cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.1k Pull requests 489 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

test(e2e): workflow example 2 — automated test generation for a module (trusted profile) #795

Closed
freemo wants to merge 1 commit from test/e2e-wf02-test-generation into master
pull from: test/e2e-wf02-test-generation
merge into: cleveragents:master
Conversation 5 Commits 1 Files changed 2 +546
freemo commented 2026-03-12 23:12:21 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Summary

E2E Robot Framework test for Workflow Example 2: Automated Test Generation using the trusted automation profile. Exercises the full plan lifecycle against a temporary repository with a low-coverage auth module, verifying that CleverAgents can autonomously generate tests.

Closes #748

Changes

  • robot/e2e/wf02_test_generation.robot — New E2E test suite covering:
    • Fixture setup: temp git repo with src/auth.py (realistic auth module) and tests/test_auth.py (minimal coverage baseline)
    • Coverage validation registration (validation add) and project attachment (validation attach) per spec WF02 Step 1
    • Action creation with dynamic actor selection (Anthropic/OpenAI based on available API keys)
    • Full plan lifecycle: plan use → plan execute (strategize) → plan status → plan execute (execute) → plan artifacts → plan diff → lifecycle-apply
    • Trusted profile verification: After plan use --automation-profile trusted, the test asserts the resolved automation_profile field is "trusted" — with WARN fallback if field absent
    • Post-apply state assertion: After lifecycle-apply, verifies plan transitioned to apply phase via plan status --format json with Should Contain on phase field, consistent with m6_acceptance.robot Full Flow Apply Step pattern
    • Unique per-run entity names: UUID-based RUN_SUFFIX appended to action, project, resource, validation, and temp repo names to avoid UNIQUE constraint collisions on repeated runs
    • Plan status assertions: Status check after strategize logs rc WARN on failure and parses/logs the phase field for traceability
    • Invariant enforcement: diff must not modify any src/ files (semantic regex (?:---|\\+\\+\\+) for unified diff markers via --format plain), with WARN logged when diff command fails
    • Artifacts verification: plan artifacts --format json output checked for generated test files using JSON path patterns, with WARN when rc=0 but zero files parsed
    • Post-apply verification: new test file detection or existing file modification, with File Should Exist guard for content-growth fallback
    • Coverage improvement check: apply output parsing or direct pytest --cov fallback with hard failure if LLM produced artifacts but coverage doesn't reach 80%
    • Zero-artifact visibility: Uses Pass Execution instead of WARN+PASS to make zero-artifact outcomes clearly visible in Robot Framework reports
  • CHANGELOG.md — Added entry under Unreleased

Key Design Decisions

  • WF02 Suite Setup with explicit init and UUID suffix: Dedicated suite setup calls E2E Suite Setup then init --force --yes, generates UUID-based RUN_SUFFIX and overrides entity name suite variables — consistent with m6_acceptance.robot pattern
  • Force Tags E2E: Added in Settings section for consistency with project conventions; redundant [Tags] E2E on test case removed since Force Tags already applies it
  • [Teardown] on test case: Added per project convention for individual test case cleanup logging
  • --format plain for plan diff: Ensures unified diff markers (--- a/, +++ b/) are present for the Verify No Production Code Changes regex invariant check — Rich format does not produce these markers
  • Semantic regex (?:---|\\+\\+\\+) for diff file headers: Replaced overly broad [+-]{3} with exact unified diff markers for precision
  • --format json for plan artifacts: Enables reliable JSON parsing of files_changed and path fields — Rich table output cannot be parsed as JSON
  • Regex for files_changed empty check: Uses "files_changed"\\s*:\\s*\\[\\s*\\] instead of exact string match for resilience against JSON formatting differences
  • Action YAML with arguments, state, and 3 invariants: Matches spec WF02 action definition structure — arguments field (schema name, not spec's args) includes target_module (default "src/auth") and coverage_target (default 80); state: available included; third invariant for conftest.py patterns added
  • Arguments use required: false with defaults: A production bug in PlanLifecycleService.use_action causes UNIQUE constraint violations when --arg values duplicate action argument definitions; arguments are defined with defaults as a workaround. TODO comment documents this for future removal.
  • expected_rc=None for LLM-dependent commands: All plan lifecycle commands use flexible return code handling since LLM calls can legitimately fail in E2E
  • Safe Parse Json Field from common_e2e.resource: Eliminates duplicated Extract Plan Id keyword
  • Pass Execution for zero-artifact outcomes: When the LLM produces zero artifacts, Verify Test Files Exist and Verify Coverage Improvement use Pass Execution instead of WARN+PASS to make these outcomes clearly visible in Robot Framework reports without false failures
  • Hard failure for coverage when artifacts exist: Verify Coverage Improvement uses Fail (not WARN) when the LLM produced artifacts but coverage doesn't meet the 80% threshold
  • Coverage regex anchoring: (?i)coverage.*\\bpass(?:ed)?\\b to prevent false-positive matches
  • Catenate SEPARATOR=\\n for all multi-line content: Consistent separator style across all keywords including validation YAML
  • Fixture content length passed as parameter: Verify Test Files Exist receives fixture_content_length as a parameter instead of redundantly calling Build Minimal Test Content
  • File Should Exist guard for content-growth fallback: In Verify Test Files Exist, checks test_auth.py exists before reading to handle LLM file renames gracefully
  • Artifacts zero-count WARN: When plan artifacts returns rc=0 with non-trivial output but no files are parsed, a WARN is logged to surface potential JSON schema changes
  • Validation YAML cwd documented: Subprocess.run in validation code does not set cwd because the validation engine sets the working directory to the resource root before invocation
  • Validation timeout reduced to 240s: From 600s, appropriate for single-module coverage check
  • Subprocess timeout in validation YAML: subprocess.run includes timeout=120 with TimeoutExpired exception handling
  • plan status between execution phases: Added status check after strategize phase with rc WARN and phase logging
  • Sequential step numbering (1–14): Steps renumbered to sequential integers

Quality Gates

Gate Result
nox -e lint ✅ Pass
nox -e typecheck ✅ Pass (0 errors)
nox -e unit_tests ✅ Pass (12295 scenarios)
nox -e integration_tests ✅ Pass
nox -e e2e_tests ✅ Pass (38/38 tests, WF02 passes)
nox -e coverage_report ✅ 98% (≥ 97% threshold)
## Summary E2E Robot Framework test for **Workflow Example 2: Automated Test Generation** using the `trusted` automation profile. Exercises the full plan lifecycle against a temporary repository with a low-coverage `auth` module, verifying that CleverAgents can autonomously generate tests. Closes #748 ## Changes - **`robot/e2e/wf02_test_generation.robot`** — New E2E test suite covering: - Fixture setup: temp git repo with `src/auth.py` (realistic auth module) and `tests/test_auth.py` (minimal coverage baseline) - Coverage validation registration (`validation add`) and project attachment (`validation attach`) per spec WF02 Step 1 - Action creation with dynamic actor selection (Anthropic/OpenAI based on available API keys) - Full plan lifecycle: `plan use` → `plan execute` (strategize) → `plan status` → `plan execute` (execute) → `plan artifacts` → `plan diff` → `lifecycle-apply` - **Trusted profile verification**: After `plan use --automation-profile trusted`, the test asserts the resolved `automation_profile` field is `"trusted"` — with WARN fallback if field absent - **Post-apply state assertion**: After `lifecycle-apply`, verifies plan transitioned to apply phase via `plan status --format json` with `Should Contain` on phase field, consistent with `m6_acceptance.robot` `Full Flow Apply Step` pattern - **Unique per-run entity names**: UUID-based `RUN_SUFFIX` appended to action, project, resource, validation, and temp repo names to avoid UNIQUE constraint collisions on repeated runs - **Plan status assertions**: Status check after strategize logs rc WARN on failure and parses/logs the phase field for traceability - Invariant enforcement: diff must not modify any `src/` files (semantic regex `(?:---|\\+\\+\\+)` for unified diff markers via `--format plain`), with WARN logged when diff command fails - Artifacts verification: `plan artifacts --format json` output checked for generated test files using JSON path patterns, with WARN when rc=0 but zero files parsed - Post-apply verification: new test file detection or existing file modification, with `File Should Exist` guard for content-growth fallback - Coverage improvement check: apply output parsing or direct `pytest --cov` fallback with **hard failure** if LLM produced artifacts but coverage doesn't reach 80% - **Zero-artifact visibility**: Uses `Pass Execution` instead of WARN+PASS to make zero-artifact outcomes clearly visible in Robot Framework reports - **`CHANGELOG.md`** — Added entry under Unreleased ## Key Design Decisions - **`WF02 Suite Setup` with explicit `init` and UUID suffix**: Dedicated suite setup calls `E2E Suite Setup` then `init --force --yes`, generates UUID-based `RUN_SUFFIX` and overrides entity name suite variables — consistent with `m6_acceptance.robot` pattern - **`Force Tags E2E`**: Added in Settings section for consistency with project conventions; redundant `[Tags] E2E` on test case removed since `Force Tags` already applies it - **`[Teardown]` on test case**: Added per project convention for individual test case cleanup logging - **`--format plain` for `plan diff`**: Ensures unified diff markers (`--- a/`, `+++ b/`) are present for the `Verify No Production Code Changes` regex invariant check — Rich format does not produce these markers - **Semantic regex `(?:---|\\+\\+\\+)` for diff file headers**: Replaced overly broad `[+-]{3}` with exact unified diff markers for precision - **`--format json` for `plan artifacts`**: Enables reliable JSON parsing of `files_changed` and `path` fields — Rich table output cannot be parsed as JSON - **Regex for `files_changed` empty check**: Uses `"files_changed"\\s*:\\s*\\[\\s*\\]` instead of exact string match for resilience against JSON formatting differences - **Action YAML with `arguments`, `state`, and 3 invariants**: Matches spec WF02 action definition structure — `arguments` field (schema name, not spec's `args`) includes `target_module` (default `"src/auth"`) and `coverage_target` (default `80`); `state: available` included; third invariant for conftest.py patterns added - **Arguments use `required: false` with defaults**: A production bug in `PlanLifecycleService.use_action` causes UNIQUE constraint violations when `--arg` values duplicate action argument definitions; arguments are defined with defaults as a workaround. TODO comment documents this for future removal. - **`expected_rc=None` for LLM-dependent commands**: All plan lifecycle commands use flexible return code handling since LLM calls can legitimately fail in E2E - **`Safe Parse Json Field` from `common_e2e.resource`**: Eliminates duplicated `Extract Plan Id` keyword - **`Pass Execution` for zero-artifact outcomes**: When the LLM produces zero artifacts, `Verify Test Files Exist` and `Verify Coverage Improvement` use `Pass Execution` instead of WARN+PASS to make these outcomes clearly visible in Robot Framework reports without false failures - **Hard failure for coverage when artifacts exist**: `Verify Coverage Improvement` uses `Fail` (not WARN) when the LLM produced artifacts but coverage doesn't meet the 80% threshold - **Coverage regex anchoring**: `(?i)coverage.*\\bpass(?:ed)?\\b` to prevent false-positive matches - **`Catenate SEPARATOR=\\n` for all multi-line content**: Consistent separator style across all keywords including validation YAML - **Fixture content length passed as parameter**: `Verify Test Files Exist` receives `fixture_content_length` as a parameter instead of redundantly calling `Build Minimal Test Content` - **`File Should Exist` guard for content-growth fallback**: In `Verify Test Files Exist`, checks `test_auth.py` exists before reading to handle LLM file renames gracefully - **Artifacts zero-count WARN**: When `plan artifacts` returns rc=0 with non-trivial output but no files are parsed, a WARN is logged to surface potential JSON schema changes - **Validation YAML cwd documented**: Subprocess.run in validation code does not set `cwd` because the validation engine sets the working directory to the resource root before invocation - **Validation timeout reduced to 240s**: From 600s, appropriate for single-module coverage check - **Subprocess timeout in validation YAML**: `subprocess.run` includes `timeout=120` with `TimeoutExpired` exception handling - **`plan status` between execution phases**: Added status check after strategize phase with rc WARN and phase logging - **Sequential step numbering (1–14)**: Steps renumbered to sequential integers ## Quality Gates | Gate | Result | |------|--------| | `nox -e lint` | ✅ Pass | | `nox -e typecheck` | ✅ Pass (0 errors) | | `nox -e unit_tests` | ✅ Pass (12295 scenarios) | | `nox -e integration_tests` | ✅ Pass | | `nox -e e2e_tests` | ✅ Pass (38/38 tests, WF02 passes) | | `nox -e coverage_report` | ✅ 98% (≥ 97% threshold) |
test(e2e): workflow example 2 — automated test generation for a module (trusted profile)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 38s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m57s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m8s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 43s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m50s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 37m29s
Details
5fd535996d 
E2E Robot Framework test for WF2: Automated Test Generation using the
trusted automation profile. Exercises the full plan lifecycle (action
create, resource add, project create, plan use/execute/diff/apply)
against a temporary repository with a low-coverage auth module.

Key design decisions:
- Uses common_e2e.resource keywords for setup/teardown and CLI execution
- All LLM-dependent commands use expected_rc=None for flexible assertions
- Plan ID extraction supports UUID, JSON key, and short hash patterns
- Invariant verification checks that diff output excludes production code
- Post-apply validation confirms test files exist in the repo

ISSUES CLOSED: #748
freemo added this to the v3.1.0 milestone 2026-03-12 23:12:26 +00:00
freemo force-pushed test/e2e-wf02-test-generation from 5fd535996d
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 38s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m57s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m8s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 43s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m50s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 37m29s
Details
to c8b7dbe424
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 27s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 34s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 19s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m28s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m9s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 12s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m4s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 34m39s
Details
2026-03-13 16:24:25 +00:00 Compare
freemo force-pushed test/e2e-wf02-test-generation from c8b7dbe424
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 27s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 34s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 19s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m28s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m9s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 12s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m4s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 34m39s
Details
to 3fcbb0aaf0
Some checks failed
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 26s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 29s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 33s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m11s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m49s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m27s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 34m30s
Details
2026-03-13 23:19:31 +00:00 Compare
freemo commented 2026-03-14 04:44:32 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

PM Review — Day 34

Status: Mergeable, 0 reviews, M2 (v3.1.0)
Author: @freemo

E2E test for WF02 (automated test generation for a module, trusted profile). Retroactive M2 coverage.

Action Items

Who Action Deadline
@hurui200320 Peer review Day 37
## PM Review — Day 34 **Status**: Mergeable, 0 reviews, M2 (v3.1.0) **Author**: @freemo E2E test for WF02 (automated test generation for a module, trusted profile). Retroactive M2 coverage. ### Action Items | Who | Action | Deadline | |-----|--------|----------| | @hurui200320 | **Peer review** | Day 37 |
freemo modified the milestone from v3.1.0 to v3.2.0 2026-03-16 00:31:59 +00:00
freemo commented 2026-03-16 09:27:02 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

PM Status — Day 36 (2026-03-16)

Day 34 review assignment deadline check. This PR has been in review for 2+ days with 0 reviewer activity.

Reminder: Assigned reviewer — please post your review by Day 37 EOD or flag any blockers. These E2E test PRs are foundational for milestone acceptance gates and cannot remain unreviewed indefinitely.

If you are unable to review by the deadline, please comment so the review can be reassigned.

## PM Status — Day 36 (2026-03-16) Day 34 review assignment deadline check. This PR has been in review for 2+ days with 0 reviewer activity. **Reminder**: Assigned reviewer — please post your review by **Day 37 EOD** or flag any blockers. These E2E test PRs are foundational for milestone acceptance gates and cannot remain unreviewed indefinitely. If you are unable to review by the deadline, please comment so the review can be reassigned.
freemo reviewed 2026-03-16 16:15:16 +00:00
freemo left a comment
Copy link

PM Day 36 Triage: M3 E2E test PR (v3.2.0). Lower priority than bug fixes and TDD infrastructure. Reviewer: @brent.edwards after critical path items clear.

PM Day 36 Triage: M3 E2E test PR (v3.2.0). Lower priority than bug fixes and TDD infrastructure. Reviewer: @brent.edwards after critical path items clear.
freemo commented 2026-03-16 22:22:48 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

@hurui200320 I am going to have you take over this PR, it is mostly completed but is waiting on #628 and #966 One is yours and one is Brent's. Please be sure to get this PR and the two blocking PRs I listed in asap, thanks.

@hurui200320 I am going to have you take over this PR, it is mostly completed but is waiting on https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveragents-core/issues/628 and https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveragents-core/issues/966 One is yours and one is Brent's. Please be sure to get this PR and the two blocking PRs I listed in asap, thanks.
hurui200320 force-pushed test/e2e-wf02-test-generation from 3fcbb0aaf0
Some checks failed
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 26s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 29s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 33s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m11s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m49s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m27s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 34m30s
Details
to 08a0970311
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 49s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 15s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m24s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m38s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 4m55s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 15s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 8m12s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 38m7s
Details
2026-03-18 08:45:47 +00:00 Compare
hurui200320 force-pushed test/e2e-wf02-test-generation from 08a0970311
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 49s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 15s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m24s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m38s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 4m55s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 15s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 8m12s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 38m7s
Details
to 91928627c7
All checks were successful
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m48s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 3m58s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m43s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m53s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m21s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m15s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 48m3s
Details
2026-03-24 07:34:48 +00:00 Compare
hurui200320 force-pushed test/e2e-wf02-test-generation from 91928627c7
All checks were successful
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m48s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 3m58s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m43s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m53s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m21s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m15s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 48m3s
Details
to 306707538d
Some checks failed
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m20s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m55s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m2s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m20s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m23s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m40s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 10m11s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
2026-03-24 08:32:35 +00:00 Compare
hurui200320 force-pushed test/e2e-wf02-test-generation from 306707538d
Some checks failed
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m20s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m55s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m2s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m20s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m23s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m40s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 10m11s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
to 9441193303
All checks were successful
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m18s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m41s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m54s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m2s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m50s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m44s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m43s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m15s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 48m13s
Details
2026-03-24 09:10:04 +00:00 Compare
hurui200320 force-pushed test/e2e-wf02-test-generation from 9441193303
All checks were successful
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m18s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m41s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m54s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m2s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m50s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m44s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m43s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m15s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 48m13s
Details
to 7bd4f0a0e4
All checks were successful
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 44s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 52s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m25s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m47s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m55s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m48s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 9m52s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 54m18s
Details
2026-03-24 10:12:53 +00:00 Compare
hurui200320 force-pushed test/e2e-wf02-test-generation from 7bd4f0a0e4
All checks were successful
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 44s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 52s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m25s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m47s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m55s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m48s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 9m52s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 54m18s
Details
to cd06fe58f6
Some checks failed
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 45s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 6m18s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 6m45s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 6m49s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 6m50s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m6s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m15s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 13m36s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m47s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 1h0m14s
Details
2026-03-27 10:00:05 +00:00 Compare
freemo self-assigned this 2026-04-02 06:15:24 +00:00
freemo commented 2026-04-02 17:34:21 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

🤖 Backlog Groomer (groomer-1): Closing as duplicate of #748.

Issue #748 (test(e2e): workflow example 2 — automated test generation for a module) is the canonical version with full labels (MoSCoW/Must have, Priority/Critical, State/In Review, Type/Testing) and milestone v3.2.0. This issue is an exact title duplicate.

🤖 **Backlog Groomer (groomer-1):** Closing as duplicate of #748. Issue #748 (`test(e2e): workflow example 2 — automated test generation for a module`) is the canonical version with full labels (`MoSCoW/Must have`, `Priority/Critical`, `State/In Review`, `Type/Testing`) and milestone `v3.2.0`. This issue is an exact title duplicate.
freemo closed this pull request 2026-04-02 17:34:34 +00:00
Some checks failed
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 45s
Required
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 6m18s
Required
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 6m45s
Required
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 6m49s
Required
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 6m50s
Required
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m6s
Required
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m15s
Required
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
Required
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 13m36s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m47s
Required
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 1h0m14s
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
CoreRasurae
hamza.khyari
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
v3.2.0
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
freemo
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Depends on
#627 Implement @tdd_expected_fail tag handling in Behave environment
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
#628 Implement @tdd_expected_fail tag handling in Robot Framework
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!795
No description provided.