feat(agents): add offset-based pagination to file_read #83
Closed
opened 2026-07-30 15:47:38 +00:00 by CoreRasurae
·
0 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
Labels
Clear labels
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
CoreRasurae
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Depends on
#85 feat(agents): add offset-based pagination to file_read
cleveragents/cleveractors-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveractors-core#83
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Metadata
Background and context
ToolAgent._file_read_tool(cleveractors.agents.tool) always reads a file from the beginning:f.read()loads the entire file, and the optionalmax_charsargument (added by ADR-2030 D-3) only bounds where the returned content stops — it always slicescontent[:max_chars], i.e. from position 0. There is no.seek()/.tell()or equivalent anywhere in the codebase.This means once a large file is truncated at
max_chars, there is no way to retrieve the next chunk. Per ADR-2030's own guidance embedded in the tool schema (cleveractors.agents.llm_tools._BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["file_read"]: "Use 8000 for scanning, 16000 for analysis"), the LLM is explicitly steered toward truncated reads for large files, but is given no built-in mechanism to continue past the truncation point. Today the only workaround is falling back to theshelltool (tail -c +N,sed -n,dd skip=...) — exactly the kind of awkward, error-prone detour ADR-2030 (D-4) already eliminated for shell-commands-passed-as-paths.Adding an
offsetargument lets the LLM page through a large file across multiplefile_readcalls without needing shell fallbacks, and without re-reading (and re-spending context on) content it already saw.Current behavior
file_readhas nooffsetargument in its schema (_BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["file_read"]["parameters"]) or its implementation (ToolAgent._file_read_tool).fileandmax_charsalways return the identical (truncated) prefix.[FILE_READ_SUCCESS]header, or elsewhere — for the LLM to learn that more content exists beyond a truncated read, or what offset to request next.Expected behavior
file_readaccepts an optionaloffsetargument (default0, preserving all current behavior when omitted) that starts the returned content at that position within the file instead of position 0.max_chars,offsetallows retrieving a bounded window[offset, offset + max_chars)of the file, enabling sequential pagination across multiple calls.[FILE_READ_SUCCESS]header (and/or theTRUNCATEDmarker) is extended so the LLM can tell, from the response alone, whether more content remains past the returned window and — ideally — what offset to pass next, without it having to computeoffset + max_charsitself from scratch.ExecutionErrorrather than an unhandled exception or silent empty content.offsetis omitted — this is purely additive, per §1.3 of the Actor Configuration Standard (compliant implementations MAY provide additional tool arguments).Open design questions the ADR below MUST resolve
These are genuine design decisions, not implementation details to leave implicit:
offset: characters (consistent withmax_chars, which already counts decoded characters since the file is opened in text mode) vs. bytes vs. lines. Characters is the natural choice for consistency withmax_chars, but the ADR must state this explicitly and justify it.offsetwould be (e.g. extending the existingTRUNCATED to N charsconvention with something like| MORE_CONTENT_AT_OFFSET: N).offsetshould (eventually) paginate very large directory listings too, or is explicitly deferred to a future issue.max_charsalready does today), or whether byte-level seeking is required for large-file efficiency. Given_file_read_toolalready reads the whole file formax_chars, keeping the same approach foroffsetis likely acceptable for v1 — but the ADR must say so explicitly rather than leaving it to be inferred from the diff.Acceptance criteria
_BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["file_read"]["parameters"](cleveractors.agents.llm_tools) documents a new optionaloffsetparameter, including its unit and interaction withmax_chars.ToolAgent._file_read_toolacceptsoffset, defaulting to0; omitting it reproduces byte-for-byte identical output to current behavior (regression guard).offset=Nreturns content starting at character positionNof the file (not position 0).offsetor a non-integeroffsetraisesExecutionErrorwith a clear message (mirroring the existingmax_charsinteger-validation pattern).offsetat or beyond the file's length raisesExecutionErroror returns a clearly-labeled empty-content response (per the ADR's decision) — not an unhandledIndexError/silent empty string.docs/adr/ADR-2033-file-read-offset-pagination.mdexists, is written in the Context/Decision/Consequences/Alternatives-Considered format used by ADR-2030/2031/2032, and resolves all the open design questions listed above.nox -s coverage_reportstays ≥ 97%.Supporting information
docs/index.md) — definesfile_read's baseline argument set (file/args[0]) and states additional arguments MAY be handled by implementations.docs/adr/ADR-2030-tool-calling-spec-extensions.md— D-2 (directory listing) and D-3 (max_charstruncation) are the direct precedent this issue extends; D-4 establishes the precedent of giving the LLM an actionable path instead of a dead end, which is the same motivation foroffset.a8f68b8:cleveractors.agents.tool.ToolAgent._file_read_toolcleveractors.agents.llm_tools._BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["file_read"]cleveractors.agents.llm_tools.normalize_tool_entrySubtasks
docs/adr/ADR-2033-file-read-offset-pagination.md(Context/Decision/Consequences/Alternatives Considered), resolving the open design questions above — required, not optional, since this changes tool behavior and its LLM-facing schemaoffsetparameter to_BUILTIN_TOOL_SCHEMAS["file_read"]incleveractors.agents.llm_tools, per the ADR's decisionsoffsethandling inToolAgent._file_read_tool, including validation and continuation signaling, per the ADR's decisionsoffset=0matches current (no-offset) behavior exactlyoffset=Nreturns the expected windowed contentoffsetandmax_charsto page through a file across two calls with no gap or overlapDefinition of Done
This issue is complete when:
docs/adr/ADR-2033-file-read-offset-pagination.mdis merged in the same PR as the implementation, with statusaccepted.