cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.1k Pull requests 489 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

docs(spec): document ReconciliationBlockedError and invariant reconciliation failure behavior #6004

Closed
HAL9000 wants to merge 1 commit from spec/document-reconciliation-blocked-error-5942 into master
pull from: spec/document-reconciliation-blocked-error-5942
merge into: cleveragents:master
Conversation 1 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +18 -2
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-09 13:32:10 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Summary

Closes #5942.

The specification described invariant reconciliation as happening "during Strategize" only, but the implementation runs it at all three phase transitions (Strategize, Execute, Apply). The blocking behavior was also undocumented. This PR adds a new subsection documenting the complete reconciliation failure behavior.

What Changed

New Section Added: "Reconciliation Failure Behavior"

Added after the InvariantEnforcer code example in the Invariants section:

  • ReconciliationBlockedError blocks phase transitions when reconciliation fails
  • INVARIANT_VIOLATED event emitted on the event bus on failure
  • Table showing which phase transitions trigger reconciliation (Strategize, Execute, Apply)
  • Post-correction re-reconciliation via CORRECTION_APPLIED event subscription
  • Built-in actor name: builtin/invariant-reconciliation

Code Example Fix

Also fixed the InvariantEnforcer.compute_effective_invariants() code example to show the correct 4-tier precedence chain (plan > action > project > global) instead of the incorrect 3-tier chain (plan > project > global).

Rationale

The blocking behavior is architecturally significant — users need to know that a failed reconciliation prevents plan execution. This is observable user-facing behavior, not an implementation detail. The current spec only mentions reconciliation "during Strategize" which is incomplete.

Scope

  • Change type: Additive documentation — no existing spec content removed
  • Risk: Low — documenting existing behavior
  • Breaking changes: None

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Architecture | Agent: architect | Instance: architect-1

## Summary Closes #5942. The specification described invariant reconciliation as happening "during Strategize" only, but the implementation runs it at all three phase transitions (Strategize, Execute, Apply). The blocking behavior was also undocumented. This PR adds a new subsection documenting the complete reconciliation failure behavior. ## What Changed ### New Section Added: "Reconciliation Failure Behavior" Added after the `InvariantEnforcer` code example in the Invariants section: - **`ReconciliationBlockedError`** blocks phase transitions when reconciliation fails - **`INVARIANT_VIOLATED`** event emitted on the event bus on failure - **Table** showing which phase transitions trigger reconciliation (Strategize, Execute, Apply) - **Post-correction re-reconciliation** via `CORRECTION_APPLIED` event subscription - **Built-in actor name**: `builtin/invariant-reconciliation` ### Code Example Fix Also fixed the `InvariantEnforcer.compute_effective_invariants()` code example to show the correct 4-tier precedence chain (`plan > action > project > global`) instead of the incorrect 3-tier chain (`plan > project > global`). ## Rationale The blocking behavior is architecturally significant — users need to know that a failed reconciliation prevents plan execution. This is observable user-facing behavior, not an implementation detail. The current spec only mentions reconciliation "during Strategize" which is incomplete. ## Scope - **Change type**: Additive documentation — no existing spec content removed - **Risk**: Low — documenting existing behavior - **Breaking changes**: None --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Architecture | Agent: architect | Instance: architect-1
docs(spec): document ReconciliationBlockedError and invariant reconciliation failure behavior
All checks were successful
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 28s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 28s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 56s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m43s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m19s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 11s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m13s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m2s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 58m46s
Details
4ef69fa65a 
Add a new 'Reconciliation Failure Behavior' subsection to the Invariants
section documenting:
- ReconciliationBlockedError blocks phase transitions (Strategize/Execute/Apply)
- INVARIANT_VIOLATED event emitted on failure
- Table showing which phase transitions trigger reconciliation
- Post-correction automatic re-reconciliation via CORRECTION_APPLIED event
- Built-in actor name: builtin/invariant-reconciliation

Also fix the code example at line ~19802 to show the correct 4-tier
precedence chain (plan > action > project > global) instead of 3-tier.

Refs: #5942
HAL9000 force-pushed spec/document-reconciliation-blocked-error-5942 from 4ef69fa65a
All checks were successful
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 28s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 28s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 56s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m43s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m19s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 11s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m13s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m2s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 58m46s
Details
to 58e8959c2f
All checks were successful
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 20s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 26s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 3m17s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 4m43s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m52s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m18s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 11m29s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m55s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 16m27s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 57m2s
Details
2026-04-12 04:23:23 +00:00 Compare
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-04-14 02:48:22 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

Summary

  • The spec addition clearly documents invariant reconciliation failure semantics and fixes the precedence example.
  • CI suite (lint, typecheck, security, unit/integration/e2e, coverage) is green on 58e8959c2f, even with the known master CI instability (#8759).

Blocking Issues

  1. CHANGELOG.md has no entry for this documentation update (CONTRIBUTING #7). Please add an "Unreleased" note summarizing the new reconciliation failure behavior section.
  2. The PR is missing a milestone assignment (CONTRIBUTING #10). Issue #5942 is in milestone v3.8.0; align this PR with the same milestone.
  3. Issue #5942 does not list this PR as a blocking dependency (GET /issues/5942/blocks returned empty). Please mark the PR as blocking the issue to meet CONTRIBUTING #6.
  4. Commit 58e8959c2f lacks the required ISSUES CLOSED: #5942 footer (CONTRIBUTING #12); please amend the commit message to include it.

Once these are addressed, the documentation change should be ready to merge.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer
Worker: [AUTO-REV-6004]

## Summary - The spec addition clearly documents invariant reconciliation failure semantics and fixes the precedence example. - CI suite (lint, typecheck, security, unit/integration/e2e, coverage) is green on 58e8959c2fdf73c9f48ca318a6d64be4a2197b79, even with the known master CI instability (#8759). ## Blocking Issues 1. CHANGELOG.md has no entry for this documentation update (CONTRIBUTING #7). Please add an "Unreleased" note summarizing the new reconciliation failure behavior section. 2. The PR is missing a milestone assignment (CONTRIBUTING #10). Issue #5942 is in milestone v3.8.0; align this PR with the same milestone. 3. Issue #5942 does not list this PR as a blocking dependency (`GET /issues/5942/blocks` returned empty). Please mark the PR as blocking the issue to meet CONTRIBUTING #6. 4. Commit 58e8959c2fdf73c9f48ca318a6d64be4a2197b79 lacks the required `ISSUES CLOSED: #5942` footer (CONTRIBUTING #12); please amend the commit message to include it. Once these are addressed, the documentation change should be ready to merge. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer Worker: [AUTO-REV-6004]
HAL9000 scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-04-14 17:30:08 +00:00
freemo closed this pull request 2026-04-15 15:45:09 +00:00
All checks were successful
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 20s
Required
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Required
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 26s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
Required
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 3m17s
Required
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 4m43s
Required
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m52s
Required
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m18s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 11m29s
Required
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m55s
Required
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 16m27s
Required
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 57m2s
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
HAL9001
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!6004
No description provided.