Implement real type: tool graph node execution by wiring NodeConfig.tool to ToolAgent._execute_tool
#75
Closed
opened 2026-07-07 09:12:00 +00:00 by hurui200320
·
0 comments
No Branch/Tag Specified
Labels
Clear labels
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
Depends on
#77 Epic: LLM Agent Runtime Stabilization — reliability, resource enforcement & correctness hardening
cleveragents/cleveractors-core
#81 feat(langgraph): implement real type:tool graph node execution via ToolAgent dispatch
cleveragents/cleveractors-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveractors-core#75
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Metadata
Commit Message:
feat(langgraph): implement real type:tool graph node execution via ToolAgent dispatchBranch:
feature/m1-graph-tool-node-executionBackground
The library supports two distinct tool-calling code paths. Only one of them works.
Path A — LLM-driven tool calling (working): An
agentnode contains anLLMAgentwith tools in itsconfig.toolslist. The LLM decides when to call a tool;LLMAgent._execute_tool_loop()dispatches each call to aToolAgent, which looks up the handler inself.builtin_toolsand calls it with(tool_args, context). This path was fully implemented in issues #59 and #67.Path B — Graph tool nodes (stub): A
type: toolnode in the graph topology represents a deterministic, graph-driven tool invocation — the graph calls the tool, not the LLM. This path hitsNode._execute_tool(), which is a non-functional stub:Two blockers prevent Path B from working.
Blocker 1 —
_execute_tool()takes nostateargument and performs no dispatch. Every other node handler (_execute_agent,_execute_conditional, etc.) receivesGraphState. Without it, the method cannot read the previous node's output to pass as tool input. There is no registry lookup and no handler call — a fabricated string is returned unconditionally for every tool name, including non-existent ones. Atype: toolgraph node withtool: cleverthis/json-transformtoday silently returns"Executed cleverthis/json-transform"with no actual execution.Blocker 2 — Two YAML parsing gaps. First, the spec uses a singular
tool:key inside atype: toolgraph node (e.g.tool: cleverthis/json-transform).runtime_dispatch._execute_graph()readsnode_def.get("tools", [])(plural), so the tool name never reachesNodeConfig.NodeConfigitself only hastools: List[str]; there is notool: str | Nonefield for the single-tool case. Second, the static configuration block under a tool node (e.g.config: {expression: "$.x", language: jsonpath}) is not captured anywhere.runtime_dispatchstoresnode_def.get("metadata", {})but not theconfig:sub-key, so there is currently no way for_execute_tool()to know the static arguments the YAML author declared.These gaps mean Path B is entirely inert today. The spec's Minimal Actor Subset table marks
type: toolgraph nodes as a supported MVP feature, so this is a spec/implementation gap.Proposed Solution
Path B should be wired to the same
ToolAgent._execute_tool(tool_name, tool_args, context)kernel that Path A already uses. That method already handlesbuiltin_toolsdispatch (the hookPlatformAwareToolAgentincleveragents-webappuses to register platform handlers) and the Python-sandbox path for inline tools. No new handler registry is needed inPureLangGraph.A — Add
tool: str | Noneandstatic_config: dicttoNodeConfigB — Fix
runtime_dispatch._execute_graph()to parsetool:andconfig:The same fix must be applied to the second
_execute_graphcall site at line ~1139.C — Auto-create a
ToolAgentfor eachtype: toolnode in_execute_graphAfter the existing agent-creation loop, add a pass for tool nodes:
This reuses the existing
ToolAgentclass directly. Once issue #73 (tool_agent_classparameter) is resolved,ToolAgent(...)becomestool_agent_class(...), which is the clean upgrade path — but #73 is not a blocking dependency: the existingPlatformAwareToolAgentmonkey-patch incleveragents-webappalready patches theToolAgentreference incleveractors.langgraph.nodes, so the auto-created instance inheritsPlatformAwareToolAgent'sbuiltin_toolsregistration.D — Add
ToolAgent.invoke()as a clean programmatic entry pointprocess_message()is designed for LLM-driven calling and parses a string message to extract tool name and args. For graph-driven calling we already know both — a direct programmatic entry point avoids the parsing overhead and avoids coupling graph-node dispatch to message-format conventions:E — Implement real
_execute_tool(self, state: GraphState)F — Update
Node.execute()dispatcherRelationship to Issue #73
Issue #73 (
tool_agent_classparameter forAgentFactoryandcreate_executor) is complementary but not blocking. After #73 lands, theToolAgent(...)call in step C above becomestool_agent_class(...), eliminating the need for thecleveragents-webappmonkey-patch entirely. This issue can ship before or after #73 without conflict; the two changes compose cleanly.Acceptance Criteria
NodeConfighastool: str | Noneandstatic_config: dict[str, Any]fields.runtime_dispatch._execute_graph()(both call sites) readsnode_def.get("tool")andnode_def.get("config", {})and populates the newNodeConfigfields.ToolAgent(or the activeToolAgentsubclass) is auto-created for eachtype: toolnode with a non-emptytool:field and stored in theagentsdict under the node's ID.ToolAgent.invoke(tool_name, tool_args, context)exists as a public method that calls_execute_tool()directly without message parsing.Node._execute_tool(state)dispatches toagent.invoke()with the previous node's output threaded asinputmerged with the node'sstatic_config.Node._execute_tool(state)returns a structured{"metadata": {"tool_error": ...}}dict (no exception raised) when no agent is found or the tool name is empty.Node.execute()passesstateto_execute_tool(state).type: toolnodes withtools: [...]and notool:field) is identical to the current behaviour — no regression.tool:key parsed from raw node config;config:block stored asstatic_config;ToolAgent.invoke()calls_execute_tool()with correct args;Node._execute_tool(state)threads previous-node output asinput; structured error returned when no agent found.CHANGELOG.mdupdated with one entry for this commit.cleveragents-webappteam notified (comment on this issue) once PR is merged with the release tag or commit SHA.Subtasks
Node.__init__already stores theagentsdict as an instance attribute (check before coding — avoids an unplanned change).tool: str | Noneandstatic_config: dict[str, Any]toNodeConfig; update all construction sites inruntime_dispatchandpure_graph.ToolAgent.invoke()public method.ToolAgentauto-creation pass in_execute_graph()(both call sites).Node._execute_tool(state)with dispatch, input threading, and error path.Node.execute()dispatcher to passstate.CHANGELOG.md.cleveragents-webappteam via issue comment once PR is merged.Definition of Done
type: toolgraph nodes with atool:field dispatch to the named tool handler viaToolAgent.invoke(), with the previous node's output threaded asinputand the node'sconfig:block merged in as static arguments.ToolAgent._execute_tool()kernel (and thereforePlatformAwareToolAgent'sbuiltin_toolsregistration) is exercised by Path B, mirroring Path A.cleveractors-corequality gates pass (noxsuite green, coverage ≥ threshold, Pyright strict clean).master.cleveragents-webappteam notified with the new release tag or commit SHA.