fix(ci): benchmark_regression job intermittently hangs/times out and never signals real regressions correctly #86
Open
opened 2026-07-31 11:54:35 +00:00 by CoreRasurae
·
0 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
Labels
Clear labels
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Depends on
#87 fix(ci): make benchmark_regression job fast and correctly fail on regressions
cleveragents/cleveractors-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveractors-core#86
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Metadata
Background and context
While investigating a hung
benchmarkCI job on PR #85's run (https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveractors-core/actions/runs/31568/jobs/205876), the "Run ASV benchmark regression check via nox" step ran for 41m13s and ended infailure, withcontinue-on-error: trueso it did not block the PR. Fixing this uncovered three compounding issues rather than one.Issue 1 — ASV calibration overhead
noxfile.py'sbenchmark_regressionsession ranasv continuous origin/master HEAD --show-stderrwith none of ASV's speed-oriented flags. By default, ASV auto-calibrates the iteration count per benchmark, runs multiple timed repeats, and repeats the whole cycle acrossprocesses(default 2) — for 2 commits × 69 benchmarks = 138 full calibrated runs. Individual benchmarks cost 20-90s of wall clock between log entries, while their actual measured cost was microseconds-to-low-milliseconds — ASV's own calibration/repeat overhead, not the code under test, dominated total time.Issue 2 — packaging bottleneck (surfaced after fixing #1)
After scoping ASV's
--quickflag to CI (fixing issue 1), a second, independent run (https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveractors-core/actions/runs/31578/jobs/205924) still took ~14 minutes.asv.conf.json'sbuild_command/install_command/uninstall_commandused plainpython -m build/pip, which silently spent ~11 minutes per run — PEP 517 build isolation plus a full, uncachedpip installof the whole dependency tree (langchain/langgraph, etc.) per compared commit, with no console output during pip's resolver work.uv(already installed and used elsewhere in this CI job) doesn't share pip's slow/silent resolver behavior, but a naive swap to bareuv build/uv pip install/uv pip uninstallinitially failed withModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cleveractors', because:find_executable()only searches each managed virtualenv's ownbin/directory, never$PATH— so a system-leveluvbinary is invisible to it unless installed into that venv.uv pip install/uv pip uninstall(unlikepython -m pip install, which is unambiguous becausepythonitself is resolved from inside the target venv) has no reliable way to infer which of ASV's several per-commit venvs to target without an explicit--pythonargument.Issue 3 — success_codes never matched ASV's real exit code
asv continuousreturns the booleanworsenedas its process exit code:0= no significant regression,1= a benchmark measurably worsened past--factor. There is no exit code2in this ASV version.noxfile.py's pre-existingsuccess_codes=[0, 2]therefore never matched the real "worsened" code (1), so the session — and by extension the CI job step — failed unconditionally on any regression signal, real or noise, ever since this job was first wired into CI. This was independent of issues 1 and 2 and pre-dated all of this work.Current behavior (before this fix)
noxfile.py'sbenchmark_regressionsession does not forward extra CLI args toasv continuous, always running full (non-quick) calibration.asv.conf.jsonuses plainpython -m build/pipfor its own per-commit environment build/install/uninstall.noxfile.py'ssuccess_codes=[0, 2]for theasv continuouscall does not include1, the actual "worsened" exit code.failureregardless of whether a real regression occurred.Expected behavior
benchmark_regressionrun completes reliably in a small fraction of the previous time (--quick, scoped to CI only via*session.posargs).uv(fast, no silent resolver backtracking), correctly targeting each per-commit venv viamatrix-bootstrappeduv+ explicit--python {env_dir}/bin/python.asv continuousreports a real, significant regression (success_codes=[0]) — not on every run regardless of significance.continue-on-error: trueon the job (unchanged) is what keeps this from blocking the PR merge.noxfile.py'sbenchmark_regressionsession when invoked without extra args, for use at other CI stages later.Acceptance criteria
noxfile.py'sbenchmark_regressionsession forwards*session.posargstoasv continuous..gitea/workflows/ci.yml'sbenchmarkjob invokesnox -s benchmark_regression -- --quick.asv.conf.json'sbuild_command/install_command/uninstall_commanduseuv, withuvbootstrapped viamatrixand--python {env_dir}/bin/pythonpassed explicitly.noxfile.py'ssuccess_codesfor theasv continuouscall corrected to[0].rm -rf .asv/env .asv/resultsbetween runs): completes in ~3-11 minutes; correctly reportsfailedwhen a real regression is detected between the compared commits.benchmarkjob completes in a small fraction of the previous ~41 minutes, and that its conclusion matches whether a real regression was detected.nox -s coverage_reportunaffected (this change touches CI workflow/noxfile.py/asv.conf.json only, nosrc/changes).Supporting information
asv continuous --help:--quick, -q Do a "quick" run, where each benchmark function is run only once...asv/commands/continuous.py):return worsened— confirms the real exit-code semantics (0/1, never 2).asv/environment.py: find_executable): confirms the search is restricted to the managed venv's ownbin/, explaining why a system-leveluvwasn't found until added viamatrix.Subtasks
*session.posargsinnoxfile.py'sbenchmark_regressionsession--quickto.gitea/workflows/ci.yml'sbenchmarkjob invocation onlyasv.conf.json's build/install/uninstall commands touv, bootstrapped viamatrixand targeted via explicit--python {env_dir}/bin/pythonnoxfile.py'ssuccess_codesforasv continuousto[0]nox -s coverage_report(expected unaffected; confirm no regression)nox(all default sessions), fix any errorsDefinition of Done
This issue is complete when:
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
fix(ci): benchmark_regression job intermittently hangs/times out under full ASV calibrationto fix(ci): benchmark_regression job intermittently hangs/times out and never signals real regressions correctly