clevermicro/amq-adapter-python
14
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 16 Pull Requests 4 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat/63-cleverswarm-unidirectional #64

Open
stanislav.hejny wants to merge 0 commits from feat/63-cleverswarm-unidirectional into develop
pull from: feat/63-cleverswarm-unidirectional
merge into: clevermicro:develop
Conversation 3 Commits - Files Changed -
stanislav.hejny commented 2025-07-24 09:07:39 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source
No description provided.
stanislav.hejny added 5 commits 2025-07-24 09:07:41 +00:00
test: add tests for RPC command invocation and error handling 2b20c9a0dc
test: convert demo script to unittest framework in test_rpc.py ad49cb2836 
Co-authored-by: aider (openrouter/openai/o3-mini-high) <aider@aider.chat>
test: update tests to use invoke_command directly f3be2fbfea
test: add package_name parameter to invoke_command calls in test_rpc.py 4985344e5e 
Co-authored-by: aider (openrouter/openai/o3-mini-high) <aider@aider.chat>
feat/#63 - fix the send_command and add unit tests
Unit test coverage / pytest (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Details
Unit test coverage / pytest (push) Failing after 1m50s
Details
CI for pypl publish / publish-lib (push) Successful in 1m57s
Details
/ build-and-push (push) Successful in 1m59s
Details
Build and Publish Docker Image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 2m12s
Details
9491517696
gitea-actions bot commented 2025-07-24 09:08:55 +00:00
Copy Link
Copy Source

Coverage is 85%

Coverage is 85%
stanislav.hejny added 1 commit 2025-07-26 14:29:44 +00:00
feat/#63 - cleverswarm unidirectional command
Unit test coverage / pytest (push) Has been cancelled
Details
/ build-and-push (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Unit test coverage / pytest (pull_request) Failing after 1m51s
Details
41fbe46129
stanislav.hejny added 1 commit 2025-07-26 14:30:23 +00:00
feat/#63 - cleverswarm unidirectional command
Unit test coverage / pytest (push) Failing after 1m46s
Details
/ build-and-push (push) Successful in 1m36s
Details
Unit test coverage / pytest (pull_request) Failing after 1m15s
Details
9984501fee
stanislav.hejny added 1 commit 2025-07-26 14:42:08 +00:00
feat/#63 - cleverswarm unidirectional command
Unit test coverage / pytest (pull_request) Successful in 1m38s
Details
Unit test coverage / pytest (push) Successful in 1m52s
Details
CI for pypl publish / publish-lib (push) Successful in 2m7s
Details
/ build-and-push (push) Successful in 2m20s
Details
Build and Publish Docker Image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 2m32s
Details
66132db13a
gitea-actions bot commented 2025-07-26 14:43:45 +00:00
Copy Link
Copy Source

Coverage is 85%

Coverage is 85%
stanislav.hejny added 1 commit 2025-07-27 08:51:06 +00:00
feat/#63 - add iterator instead of RabbitMQ callback
Unit test coverage / pytest (pull_request) Failing after 1m49s
Details
Build and Publish Docker Image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 2m29s
Details
Unit test coverage / pytest (push) Failing after 1m45s
Details
/ build-and-push (push) Successful in 1m52s
Details
CI for pypl publish / publish-lib (push) Successful in 1m44s
Details
07f6f4569c
gitea-actions bot commented 2025-07-27 08:52:53 +00:00
Copy Link
Copy Source

Coverage is 84%

Coverage is 84%
Some checks are pending
Unit test coverage / pytest (pull_request) Failing after 1m49s
Details
Build and Publish Docker Image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 2m29s
Details
Unit test coverage / pytest (push) Failing after 1m45s
Details
/ build-and-push (push) Successful in 1m52s
Details
CI for pypl publish / publish-lib (push) Successful in 1m44s
Details
This branch is already included in the target branch. There is nothing to merge.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin feat/63-cleverswarm-unidirectional:feat/63-cleverswarm-unidirectional
git checkout feat/63-cleverswarm-unidirectional
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
Needs feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
 Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
 Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
 Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair) argocd CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes) drew (Drew Morris) eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci) freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman) hurui200320 (Rui Hu) justin.morris khird (Kyle Hird) mngrif (Michael Griffith) org.clevermicro (System User) org.cleverswarm (System User) org.inf-cd salcedo (Brian Salcedo) stanislav.hejny (Stanislav Hejny)
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: clevermicro/amq-adapter-python#64
Delete Branch "feat/63-cleverswarm-unidirectional"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?