fix(acms): harden hot/warm/cold tier service reliability #11238

Merged

HAL9000 merged 2 commits from pr-fix/9663-hot-warm-cold-tier-reliability into master 2026-05-28 21:31:23 +00:00

Conversation 11 Commits 2 Files changed 1 +53 -18

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-16 23:43:36 +00:00

Owner

Copy link

Summary

Harden the ContextTierService for production reliability under concurrent plan execution and high-throughput scenario.

Changes

1. Remove dead conflicting defaults: Deleted _DEFAULT_MAX_TOKENS_HOT, _DEFAULT_MAX_DECISIONS_WARM, _DEFAULT_MAX_DECISIONS_COLD which were never used (all budget flows through budget_from_settings() in context_tier_settings.py) and contradicted the canonical values.

2. Warm-tier capacity enforcement: Added _enforce_warm_capacity() — count-based LRU eviction of the warm tier when max_decisions_warm is exceeded. Triggered after:

   • Cold → warm promotion (in promote())
   • Hot-budget-fallback restore to warm (when promoted fragment could't fit in hot)

3. Immutable snapshot returns: get_all_fragments() and get_hot_fragments() now return model_copy() instances instead of live mutable references, preventing state corruption from external mutation while the RLock is held.

4. Naming consistency: _COLD_SUMMARY_MAX_CHARS renamed to _default_summarisation_max_chars following snake_case convention used throughout the module.

Impact

• No breaking API changes — return types and method signatures unchanged (copies still implement TieredFragment).
• Warmer tiers no longer silently exceed max_decisions_warm capacity after promotions.
• Thread-safety improved for all public reader methods.

## Summary Harden the `ContextTierService` for production reliability under concurrent plan execution and high-throughput scenario. ### Changes 1. **Remove dead conflicting defaults**: Deleted `_DEFAULT_MAX_TOKENS_HOT`, `_DEFAULT_MAX_DECISIONS_WARM`, `_DEFAULT_MAX_DECISIONS_COLD` which were never used (all budget flows through `budget_from_settings()` in `context_tier_settings.py`) and contradicted the canonical values. 2. **Warm-tier capacity enforcement**: Added `_enforce_warm_capacity()` — count-based LRU eviction of the warm tier when `max_decisions_warm` is exceeded. Triggered after: - Cold → warm promotion (in `promote()`) - Hot-budget-fallback restore to warm (when promoted fragment could't fit in hot) 3. **Immutable snapshot returns**: `get_all_fragments()` and `get_hot_fragments()` now return `model_copy()` instances instead of live mutable references, preventing state corruption from external mutation while the RLock is held. 4. **Naming consistency**: `_COLD_SUMMARY_MAX_CHARS` renamed to `_default_summarisation_max_chars` following snake_case convention used throughout the module. ### Impact - No breaking API changes — return types and method signatures unchanged (copies still implement `TieredFragment`). - Warmer tiers no longer silently exceed `max_decisions_warm` capacity after promotions. - Thread-safety improved for all public reader methods.

HAL9000 added 1 commit 2026-05-16 23:43:36 +00:00

fix(acms): harden hot/warm/cold tier service reliability ... 03e34b035e

- Remove unused conflicting _DEFAULT_* constants that conflicted with
  canonical defaults in context_tier_settings.py (which serves as the
  sole source of truth for budget/setting defaults).

- Add _enforce_warm_capacity() to enforce max_decisions_warm limit on
  warm tier after cold→warm promotion and hot-budget-fallback restore,
  preventing silent over-capacity data accumulation.

- Return deep copies (model_copy) from get_all_fragments() and
  get_hot_fragments() to prevent callers from mutating internal fragment
  state while the service holds its RLock under concurrent plan execution.

- Rename _COLD_SUMMARY_MAX_CHARS → _default_summarisation_max_chars for
  consistent snake_case naming throughout the module.

Fixes: PR #9663

HAL9000 added the

State

In Review

label 2026-05-17 08:38:22 +00:00

HAL9000 referenced this pull request from HAL9000/cleveragents-core 2026-05-21 10:32:48 +00:00

[sentinel #11238] fix(acms): harden hot/warm/cold tier service reliability #2

HAL9000 added the

controller-managed

label 2026-05-28 13:42:11 +00:00

HAL9000 force-pushed pr-fix/9663-hot-warm-cold-tier-reliability from 03e34b035e to 5031170a71 2026-05-28 13:57:27 +00:00 Compare

HAL9000 force-pushed pr-fix/9663-hot-warm-cold-tier-reliability from 5031170a71 to 68fa0479c0 2026-05-28 19:50:48 +00:00 Compare

HAL9000 added 1 commit 2026-05-28 20:54:50 +00:00

fix(context_tiers): guard cold→warm promotion against immediate eviction ... 0fee675807

Mirror the warm→hot budget-fallback pattern for the cold→warm promotion
path in ContextTierService.promote(). When _enforce_warm_capacity()
evicts the just-promoted fragment (because its last_accessed timestamp
predates all existing warm entries), restore it with _touch() so it
carries a current timestamp and is not immediately re-evicted.

Without this guard the fragment is silently lost from all stores while
the caller receives a stale handle with tier=WARM — identical to the
data-loss scenario the hot-budget fallback was introduced to prevent.

ISSUES CLOSED: #9663

HAL9000 added the

auto/claimed-merge

label 2026-05-28 21:31:17 +00:00

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-28 21:31:17 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

Claimed by merge_drive.py (pid 1264876) until 2026-05-28T23:01:17.275801+00:00.

This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.

<!-- merge_drive.py: claim --> Claimed by `merge_drive.py` (pid 1264876) until `2026-05-28T23:01:17.275801+00:00`. This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.

HAL9001 approved these changes 2026-05-28 21:31:21 +00:00

HAL9001 left a comment

Copy link

Approved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 17).

Approved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 17).

HAL9000 merged commit 1566917c40 into master 2026-05-28 21:31:23 +00:00

HAL9000 removed the

auto/claimed-merge

label 2026-05-28 21:31:23 +00:00

HAL9000 referenced this pull request from a commit 2026-05-28 21:31:24 +00:00

Merge pull request 'fix(acms): harden hot/warm/cold tier service reliability' (#11238) from pr-fix/9663-hot-warm-cold-tier-reliability into master

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-31 16:08:08 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

event occurred 2026-05-28T13:54:29.105366+00:00

🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.

(check no_duplicates, category no_duplicates)

PR #11238 is a targeted hardening fix for ContextTierService that combines four distinct reliability improvements: removing dead defaults, enforcing warm-tier capacity with LRU eviction, returning immutable fragment snapshots, and naming consistency. No open PR duplicates this specific combination. Related ACMS PRs (#9663, #10783, #11096) address original feature implementations or different constraints (budget enforcement, path matching, pipeline wiring); none implement the warm-capacity enforcement or immutability patterns central to #11238.

*event occurred 2026-05-28T13:54:29.105366+00:00* **🌱 Grooming: proceed** — PR cleared for processing. (check `no_duplicates`, category `no_duplicates`) PR #11238 is a targeted hardening fix for ContextTierService that combines four distinct reliability improvements: removing dead defaults, enforcing warm-tier capacity with LRU eviction, returning immutable fragment snapshots, and naming consistency. No open PR duplicates this specific combination. Related ACMS PRs (#9663, #10783, #11096) address original feature implementations or different constraints (budget enforcement, path matching, pipeline wiring); none implement the warm-capacity enforcement or immutability patterns central to #11238. <!-- controller:fingerprint:2facce9b80eaf0e6 -->

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-31 16:08:09 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

event occurred 2026-05-28T13:57:04.956938+00:00

📋 Estimate: tier 1.

Single-file change (+41/-18) but involves non-trivial new logic: a new LRU eviction method (_enforce_warm_capacity()), changed return semantics for two public methods (mutable refs → model_copy() immutable snapshots), and modifications to the promote() call chain. Thread-safety reasoning required to verify correctness of RLock usage around the new eviction path. Not mechanical — standard engineering work warrants tier 1.

*event occurred 2026-05-28T13:57:04.956938+00:00* **📋 Estimate: tier 1.** Single-file change (+41/-18) but involves non-trivial new logic: a new LRU eviction method (_enforce_warm_capacity()), changed return semantics for two public methods (mutable refs → model_copy() immutable snapshots), and modifications to the promote() call chain. Thread-safety reasoning required to verify correctness of RLock usage around the new eviction path. Not mechanical — standard engineering work warrants tier 1. <!-- controller:fingerprint:58129e5477b1d935 -->

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-31 16:08:10 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

(attempt #3, tier 1)

event occurred 2026-05-28T13:58:30.893624+00:00

🔧 Implementer attempt — rebased.

Pushed 1 commit: 5031170.

_(attempt #3, tier 1)_ *event occurred 2026-05-28T13:58:30.893624+00:00* **🔧 Implementer attempt — `rebased`.** Pushed 1 commit: `5031170`. <!-- controller:fingerprint:2e6f7f8ed885a31f -->

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-31 16:08:27 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

event occurred 2026-05-28T19:46:37.111234+00:00

🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.

(check no_duplicates, category no_duplicates)

Searched open PRs for topical match on ContextTierService hardening. Found related feature PR #9663 (hot/warm/cold tier implementation) but it is the original feature, not a duplicate of this fix. Other ACMS PRs address path matching, pipeline wiring, budget enforcement, and indexing—none overlap with ContextTierService production-reliability hardening. No duplicate detected.

*event occurred 2026-05-28T19:46:37.111234+00:00* **🌱 Grooming: proceed** — PR cleared for processing. (check `no_duplicates`, category `no_duplicates`) Searched open PRs for topical match on `ContextTierService` hardening. Found related feature PR #9663 (hot/warm/cold tier implementation) but it is the original feature, not a duplicate of this fix. Other ACMS PRs address path matching, pipeline wiring, budget enforcement, and indexing—none overlap with ContextTierService production-reliability hardening. No duplicate detected. <!-- controller:fingerprint:677e36505ea54fb7 -->

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-31 16:08:28 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

event occurred 2026-05-28T19:50:33.790742+00:00

📋 Estimate: tier 1.

Single-file change (+41/-18) to ContextTierService, but contains non-trivial logic: a new _enforce_warm_capacity() method with count-based LRU eviction logic requiring correctness reasoning under concurrent access (RLock), and immutable snapshot returns via model_copy() with thread-safety implications. Dead code removal and constant rename are mechanical, but the eviction and snapshot components involve concurrency semantics that exceed the reliable envelope of tier 0. CI is fully green. Tier 1 is the appropriate default for this class of focused-but-logic-heavy single-file work.

*event occurred 2026-05-28T19:50:33.790742+00:00* **📋 Estimate: tier 1.** Single-file change (+41/-18) to ContextTierService, but contains non-trivial logic: a new _enforce_warm_capacity() method with count-based LRU eviction logic requiring correctness reasoning under concurrent access (RLock), and immutable snapshot returns via model_copy() with thread-safety implications. Dead code removal and constant rename are mechanical, but the eviction and snapshot components involve concurrency semantics that exceed the reliable envelope of tier 0. CI is fully green. Tier 1 is the appropriate default for this class of focused-but-logic-heavy single-file work. <!-- controller:fingerprint:0f37b7632bad7406 -->

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-31 16:08:33 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

(attempt #7, tier 1)

event occurred 2026-05-28T19:51:15.657461+00:00

🔧 Implementer attempt — rebased.

Pushed 1 commit: 68fa047.

_(attempt #7, tier 1)_ *event occurred 2026-05-28T19:51:15.657461+00:00* **🔧 Implementer attempt — `rebased`.** Pushed 1 commit: `68fa047`. <!-- controller:fingerprint:5500a9b427dc6be9 -->

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-31 16:08:34 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

event occurred 2026-05-28T20:15:50.347667+00:00

🔴 Changes requested

Confidence: high.

Blocking issues (1):

• [error] src/cleveragents/application/services/context_tiers.py:295-307 — Lines 295-307 (cold→warm branch of promote):

  frag = self._cold.pop(fragment_id)
  promoted = frag.model_copy(update={"tier": ContextTier.WARM})
  self._warm[fragment_id] = promoted
  self._emit_tier_event(...)

  Enforce warm-tier capacity after promotion.

  self._enforce_warm_capacity()
  return promoted

After _enforce_warm_capacity() runs it calls del self._warm[oldest_id] on the LRU warm fragment (lines 461). When the warm tier is at capacity and the just-promoted cold fragment has the oldest last_accessed value among all warm fragments (no _touch() is called during cold→warm promotion — compare to _touch in the _touch staticmethod at line 518), the newly added fragment is the eviction target. It was already removed from self._cold at line 296, so after the eviction it exists in no tier. Yet line 307 unconditionally returns promoted with .tier=ContextTier.WARM, giving the caller a stale handle to a fragment that is silently lost from all stores. The warm→hot path at lines 322-335 explicitly guards against this identical scenario with if fragment_id not in self._hot: followed by restoration + _enforce_warm_capacity(). The cold→warm path was not given the same protection.

• Suggested fix: Mirror the hot-budget fallback pattern. After self._enforce_warm_capacity() at line 306, add: if fragment_id not in self._warm: promoted = self._touch(promoted); self._warm[fragment_id] = promoted; self._enforce_warm_capacity(). The _touch() call updates last_accessed to now so the restored fragment is not immediately re-evicted. Alternatively, call _touch() on promoted before inserting at line 298 (i.e. promoted = self._touch(frag.model_copy(update={"tier": ContextTier.WARM}))), ensuring the just-promoted fragment is never the LRU immediately after promotion — matching the implicit access semantics of a promotion event.

*event occurred 2026-05-28T20:15:50.347667+00:00* **🔴 Changes requested** Confidence: high. **Blocking issues (1):** - [error] `src/cleveragents/application/services/context_tiers.py:295-307` — Lines 295-307 (cold→warm branch of `promote`): frag = self._cold.pop(fragment_id) promoted = frag.model_copy(update={"tier": ContextTier.WARM}) self._warm[fragment_id] = promoted self._emit_tier_event(...) # Enforce warm-tier capacity after promotion. self._enforce_warm_capacity() return promoted After `_enforce_warm_capacity()` runs it calls `del self._warm[oldest_id]` on the LRU warm fragment (lines 461). When the warm tier is at capacity and the just-promoted cold fragment has the oldest `last_accessed` value among all warm fragments (no `_touch()` is called during cold→warm promotion — compare to `_touch` in the `_touch` staticmethod at line 518), the newly added fragment is the eviction target. It was already removed from `self._cold` at line 296, so after the eviction it exists in no tier. Yet line 307 unconditionally returns `promoted` with `.tier=ContextTier.WARM`, giving the caller a stale handle to a fragment that is silently lost from all stores. The warm→hot path at lines 322-335 explicitly guards against this identical scenario with `if fragment_id not in self._hot:` followed by restoration + `_enforce_warm_capacity()`. The cold→warm path was not given the same protection. - _Suggested fix:_ Mirror the hot-budget fallback pattern. After `self._enforce_warm_capacity()` at line 306, add: `if fragment_id not in self._warm: promoted = self._touch(promoted); self._warm[fragment_id] = promoted; self._enforce_warm_capacity()`. The `_touch()` call updates `last_accessed` to now so the restored fragment is not immediately re-evicted. Alternatively, call `_touch()` on `promoted` before inserting at line 298 (i.e. `promoted = self._touch(frag.model_copy(update={"tier": ContextTier.WARM}))`), ensuring the just-promoted fragment is never the LRU immediately after promotion — matching the implicit access semantics of a promotion event. <!-- controller:fingerprint:47905ef5395e7138 -->

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-31 16:08:35 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

(attempt #9, tier 1)

event occurred 2026-05-28T20:55:06.953674+00:00

🔧 Implementer attempt — resolved.

Pushed 1 commit: 0fee675.

Files touched: src/cleveragents/application/services/context_tiers.py.

_(attempt #9, tier 1)_ *event occurred 2026-05-28T20:55:06.953674+00:00* **🔧 Implementer attempt — `resolved`.** Pushed 1 commit: `0fee675`. Files touched: `src/cleveragents/application/services/context_tiers.py`. <!-- controller:fingerprint:d55e7261d0098740 -->

HAL9000 commented 2026-05-31 16:08:36 +00:00

Author

Owner

Copy link

event occurred 2026-05-28T21:24:46.362843+00:00

✅ Approved

Reviewed at commit 0fee675.

Confidence: high.

*event occurred 2026-05-28T21:24:46.362843+00:00* **✅ Approved** Reviewed at commit `0fee675`. Confidence: high. <!-- controller:fingerprint:226ad8656743a723 -->

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

No reviewers

HAL9001

Labels

Clear labels   

auto/needs-reevaluation

Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  

controller-managed

Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  

overdue

  

auto/blocked-by-deps

PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  

auto/ci-timeout

Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  

auto/claimed-implementer

Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  

auto/claimed-merge

Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  

auto/claimed-reviewer

Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  

auto/driver-down

Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  

auto/invariant-violation

Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  

auto/last-attempt-tier-0

In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  

auto/last-attempt-tier-1

In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  

auto/last-attempt-tier-2

In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  

auto/last-attempt-tier-min

In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  

Automation Tracking

Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  

auto/needs-conflict-resolution

Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  

auto/needs-implementer

Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  

auto/postmortem

Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  

auto/ready-to-merge

Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  

auto/restart-throttled

Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  

auto/revert

Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  

auto/sentinel

Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  

auto/stale-inactivity

No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  

auto/unstable

Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  

Blocked

A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  

Bounty

$100

A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

Bounty

$1000

A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

Bounty

$10000

A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

Bounty

$20

A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

Bounty

$2000

A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

Bounty

$250

A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

Bounty

$50

A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

Bounty

$500

A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

Bounty

$5000

A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

Bounty

$750

A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  

MoSCoW

Could have

Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  

MoSCoW

Must have

Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  

MoSCoW

Should have

Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  

Needs Feedback

There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  

Points

1

1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Points

13

13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Points

2

2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Points

21

21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Points

3

3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Points

34

34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Points

5

5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Points

55

55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Points

8

8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Points

88

88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  

Priority

Backlog

This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  

Priority

CI Blocker

Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  

Priority

Critical

The priority is critical

  

Priority

High

The priority is high

  

Priority

Low

The priority is low

  

Priority

Medium

The priority is medium

  

Signed-off: Owner

When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  

Signed-off: Scrum Master

When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  

Signed-off: Tech Lead

When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  

Spike

A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  

State

Completed

The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  

State

Duplicate

A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  

State

In Progress

A ticket that is actively being developed.

  

State

In Review

A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  

State

Paused

This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  

State

Unverified

All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  

State

Verified

The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  

State

Wont Do

This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  

Type

Automation

Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  

Type

Bug

Something that doesnt work as intended.

  

Type

Discussion

Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  

Type

Documentation

An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  

Type

Epic

Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  

Type

Feature

Some new functionality not present.

  

Type

Legendary

A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  

Type

Refactor

A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  

Type

Support

Someone needs help using the project.

  

Type

Task

A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  

Type

Testing

Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels

auto/needs-reevaluation

controller-managed

overdue

auto/blocked-by-deps

auto/ci-timeout

auto/claimed-implementer

auto/claimed-merge

auto/claimed-reviewer

auto/driver-down

auto/invariant-violation

auto/last-attempt-tier-0

auto/last-attempt-tier-1

auto/last-attempt-tier-2

auto/last-attempt-tier-min

Automation Tracking

auto/needs-conflict-resolution

auto/needs-implementer

auto/postmortem

auto/ready-to-merge

auto/restart-throttled

auto/revert

auto/sentinel

auto/stale-inactivity

auto/unstable

Blocked

Bounty

$100

Bounty

$1000

Bounty

$10000

Bounty

$20

Bounty

$2000

Bounty

$250

Bounty

$50

Bounty

$500

Bounty

$5000

Bounty

$750

MoSCoW

Could have

MoSCoW

Must have

MoSCoW

Should have

Needs Feedback

Points

1

Points

13

Points

2

Points

21

Points

3

Points

34

Points

5

Points

55

Points

8

Points

88

Priority

Backlog

Priority

CI Blocker

Priority

Critical

Priority

High

Priority

Low

Priority

Medium

Signed-off: Owner

Signed-off: Scrum Master

Signed-off: Tech Lead

Spike

State

Completed

State

Duplicate

State

In Progress

State

In Review

State

Paused

State

Unverified

State

Verified

State

Wont Do

Type

Automation

Type

Bug

Type

Discussion

Type

Documentation

Type

Epic

Type

Feature

Type

Legendary

Type

Refactor

Type

Support

Type

Task

Type

Testing

Milestone

Clear milestone

No items

No milestone

Projects

Clear projects

No items

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

No assignees

2 participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

cleveragents/cleveragents-core!11238

No description provided.