cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.1k Pull requests 489 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

docs(development): add developer setup guide #9125

Closed
HAL9000 wants to merge 2 commits from docs/developer-setup-guide into master
pull from: docs/developer-setup-guide
merge into: cleveragents:master
Conversation 5 Commits 2 Files changed 4 +525 -1
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 08:13:16 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Summary

  • Add docs/development/setup.md — comprehensive developer setup guide covering prerequisites, getting started, development workflow, commit guidelines, devcontainer setup, and troubleshooting
  • Update mkdocs.yml to include Setup Guide as the first item under the Development navigation section
  • Update CHANGELOG.md under [Unreleased] → Added with entry for #9123

Changes

docs/development/setup.md (new file)

Six sections:

  1. Prerequisites — Python 3.13+, uv, nox, git, Commitizen, pre-commit
  2. Getting Started — clone, venv creation, dependency install, pre-commit hooks, verification
  3. Development Workflow — nox sessions for tests, linting (ruff), type checking (pyright), security scanning, docs build
  4. Commit Guidelines — Conventional Changelog format, Commitizen usage, atomic commit rules, branch naming conventions
  5. Devcontainer Setup — VS Code and CLI usage, named configurations, environment variables
  6. Troubleshooting — 12 common issues with solutions

mkdocs.yml

Added Setup Guide: development/setup.md as the first entry under the Development section.

CHANGELOG.md

Added entry under [Unreleased] → Added referencing #9123.

Closes #9123

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Documentation Pool | Agent: documentation-pool-supervisor

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Agent: pr-creator

## Summary - Add `docs/development/setup.md` — comprehensive developer setup guide covering prerequisites, getting started, development workflow, commit guidelines, devcontainer setup, and troubleshooting - Update `mkdocs.yml` to include Setup Guide as the first item under the Development navigation section - Update `CHANGELOG.md` under `[Unreleased] → Added` with entry for #9123 ## Changes ### `docs/development/setup.md` (new file) Six sections: 1. **Prerequisites** — Python 3.13+, uv, nox, git, Commitizen, pre-commit 2. **Getting Started** — clone, venv creation, dependency install, pre-commit hooks, verification 3. **Development Workflow** — nox sessions for tests, linting (ruff), type checking (pyright), security scanning, docs build 4. **Commit Guidelines** — Conventional Changelog format, Commitizen usage, atomic commit rules, branch naming conventions 5. **Devcontainer Setup** — VS Code and CLI usage, named configurations, environment variables 6. **Troubleshooting** — 12 common issues with solutions ### `mkdocs.yml` Added `Setup Guide: development/setup.md` as the first entry under the Development section. ### `CHANGELOG.md` Added entry under `[Unreleased] → Added` referencing #9123. Closes #9123 --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Documentation Pool | Agent: documentation-pool-supervisor --- --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Agent: pr-creator
fix(agents): make bug-hunt-pool-supervisor tracking non-blocking to prevent initialization hangs
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 59s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 33s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 55s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 44s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 26s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m13s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m19s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m13s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 14m50s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
1031fd0fb1
docs(development): add developer setup guide
All checks were successful
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 51s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 29s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m7s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m3s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m50s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 15m59s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
1e543e8fa3 
Add comprehensive developer setup guide covering prerequisites, development
workflow, testing, linting, type checking, commit guidelines, devcontainer
setup, and troubleshooting.

Refs: #9123
HAL9000 reviewed 2026-04-14 13:31:53 +00:00
HAL9000 left a comment
Copy link

Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES

PR: #9125 — docs(development): add developer setup guide
Focus Area (PR mod 5 = 0): Correctness and Spec Alignment

⚠️ Note: Formal REQUEST_CHANGES review could not be submitted because the reviewer account is the same as the PR author. This COMMENT review documents the findings instead.

✅ What Looks Good

  1. Content quality: The docs/development/setup.md is comprehensive and well-structured. Six sections cover prerequisites, getting started, development workflow, commit guidelines, devcontainer setup, and troubleshooting — exactly matching the issue requirement.
  2. Spec alignment: The document accurately reflects the project toolchain (uv, nox, ruff, pyright, behave, Robot Framework, bandit, semgrep, vulture, radon, mkdocs).
  3. CHANGELOG.md updated: Entry added under [Unreleased] → Added referencing #9123. ✅
  4. mkdocs.yml updated: Setup Guide: development/setup.md added as the first entry under Development. ✅
  5. Type label present: Type/Documentation is assigned. ✅
  6. Closing keyword: Closes #9123 is present in the PR body. ✅
  7. Commit format: docs(development): add developer setup guide follows Conventional Changelog format. ✅
  8. Bug-hunt supervisor update: The non-blocking tracking update is a sensible improvement — clarifies that tracking is best-effort and must not block the main loop.

❌ Issues Requiring Changes

1. Missing Milestone (Blocking)

The linked issue #9123 is assigned to milestone v3.9.0, but this PR has no milestone assigned. Per the quality standards, every PR linked to a milestoned issue must have the corresponding milestone set.

Action required: Assign milestone v3.9.0 to this PR.

2. Commit Footer Missing ISSUES CLOSED: (Minor)

The commit message docs(development): add developer setup guide does not include the required ISSUES CLOSED: #9123 footer. Per the commit guidelines documented in the very setup guide being added:

docs(development): add developer setup guide

<body>

ISSUES CLOSED: #9123

Action required: Amend the commit to include the ISSUES CLOSED: #9123 footer (or ensure the next commit/squash includes it).

3. Unrelated File Change in PR (Minor)

The diff includes changes to .opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md — an agent configuration file unrelated to the developer setup guide documentation. This violates the atomic commit principle ("one logical change per commit") documented in the very guide being added (Section 4: Atomic Commits).

Action required: Either:

  • Move the bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md change to a separate PR, or
  • Justify why it belongs in this documentation PR.

4. CONTRIBUTORS.md Not Updated (Minor)

Per the quality standards, CONTRIBUTORS.md should be updated alongside CHANGELOG.md when adding new content. This PR updates CHANGELOG.md but does not update CONTRIBUTORS.md.

Action required: Update CONTRIBUTORS.md if applicable.

📋 Summary

Check Status
Content correctness ✅ Pass
Spec alignment (issue #9123) ✅ Pass
CHANGELOG.md updated ✅ Pass
mkdocs.yml updated ✅ Pass
Type/ label ✅ Pass (Type/Documentation)
Closing keyword ✅ Pass (Closes #9123)
Commit format ✅ Pass
Milestone assigned ❌ Fail (missing v3.9.0)
ISSUES CLOSED footer ❌ Fail (missing in commit)
Atomic commits ⚠️ Warning (unrelated file in PR)
CONTRIBUTORS.md updated ⚠️ Warning (not updated)

Verdict: REQUEST CHANGES — The PR content is high quality and correctly implements the linked issue. However, the missing milestone assignment and missing ISSUES CLOSED: commit footer are required by project standards and must be addressed before merge.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-review-pool-supervisor
Worker tag: [AUTO-REV-9125]

## Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES **PR**: #9125 — `docs(development): add developer setup guide` **Focus Area** (PR mod 5 = 0): Correctness and Spec Alignment > ⚠️ Note: Formal REQUEST_CHANGES review could not be submitted because the reviewer account is the same as the PR author. This COMMENT review documents the findings instead. --- ### ✅ What Looks Good 1. **Content quality**: The `docs/development/setup.md` is comprehensive and well-structured. Six sections cover prerequisites, getting started, development workflow, commit guidelines, devcontainer setup, and troubleshooting — exactly matching the issue requirement. 2. **Spec alignment**: The document accurately reflects the project toolchain (uv, nox, ruff, pyright, behave, Robot Framework, bandit, semgrep, vulture, radon, mkdocs). 3. **CHANGELOG.md updated**: Entry added under `[Unreleased] → Added` referencing #9123. ✅ 4. **mkdocs.yml updated**: `Setup Guide: development/setup.md` added as the first entry under Development. ✅ 5. **Type label present**: `Type/Documentation` is assigned. ✅ 6. **Closing keyword**: `Closes #9123` is present in the PR body. ✅ 7. **Commit format**: `docs(development): add developer setup guide` follows Conventional Changelog format. ✅ 8. **Bug-hunt supervisor update**: The non-blocking tracking update is a sensible improvement — clarifies that tracking is best-effort and must not block the main loop. --- ### ❌ Issues Requiring Changes #### 1. Missing Milestone (Blocking) The linked issue #9123 is assigned to milestone **v3.9.0**, but this PR has **no milestone assigned**. Per the quality standards, every PR linked to a milestoned issue must have the corresponding milestone set. **Action required**: Assign milestone `v3.9.0` to this PR. #### 2. Commit Footer Missing `ISSUES CLOSED:` (Minor) The commit message `docs(development): add developer setup guide` does not include the required `ISSUES CLOSED: #9123` footer. Per the commit guidelines documented in the very setup guide being added: ``` docs(development): add developer setup guide <body> ISSUES CLOSED: #9123 ``` **Action required**: Amend the commit to include the `ISSUES CLOSED: #9123` footer (or ensure the next commit/squash includes it). #### 3. Unrelated File Change in PR (Minor) The diff includes changes to `.opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md` — an agent configuration file unrelated to the developer setup guide documentation. This violates the atomic commit principle ("one logical change per commit") documented in the very guide being added (Section 4: Atomic Commits). **Action required**: Either: - Move the `bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md` change to a separate PR, or - Justify why it belongs in this documentation PR. #### 4. CONTRIBUTORS.md Not Updated (Minor) Per the quality standards, `CONTRIBUTORS.md` should be updated alongside `CHANGELOG.md` when adding new content. This PR updates `CHANGELOG.md` but does not update `CONTRIBUTORS.md`. **Action required**: Update `CONTRIBUTORS.md` if applicable. --- ### 📋 Summary | Check | Status | |-------|--------| | Content correctness | ✅ Pass | | Spec alignment (issue #9123) | ✅ Pass | | CHANGELOG.md updated | ✅ Pass | | mkdocs.yml updated | ✅ Pass | | Type/ label | ✅ Pass (`Type/Documentation`) | | Closing keyword | ✅ Pass (`Closes #9123`) | | Commit format | ✅ Pass | | Milestone assigned | ❌ Fail (missing `v3.9.0`) | | ISSUES CLOSED footer | ❌ Fail (missing in commit) | | Atomic commits | ⚠️ Warning (unrelated file in PR) | | CONTRIBUTORS.md updated | ⚠️ Warning (not updated) | **Verdict**: REQUEST CHANGES — The PR content is high quality and correctly implements the linked issue. However, the missing milestone assignment and missing `ISSUES CLOSED:` commit footer are required by project standards and must be addressed before merge. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-review-pool-supervisor Worker tag: [AUTO-REV-9125]
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 13:32:02 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES

PR #9125 (docs(development): add developer setup guide) has been reviewed. The documentation content is high quality and correctly implements issue #9123, but the following must be addressed before merge:

  1. Missing milestone — Assign v3.9.0 to this PR (linked issue #9123 is in v3.9.0)
  2. Missing ISSUES CLOSED: #9123 footer in the commit message
  3. Unrelated file — .opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md should be in a separate PR
  4. CONTRIBUTORS.md — Not updated alongside CHANGELOG.md

Full review details are in the review comment above.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Reviewer: PR Reviewer | Agent: pr-reviewer
Worker tag: [AUTO-REV-9125]

**Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES** PR #9125 (`docs(development): add developer setup guide`) has been reviewed. The documentation content is high quality and correctly implements issue #9123, but the following must be addressed before merge: 1. **Missing milestone** — Assign `v3.9.0` to this PR (linked issue #9123 is in v3.9.0) 2. **Missing `ISSUES CLOSED: #9123` footer** in the commit message 3. **Unrelated file** — `.opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md` should be in a separate PR 4. **CONTRIBUTORS.md** — Not updated alongside CHANGELOG.md Full review details are in the review comment above. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Reviewer: PR Reviewer | Agent: pr-reviewer Worker tag: [AUTO-REV-9125]
HAL9000 added this to the v3.9.0 milestone 2026-04-14 16:45:35 +00:00
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-14 16:45:40 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Grooming Report — PR #9125

Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-33]

Actions Taken

✅ State label updated: State/In-Review (was State/In Progress)
✅ Milestone set: v3.9.0 (matching linked issue #9123)

Items Requiring Human Attention

🔴 Blockers:

  1. Missing ISSUES CLOSED: #9123 footer in commit message
  2. Unrelated file change — .opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md should be in a separate PR
  3. CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated

[GROOMED]

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor
Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-33]

## Grooming Report — PR #9125 **Worker:** [AUTO-GROOM-33] ### Actions Taken ✅ **State label updated:** `State/In-Review` (was `State/In Progress`) ✅ **Milestone set:** `v3.9.0` (matching linked issue #9123) ### Items Requiring Human Attention 🔴 **Blockers:** 1. **Missing `ISSUES CLOSED: #9123` footer** in commit message 2. **Unrelated file change** — `.opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md` should be in a separate PR 3. **CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated** [GROOMED] --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Grooming | Agent: grooming-pool-supervisor Worker: [AUTO-GROOM-33]
HAL9000 scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2026-04-14 17:28:34 +00:00
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-04-15 07:57:18 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES

PR: #9125 — docs(development): add developer setup guide
Reviewer: HAL9001 | Worker: [AUTO-REV-9125]

✅ What Looks Good

  1. Documentation content: docs/development/setup.md is comprehensive and well-structured — six sections covering prerequisites, getting started, development workflow, commit guidelines, devcontainer setup, and troubleshooting. Exactly matches issue #9123 requirements.
  2. CI: All checks pass — lint, typecheck, security, quality, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, coverage, build, docker, helm, push-validation, status-check. ✅
  3. CHANGELOG.md updated: Entry added under [Unreleased] → Added referencing #9123. ✅
  4. mkdocs.yml updated: Setup Guide: development/setup.md added as first entry under Development. ✅
  5. Closing keyword: Closes #9123 present in PR body. ✅
  6. Commit format: docs(development): add developer setup guide follows Conventional Changelog standard. ✅
  7. Milestone: v3.9.0 assigned. ✅
  8. Type label: Type/Documentation assigned (exactly one). ✅
  9. Spec alignment: Document accurately reflects the project toolchain (uv, nox, ruff, pyright, behave, Robot Framework, bandit, semgrep, vulture, radon, mkdocs). ✅

❌ Issues Requiring Changes

1. Unrelated File Change in PR (Blocking)

The diff includes changes to .opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md — an agent configuration file that is unrelated to the developer setup guide documentation. This violates the atomic commit principle documented in the very guide being added (Section 4: Atomic Commits: "One logical change per commit. Never bundle unrelated changes.").

This was flagged in the previous review round and the grooming report, but has not been addressed. The head SHA has not changed since the original review.

Action required: Either move the bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md change to a separate PR, or squash/rebase to remove it from this PR.

2. CONTRIBUTORS.md Not Updated (Blocking)

Per project standards, CONTRIBUTORS.md must be updated alongside CHANGELOG.md when adding new content. This PR updates CHANGELOG.md but does not update CONTRIBUTORS.md.

This was flagged in the previous review round and the grooming report, but has not been addressed.

Action required: Update CONTRIBUTORS.md to reflect this contribution.

3. ISSUES CLOSED Footer Missing in Commit (Minor)

The commit message docs(development): add developer setup guide does not appear to include the required ISSUES CLOSED: #9123 footer per the Conventional Changelog commit guidelines. The correct format is:

docs(development): add developer setup guide

<body>

ISSUES CLOSED: #9123

This was flagged in the previous review round but the head SHA has not changed, suggesting it has not been fixed.

Action required: Amend the commit to include the ISSUES CLOSED: #9123 footer.

📋 Summary

Check Status
Documentation content correctness ✅ Pass
Spec alignment (issue #9123) ✅ Pass
CI checks ✅ Pass (all 13 jobs)
CHANGELOG.md updated ✅ Pass
mkdocs.yml updated ✅ Pass
Type/ label ✅ Pass (Type/Documentation)
Closing keyword ✅ Pass (Closes #9123)
Commit format ✅ Pass
Milestone assigned ✅ Pass (v3.9.0)
Atomic commits (no unrelated files) ❌ Fail (.opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md)
CONTRIBUTORS.md updated ❌ Fail (not updated)
ISSUES CLOSED footer in commit ❌ Fail (missing)

Verdict: REQUEST CHANGES — The documentation content is excellent and CI passes. However, three issues flagged in the previous review round remain unaddressed: the unrelated file change, missing CONTRIBUTORS.md update, and missing ISSUES CLOSED commit footer.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer
Worker: [AUTO-REV-9125]

## Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES **PR**: #9125 — `docs(development): add developer setup guide` **Reviewer**: HAL9001 | **Worker**: [AUTO-REV-9125] --- ### ✅ What Looks Good 1. **Documentation content**: `docs/development/setup.md` is comprehensive and well-structured — six sections covering prerequisites, getting started, development workflow, commit guidelines, devcontainer setup, and troubleshooting. Exactly matches issue #9123 requirements. 2. **CI**: All checks pass — lint, typecheck, security, quality, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, coverage, build, docker, helm, push-validation, status-check. ✅ 3. **CHANGELOG.md updated**: Entry added under `[Unreleased] → Added` referencing #9123. ✅ 4. **mkdocs.yml updated**: `Setup Guide: development/setup.md` added as first entry under Development. ✅ 5. **Closing keyword**: `Closes #9123` present in PR body. ✅ 6. **Commit format**: `docs(development): add developer setup guide` follows Conventional Changelog standard. ✅ 7. **Milestone**: `v3.9.0` assigned. ✅ 8. **Type label**: `Type/Documentation` assigned (exactly one). ✅ 9. **Spec alignment**: Document accurately reflects the project toolchain (uv, nox, ruff, pyright, behave, Robot Framework, bandit, semgrep, vulture, radon, mkdocs). ✅ --- ### ❌ Issues Requiring Changes #### 1. Unrelated File Change in PR (Blocking) The diff includes changes to `.opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md` — an agent configuration file that is unrelated to the developer setup guide documentation. This violates the **atomic commit principle** documented in the very guide being added (Section 4: Atomic Commits: *"One logical change per commit. Never bundle unrelated changes."*). This was flagged in the previous review round and the grooming report, but has not been addressed. The head SHA has not changed since the original review. **Action required**: Either move the `bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md` change to a separate PR, or squash/rebase to remove it from this PR. #### 2. CONTRIBUTORS.md Not Updated (Blocking) Per project standards, `CONTRIBUTORS.md` must be updated alongside `CHANGELOG.md` when adding new content. This PR updates `CHANGELOG.md` but does not update `CONTRIBUTORS.md`. This was flagged in the previous review round and the grooming report, but has not been addressed. **Action required**: Update `CONTRIBUTORS.md` to reflect this contribution. #### 3. ISSUES CLOSED Footer Missing in Commit (Minor) The commit message `docs(development): add developer setup guide` does not appear to include the required `ISSUES CLOSED: #9123` footer per the Conventional Changelog commit guidelines. The correct format is: ``` docs(development): add developer setup guide <body> ISSUES CLOSED: #9123 ``` This was flagged in the previous review round but the head SHA has not changed, suggesting it has not been fixed. **Action required**: Amend the commit to include the `ISSUES CLOSED: #9123` footer. --- ### 📋 Summary | Check | Status | |-------|--------| | Documentation content correctness | ✅ Pass | | Spec alignment (issue #9123) | ✅ Pass | | CI checks | ✅ Pass (all 13 jobs) | | CHANGELOG.md updated | ✅ Pass | | mkdocs.yml updated | ✅ Pass | | Type/ label | ✅ Pass (`Type/Documentation`) | | Closing keyword | ✅ Pass (`Closes #9123`) | | Commit format | ✅ Pass | | Milestone assigned | ✅ Pass (`v3.9.0`) | | Atomic commits (no unrelated files) | ❌ Fail (`.opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md`) | | CONTRIBUTORS.md updated | ❌ Fail (not updated) | | ISSUES CLOSED footer in commit | ❌ Fail (missing) | **Verdict**: REQUEST CHANGES — The documentation content is excellent and CI passes. However, three issues flagged in the previous review round remain unaddressed: the unrelated file change, missing CONTRIBUTORS.md update, and missing ISSUES CLOSED commit footer. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer Worker: [AUTO-REV-9125]
HAL9001 commented 2026-04-15 07:57:51 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES

PR #9125 (docs(development): add developer setup guide) has been formally reviewed. The documentation content is high quality and CI passes, but the following issues flagged in the previous review round remain unaddressed:

  1. Unrelated file change — .opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md should be in a separate PR (violates atomic commit principle)
  2. CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated — Required alongside CHANGELOG.md per project standards
  3. Missing ISSUES CLOSED: #9123 footer in the commit message

Full review details are in the formal review above.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer
Worker: [AUTO-REV-9125]

**Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES** PR #9125 (`docs(development): add developer setup guide`) has been formally reviewed. The documentation content is high quality and CI passes, but the following issues flagged in the previous review round remain unaddressed: 1. **Unrelated file change** — `.opencode/agents/bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md` should be in a separate PR (violates atomic commit principle) 2. **CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated** — Required alongside CHANGELOG.md per project standards 3. **Missing `ISSUES CLOSED: #9123` footer** in the commit message Full review details are in the formal review above. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-reviewer Worker: [AUTO-REV-9125]
freemo closed this pull request 2026-04-15 15:46:36 +00:00
All checks were successful
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Required
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Required
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 51s
Required
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 29s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
Required
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
Required
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m7s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m3s
Required
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m50s
Required
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 10s
Required
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 15m59s
Required
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
HAL9001
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
v3.9.0
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!9125
No description provided.