feat(registry): implement async RegistryClient using httpx #32
Merged
CoreRasurae
merged 1 commits from 2026-06-05 22:27:54 +00:00
feature/m1-registry-http-client into master
Dismiss Review
Are you sure you want to dismiss this review?
Labels
Clear labels
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
No Label
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
#24 feat(registry): implement async HTTP client using httpx
cleveragents/cleveractors-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveractors-core#32
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "feature/m1-registry-http-client"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Add async RegistryClient implementing the Package Registry Standard v1.0.0 HTTP API endpoints using httpx.AsyncClient.
Closes #24
3f8a2b1df2to1ae754cc01A few things I found.
@@ -0,0 +139,4 @@Scenario: Unknown error status falls back to RegistryErrorWhen I create a RegistryClient pointed at "https://registry.example.com"When the mock server returns status 418 with non-JSON body "plain text error"The 418 return code means: "I'm a teapot". Source: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Status/418
Are you sure that's the return code that you want to use?
@@ -0,0 +131,4 @@future = asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe(coro_fn(), loop)future.result(timeout=10)else:loop.run_until_complete(coro_fn())Why does the execution allow 10 seconds if the event loop is already running, but as much time as desired if the event loop needs to be started?
Fixed. Both code paths now use asyncio.wait_for() with a consistent 30s timeout (future.result(timeout=30) for running loops, loop.run_until_complete(asyncio.wait_for(coro_fn(), timeout=30)) for non-running loops, and asyncio.run(asyncio.wait_for(coro_fn(), timeout=30)) for the fallback).
@@ -0,0 +63,4 @@"packages": [],"count": 0,},)This is probably not a good response. There are packages returned in the earlier parts of this
ifstatement. But nothing is listed here.A generic testing framework would want examples of packages here. It would read the example packages, then try to read them.
Fixed. fake_registry_server.py now defines EXAMPLE_PACKAGES with 2 packages (an actor and a graph) that are returned by the /browse endpoint. The browse response also supports optional ?type= filtering.
@@ -0,0 +33,4 @@"skill": "pkg_skl_","mcp": "pkg_mcp_","lsp": "pkg_lsp_",}When I look at https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveractors-core/pulls/31/files , file src/cleveractors/registry/types.py , lines 14-21 and I see this file, I get nervous. This is close to the same information in two different files.
What happens when a new package type appears in one but not the other?
I strongly recommend that the prefixes be in the same file, next to each other, so that it will be harder for them to get out of sync.
That will be consolidated better after merging this PR and with other PR merged too. For now these are independent works.
How do you know this isn't a
ValidationError?(Replying to your inline comment on
src/cleveractors/registry/exceptions.pyin theexception_for_statusfunction)The exception_for_status() function is the fallback — it only activates when the server does not include an explicit error type in the response body.
Per Package Registry Standard §13.1, compliant servers return errors as:
Extract
body["error"]["type"]from the JSON responseLook it up in
_ERROR_TYPE_MAPto get the correct exception classRaise that specific exception (e.g.
ValidationError, VersionNotFoundError, ...)Only when the body lacks a recognizable error.type field does
exception_for_status()act as the status-code-only fallbackThis means a standards-compliant server can signal either ValidationError or InvalidPackageIdError at 400 by including the appropriate type value, and the client will raise the correct exception.
Test added:
@@ -0,0 +68,4 @@if status_code == 403:return AccessDeniedError(message)if status_code == 404:return PackageNotFoundError(message)The above list of errors maps from
PackageNotFoundErrorandVersionNotFoundErrorto 404. How do you know that this is aPackageNotFoundErrorinstead of aVersionNotFoundError?Fixed. The _request() method now parses the standard error format {"error": {"type": "...", "message": "..."}} from the JSON response body per Package Registry Standard §13.1. When the error type is present, it is matched against the defined types in _ERROR_TYPE_MAP to raise the correct specific exception. The status-code fallback via exception_for_status() is preserved for servers that do not include the type field or return non-standard error formats.
FOR ANYONE ELSE READING THIS -- We need to work quickly.
If, in your judgement, all of the problems have been either solved (i.e. new code) or there is an explanation, then feel free to accept this code and merge it with
master.1ae754cc01to92d5305a20Thanks for the thorough review, Brent. Here is what was addressed and the rationale for each point:
Applied
#2 — Timeout asymmetry in
RegistryClientLib._run()Fixed. Both code paths now use
asyncio.wait_for()with a consistent 30s timeout (future.result(timeout=30)for running loops,loop.run_until_complete(asyncio.wait_for(coro_fn(), timeout=30))for non-running loops, andasyncio.run(asyncio.wait_for(coro_fn(), timeout=30))for the fallback).#3 — Fake server browse returns empty list
Fixed.
fake_registry_server.pynow definesEXAMPLE_PACKAGESwith 2 packages (an actor and a graph) that are returned by the/browseendpoint. The browse response also supports optional?type=filtering.#6 — 404 maps to
PackageNotFoundErrorbut could beVersionNotFoundErrorFixed. The
_request()method now parses the standard error format{"error": {"type": "...", "message": "..."}}from the JSON response body per Package Registry Standard §13.1. When the error type is present, it is matched against the defined types in_ERROR_TYPE_MAPto raise the correct specific exception. The status-code fallback viaexception_for_status()is preserved for servers that do not include the type field or return non-standard error formats.#7 — 400 maps to
InvalidPackageIdErrorbut could beValidationErrorSame fix as #6. Added Behave scenarios verifying both
VersionNotFoundError(404 + type in body) andValidationError(400 + type in body) are correctly raised when the server includes the explicit error type.Not Applied
#1 — HTTP 418 status code in test
Not changed. The 418 response status is used in a single test scenario whose purpose is to verify that unmapped HTTP status codes fall through to the generic
RegistryError. Any unregistered 4xx code serves this purpose equally well; 418 is as arbitrary as 417 or 422. The scenario description explicitly states "Unknown error status falls back to RegistryError", making the intent clear.#4/#5 — Duplicate
_PACKAGE_TYPE_PREFIXESdict vs PR #31types.pyNot changed. As noted in your follow-up comment #5, these are independent works developed on separate branches. Consolidation will happen after both PRs are merged. Duplicating a small mapping on separate branches avoids a merge-order dependency between the two PRs.
Re: How do you know this isn't a ValidationError?
(Replying to your inline comment on
src/cleveractors/registry/exceptions.pyin theexception_for_statusfunction)The
exception_for_status()function is the fallback — it only activates when the server does not include an explicit error type in the response body.Per Package Registry Standard §13.1, compliant servers return errors as:
The
_request()method now parses this structure first:body["error"]["type"]from the JSON response_ERROR_TYPE_MAPto get the correct exception classValidationError,VersionNotFoundError, ...)error.typefield doesexception_for_status()act as the status-code-only fallbackThis means a standards-compliant server can signal either
ValidationErrororInvalidPackageIdErrorat 400 by including the appropriate type value, and the client will raise the correct exception.Test added:
Looks good to me!