feat/multi-agent #5

Open
brent.edwards wants to merge 28 commits from feat/multi-agent into master
Member

Multiple changes made by Aditya.

Multiple changes made by Aditya.
aditya was assigned by brent.edwards 2025-10-03 16:23:52 +00:00
brent.edwards left a comment
Author
Member

Good work, Aditya!

Remember that new code needs to match mypy --strict and pylint code guidelines.

Good work, Aditya! Remember that new code needs to match `mypy --strict` and `pylint` code guidelines.
@ -0,0 +2,4 @@
A powerful, reactive Agent Framework using RxPy streams for complex AI agent orchestration and message routing.
[![PyPI Package](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/cleveragents.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/cleveragents/)
Author
Member

This leads to a 404 error.

This leads to a 404 error.
Member

@brent.edwards The 404 link has been removed.

@brent.edwards The 404 link has been removed.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +3,4 @@
A powerful, reactive Agent Framework using RxPy streams for complex AI agent orchestration and message routing.
[![PyPI Package](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/cleveragents.svg)](https://pypi.org/project/cleveragents/)
[![Travis-CI Build Status](https://img.shields.io/travis/cleverthis/cleveragents.svg)](https://travis-ci.org/cleverthis/cleveragents)
Author
Member

This also leads to a 404 error.

This also leads to a 404 error.
Member

@brent.edwards The 404 link has been removed.

@brent.edwards The 404 link has been removed.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +29,4 @@
### Install from PyPI
```bash
pip install cleveragents
Author
Member

Here's what happens when I try this command:

❯ pip install cleveragents
ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement cleveragents (from versions: none)

[notice] A new release of pip is available: 25.0.1 -> 25.2
[notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
ERROR: No matching distribution found for cleveragents
Here's what happens when I try this command: ``` ❯ pip install cleveragents ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement cleveragents (from versions: none) [notice] A new release of pip is available: 25.0.1 -> 25.2 [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip ERROR: No matching distribution found for cleveragents ```
Member

@brent.edwards updated the install instructions in README.md

@brent.edwards updated the install instructions in README.md
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +210,4 @@
provider: openai
model: gpt-4
api_key: "sk-your-key-here"
```
Author
Member

Information about configuration files can already be found in lines 92-110.

Information about configuration files can already be found in lines 92-110.
Member

@brent.edwards removed the duplicate information.

@brent.edwards removed the duplicate information.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +273,4 @@
```bash
# Run all tests
python -m behave tests/features
Author
Member

Bug in the software:

With the installation as above, this command fails.

To fix it, we need to type pip install behave.

When I run the tests, I get the following results:

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:154  Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution

73 features passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped
1217 scenarios passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped
6559 steps passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped
Took 0min 49.345s

The tests need to pass before we can move forward.

Another question --

Not all of the tests are in the format for behave. Examples include:

  • test_json_sanitization.py
  • scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh
  • test_multi_agent_interactive.sh

I can't see how the one line runs all of the tests.

Bug in the software: With the installation as above, this command fails. To fix it, we need to type `pip install behave`. When I run the tests, I get the following results: ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:154 Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648 tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution 73 features passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped 1217 scenarios passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped 6559 steps passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped Took 0min 49.345s ``` The tests need to pass before we can move forward. Another question -- Not all of the tests are in the format for `behave`. Examples include: * `test_json_sanitization.py` * `scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh` * `test_multi_agent_interactive.sh` I can't see how the one line runs all of the tests.
Author
Member

Update:

When I run the tests, I still see one failing:

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution

74 features passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
1218 scenarios passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
6560 steps passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
Took 0min 49.185s
Update: When I run the tests, I still see one failing: ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution 74 features passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped 1218 scenarios passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped 6560 steps passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped Took 0min 49.185s ```
Author
Member

Hi Aditya --

When I run python -m behave tests/features/, here is the summary that I now get:

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:8  Direct prompt template processing
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution

Errored scenarios:
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:13  Direct single-shot with message content
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:18  Direct interactive session setup
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:23  Direct application disposal
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:28  Direct visualization generation
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:33  Direct configuration conversion
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:38  Direct template registration
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:43  Direct agent creation paths
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:48  Direct route setup
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:53  Direct stream operations
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:58  Direct interactive session full workflow
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:63  Direct timeout and error handling
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:68  Direct complex template processing
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:10  Single-shot with no config loaded error on line 220
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:15  Single-shot with None message content handling lines 231-236
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:20  Single-shot with message without content attribute lines 234-236
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:25  Interactive session with no config loaded error on line 288
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:30  Interactive help command lines 320-321
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:35  Interactive stream command processing lines 322-324
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:40  Interactive graph command processing lines 325-327
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:45  Interactive empty input handling lines 328-329
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:50  Interactive keyboard interrupt handling lines 340-342
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:55  Interactive EOF handling lines 343-344
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:60  Config to dict conversion with no config line 358-359
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:65  Template registration with no config early return line 376-377
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:70  Template registration with non-dict templates lines 384-385
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:75  Enhanced registry with raw template processing lines 414-441
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:80  Agent creation error with no factory line 455-456
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:85  Agent creation with enhanced registry template instances line 474-491
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:90  Agent creation with regular registry fallback lines 490-491
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:95  Agent creation with regular registry instantiation lines 495-498
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:100  Agent creation with no instantiate capability lines 501-502
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:105  Route setup with no routes early return lines 518-519
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:110  Route setup bridge initialization lines 522-527
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:115  Route template with no registry fallback lines 538-544
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:120  Stream route template field updates lines 548-561
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:125  Graph route template field updates lines 562-567
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:130  State class resolution failure lines 582-591
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:135  Bridge route registration lines 607-609
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:140  Stream operations with no config early return line 615-616
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:145  Merge operations processing lines 619-624
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:150  Split operations processing lines 627-632
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:155  Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:160  Pipeline setup with no config early return line 654-655
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:165  Pipeline configuration conversion lines 658-667
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:170  Stream command with invalid stream lines 682-683
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:175  Graph command with invalid graph lines 702-703
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:180  Graph command usage error line 720
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:185  Graph execution with no messages lines 736-739
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:190  Graph execution error handling lines 741-742
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:195  Application disposal lines 746-747
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:200  Network visualization with complex configuration lines 760-795
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:205  Network visualization with unsupported format lines 798

72 features passed, 2 failed, 1 error, 0 skipped
1171 scenarios passed, 2 failed, 52 error, 0 skipped
6449 steps passed, 2 failed, 52 error, 104 skipped
Took 0min 43.403s
Hi Aditya -- When I run `python -m behave tests/features/`, here is the summary that I now get: ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:8 Direct prompt template processing tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution Errored scenarios: tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:13 Direct single-shot with message content tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:18 Direct interactive session setup tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:23 Direct application disposal tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:28 Direct visualization generation tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:33 Direct configuration conversion tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:38 Direct template registration tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:43 Direct agent creation paths tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:48 Direct route setup tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:53 Direct stream operations tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:58 Direct interactive session full workflow tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:63 Direct timeout and error handling tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:68 Direct complex template processing tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:10 Single-shot with no config loaded error on line 220 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:15 Single-shot with None message content handling lines 231-236 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:20 Single-shot with message without content attribute lines 234-236 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:25 Interactive session with no config loaded error on line 288 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:30 Interactive help command lines 320-321 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:35 Interactive stream command processing lines 322-324 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:40 Interactive graph command processing lines 325-327 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:45 Interactive empty input handling lines 328-329 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:50 Interactive keyboard interrupt handling lines 340-342 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:55 Interactive EOF handling lines 343-344 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:60 Config to dict conversion with no config line 358-359 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:65 Template registration with no config early return line 376-377 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:70 Template registration with non-dict templates lines 384-385 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:75 Enhanced registry with raw template processing lines 414-441 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:80 Agent creation error with no factory line 455-456 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:85 Agent creation with enhanced registry template instances line 474-491 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:90 Agent creation with regular registry fallback lines 490-491 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:95 Agent creation with regular registry instantiation lines 495-498 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:100 Agent creation with no instantiate capability lines 501-502 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:105 Route setup with no routes early return lines 518-519 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:110 Route setup bridge initialization lines 522-527 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:115 Route template with no registry fallback lines 538-544 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:120 Stream route template field updates lines 548-561 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:125 Graph route template field updates lines 562-567 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:130 State class resolution failure lines 582-591 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:135 Bridge route registration lines 607-609 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:140 Stream operations with no config early return line 615-616 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:145 Merge operations processing lines 619-624 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:150 Split operations processing lines 627-632 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:155 Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:160 Pipeline setup with no config early return line 654-655 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:165 Pipeline configuration conversion lines 658-667 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:170 Stream command with invalid stream lines 682-683 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:175 Graph command with invalid graph lines 702-703 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:180 Graph command usage error line 720 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:185 Graph execution with no messages lines 736-739 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:190 Graph execution error handling lines 741-742 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:195 Application disposal lines 746-747 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:200 Network visualization with complex configuration lines 760-795 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:205 Network visualization with unsupported format lines 798 72 features passed, 2 failed, 1 error, 0 skipped 1171 scenarios passed, 2 failed, 52 error, 0 skipped 6449 steps passed, 2 failed, 52 error, 104 skipped Took 0min 43.403s ```
Author
Member

Hi Aditya --

When I run python -m behave tests/features now, this is what I get:

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:8  Direct prompt template processing
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:608  Tool agent file write append mode

Errored scenarios:
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:13  Direct single-shot with message content
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:18  Direct interactive session setup
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:23  Direct application disposal
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:28  Direct visualization generation
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:33  Direct configuration conversion
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:38  Direct template registration
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:43  Direct agent creation paths
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:48  Direct route setup
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:53  Direct stream operations
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:58  Direct interactive session full workflow
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:63  Direct timeout and error handling
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:68  Direct complex template processing
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:10  Single-shot with no config loaded error on line 220
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:15  Single-shot with None message content handling lines 231-236
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:20  Single-shot with message without content attribute lines 234-236
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:25  Interactive session with no config loaded error on line 288
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:30  Interactive help command lines 320-321
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:35  Interactive stream command processing lines 322-324
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:40  Interactive graph command processing lines 325-327
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:45  Interactive empty input handling lines 328-329
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:50  Interactive keyboard interrupt handling lines 340-342
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:55  Interactive EOF handling lines 343-344
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:60  Config to dict conversion with no config line 358-359
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:65  Template registration with no config early return line 376-377
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:70  Template registration with non-dict templates lines 384-385
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:75  Enhanced registry with raw template processing lines 414-441
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:80  Agent creation error with no factory line 455-456
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:85  Agent creation with enhanced registry template instances line 474-491
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:90  Agent creation with regular registry fallback lines 490-491
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:95  Agent creation with regular registry instantiation lines 495-498
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:100  Agent creation with no instantiate capability lines 501-502
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:105  Route setup with no routes early return lines 518-519
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:110  Route setup bridge initialization lines 522-527
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:115  Route template with no registry fallback lines 538-544
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:120  Stream route template field updates lines 548-561
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:125  Graph route template field updates lines 562-567
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:130  State class resolution failure lines 582-591
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:135  Bridge route registration lines 607-609
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:140  Stream operations with no config early return line 615-616
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:145  Merge operations processing lines 619-624
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:150  Split operations processing lines 627-632
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:155  Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:160  Pipeline setup with no config early return line 654-655
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:165  Pipeline configuration conversion lines 658-667
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:170  Stream command with invalid stream lines 682-683
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:175  Graph command with invalid graph lines 702-703
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:180  Graph command usage error line 720
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:185  Graph execution with no messages lines 736-739
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:190  Graph execution error handling lines 741-742
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:195  Application disposal lines 746-747
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:200  Network visualization with complex configuration lines 760-795
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:205  Network visualization with unsupported format lines 798

72 features passed, 2 failed, 1 error, 0 skipped
1170 scenarios passed, 3 failed, 52 error, 0 skipped
6448 steps passed, 3 failed, 52 error, 104 skipped
Took 0min 42.813s
Hi Aditya -- When I run `python -m behave tests/features` now, this is what I get: ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:8 Direct prompt template processing tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution tests/features/tool_agent.feature:608 Tool agent file write append mode Errored scenarios: tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:13 Direct single-shot with message content tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:18 Direct interactive session setup tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:23 Direct application disposal tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:28 Direct visualization generation tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:33 Direct configuration conversion tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:38 Direct template registration tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:43 Direct agent creation paths tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:48 Direct route setup tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:53 Direct stream operations tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:58 Direct interactive session full workflow tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:63 Direct timeout and error handling tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:68 Direct complex template processing tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:10 Single-shot with no config loaded error on line 220 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:15 Single-shot with None message content handling lines 231-236 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:20 Single-shot with message without content attribute lines 234-236 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:25 Interactive session with no config loaded error on line 288 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:30 Interactive help command lines 320-321 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:35 Interactive stream command processing lines 322-324 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:40 Interactive graph command processing lines 325-327 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:45 Interactive empty input handling lines 328-329 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:50 Interactive keyboard interrupt handling lines 340-342 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:55 Interactive EOF handling lines 343-344 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:60 Config to dict conversion with no config line 358-359 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:65 Template registration with no config early return line 376-377 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:70 Template registration with non-dict templates lines 384-385 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:75 Enhanced registry with raw template processing lines 414-441 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:80 Agent creation error with no factory line 455-456 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:85 Agent creation with enhanced registry template instances line 474-491 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:90 Agent creation with regular registry fallback lines 490-491 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:95 Agent creation with regular registry instantiation lines 495-498 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:100 Agent creation with no instantiate capability lines 501-502 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:105 Route setup with no routes early return lines 518-519 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:110 Route setup bridge initialization lines 522-527 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:115 Route template with no registry fallback lines 538-544 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:120 Stream route template field updates lines 548-561 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:125 Graph route template field updates lines 562-567 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:130 State class resolution failure lines 582-591 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:135 Bridge route registration lines 607-609 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:140 Stream operations with no config early return line 615-616 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:145 Merge operations processing lines 619-624 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:150 Split operations processing lines 627-632 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:155 Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:160 Pipeline setup with no config early return line 654-655 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:165 Pipeline configuration conversion lines 658-667 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:170 Stream command with invalid stream lines 682-683 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:175 Graph command with invalid graph lines 702-703 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:180 Graph command usage error line 720 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:185 Graph execution with no messages lines 736-739 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:190 Graph execution error handling lines 741-742 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:195 Application disposal lines 746-747 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:200 Network visualization with complex configuration lines 760-795 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:205 Network visualization with unsupported format lines 798 72 features passed, 2 failed, 1 error, 0 skipped 1170 scenarios passed, 3 failed, 52 error, 0 skipped 6448 steps passed, 3 failed, 52 error, 104 skipped Took 0min 42.813s ```
Member

@brent.edwards

all behave tests and unit tests are passing now.
Also
scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh
test_multi_agent_interactive.sh
files have been removed.

@brent.edwards all behave tests and unit tests are passing now. Also scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh test_multi_agent_interactive.sh files have been removed.
Author
Member

When I ran it locally, I got the following failure:

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution

74 features passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
1224 scenarios passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
6606 steps passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
Took 0min 49.820s

When you're back, we can work together to figure out the difference between our systems.

Thanks for fixing most of the problems!

When I ran it locally, I got the following failure: ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution 74 features passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped 1224 scenarios passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped 6606 steps passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped Took 0min 49.820s ``` When you're back, we can work together to figure out the difference between our systems. Thanks for fixing most of the problems!
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +276,4 @@
python -m behave tests/features
# Run with coverage
python -m pytest --cov=cleveragents
Author
Member
  1. pytest is not installed.
  2. After I install pytest, I get the following problems:
 python -m pytest --cov=cleveragents
ERROR: usage: __main__.py [options] [file_or_dir] [file_or_dir] [...]
__main__.py: error: unrecognized arguments: --cov=cleveragents
  inifile: /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core/setup.cfg
  rootdir: /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core
  1. The tests appear to mostly be based on behave not pytest.

I guess that you could use coverage.py but I had problems running it.

1. `pytest` is not installed. 2. After I install `pytest`, I get the following problems: ``` python -m pytest --cov=cleveragents ERROR: usage: __main__.py [options] [file_or_dir] [file_or_dir] [...] __main__.py: error: unrecognized arguments: --cov=cleveragents inifile: /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core/setup.cfg rootdir: /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core ``` 3. The tests appear to mostly be based on `behave` not `pytest`. I guess that you could use `coverage.py` but I had problems running it.
Author
Member

This command now runs tests/unit/core/test_json_sanitization.py and tests/unit/core/test_tool_command_processing.py. But that's not all of the tests.

This command now runs `tests/unit/core/test_json_sanitization.py` and `tests/unit/core/test_tool_command_processing.py`. But that's not all of the tests.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +279,4 @@
python -m pytest --cov=cleveragents
# Run with tox for multiple environments
tox
Author
Member

Running tox gives the following problem in the middle:

lists of files in version control and sdist do not match!
missing from VCS:
  examples/documents/BusinessServiceAgreement.docx
  examples/documents/BusinessServiceAgreement.txt
missing from sdist:
  README.md
check: exit 1 (1.61 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> check-manifest /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core pid=469604

and the tests run endlessly but it occasionally pauses with the message

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:154  Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution

73 features passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped
1217 scenarios passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped
6559 steps passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped
Took 0min 49.383s
py311-nocov: exit 1 (122.66 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> behave tests/features pid=485307
py311-nocov: FAIL ✖ in 2 minutes 13.48 seconds

regularly.

Running `tox` gives the following problem in the middle: ``` lists of files in version control and sdist do not match! missing from VCS: examples/documents/BusinessServiceAgreement.docx examples/documents/BusinessServiceAgreement.txt missing from sdist: README.md check: exit 1 (1.61 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> check-manifest /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core pid=469604 ``` and the tests run endlessly but it occasionally pauses with the message ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:154 Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648 tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution 73 features passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped 1217 scenarios passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped 6559 steps passed, 2 failed, 0 skipped Took 0min 49.383s py311-nocov: exit 1 (122.66 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> behave tests/features pid=485307 py311-nocov: FAIL ✖ in 2 minutes 13.48 seconds ``` regularly.
Author
Member

When I run tox now, I get the following in the middle:

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution

and it keeps rerunning.

When I run `tox` now, I get the following in the middle: ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution ``` and it keeps rerunning.
Author
Member

I just tried tox -e py312-nocov and here are the results:

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:8  Direct prompt template processing
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution

Errored scenarios:
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:13  Direct single-shot with message content
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:18  Direct interactive session setup
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:23  Direct application disposal
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:28  Direct visualization generation
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:33  Direct configuration conversion
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:38  Direct template registration
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:43  Direct agent creation paths
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:48  Direct route setup
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:53  Direct stream operations
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:58  Direct interactive session full workflow
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:63  Direct timeout and error handling
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:68  Direct complex template processing
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:10  Single-shot with no config loaded error on line 220
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:15  Single-shot with None message content handling lines 231-236
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:20  Single-shot with message without content attribute lines 234-236
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:25  Interactive session with no config loaded error on line 288
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:30  Interactive help command lines 320-321
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:35  Interactive stream command processing lines 322-324
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:40  Interactive graph command processing lines 325-327
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:45  Interactive empty input handling lines 328-329
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:50  Interactive keyboard interrupt handling lines 340-342
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:55  Interactive EOF handling lines 343-344
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:60  Config to dict conversion with no config line 358-359
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:65  Template registration with no config early return line 376-377
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:70  Template registration with non-dict templates lines 384-385
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:75  Enhanced registry with raw template processing lines 414-441
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:80  Agent creation error with no factory line 455-456
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:85  Agent creation with enhanced registry template instances line 474-491
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:90  Agent creation with regular registry fallback lines 490-491
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:95  Agent creation with regular registry instantiation lines 495-498
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:100  Agent creation with no instantiate capability lines 501-502
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:105  Route setup with no routes early return lines 518-519
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:110  Route setup bridge initialization lines 522-527
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:115  Route template with no registry fallback lines 538-544
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:120  Stream route template field updates lines 548-561
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:125  Graph route template field updates lines 562-567
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:130  State class resolution failure lines 582-591
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:135  Bridge route registration lines 607-609
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:140  Stream operations with no config early return line 615-616
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:145  Merge operations processing lines 619-624
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:150  Split operations processing lines 627-632
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:155  Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:160  Pipeline setup with no config early return line 654-655
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:165  Pipeline configuration conversion lines 658-667
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:170  Stream command with invalid stream lines 682-683
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:175  Graph command with invalid graph lines 702-703
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:180  Graph command usage error line 720
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:185  Graph execution with no messages lines 736-739
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:190  Graph execution error handling lines 741-742
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:195  Application disposal lines 746-747
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:200  Network visualization with complex configuration lines 760-795
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:205  Network visualization with unsupported format lines 798

72 features passed, 2 failed, 1 error, 0 skipped
1171 scenarios passed, 2 failed, 52 error, 0 skipped
6449 steps passed, 2 failed, 52 error, 104 skipped
Took 0min 42.873s
py312-nocov: exit 1 (116.51 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> behave tests/features pid=46119
  py312-nocov: FAIL code 1 (168.51=setup[52.00]+cmd[116.51] seconds)
  evaluation failed :( (168.66 seconds)
I just tried `tox -e py312-nocov` and here are the results: ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:8 Direct prompt template processing tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution Errored scenarios: tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:13 Direct single-shot with message content tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:18 Direct interactive session setup tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:23 Direct application disposal tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:28 Direct visualization generation tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:33 Direct configuration conversion tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:38 Direct template registration tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:43 Direct agent creation paths tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:48 Direct route setup tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:53 Direct stream operations tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:58 Direct interactive session full workflow tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:63 Direct timeout and error handling tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:68 Direct complex template processing tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:10 Single-shot with no config loaded error on line 220 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:15 Single-shot with None message content handling lines 231-236 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:20 Single-shot with message without content attribute lines 234-236 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:25 Interactive session with no config loaded error on line 288 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:30 Interactive help command lines 320-321 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:35 Interactive stream command processing lines 322-324 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:40 Interactive graph command processing lines 325-327 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:45 Interactive empty input handling lines 328-329 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:50 Interactive keyboard interrupt handling lines 340-342 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:55 Interactive EOF handling lines 343-344 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:60 Config to dict conversion with no config line 358-359 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:65 Template registration with no config early return line 376-377 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:70 Template registration with non-dict templates lines 384-385 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:75 Enhanced registry with raw template processing lines 414-441 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:80 Agent creation error with no factory line 455-456 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:85 Agent creation with enhanced registry template instances line 474-491 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:90 Agent creation with regular registry fallback lines 490-491 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:95 Agent creation with regular registry instantiation lines 495-498 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:100 Agent creation with no instantiate capability lines 501-502 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:105 Route setup with no routes early return lines 518-519 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:110 Route setup bridge initialization lines 522-527 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:115 Route template with no registry fallback lines 538-544 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:120 Stream route template field updates lines 548-561 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:125 Graph route template field updates lines 562-567 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:130 State class resolution failure lines 582-591 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:135 Bridge route registration lines 607-609 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:140 Stream operations with no config early return line 615-616 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:145 Merge operations processing lines 619-624 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:150 Split operations processing lines 627-632 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:155 Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:160 Pipeline setup with no config early return line 654-655 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:165 Pipeline configuration conversion lines 658-667 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:170 Stream command with invalid stream lines 682-683 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:175 Graph command with invalid graph lines 702-703 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:180 Graph command usage error line 720 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:185 Graph execution with no messages lines 736-739 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:190 Graph execution error handling lines 741-742 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:195 Application disposal lines 746-747 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:200 Network visualization with complex configuration lines 760-795 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:205 Network visualization with unsupported format lines 798 72 features passed, 2 failed, 1 error, 0 skipped 1171 scenarios passed, 2 failed, 52 error, 0 skipped 6449 steps passed, 2 failed, 52 error, 104 skipped Took 0min 42.873s py312-nocov: exit 1 (116.51 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> behave tests/features pid=46119 py312-nocov: FAIL code 1 (168.51=setup[52.00]+cmd[116.51] seconds) evaluation failed :( (168.66 seconds) ```
Author
Member

When I try tox -e py312-nocov, I get the following:

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:8  Direct prompt template processing
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:608  Tool agent file write append mode

Errored scenarios:
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:13  Direct single-shot with message content
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:18  Direct interactive session setup
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:23  Direct application disposal
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:28  Direct visualization generation
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:33  Direct configuration conversion
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:38  Direct template registration
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:43  Direct agent creation paths
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:48  Direct route setup
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:53  Direct stream operations
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:58  Direct interactive session full workflow
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:63  Direct timeout and error handling
  tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:68  Direct complex template processing
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:10  Single-shot with no config loaded error on line 220
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:15  Single-shot with None message content handling lines 231-236
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:20  Single-shot with message without content attribute lines 234-236
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:25  Interactive session with no config loaded error on line 288
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:30  Interactive help command lines 320-321
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:35  Interactive stream command processing lines 322-324
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:40  Interactive graph command processing lines 325-327
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:45  Interactive empty input handling lines 328-329
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:50  Interactive keyboard interrupt handling lines 340-342
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:55  Interactive EOF handling lines 343-344
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:60  Config to dict conversion with no config line 358-359
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:65  Template registration with no config early return line 376-377
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:70  Template registration with non-dict templates lines 384-385
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:75  Enhanced registry with raw template processing lines 414-441
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:80  Agent creation error with no factory line 455-456
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:85  Agent creation with enhanced registry template instances line 474-491
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:90  Agent creation with regular registry fallback lines 490-491
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:95  Agent creation with regular registry instantiation lines 495-498
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:100  Agent creation with no instantiate capability lines 501-502
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:105  Route setup with no routes early return lines 518-519
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:110  Route setup bridge initialization lines 522-527
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:115  Route template with no registry fallback lines 538-544
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:120  Stream route template field updates lines 548-561
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:125  Graph route template field updates lines 562-567
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:130  State class resolution failure lines 582-591
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:135  Bridge route registration lines 607-609
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:140  Stream operations with no config early return line 615-616
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:145  Merge operations processing lines 619-624
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:150  Split operations processing lines 627-632
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:155  Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:160  Pipeline setup with no config early return line 654-655
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:165  Pipeline configuration conversion lines 658-667
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:170  Stream command with invalid stream lines 682-683
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:175  Graph command with invalid graph lines 702-703
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:180  Graph command usage error line 720
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:185  Graph execution with no messages lines 736-739
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:190  Graph execution error handling lines 741-742
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:195  Application disposal lines 746-747
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:200  Network visualization with complex configuration lines 760-795
  tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:205  Network visualization with unsupported format lines 798

72 features passed, 2 failed, 1 error, 0 skipped
1170 scenarios passed, 3 failed, 52 error, 0 skipped
6448 steps passed, 3 failed, 52 error, 104 skipped
Took 0min 42.628s
py312-nocov: exit 1 (116.96 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> behave tests/features pid=57746
  py312-nocov: FAIL code 1 (132.58=setup[15.62]+cmd[116.96] seconds)
  evaluation failed :( (132.93 seconds)
When I try ` tox -e py312-nocov`, I get the following: ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:8 Direct prompt template processing tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution tests/features/tool_agent.feature:608 Tool agent file write append mode Errored scenarios: tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:13 Direct single-shot with message content tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:18 Direct interactive session setup tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:23 Direct application disposal tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:28 Direct visualization generation tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:33 Direct configuration conversion tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:38 Direct template registration tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:43 Direct agent creation paths tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:48 Direct route setup tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:53 Direct stream operations tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:58 Direct interactive session full workflow tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:63 Direct timeout and error handling tests/features/application_direct_coverage.feature:68 Direct complex template processing tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:10 Single-shot with no config loaded error on line 220 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:15 Single-shot with None message content handling lines 231-236 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:20 Single-shot with message without content attribute lines 234-236 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:25 Interactive session with no config loaded error on line 288 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:30 Interactive help command lines 320-321 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:35 Interactive stream command processing lines 322-324 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:40 Interactive graph command processing lines 325-327 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:45 Interactive empty input handling lines 328-329 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:50 Interactive keyboard interrupt handling lines 340-342 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:55 Interactive EOF handling lines 343-344 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:60 Config to dict conversion with no config line 358-359 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:65 Template registration with no config early return line 376-377 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:70 Template registration with non-dict templates lines 384-385 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:75 Enhanced registry with raw template processing lines 414-441 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:80 Agent creation error with no factory line 455-456 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:85 Agent creation with enhanced registry template instances line 474-491 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:90 Agent creation with regular registry fallback lines 490-491 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:95 Agent creation with regular registry instantiation lines 495-498 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:100 Agent creation with no instantiate capability lines 501-502 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:105 Route setup with no routes early return lines 518-519 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:110 Route setup bridge initialization lines 522-527 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:115 Route template with no registry fallback lines 538-544 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:120 Stream route template field updates lines 548-561 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:125 Graph route template field updates lines 562-567 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:130 State class resolution failure lines 582-591 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:135 Bridge route registration lines 607-609 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:140 Stream operations with no config early return line 615-616 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:145 Merge operations processing lines 619-624 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:150 Split operations processing lines 627-632 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:155 Subscription re-setup after operations lines 644-648 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:160 Pipeline setup with no config early return line 654-655 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:165 Pipeline configuration conversion lines 658-667 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:170 Stream command with invalid stream lines 682-683 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:175 Graph command with invalid graph lines 702-703 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:180 Graph command usage error line 720 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:185 Graph execution with no messages lines 736-739 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:190 Graph execution error handling lines 741-742 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:195 Application disposal lines 746-747 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:200 Network visualization with complex configuration lines 760-795 tests/features/application_missing_lines_coverage.feature:205 Network visualization with unsupported format lines 798 72 features passed, 2 failed, 1 error, 0 skipped 1170 scenarios passed, 3 failed, 52 error, 0 skipped 6448 steps passed, 3 failed, 52 error, 104 skipped Took 0min 42.628s py312-nocov: exit 1 (116.96 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> behave tests/features pid=57746 py312-nocov: FAIL code 1 (132.58=setup[15.62]+cmd[116.96] seconds) evaluation failed :( (132.93 seconds) ```
Member

All tests are passing now.

All tests are passing now.
Author
Member

When I run tox -e py312-nocov, I still get:

Failing scenarios:
  tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84  Tool Agent shell command execution

74 features passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
1224 scenarios passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
6606 steps passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped
Took 0min 49.164s
py312-nocov: exit 1 (122.16 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> behave tests/features pid=2539995
  py312-nocov: FAIL code 1 (138.74=setup[16.59]+cmd[122.16] seconds)
  evaluation failed :( (138.84 seconds)
When I run ` tox -e py312-nocov`, I still get: ``` Failing scenarios: tests/features/tool_agent.feature:84 Tool Agent shell command execution 74 features passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped 1224 scenarios passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped 6606 steps passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped Took 0min 49.164s py312-nocov: exit 1 (122.16 seconds) /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core> behave tests/features pid=2539995 py312-nocov: FAIL code 1 (138.74=setup[16.59]+cmd[122.16] seconds) evaluation failed :( (138.84 seconds) ```
@ -0,0 +41,4 @@
- sources: [source_streams]
target: target_stream
splits:
Author
Member

Is splits required or optional?

Is `splits` required or optional?
Member

splits is optional. Also mentioned the same in the document

splits is optional. Also mentioned the same in the document
@ -0,0 +61,4 @@
global:
variable_name: value
```
Author
Member

There should be a section about global configuration here.

It should include links to documentation of Jinja and Mustache.

There should be a section about global configuration here. It should include links to documentation of Jinja and Mustache.
Member

added global configuration section and links to documentation of Jinja and Mustache

added global configuration section and links to documentation of Jinja and Mustache
@ -0,0 +104,4 @@
safe_mode: true
timeout: 30
```
Author
Member

Can you explain what a tool agent is? The only definition so far is in README.md line 241.

You list several tools but don't explain what they are or what they do. This is the best place to explain the basic tools.

Can you explain what a tool agent is? The only definition so far is in `README.md` line 241. You list several tools but don't explain what they are or what they do. This is the best place to explain the basic tools.
Member

Added the details for tool agent. @brent.edwards

Added the details for tool agent. @brent.edwards
@ -0,0 +130,4 @@
input: sub_agent1
output: sub_stream1
```
Author
Member

Could you explain here what a composite agent is?

What does it do, why is it important?

Could you explain here what a composite agent is? What does it do, why is it important?
Member

Added the details for composite agent. @brent.edwards

Added the details for composite agent. @brent.edwards
@ -0,0 +145,4 @@
operators:
- type: map
params:
agent: agent_name
Author
Member

I guess that it would be more helpful to see an example function here than an agent.

There seem to be other ways to run other agents, but I haven't yet seen a way to run simple code.

I guess that it would be more helpful to see an example function here than an agent. There seem to be other ways to run other agents, but I haven't yet seen a way to run simple code.
Member

@brent.edwards added the same here

@brent.edwards added the same here
@ -0,0 +177,4 @@
- `replay`: Replay all previous values
**Operators:**
- `map`: Transform messages using agents or functions
Author
Member

Could you link to where there's more documentation for the functions? I suspect that will be very important to programmers.

Could you link to where there's more documentation for the functions? I suspect that will be very important to programmers.
Member

added @brent.edwards

added @brent.edwards
@ -0,0 +220,4 @@
parallel_execution: true
state_class: "my_module.MyState"
```
Author
Member

Could you point to where someone can find more details on entry_point and edges -- the central point of a graph?

Could you point to where someone can find more details on `entry_point` and `edges` -- the central point of a graph?
@ -0,0 +253,4 @@
preserve_subscriptions: true
preserve_checkpointing: true
```
Author
Member

Could you point to where people can find more information about bridge routes?

Could you point to where people can find more information about bridge routes?
@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
agents:
Author
Member

Is this the latest version of the code? For example, this code doesn't seem to write its analysis to a file.

Is this the latest version of the code? For example, this code doesn't seem to write its analysis to a file.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
# Multi-Agent Paper Writer - Multiple Specialized Agents Working Together
Author
Member

As part of this header, could you mention that this code needs the --unsafe flag?

As part of this header, could you mention that this code needs the `--unsafe` flag?
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -294,7 +294,14 @@ class ReactiveCleverAgentsApp:
# Set up observers for output and errors
def on_output(msg: StreamMessage):
Author
Member

Just FYI -- pylint requires a docstring for methods, and a return value.

Just FYI -- `pylint` requires a docstring for methods, and a return value.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -298,0 +300,4 @@
print(f"\n[DEBUG] Empty output received\n")
else:
# Check for tool execution commands
processed_content = self._process_tool_commands(content_str)
Author
Member

This code changes the program's behavior. Could you write a quick test that covers this change?

This code changes the program's behavior. Could you write a quick test that covers this change?
@ -338,3 +345,3 @@
# Give streams time to process
await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
await asyncio.sleep(2.0)
Author
Member

FYI... I get nervous when code tries to guesstimate how long processing will take. It's always either never enough time or too much time.

Is it possible to use some signal between the stream and this code to notify when the stream is done processing?

FYI... I get nervous when code tries to guesstimate how long processing will take. It's always either never enough time or too much time. Is it possible to use some signal between the stream and this code to notify when the stream is done processing?
@ -668,6 +664,151 @@ class ReactiveCleverAgentsApp:
self.langgraph_bridge.create_hybrid_pipeline(config_dict)
self.logger.debug(f"Created hybrid pipeline: {pipeline_name}")
def _sanitize_json_string(self, json_str: str) -> str:
Author
Member

By the way, thank you very much for the test_json_sanitation.py file!

This method could be static.

By the way, thank you very much for the `test_json_sanitation.py` file! This method could be static.
@ -671,0 +677,4 @@
Returns:
Sanitized JSON string with control characters properly escaped
"""
import re
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:680:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (re) (import-outside-toplevel)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:680:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (re) (import-outside-toplevel)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +678,4 @@
Sanitized JSON string with control characters properly escaped
"""
import re
import json
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:681:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (json) (import-outside-toplevel)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:681:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (json) (import-outside-toplevel)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +679,4 @@
"""
import re
import json
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:682:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:682:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +686,4 @@
return json_str # Already valid, no sanitization needed
except json.JSONDecodeError:
pass # Need to sanitize
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:689:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:689:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +689,4 @@
# Strategy: Find all quoted string values and escape control characters within them
# We need to be careful to only escape content inside string values, not the JSON structure
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:692:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:692:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +690,4 @@
# Strategy: Find all quoted string values and escape control characters within them
# We need to be careful to only escape content inside string values, not the JSON structure
def escape_string_content(match):
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:693: error: Function is missing a type annotation [no-untyped-def]

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:693: error: Function is missing a type annotation [no-untyped-def]
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +695,4 @@
# match.group(0) is the full match including quotes
# match.group(1) is the content inside the quotes
content = match.group(1)
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:698:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:698:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +705,4 @@
content = content.replace('\b', '\\b')
content = content.replace('\f', '\\f')
content = content.replace('"', '\\"') # Escape quotes
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:708:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

(I'm not going to include more of these. Use pylint to find all of them.)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:708:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace) (I'm not going to include more of these. Use `pylint` to find all of them.)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +712,4 @@
# Pattern to match quoted strings (both keys and values)
# This matches: "anything including newlines and special chars"
# We use a negative lookbehind to avoid matching escaped quotes
pattern = r'"((?:[^"\\]|\\.)*)"|"([^"]*(?:\n[^"]*)*)"'
Author
Member

You write pattern twice; only the second one is used. You should remove this variable.

You write `pattern` twice; only the second one is used. You should remove this variable.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +721,4 @@
return sanitized
def _process_tool_commands(self, content: str) -> str:
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:724:4: R0914: Too many local variables (17/15) (too-many-locals)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:724:4: R0914: Too many local variables (17/15) (too-many-locals)
@ -671,0 +727,4 @@
Detects [TOOL_EXECUTE:tool_name] commands and executes actual tools.
"""
import re
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:730:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (re) (import-outside-toplevel)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:730:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (re) (import-outside-toplevel)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +728,4 @@
Detects [TOOL_EXECUTE:tool_name] commands and executes actual tools.
"""
import re
import json
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:731:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (json) (import-outside-toplevel)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:731:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (json) (import-outside-toplevel)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +729,4 @@
"""
import re
import json
import asyncio
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:732:8: W0404: Reimport 'asyncio' (imported line 8) (reimported)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:732:8: W0621: Redefining name 'asyncio' from outer scope (line 8) (redefined-outer-name)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:732:8: W0404: Reimport 'asyncio' (imported line 8) (reimported) src/cleveragents/core/application.py:732:8: W0621: Redefining name 'asyncio' from outer scope (line 8) (redefined-outer-name)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +734,4 @@
# Pattern to match tool execution commands
pattern = r'\[TOOL_EXECUTE:(\w+)\]\s*(\{[^}]+\})\s*\[/TOOL_EXECUTE\]'
def execute_tool_sync(tool_name, tool_params):
Author
Member

The parameters will need types:

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:737: error: Function is missing a type annotation [no-untyped-def]

The parameters will need types: src/cleveragents/core/application.py:737: error: Function is missing a type annotation [no-untyped-def]
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +755,4 @@
# Try to get the current running loop
try:
loop = asyncio.get_running_loop()
Author
Member

loop is never used.

`loop` is never used.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +757,4 @@
try:
loop = asyncio.get_running_loop()
# We're already in an async context, create a task
import concurrent.futures
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:760:20: C0415: Import outside toplevel (concurrent.futures) (import-outside-toplevel)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:760:20: C0415: Import outside toplevel (concurrent.futures) (import-outside-toplevel)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +767,4 @@
# No running loop, we can use asyncio.run
result = asyncio.run(file_manager.process_message(tool_request, context))
return f"\n{result}"
Author
Member

It's possible that result was never filled.

It's possible that `result` was never filled.
@ -671,0 +769,4 @@
return f"\n{result}"
except Exception as e:
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:772:19: W0718: Catching too general exception Exception (broad-exception-caught)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:772:19: W0718: Catching too general exception Exception (broad-exception-caught)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +770,4 @@
return f"\n{result}"
except Exception as e:
self.logger.error(f"Tool execution failed: {e}")
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:773:16: W1203: Use lazy % formatting in logging functions (logging-fstring-interpolation)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:773:16: W1203: Use lazy % formatting in logging functions (logging-fstring-interpolation)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +790,4 @@
# Sanitize JSON string before parsing to handle LLM-generated malformed JSON
sanitized_params_str = self._sanitize_json_string(tool_params_str)
tool_params = json.loads(sanitized_params_str)
tool_result = execute_tool_sync(tool_name, tool_params)
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:793: error: Call to untyped function "execute_tool_sync" in typed context [no-untyped-call]

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:793: error: Call to untyped function "execute_tool_sync" in typed context [no-untyped-call]
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +799,4 @@
result_content[match.end():]
)
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
self.logger.error(f"Failed to parse tool params: {e}")
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:802:16: W1203: Use lazy % formatting in logging functions (logging-fstring-interpolation)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:802:16: W1203: Use lazy % formatting in logging functions (logging-fstring-interpolation)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -671,0 +800,4 @@
)
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
self.logger.error(f"Failed to parse tool params: {e}")
error_msg = f"\n❌ Error: Invalid tool parameters format"
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:803:28: W1309: Using an f-string that does not have any interpolated variables (f-string-without-interpolation)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:803:28: W1309: Using an f-string that does not have any interpolated variables (f-string-without-interpolation)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +36,4 @@
```bash
git clone https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cd cleveragents
Author
Member

This line should be

cd cleveragents-core
This line should be ``` cd cleveragents-core ```
brent.edwards left a comment
Author
Member

Thank you for your hard work!

Thank you for your hard work!
@ -194,0 +201,4 @@
# No event loop in current thread, create one
loop = asyncio.new_event_loop()
asyncio.set_event_loop(loop)
self._memory_lock_instance = asyncio.Lock()
Author
Member

The fact that you're creating a memory lock means to me that this code is meant to be multithreaded. If I'm wrong -- if you're getting a memory lock for another reason -- then ignore this problem.

This code appears to be a check then act race condition.

If two threads tried to get the memory lock at the same time, and if the two threads both saw that self._memory_lock_instance is None, then two asyncio.Lock() would be created.

The fact that you're creating a memory lock means to me that this code is meant to be multithreaded. If I'm wrong -- if you're getting a memory lock for another reason -- then ignore this problem. This code appears to be a [check then act](https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/java/race-conditions/) race condition. If two threads tried to get the memory lock at the same time, and if the two threads both saw that `self._memory_lock_instance is None`, then two `asyncio.Lock()` would be created.
@ -338,3 +348,3 @@
# Give streams time to process
await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
await asyncio.sleep(2.0)
Author
Member

FYI -- I still get nervous whenever I see sleep with a specific length of time to "give time to process". What happens when that's not enough time?

FYI -- I still get nervous whenever I see sleep with a specific length of time to "give time to process". What happens when that's not enough time?
@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
#!/bin/bash
Author
Member

First and foremost, feel free to use any (reasonable) language. This is not a mandate.

In my experience, Python is better for writing tests than Bash. It's easier to understand and expand.

First and foremost, feel free to use any (reasonable) language. This is not a mandate. In my experience, Python is better for writing tests than Bash. It's easier to understand and expand.
Author
Member

A second item -- these tests should be included in the instructions of how to test CleverAgents.

A second item -- these tests should be included in the instructions of how to test CleverAgents.
@ -0,0 +30,4 @@
# Run the legal contract analyzer
python -m cleveragents run \
-c examples/legal_contract_metadata_extractor.yaml \
-p "sample_contract.txt" \
Author
Member

Where is sample_contract.txt?

Where is `sample_contract.txt`?
@ -0,0 +53,4 @@
if grep -q "FILE_LOADER AGENT" /tmp/contract_test_output.log; then
echo "✅ FILE_LOADER agent simulation found"
else
echo "❌ FILE_LOADER agent simulation not found"
Author
Member

Failing this should cause the test to fail.

Failing this should cause the test to fail.
@ -0,0 +59,4 @@
if grep -q "TEXT_PREPROCESSOR AGENT\|CONTRACT_ANALYZER AGENT\|RISK_ASSESSOR AGENT\|JSON_FORMATTER AGENT" /tmp/contract_test_output.log; then
echo "✅ Analysis agent simulation found"
else
echo "❌ Analysis agent simulation not found (may continue in next interaction)"
Author
Member

Failing this should cause the test to fail.

Failing this should cause the test to fail.
@ -0,0 +70,4 @@
if grep -q "TOOL_EXECUTE:file_read" /tmp/contract_test_output.log; then
echo "✅ File reading tool execution command found"
else
echo "⚠️ File reading tool execution command not found"
Author
Member

Failing this should cause the overall test to fail. (Et cetera for five more locations below.)

Failing this should cause the overall test to fail. (Et cetera for five more locations below.)
@ -0,0 +164,4 @@
# Clean up
rm -f /tmp/contract_test_output.log
Author
Member

When I run this test locally, individual tests fail (though the general test passes.)

Here's part of the output:

=== TEST 2: Agent Simulation Verification ===
Checking if orchestrator simulates specialist agents...
✅ FILE_LOADER agent simulation found
❌ Analysis agent simulation not found (may continue in next interaction)

=== TEST 3: Tool Execution Verification ===
Checking if file reading tool executed properly...
⚠️  File reading tool execution command not found

=== TEST 4: Contract Loading Validation ===
Checking if contract was loaded...
❌ Contract content not found in output

=== TEST 5: Metadata Extraction Validation ===
Checking if contract metadata was extracted...
❌ Party extraction not working
❌ Party extraction not working
⚠️  Financial terms extraction may need additional processing
When I run this test locally, individual tests fail (though the general test passes.) Here's part of the output: ``` === TEST 2: Agent Simulation Verification === Checking if orchestrator simulates specialist agents... ✅ FILE_LOADER agent simulation found ❌ Analysis agent simulation not found (may continue in next interaction) === TEST 3: Tool Execution Verification === Checking if file reading tool executed properly... ⚠️ File reading tool execution command not found === TEST 4: Contract Loading Validation === Checking if contract was loaded... ❌ Contract content not found in output === TEST 5: Metadata Extraction Validation === Checking if contract metadata was extracted... ❌ Party extraction not working ❌ Party extraction not working ⚠️ Financial terms extraction may need additional processing ```
@ -0,0 +24,4 @@
echo "Starting test..."
echo ""
cat << 'EOF' | timeout 120 python -m cleveragents interactive -c examples/multi_agent_paper_writer.yaml --unsafe 2>&1 | grep -v "^\[" | head -100
Author
Member

With the setup given, my version of timeout isn't working.

You should probably say that any output means that something is probably wrong.

With the setup given, my version of `timeout` isn't working. You should probably say that any output means that something is probably wrong.
@ -0,0 +34,4 @@
echo ""
echo "=========================================="
echo "Test Complete!"
Author
Member

Other than timing out, can this test ever fail?

Other than timing out, can this test ever fail?
Author
Member

Here is my output of this test. It doesn't look like a successful test to me. What do you think?

❯ sh tests/scripts/test_multi_agent_interactive.sh 
==========================================
Multi-Agent Paper Writer Test
==========================================

This will simulate a conversation with multiple agents:
  1. RESEARCHER gathers requirements
  2. WRITER creates the paper
  3. Natural handoffs between agents

Starting test...


Reactive CleverAgents Interactive Session
Type 'exit' to quit, 'help' for commands

>>> [httpx] HTTP Request: POST https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions "HTTP/1.1 200 OK"

=== RESEARCHER AGENT ===>
Hello! How can I assist you today? Are you looking to start a research paper? If so, could you please provide me some information about the topic you're interested in?

>>> [openai._base_client] Retrying request to /chat/completions in 0.488640 seconds

=== RESEARCHER AGENT ===>
That's an interesting topic! To help you tailor the paper, I have a few questions:

1. What is the specific aspect of quantum entanglement you want to focus on? 
2. Who is your target audience? (e.g., students, physicists, general public)
3. Are there any specific resources or references you'd like to include?
4. What is the expected length of the paper?
5. Do you have any deadline for this task? 

These details will help us create a comprehensive paper.

>>> [openai._base_client] Retrying request to /chat/completions in 0.449424 seconds

=== RESEARCHER AGENT ===>
Great! Writing for a specialized audience like quantum physics researchers will allow us to delve deep into the topic. 

Could you now answer the remaining questions:
1. What is the specific aspect of quantum entanglement you want to focus on in your paper? 
2. Are there any specific resources or references you'd like to include?
3. What is the expected length of the paper?
4. Do you have any deadline for this task? 

Having this information will help us structure the paper appropriately.

>>> [openai._base_client] Retrying request to /chat/completions in 0.415122 seconds

=== WRITER AGENT ===>
I apologize but I still need some more information to begin writing. Could you please provide:

1. The specific aspect of quantum entanglement you want to focus on.
2. Any specific resources or references to include.
3. The expected length of the paper.
4. The deadline for this task. 

These details will help me create a well-structured and effective paper.

>>> 
Goodbye!

==========================================
Test Complete!
==========================================
Here is my output of this test. It doesn't look like a successful test to me. What do you think? ``` ❯ sh tests/scripts/test_multi_agent_interactive.sh ========================================== Multi-Agent Paper Writer Test ========================================== This will simulate a conversation with multiple agents: 1. RESEARCHER gathers requirements 2. WRITER creates the paper 3. Natural handoffs between agents Starting test... Reactive CleverAgents Interactive Session Type 'exit' to quit, 'help' for commands >>> [httpx] HTTP Request: POST https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions "HTTP/1.1 200 OK" === RESEARCHER AGENT ===> Hello! How can I assist you today? Are you looking to start a research paper? If so, could you please provide me some information about the topic you're interested in? >>> [openai._base_client] Retrying request to /chat/completions in 0.488640 seconds === RESEARCHER AGENT ===> That's an interesting topic! To help you tailor the paper, I have a few questions: 1. What is the specific aspect of quantum entanglement you want to focus on? 2. Who is your target audience? (e.g., students, physicists, general public) 3. Are there any specific resources or references you'd like to include? 4. What is the expected length of the paper? 5. Do you have any deadline for this task? These details will help us create a comprehensive paper. >>> [openai._base_client] Retrying request to /chat/completions in 0.449424 seconds === RESEARCHER AGENT ===> Great! Writing for a specialized audience like quantum physics researchers will allow us to delve deep into the topic. Could you now answer the remaining questions: 1. What is the specific aspect of quantum entanglement you want to focus on in your paper? 2. Are there any specific resources or references you'd like to include? 3. What is the expected length of the paper? 4. Do you have any deadline for this task? Having this information will help us structure the paper appropriately. >>> [openai._base_client] Retrying request to /chat/completions in 0.415122 seconds === WRITER AGENT ===> I apologize but I still need some more information to begin writing. Could you please provide: 1. The specific aspect of quantum entanglement you want to focus on. 2. Any specific resources or references to include. 3. The expected length of the paper. 4. The deadline for this task. These details will help me create a well-structured and effective paper. >>> Goodbye! ========================================== Test Complete! ========================================== ```
@ -0,0 +16,4 @@
echo ""
timeout 120 python -m cleveragents run \
-c examples/scientific_paper_writer_single_turn.yaml \
Author
Member

This filename does not exist.

This filename does not exist.
@ -0,0 +20,4 @@
"""Test suite for tool command processing with nested JSON."""
def test_simple_file_read_command(self):
"""Test that simple file_read commands are detected correctly."""
Author
Member

When I run this test, I get the following warning:

tests/unit/core/test_tool_command_processing.py::TestToolCommandProcessing::test_simple_file_read_command
  /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core/src/cleveragents/core/application.py:92: DeprecationWarning: There is no current event loop
    self.loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()

-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
When I run this test, I get the following warning: ``` tests/unit/core/test_tool_command_processing.py::TestToolCommandProcessing::test_simple_file_read_command /home/brent.edwards/Workspace/cleveragents-core/src/cleveragents/core/application.py:92: DeprecationWarning: There is no current event loop self.loop = asyncio.get_event_loop() -- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html ```
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +274,4 @@
```bash
# Run all tests
python -m behave tests/features
Author
Member

Could you include here how to run all of the other tests?

Could you include here how to run all of the other tests?
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +1,384 @@
# Legal Contract Metadata Extractor - True Multi-Agent Analysis System
Author
Member

When I ran the program against the Business Services Agreement.docx that I listed, it gave the following response:

```json
{
  "document_info": {
    "analysis_date": "2022-10-15",
    "document_type": "service_agreement",
    "total_confidence": 0.91,
    "analysis_version": "1.0"
  },
  "parties": [],
  "dates": {},
  "financial_terms": {},
  "obligations": {},
  "legal_terms": {},
  "risk_assessment": {
    "high_risk_terms": [
      {
        "term": "Liability Limit",
        "description": "The liability limit of 12 months of payments may be insufficient for potential damages, especially in case of data breaches or significant service disruptions.",
        "confidence": 0.90
      },
      {
        "term": "99.9% uptime guarantee",
        "description": "While this is a standard clause, the contract does not specify any penalties or remedies if the provider fails to meet this guarantee.",
        "confidence": 0.85
      }
    ],
    "missing_standard_clauses": [
      {
        "clause": "Data protection and privacy clauses",
        "description": "Given the nature of services provided, the contract should include specific data protection and privacy clauses.",
        "confidence": 0.95
      },
      {
        "clause": "Force Majeure",
        "description": "The contract does not include a force majeure clause, which could leave the parties unprotected in the event of unforeseen circumstances.",
        "confidence": 0.90
      },
      {
        "clause": "Dispute Resolution",
        "description": "The contract lacks a dispute resolution clause, leaving the parties without a clear path to resolve potential disagreements.",
        "confidence": 0.85
      }
    ],
    "ambiguous_language": [
      {
        "term": "24/7 technical support",
        "description": "The contract does not specify what constitutes 'technical support'. This could lead to disagreements about the level of service expected.",
        "confidence": 0.80
      },
      {
        "term": "Network infrastructure management",
        "description": "The contract does not provide a clear definition or scope for 'network infrastructure management'.",
        "confidence": 0.75
      }
    ],
    "compliance_concerns": [
      {
        "concern": "Data Privacy",
        "description": "The contract does not mention compliance with data privacy regulations such as GDPR or CCPA. This could expose both parties to regulatory risks.",
        "confidence": 0.90
      },
      {
        "concern": "Confidentiality",
        "description": "While the contract requires confidentiality, it does not specify the procedures for handling confidential information.",
        "confidence": 0.85
      }
    ],
    "overall_assessment": {
      "risk_score": 0.75,
      "risk_level": "High",
      "recommendation": "Revise the contract to include missing clauses, clarify ambiguous terms, and address compliance concerns."
    }
  },
  "extraction_summary": {}
}

There are several important things wrong:

  1. The analysis date should be today, not three years ago.
  2. parties, dates, financial terms, obligations, and legal terms are not mentioned.
  3. There is no liability limit in the contract.
  4. There is no 99.9% uptime guarantee.
  5. "network infrastructure management" is probably not appropriate.
  6. The contract never mentions confidentiality.
  7. There is no extraction summary.

If I recall correctly, it looks like the same analysis that was given for a different contract.

When I ran the program against the `Business Services Agreement.docx` that I listed, it gave the following response: ``` ```json { "document_info": { "analysis_date": "2022-10-15", "document_type": "service_agreement", "total_confidence": 0.91, "analysis_version": "1.0" }, "parties": [], "dates": {}, "financial_terms": {}, "obligations": {}, "legal_terms": {}, "risk_assessment": { "high_risk_terms": [ { "term": "Liability Limit", "description": "The liability limit of 12 months of payments may be insufficient for potential damages, especially in case of data breaches or significant service disruptions.", "confidence": 0.90 }, { "term": "99.9% uptime guarantee", "description": "While this is a standard clause, the contract does not specify any penalties or remedies if the provider fails to meet this guarantee.", "confidence": 0.85 } ], "missing_standard_clauses": [ { "clause": "Data protection and privacy clauses", "description": "Given the nature of services provided, the contract should include specific data protection and privacy clauses.", "confidence": 0.95 }, { "clause": "Force Majeure", "description": "The contract does not include a force majeure clause, which could leave the parties unprotected in the event of unforeseen circumstances.", "confidence": 0.90 }, { "clause": "Dispute Resolution", "description": "The contract lacks a dispute resolution clause, leaving the parties without a clear path to resolve potential disagreements.", "confidence": 0.85 } ], "ambiguous_language": [ { "term": "24/7 technical support", "description": "The contract does not specify what constitutes 'technical support'. This could lead to disagreements about the level of service expected.", "confidence": 0.80 }, { "term": "Network infrastructure management", "description": "The contract does not provide a clear definition or scope for 'network infrastructure management'.", "confidence": 0.75 } ], "compliance_concerns": [ { "concern": "Data Privacy", "description": "The contract does not mention compliance with data privacy regulations such as GDPR or CCPA. This could expose both parties to regulatory risks.", "confidence": 0.90 }, { "concern": "Confidentiality", "description": "While the contract requires confidentiality, it does not specify the procedures for handling confidential information.", "confidence": 0.85 } ], "overall_assessment": { "risk_score": 0.75, "risk_level": "High", "recommendation": "Revise the contract to include missing clauses, clarify ambiguous terms, and address compliance concerns." } }, "extraction_summary": {} } ``` There are several important things wrong: 1. The analysis date should be today, not three years ago. 2. parties, dates, financial terms, obligations, and legal terms are not mentioned. 3. There is no liability limit in the contract. 4. There is no 99.9% uptime guarantee. 5. "network infrastructure management" is probably not appropriate. 6. The contract never mentions confidentiality. 7. There is no extraction summary. If I recall correctly, it looks like the same analysis that was given for a different contract.
@ -0,0 +1,495 @@
# Legal Contract Metadata Extractor - LangGraph with Conditional Routing
Author
Member

Even when I start with /graph contract_analysis_workflow, I still need to regularly prompt to get the machine to move forward.

But here was its final result:

{
  "document_info": {
    "file_path": "/home/brent.edwards/Documents/BusinessServicesAgreement.txt",
    "file_size": 5560,
    "num_lines": 89
  },
  "parties": [
    {
      "name": "University of North East South West Dakota at Springfield",
      "departments": ["College of Computer Science", "Department"]
    },
    {
      "name": "CleverThis",
      "address": "1234 Main Street, Hoboken, NJ 08512",
      "tax_id": "800-555-222"
    }
  ],
  "dates": {
    "effective_date": "2025-10-21",
    "termination_date": "2027-01-01"
  },
  "financial_terms": {
    "total_compensation": "$1,000,000 USD",
    "expense_cap": "$100,000 USD",
    "contract_amount": "$1,100,000 USD"
  },
  "obligations": {
    "contractor_services": "Services as per Exhibit A",
    "compensation": "University to compensate Contractor as per Exhibit B",
    "payment_processing": "University to process payment within 30 days of invoice approval",
    "renewal_option": "University to have option to renew the Agreement for ten additional one-year terms"
  },
  "legal_terms": {
    "governing_law": "The University of North East South West University Service Agreement Terms and Conditions"
  },
  "extraction_summary": {
    "parties": ["University of North East South West Dakota at Springfield", "CleverThis"],
    "dates": ["2025-10-21", "2027-01-01"],
    "financial_terms": ["$1,000,000 USD", "$100,000 USD", "$1,100,000 USD"],
    "key_terms": ["Exhibit A: Statement of Work", "Exhibit B: Payment for Services", "Travel Expenses: Reimbursed without mark-up for reasonable expenses", "Invoicing: Upon completion of a deliverable and acceptance by University"]
  }
}
Even when I start with `/graph contract_analysis_workflow`, I still need to regularly prompt to get the machine to move forward. But here was its final result: ``` { "document_info": { "file_path": "/home/brent.edwards/Documents/BusinessServicesAgreement.txt", "file_size": 5560, "num_lines": 89 }, "parties": [ { "name": "University of North East South West Dakota at Springfield", "departments": ["College of Computer Science", "Department"] }, { "name": "CleverThis", "address": "1234 Main Street, Hoboken, NJ 08512", "tax_id": "800-555-222" } ], "dates": { "effective_date": "2025-10-21", "termination_date": "2027-01-01" }, "financial_terms": { "total_compensation": "$1,000,000 USD", "expense_cap": "$100,000 USD", "contract_amount": "$1,100,000 USD" }, "obligations": { "contractor_services": "Services as per Exhibit A", "compensation": "University to compensate Contractor as per Exhibit B", "payment_processing": "University to process payment within 30 days of invoice approval", "renewal_option": "University to have option to renew the Agreement for ten additional one-year terms" }, "legal_terms": { "governing_law": "The University of North East South West University Service Agreement Terms and Conditions" }, "extraction_summary": { "parties": ["University of North East South West Dakota at Springfield", "CleverThis"], "dates": ["2025-10-21", "2027-01-01"], "financial_terms": ["$1,000,000 USD", "$100,000 USD", "$1,100,000 USD"], "key_terms": ["Exhibit A: Statement of Work", "Exhibit B: Payment for Services", "Travel Expenses: Reimbursed without mark-up for reasonable expenses", "Invoicing: Upon completion of a deliverable and acceptance by University"] } } ```
Member

@brent.edwards
This is EXPECTED BEHAVIOR for the LangGraph version with loop-back edges.

The workflow is designed for interactive review:

  • Each stage completes and loops back to coordinator
  • User reviews the output
  • User prompts to continue to next stage
  • Provides quality control and user oversight

This is IDEAL for professional legal analysis where lawyers want to:

  • Review each stage before proceeding
  • Provide corrections or feedback
  • Control workflow pace
  • Ensure accuracy at each step

For AUTOMATIC execution without manual prompts, use the stream-based version
which processes through all stages in one execution.

The final JSON output shows the system works correctly - all data was
accurately extracted from the contract.

@brent.edwards This is EXPECTED BEHAVIOR for the LangGraph version with loop-back edges. The workflow is designed for interactive review: - Each stage completes and loops back to coordinator - User reviews the output - User prompts to continue to next stage - Provides quality control and user oversight This is IDEAL for professional legal analysis where lawyers want to: - Review each stage before proceeding - Provide corrections or feedback - Control workflow pace - Ensure accuracy at each step For AUTOMATIC execution without manual prompts, use the stream-based version which processes through all stages in one execution. The final JSON output shows the system works correctly - all data was accurately extracted from the contract.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -155,1 +158,4 @@
elif self.config.get("memory_enabled", False):
# Fall back to agent's own memory if no context history
history = await self.get_memory("conversation_history", [])
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/llm.py:161:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/llm.py:161:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
brent.edwards left a comment
Author
Member

I haven't gone through the tests.

I haven't gone through the tests.
@ -288,2 +295,3 @@
with open(filepath, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
return f.read()
content = f.read()
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:297:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:297:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -290,0 +300,4 @@
# but we add a prefix for clean terminal display
line_count = content.count('\n') + 1
char_count = len(content)
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:303:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:303:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -290,0 +303,4 @@
# Format: Special marker + metadata + full content
# The special marker helps identify this for clean display
return f"[FILE_READ_SUCCESS]📄 File: {filepath} | Lines: {line_count} | Size: {char_count} chars\n[FILE_CONTENT_START]\n{content}\n[FILE_CONTENT_END]"
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:306:0: C0301: Line too long (161/100) (line-too-long)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:306:0: C0301: Line too long (161/100) (line-too-long)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -294,3 +311,3 @@
self, args: Dict[str, Any], context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]
) -> str:
"""File writing tool."""
"""File writing tool with support for write, append, and insert modes."""
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:310:4: R0912: Too many branches (15/12) (too-many-branches)
src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:310:4: R0915: Too many statements (51/50) (too-many-statements)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:310:4: R0912: Too many branches (15/12) (too-many-branches) src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:310:4: R0915: Too many statements (51/50) (too-many-statements)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -297,2 +313,4 @@
"""File writing tool with support for write, append, and insert modes."""
filepath = args.get("file", "")
content = args.get("content", "")
mode = args.get("mode", "w") # "w" (write/overwrite), "a" (append), "insert" (insert at position)
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:316:0: C0301: Line too long (106/100) (line-too-long)

If you're using mode as a set of possible values, I recommend using an Enum instead of a string. An Enum automatically makes sure that the program is one of the correct values. For example, it makes sure that the caller didn't use i instead of insert.

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:316:0: C0301: Line too long (106/100) (line-too-long) If you're using `mode` as a set of possible values, I recommend using an [`Enum`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/enum.html) instead of a string. An `Enum` automatically makes sure that the program is one of the correct values. For example, it makes sure that the caller didn't use `i` instead of `insert`.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -312,3 +336,1 @@
if filepath.startswith("/") and not (
context and context.get("_unsafe_mode", False)
):
if filepath.startswith("/") and not unsafe_mode:
Author
Member

This condition can never happen. From line 326-327, we know that unsafe_mode is true. So the condition always becomes

if filepath.startswith("/") and false:

This line probably should just be

if filepath.startswith("/")
This condition can never happen. From line 326-327, we know that `unsafe_mode` is true. So the condition always becomes ``` if filepath.startswith("/") and false: ``` This line probably should just be ``` if filepath.startswith("/") ```
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -314,2 +336,3 @@
):
if filepath.startswith("/") and not unsafe_mode:
logger.error("Absolute path blocked for %s", filepath)
raise ExecutionError("Unsafe file path blocked in safe mode")
Author
Member

There is one other thing that is usually restricted from file paths:

What is your opinion of soft links? Should they be allowed?

There is one other thing that is usually restricted from file paths: What is your opinion of soft links? Should they be allowed?
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +343,4 @@
with open(filepath, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
f.write(content)
return f"Successfully wrote {len(content)} characters to {filepath}"
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:346:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:346:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +344,4 @@
f.write(content)
return f"Successfully wrote {len(content)} characters to {filepath}"
elif mode == "a":
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:341:12: R1705: Unnecessary "elif" after "return", remove the leading "el" from "elif" (no-else-return)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:341:12: R1705: Unnecessary "elif" after "return", remove the leading "el" from "elif" (no-else-return)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +349,4 @@
with open(filepath, "a", encoding="utf-8") as f:
f.write(content)
return f"Successfully appended {len(content)} characters to {filepath}"
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:352:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:352:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +352,4 @@
elif mode == "insert":
# Insert mode - read existing content, insert at position, write back
try:
Author
Member

It would make sense to separate the "add lines to a file" to its own method, to make testing easier. (Not mandatory.)

It would make sense to separate the "add lines to a file" to its own method, to make testing easier. (Not mandatory.)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +354,4 @@
# Insert mode - read existing content, insert at position, write back
try:
with open(filepath, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
existing_lines = f.readlines()
Author
Member

Is it ever possible that this file will be too large to fit in memory?

Is it ever possible that this file will be too large to fit in memory?
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +358,4 @@
except FileNotFoundError:
# If file doesn't exist, create it with the content
existing_lines = []
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:361:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:361:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +360,4 @@
existing_lines = []
# Determine insertion position
if position is None or position == "end":
Author
Member

That position could be:

  • an int
  • a string
  • None

makes me a tiny bit nervous. I come from a strongly-typed background, and I still prefer when it's impossible to give a variable an impossible value, so that it's harder to get things wrong.

I'm not going to push this problem.

That `position` could be: - an int - a string - None makes me a tiny bit nervous. I come from a strongly-typed background, and I still prefer when it's impossible to give a variable an impossible value, so that it's harder to get things wrong. I'm not going to push this problem.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +362,4 @@
# Determine insertion position
if position is None or position == "end":
# Append at end
existing_lines.append(content if content.endswith('\n') else content + '\n')
Author
Member

On lines 365, 369, and 374, the code always adds an \n to the end of content if it doesn't already exist. It would be better to just do that once.

On lines 365, 369, and 374, the code always adds an `\n` to the end of content if it doesn't already exist. It would be better to just do that once.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +371,4 @@
elif isinstance(position, int):
# Insert at specific line number (1-indexed)
line_idx = max(0, min(position - 1, len(existing_lines)))
existing_lines.insert(line_idx, content if content.endswith('\n') else content + '\n')
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:361:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:361:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +374,4 @@
existing_lines.insert(line_idx, content if content.endswith('\n') else content + '\n')
insert_location = line_idx + 1
else:
raise ExecutionError(f"Invalid position '{position}'. Use 'start', 'end', or line number.")
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:377:0: C0301: Line too long (111/100) (line-too-long)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:377:0: C0301: Line too long (111/100) (line-too-long)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +375,4 @@
insert_location = line_idx + 1
else:
raise ExecutionError(f"Invalid position '{position}'. Use 'start', 'end', or line number.")
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:378:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:378:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +379,4 @@
# Write back
with open(filepath, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
f.writelines(existing_lines)
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:382:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:382:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +380,4 @@
with open(filepath, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
f.writelines(existing_lines)
return f"Successfully inserted {len(content)} characters at line {insert_location} in {filepath}"
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:383:8: W0621: Redefining name 're' from outer scope (line 11) (redefined-outer-name)
src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:383:8: W0404: Reimport 're' (imported line 11) (reimported)
src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:383:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (re) (import-outside-toplevel)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:383:8: W0621: Redefining name 're' from outer scope (line 11) (redefined-outer-name) src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:383:8: W0404: Reimport 're' (imported line 11) (reimported) src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:383:8: C0415: Import outside toplevel (re) (import-outside-toplevel)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +381,4 @@
f.writelines(existing_lines)
return f"Successfully inserted {len(content)} characters at line {insert_location} in {filepath}"
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:384:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:384:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +383,4 @@
return f"Successfully inserted {len(content)} characters at line {insert_location} in {filepath}"
else:
raise ExecutionError(f"Invalid mode '{mode}'. Use 'w' (write), 'a' (append), or 'insert'.")
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:386:0: C0301: Line too long (107/100) (line-too-long)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:386:0: C0301: Line too long (107/100) (line-too-long)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +384,4 @@
else:
raise ExecutionError(f"Invalid mode '{mode}'. Use 'w' (write), 'a' (append), or 'insert'.")
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:387:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:387:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -670,0 +714,4 @@
# Pattern to match any content between quotes, including newlines
pattern = r'"([^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*|[^"]*(?:\n[^"]*)*)"'
sanitized = re.sub(pattern, escape_string_content, json_str, flags=re.DOTALL)
Author
Member

In lines 678-682, you checked that json_str was a good JSON file.

Could you do two things:

  1. Turn that into a function (local to _sanitize_json_string is fine.)
  2. Call the check at the end.
  3. If the final string is not good JSON, post a warning message.

This will guarantee that it outputs good JSON, in case you missed any necessary transformations.

In lines 678-682, you checked that `json_str` was a good JSON file. Could you do two things: 1. Turn that into a function (local to `_sanitize_json_string` is fine.) 2. Call the check at the end. 3. If the final string is not good JSON, post a warning message. This will guarantee that it outputs good JSON, in case you missed any necessary transformations.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -670,0 +732,4 @@
try:
# Find the appropriate agent that can execute this tool
target_agent = None
for _, agent in self.agents.items():
Author
Member

I think this line would be a touch clearer as

for agent in self.agents.values():
I think this line would be a touch clearer as ``` for agent in self.agents.values(): ```
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -730,8 +869,16 @@ class ReactiveCleverAgentsApp:
# Execute graph
try:
print(f"Executing graph '{graph_name}'...")
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:872:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:872:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -732,1 +871,4 @@
print(f"Executing graph '{graph_name}'...")
# Prepare metadata with unsafe mode and context
metadata: Dict[str, Any] = {"context": self.config.global_context}
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:874: error: Item "None" of "ReactiveConfig | None" has no attribute "global_context" [union-attr]

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:874: error: Item "None" of "ReactiveConfig | None" has no attribute "global_context" [union-attr]
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -733,0 +873,4 @@
# Prepare metadata with unsafe mode and context
metadata: Dict[str, Any] = {"context": self.config.global_context}
metadata["_unsafe_mode"] = self.unsafe
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:876:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:876:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -393,12 +381,20 @@ class LangGraph:
{"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": input_data}]},
mode=StateUpdateMode.APPEND,
)
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/langgraph/graph.py:384:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/langgraph/graph.py:384:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
Member

@brent.edwards it has been fixed

@brent.edwards it has been fixed
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -151,1 +150,3 @@
agent_input = last_message.get("content", "")
# Check if this is a tool agent that should receive the last message
# (regardless of role) to process commands from other agents
from cleveragents.agents.tool import ToolAgent
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/langgraph/nodes.py:152:12: C0415: Import outside toplevel (cleveragents.agents.tool.ToolAgent) (import-outside-toplevel)

src/cleveragents/langgraph/nodes.py:152:12: C0415: Import outside toplevel (cleveragents.agents.tool.ToolAgent) (import-outside-toplevel)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -152,0 +160,4 @@
if msg.get("role") == "user":
last_user_message = msg.get("content", "")
break
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/langgraph/nodes.py:163:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/langgraph/nodes.py:163:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -156,0 +171,4 @@
"conversation_history": state.messages,
"full_context": True
}
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/langgraph/nodes.py:174:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)

src/cleveragents/langgraph/nodes.py:174:0: C0303: Trailing whitespace (trailing-whitespace)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +272,4 @@
### Running Tests
```bash
# Run all tests
Author
Member

One very small change: Could you change this from # Run all tests to # Run all BDD tests or # Run all feature tests?

One very small change: Could you change this from `# Run all tests` to `# Run all BDD tests` or `# Run all feature tests`?
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +294,4 @@
tox -e py312-nocov
# Individual test scripts:
bash tests/scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh
Author
Member

This test fails with

❯ bash tests/scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh 
Testing single-turn paper writer...

Usage: python -m cleveragents run [OPTIONS]
Try 'python -m cleveragents run --help' for help.

Error: Invalid value for '--config' / '-c': File 'examples/scientific_paper_writer_single_turn.yaml' does not exist.
This test fails with ``` ❯ bash tests/scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh Testing single-turn paper writer... Usage: python -m cleveragents run [OPTIONS] Try 'python -m cleveragents run --help' for help. Error: Invalid value for '--config' / '-c': File 'examples/scientific_paper_writer_single_turn.yaml' does not exist. ```
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +295,4 @@
# Individual test scripts:
bash tests/scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh
bash tests/scripts/test_multi_agent_paper_writer_langgraph.sh
Author
Member

Passes!

Passes!
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +296,4 @@
# Individual test scripts:
bash tests/scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh
bash tests/scripts/test_multi_agent_paper_writer_langgraph.sh
bash tests/scripts/test_legal_contract_analyzer_langgraph.sh
Author
Member

(deleted; no longer true)

(deleted; no longer true)
Author
Member

bash tests/scripts/test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh fails because test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh no longer exists.

`bash tests/scripts/test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh` fails because `test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh` no longer exists.
Member

Updated the same.

All 3 Test Scripts PASSING:

  1. test_multi_agent_paper_writer_langgraph.sh
    Paper generated successfully
    File saved correctly
    Multi-agent workflow validated
    All 4 agents active

  2. test_legal_contract_analyzer_langgraph.sh
    Data extraction accurate
    Risk assessment completed
    JSON formatting working
    File saving successful

  3. test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh
    Section-by-section writing works
    File append operations successful
    Content preservation validated

Current scripts in tests/scripts/:

  • test_legal_contract_analyzer_langgraph.sh
  • test_multi_agent_paper_writer_langgraph.sh
  • test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh

README.md has been updated to remove reference to test_single_turn_writer.sh

Updated the same. All 3 Test Scripts PASSING: 1. test_multi_agent_paper_writer_langgraph.sh Paper generated successfully File saved correctly Multi-agent workflow validated All 4 agents active 2. test_legal_contract_analyzer_langgraph.sh Data extraction accurate Risk assessment completed JSON formatting working File saving successful 3. test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh Section-by-section writing works File append operations successful Content preservation validated Current scripts in tests/scripts/: - test_legal_contract_analyzer_langgraph.sh - test_multi_agent_paper_writer_langgraph.sh - test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh README.md has been updated to remove reference to test_single_turn_writer.sh
Author
Member

Yup! They pass!

Yup! They pass!
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +297,4 @@
bash tests/scripts/test_single_turn_writer.sh
bash tests/scripts/test_multi_agent_paper_writer_langgraph.sh
bash tests/scripts/test_legal_contract_analyzer_langgraph.sh
bash tests/scripts/test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh
Author
Member

When I ran this test, every section had an extra [SECTION_COMPLETE] at the bottom. Here are some portions of the paper illustrating it:

...
finally proposes recommendations for establishing a robust ethical framework for AI, incorporating stakeholder engagement, human rights protections, and regulatory oversight.

[SECTION_COMPLETE]
## Introduction
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly transformed various sectors, from healthcare to finance, education to transportation, yielding unprecedented efficiencies and possibilities. However, as AI technologies advance, so too do the ethical dilemmas
...
propose recommendations for a comprehensive ethical framework for AI. Our goal is not to hinder AI development but to ensure it aligns with human values and societal norms while offering its many benefits.

[SECTION_COMPLETE]
## Methodology
The study of AI ethics in this paper is primarily conducted through a comprehensive literature review and critical analysis.
When I ran this test, every section had an extra `[SECTION_COMPLETE]` at the bottom. Here are some portions of the paper illustrating it: ``` ... finally proposes recommendations for establishing a robust ethical framework for AI, incorporating stakeholder engagement, human rights protections, and regulatory oversight. [SECTION_COMPLETE] ## Introduction Artificial Intelligence (AI) has rapidly transformed various sectors, from healthcare to finance, education to transportation, yielding unprecedented efficiencies and possibilities. However, as AI technologies advance, so too do the ethical dilemmas ... propose recommendations for a comprehensive ethical framework for AI. Our goal is not to hinder AI development but to ensure it aligns with human values and societal norms while offering its many benefits. [SECTION_COMPLETE] ## Methodology The study of AI ethics in this paper is primarily conducted through a comprehensive literature review and critical analysis. ```
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
README.md Outdated
@ -0,0 +299,4 @@
bash tests/scripts/test_legal_contract_analyzer_langgraph.sh
bash tests/scripts/test_paper_writer_section_by_section.sh
bash tests/scripts/test_multi_agent_interactive.sh
bash tests/scripts/test_legal_contract_analyzer.sh
Author
Member

Although this reported that the test ran successfully, the summary shows other problems:

Analysis complete. To save results, ask user for filename.

✅ TEST 1 PASSED: System executed successfully

=== TEST 2: Agent Simulation Verification ===
Checking if orchestrator simulates specialist agents...
❌ FILE_LOADER agent simulation not found
❌ Analysis agent simulation not found (may continue in next interaction)

=== TEST 3: Tool Execution Verification ===
Checking if file reading tool executed properly...
⚠  File reading tool execution command not found

=== TEST 4: Contract Loading Validation ===
Checking if contract was loaded...
❌ Contract content not found in output

=== TEST 5: Metadata Extraction Validation ===
Checking if contract metadata was extracted...
❌ Party extraction not working
❌ Party extraction not working
⚠  Financial terms extraction may need additional processing

=== TEST 6: Performance Check ===
Checking if processing completed within reasonable time...
✅ Processing completed successfully

==========================================
Test Summary:
==========================================
Agent simulations found: 0

That kind of difference between obvious problems and the summary that everything worked will make users VERY nervous.

Although this reported that the test ran successfully, the summary shows other problems: ``` Analysis complete. To save results, ask user for filename. ✅ TEST 1 PASSED: System executed successfully === TEST 2: Agent Simulation Verification === Checking if orchestrator simulates specialist agents... ❌ FILE_LOADER agent simulation not found ❌ Analysis agent simulation not found (may continue in next interaction) === TEST 3: Tool Execution Verification === Checking if file reading tool executed properly... ⚠ File reading tool execution command not found === TEST 4: Contract Loading Validation === Checking if contract was loaded... ❌ Contract content not found in output === TEST 5: Metadata Extraction Validation === Checking if contract metadata was extracted... ❌ Party extraction not working ❌ Party extraction not working ⚠ Financial terms extraction may need additional processing === TEST 6: Performance Check === Checking if processing completed within reasonable time... ✅ Processing completed successfully ========================================== Test Summary: ========================================== Agent simulations found: 0 ``` That kind of difference between obvious problems and the summary that everything worked will make users VERY nervous.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -297,2 +315,4 @@
"""File writing tool with support for write, append, and insert modes."""
filepath = args.get("file", "")
content = args.get("content", "")
mode = args.get("mode", "w") # "w" (write/overwrite), "a" (append), "insert" (insert at position)
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:318:0: C0301: Line too long (106/100) (line-too-long)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:318:0: C0301: Line too long (106/100) (line-too-long)
Member

@brent.edwards FIXED in commit 3aa3d62

The line was shortened from 106 to 76 characters by simplifying the comment:

@brent.edwards FIXED in commit 3aa3d62 The line was shortened from 106 to 76 characters by simplifying the comment:
brent.edwards left a comment
Author
Member

A few more comments...

A few more comments...
@ -71,3 +72,2 @@
self.input_stream.pipe(
ops.map(self._process_wrapper),
ops.flat_map(lambda future: rx.from_future(future)),
ops.map(self._process_wrapper), # type: ignore[arg-type]
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/base.py:73: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]

src/cleveragents/agents/base.py:73: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -72,2 +73,2 @@
ops.map(self._process_wrapper),
ops.flat_map(lambda future: rx.from_future(future)),
ops.map(self._process_wrapper), # type: ignore[arg-type]
ops.flat_map(rx.from_future), # type: ignore[arg-type]
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/base.py:74: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]

src/cleveragents/agents/base.py:74: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -285,3 +307,3 @@
)
return rx.create(subscribe) # type: ignore
return rx.create(subscribe) # type: ignore[no-untyped-call]
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/base.py:309: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]

src/cleveragents/agents/base.py:309: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -310,3 +332,3 @@
return await result_future
return ops.map(process_value)
return ops.map(process_value) # type: ignore[arg-type]
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/base.py:334: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]

src/cleveragents/agents/base.py:334: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore]
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -81,6 +83,58 @@ class ToolAgent(Agent):
else:
raise AgentCreationError(f"Invalid tool configuration: {tool}")
def _extract_json_from_message(self, message: str) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:86:4: R0911: Too many return statements (7/6) (too-many-return-statements)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:86:4: R0911: Too many return statements (7/6) (too-many-return-statements)
Member

@brent.edwards

This method has 7 return statements due to three distinct JSON extraction strategies,
each requiring success/failure returns:

  1. Direct JSON parsing (2 returns: success + type check)
  2. Markdown code block extraction (2 returns: success + type check)
  3. Regex pattern matching (2 returns: success + type check)
  4. Final fallback (1 return: None)

The pylint suppression is appropriate because:

  • The method does ONE clear thing: extract JSON from various formats
  • Each extraction strategy needs its own success/failure paths
  • Alternative approaches (nested functions or complex conditionals) would reduce readability
  • Current pattern seems appropriate for this
@brent.edwards This method has 7 return statements due to three distinct JSON extraction strategies, each requiring success/failure returns: 1. Direct JSON parsing (2 returns: success + type check) 2. Markdown code block extraction (2 returns: success + type check) 3. Regex pattern matching (2 returns: success + type check) 4. Final fallback (1 return: None) The pylint suppression is appropriate because: - The method does ONE clear thing: extract JSON from various formats - Each extraction strategy needs its own success/failure paths - Alternative approaches (nested functions or complex conditionals) would reduce readability - Current pattern seems appropriate for this
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -84,0 +118,4 @@
return None # Not a dict
except json.JSONDecodeError:
# Code block had invalid JSON, raise error
raise
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:119:12: W0706: The except handler raises immediately (try-except-raise)

(What this means: there is no need for the try...except statement. It acts exactly as if there were none.)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:119:12: W0706: The except handler raises immediately (try-except-raise) (What this means: there is no need for the `try`...`except` statement. It acts exactly as if there were none.)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -323,1 +346,4 @@
f.write(content)
return f"Successfully wrote {len(content)} characters to {filepath}"
elif mode == "a":
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:343:12: R1705: Unnecessary "elif" after "return", remove the leading "el" from "elif" (no-else-return)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:343:12: R1705: Unnecessary "elif" after "return", remove the leading "el" from "elif" (no-else-return)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -324,0 +393,4 @@
f"at line {insert_location} in {filepath}"
)
else:
raise ExecutionError(f"Invalid mode '{mode}'. Use 'w' (write), 'a' (append), or 'insert'.")
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:396:0: C0301: Line too long (107/100) (line-too-long)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:396:0: C0301: Line too long (107/100) (line-too-long)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -292,0 +464,4 @@
return prefix + cleaned_content
def _handle_insert_position(
self, filepath: str, cleaned_content: str, position: Union[None, int, Literal["start", "end"]]
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:467:0: C0301: Line too long (102/100) (line-too-long)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:467:0: C0301: Line too long (102/100) (line-too-long)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -321,0 +529,4 @@
f.write(cleaned_content)
return f"Successfully wrote {len(cleaned_content)} characters to {filepath}"
elif mode == "a":
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:526:12: R1705: Unnecessary "elif" after "return", remove the leading "el" from "elif" (no-else-return)

src/cleveragents/agents/tool.py:526:12: R1705: Unnecessary "elif" after "return", remove the leading "el" from "elif" (no-else-return)
Member

Agreed. The code now uses:

  • Line 481: if mode == "w": ...
  • Line 487: if mode == "a": ... (changed from elif)
  • Line 494: if mode == "insert": ... (changed from elif)

All elif statements after returns have been corrected to if statements.

Agreed. The code now uses: - Line 481: if mode == "w": ... - Line 487: if mode == "a": ... (changed from elif) - Line 494: if mode == "insert": ... (changed from elif) All elif statements after returns have been corrected to if statements.
@ -670,0 +705,4 @@
# ✅ NEW: Validate the sanitized result
if not is_valid_json(sanitized):
logger.warning(
Author
Member

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:708:12: E0602: Undefined variable 'logger' (undefined-variable)

(You need to construct the logger variable around line 46ish.)

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:708:12: E0602: Undefined variable 'logger' (undefined-variable) (You need to construct the `logger` variable around line 46ish.)
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -20,3 +22,1 @@
from rx import operators as ops
from rx.core import Observer
from rx.scheduler.eventloop import AsyncIOScheduler
from rx.core import Observer # type: ignore[attr-defined]
Author
Member

My mypy --strict reports:

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:22: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment  [unused-ignore]
My `mypy --strict` reports: ``` src/cleveragents/core/application.py:22: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore] ```
Member

Hi Brent,

Thank you for pointing that out. The issue related to the mypy errors has been resolved in another branch named mypy-pylint-fixed.

Hi Brent, Thank you for pointing that out. The issue related to the mypy errors has been resolved in another branch named mypy-pylint-fixed.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -21,2 +22,2 @@
from rx.core import Observer
from rx.scheduler.eventloop import AsyncIOScheduler
from rx.core import Observer # type: ignore[attr-defined]
from rx.scheduler.eventloop import AsyncIOScheduler # type: ignore[attr-defined]
Author
Member

My mypy --strict reports:

src/cleveragents/core/application.py:23: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment  [unused-ignore]
My `mypy --strict` reports: ``` src/cleveragents/core/application.py:23: error: Unused "type: ignore" comment [unused-ignore] ```
Member

Hi Brent,

Thank you for pointing that out. The issue related to the mypy errors has been resolved in another branch named mypy-pylint-fixed.

Hi Brent, Thank you for pointing that out. The issue related to the mypy errors has been resolved in another branch named mypy-pylint-fixed.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +40,4 @@
cd cleveragents-core
pip install -e .
```
Author
Member

You are now duplicating the installation instructions. These two sets of instructions are identical. Please remove one.

You are now duplicating the installation instructions. These two sets of instructions are identical. Please remove one.
brent.edwards marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +191,4 @@
# Google Gemini
export GOOGLE_API_KEY="your-google-key"
```
```
Author
Member

You still need to get rid of the doubled set of ``` here. I have examples below of the difference when you remove the second set of ```.

You still need to get rid of the doubled set of \`\`\` here. I have examples below of the difference when you remove the second set of ```.
@ -196,0 +207,4 @@
if self._memory_lock_instance is None:
try:
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
except RuntimeError:
Member

Your README claims compatibility with Python 3.9+, but getting a RuntimeError when no event loop exists is new behaviour in 3.14.

Your README claims compatibility with Python 3.9+, but getting a RuntimeError when no event loop exists is new behaviour in 3.14.
@ -84,0 +100,4 @@
message_stripped = message.strip()
# If message looks like JSON (starts with { and ends with }), it must be valid JSON
if message_stripped.startswith("{") and message_stripped.endswith("}"):
Member

The rules here for what you'll accept are inconsistent.

  • Suppose you are given {"number": 1} - this goes into the first case and it is valid JSON so you get the answer.
  • Suppose you are given {"number": 1}, {"letter": "a"} - this goes into the first case but is invalid JSON so you get None.
  • Suppose you are given {"number": 1}, {"letter": "a"}, "garbage" - this goes into the third case where you get the contents of the first dict (i.e. the same answer as in the first example).

Why not fall through the first case instead of returning None, so that the second example would match the third case and you'd get the same behaviour as in the third example?

The rules here for what you'll accept are inconsistent. - Suppose you are given `{"number": 1}` - this goes into the first case and it is valid JSON so you get the answer. - Suppose you are given `{"number": 1}, {"letter": "a"}` - this goes into the first case but is invalid JSON so you get None. - Suppose you are given `{"number": 1}, {"letter": "a"}, "garbage"` - this goes into the third case where you get the contents of the first dict (i.e. the same answer as in the first example). Why not fall through the first case instead of returning None, so that the second example would match the third case and you'd get the same behaviour as in the third example?
@ -292,0 +377,4 @@
self, filepath: str, unsafe_mode: bool
) -> None:
"""Validate file path for safety in safe mode."""
if not self.safe_mode:
Member

The interaction of the parameter unsafe_mode and the member variable self.safe_mode looks suspicious here.

If safe mode is off, then even if the caller tries to turn off unsafe mode, zero validation actually occurs.

If safe mode is on, then parent directories can't be referenced, but absolute filepaths can, unless the caller turns off unsafe mode as well.

Are you sure this is the desired behaviour?

The interaction of the parameter `unsafe_mode` and the member variable `self.safe_mode` looks suspicious here. If safe mode is off, then even if the caller tries to turn off unsafe mode, zero validation actually occurs. If safe mode is on, then parent directories can't be referenced, but absolute filepaths can, unless the caller turns off unsafe mode as well. Are you sure this is the desired behaviour?
@ -670,0 +724,4 @@
return f'"{content}"'
# Pattern to match any content between quotes, including newlines
pattern = r'"([^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*|[^"]*(?:\n[^"]*)*)"'
Member

Please double-check this regex - you're clearly doing something with the backslashes, but the explanatory comment doesn't describe what. To me, it looks like anything matched by the expression to the left of the pipe should also be matched by the expression to its right, so it'd be redundant. But I'm not very confident I've mentally parsed it correctly.

Please double-check this regex - you're clearly doing something with the backslashes, but the explanatory comment doesn't describe what. To me, it looks like anything matched by the expression to the left of the pipe should also be matched by the expression to its right, so it'd be redundant. But I'm not very confident I've mentally parsed it correctly.
@ -0,0 +154,4 @@
print("✅ TEST PASSED: Complex nested JSON from actual usage")
def test_old_pattern_would_fail(self):
"""Verify that the old regex pattern would fail with nested JSON."""
Member

What is the point of testing this? Writing tests against our code makes sense; writing tests against code that is no longer in the project? Not so much.

What is the point of testing this? Writing tests against our code makes sense; writing tests against code that is no longer in the project? Not so much.
This pull request can be merged automatically.
You are not authorized to merge this pull request.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin feat/multi-agent:feat/multi-agent
git switch feat/multi-agent

Merge

Merge the changes and update on Forgejo.

Warning: The "Autodetect manual merge" setting is not enabled for this repository, you will have to mark this pull request as manually merged afterwards.

git switch master
git merge --no-ff feat/multi-agent
git switch feat/multi-agent
git rebase master
git switch master
git merge --ff-only feat/multi-agent
git switch feat/multi-agent
git rebase master
git switch master
git merge --no-ff feat/multi-agent
git switch master
git merge --squash feat/multi-agent
git switch master
git merge --ff-only feat/multi-agent
git switch master
git merge feat/multi-agent
git push origin master
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#5
No description provided.