4d969eaf2b
When the reviewer finishes a review and judges the work fundamentally unworkable (implementation surfaced misdiagnosis, obsoleted-by-other-work, or irreducible complexity), it can now emit verdict='abstain' + suggested_next_action='abandon' with a Gate-3 abandon_reason_category. The controller routes REVIEWING → ABANDONED and (when the kill switch is on) performs the Forgejo close via the reviewer-abandon side-effect tick — no implementer/CI/merge cycles. Wired with the same defense-in-depth pattern Phase 2 established: MCP setter validation + outcomes mapper dispatch with confidence gating + Pydantic atomicity validator + side-effect tick with audit-trail attribution (cause=REVIEWER_ABANDON, event_type='reviewer_abandon'). Default-off CONTROLLER_GATE3_ABANDON_ENABLED kill switch so a fresh deploy is audit-only until the operator explicitly enables Forgejo writes. Bundled refactor: hoisted the 9 Gate-2 + 3 Gate-3-exclusive abandon categories into tools/controller/contracts/abandon_categories.py (triggered by Phase 3 per the plan's follow-up backlog). Both gates now consume the shared frozensets; doc-contract tests grep each agent prompt against the canonical list. Adversarial review (2 rounds): caught + fixed MCP cross-check ordering (atomicity FIRST so missing-setter shows actionable error), confidence=None symmetric downgrade across both gates, dead blocking-issues extraction in _run_close, idempotency clock-collision in the test, low-vs-missing reason-string conflation, and several test-quality gaps. 4064/4071 tests passing (7 pre-existing failures unrelated to Phase 3). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>