOG.mdrepeated 3 times) — clean up via interactive rebase7. ❌ Commit
11cca80cfooter references PR number (ISSUES CLOSED: #9796) instead of the actual issue numberResolved Since Last Review:
✅ Milestone
v3.2.0assigned✅ Documentation content is well-structured and comprehensive
✅ All other CI gates are passing (lint, typecheck, security, coverage, integration, e2e, build)
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.
(check
no_duplicates, categoryno_duplicates)PR #9796 is a conflict-resolved rebase of the closed PR #9637, targeting v3.2.0/v3.3.0 feature documentation. No open PR in the repo duplicates this scope: #9957 targets v3.0.0/v3.1.0, #10005 targets v3.8.0/v3.9.0, and #10941 (which shares the AUTO-DOCS-2 tag) targets v3.8.0/v3.9.0. The anchor has no linked-issue pattern triggering supersession checks. Conclusion: not a duplicate of any currently-open PR.
📋 Estimate: metadata-only — no code change needed.
Documentation-only PR: 3 new markdown files (docs/cli.md, docs/decisions.md, docs/subplans.md), CHANGELOG conflict resolution, and mkdocs.yml nav update. No code changes. The unit_tests CI failure is in features/db_repositories_cov_r3.feature:292 with worker elapsed time of 47.664s — within 1 second of the known :48s CI runner reaper kill threshold. This is a classic reaper-kill pattern unrelated to the docs changes. Metadata-only routing is appropriate; confidence is medium rather than high due to the failing CI gate requiring reviewer verification.
✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
11cca80.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 1567405) until2026-06-03T13:30:46.992001+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
Released by
merge_drive.py(pid 1567405). terminal_state=rebase-conflict-vs-master, op_label=auto/needs-conflict-resolution11cca80cf0toea4e95d39dea4e95d39dto97206b86b3(attempt #5, tier 1)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
rebased.Pushed 1 commit:
97206b8.✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
97206b8.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 1567405) until2026-06-03T16:24:07.527825+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
97206b86b3to78d4b866d6Released by
merge_drive.py(pid 1567405). terminal_state=ci-fail-on-rebased-sha, op_label=auto/needs-implementer(attempt #7, tier 1)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
rebase-failed.Blockers:
78d4b866d6to6455bd152c(attempt #10, tier 2)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
ci-not-ready.✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
6455bd1.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 2474893) until2026-06-03T19:28:30.677603+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
6455bd152cto01ef7e14d9Released by
merge_drive.py(pid 2474893). terminal_state=ci-fail-on-rebased-sha, op_label=auto/needs-implementer🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.
(check
no_duplicates, categoryno_duplicates)PR #9796 is a conflict-resolved rebase of the originally-closed PR #9637, documenting v3.2.0 (Decisions + Validations + Invariants) and v3.3.0 (Corrections + Subplans + Checkpoints) features. Scanned all 423 open PRs for competing documentation work: no other open PR documents these specific versions. Related AUTO-DOCS-2 tagged PRs (#10492, #10941) address different scopes/versions. Anchor is topically unique with no duplicate in the open set.
📋 Estimate: metadata-only — no code change needed.
Pure documentation PR: 3 new markdown files (docs/cli.md, docs/decisions.md, docs/subplans.md) + CHANGELOG + mkdocs.yml navigation update. No code changes. All CI failures are infrastructure/network failures — Forgejo HTTP endpoint unreachable (forgejo-http.ct-dev.svc.cluster.local:3000) causing checkout and artifact upload failures. The actual test steps that ran show success: integration_tests: OK, docker build (CLI): OK, docker build (Server): OK. This is docs-only work, metadata-only routing is appropriate.
✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
01ef7e1.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 2474893) until2026-06-03T20:21:11.632259+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
Released by
merge_drive.py(pid 2474893). terminal_state=ci-fail-on-rebased-sha, op_label=auto/needs-implementer🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.
(check
no_duplicates, categoryno_duplicates)PR #9796 is the conflict-resolved successor to closed PR #9637, explicitly closing it via the Closes token. Neither deterministic check fires. In Stage B, no open PR duplicates the v3.2.0/v3.3.0 documentation scope—this is the sole PR addressing these specific version milestones. Topically similar PRs cover different versions (v3.0.0/v3.1.0 earlier, v3.8.0/v3.9.0 later) or unrelated topics. No duplicate detected.
📋 Estimate: metadata-only — no code change needed.
Pure documentation PR: 3 new docs files (cli.md, decisions.md, subplans.md) + CHANGELOG.md + mkdocs.yml navigation. Zero code changes. All CI failures are infrastructure network errors (runner cannot reach Forgejo artifact storage at forgejo-http.ct-dev.svc.cluster.local:3000); the substantive steps all passed (integration_tests: OK, docker build CLI/Server: OK). Routes as metadata-only.
✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
01ef7e1.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 2474893) until2026-06-03T20:53:52.524266+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
Released by
merge_drive.py(pid 2474893). terminal_state=ci-fail-on-rebased-sha, op_label=auto/needs-implementer🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.
(check
no_duplicates, categoryno_duplicates)PR #9796 documents v3.2.0 and v3.3.0 feature milestones (Decisions + Validations + Invariants; Corrections + Subplans + Checkpoints). Scanned all 424 open PRs for topical overlap: #10941 and #10005 cover v3.8.0/v3.9.0 documentation (different version set); #9957 covers AUTO-DOCS-1 (v3.0.0/v3.1.0); #10550 covers v3.6.0/v3.7.0. No open PR addresses the v3.2.0/v3.3.0 documentation scope. The anchor is a conflict-resolved rebase of closed #9637, not a duplicate of any currently-open work.
📋 Estimate: metadata-only — no code change needed.
Pure documentation PR: 3 new markdown files (docs/cli.md, docs/decisions.md, docs/subplans.md) plus CHANGELOG.md and mkdocs.yml updates. No code changes, no logic branches, no test modifications. All 4 CI failures are infrastructure/network issues (Forgejo cluster unreachable for checkout/artifact-upload) — integration_tests and docker both passed their substantive steps. Scope is isolated to docs/, minimal architectural impact.
✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
01ef7e1.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 2474893) until2026-06-03T21:25:52.369086+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
Released by
merge_drive.py(pid 2474893). terminal_state=rebase-conflict-vs-master, op_label=auto/needs-conflict-resolution01ef7e14d9to27dadc8f88(attempt #22, tier 0)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
ci-not-ready.(attempt #23, tier 0)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
verified-clean.(attempt #24, tier 0)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
blocked.Blockers:
39e0d44b44but dispatch base was27dadc8f88. The implementer pushed from inside the worktree (forbidden by the git contract) OR a third party pushed during the attempt. Re-dispatch will re-prefetch and pick up the new head.(attempt #25, tier 1)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
ci-not-ready.✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
39e0d44.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 2474893) until2026-06-03T22:58:29.716689+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
Approved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 209).