feat(changeset): persist changesets and diff artifacts #429
No Reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
#163 feat(changeset): persist changesets and diff artifacts
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#429
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "feature/m2-changeset-persistence"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
This PR implements persistent storage for ChangeSet entries and ToolInvocation records, replacing the in-memory stores used during plan execution with SQLite-backed repositories. Prior to this change, ChangeSet data (the record of every file mutation made during a plan's Execute phase) was held only in memory and lost on process restart. This made it impossible to review diffs, inspect artifacts, or audit tool invocations after the fact. With persistence in place,
plan diffandplan statuscan now retrieve changeset data across restarts, and cleanup logic ensures that orphaned artifacts are removed when a plan is cancelled or apply fails.This work is part of the M2 milestone (Actor Graphs + Tool Sources) and addresses the Stage D0 requirement for durable changeset storage with full tool invocation auditability.
Closes #163
Motivation
The Execute phase generates a
SpecChangeSetcontainingChangeEntryrecords (one per file mutation) andToolInvocationrecords (one per tool execution). Without persistence, this data was ephemeral. Three concrete problems drove this change:plan difforplan statusafter a process restart saw empty output because the in-memory changeset was gone.Changes
Database layer (
src/cleveragents/infrastructure/database/)models.py): AddedChangeSetEntryModel(tablechangeset_entries) andToolInvocationModel(tabletool_invocations) with indexed columns forchangeset_id,plan_id,path, andtool_nameto support efficient lookups during diff rendering and artifact display. Both models follow the existing declarative Base pattern established by ADR-007.changeset_repository.py, 455 lines): Three classes implementing the session-factory pattern:ChangeSetEntryRepository-- CRUD operations forChangeEntrypersistence. Methods:save_entry,get_entries_for_changeset,get_entries_for_plan,delete_for_changeset,delete_for_plan. Each method includes argument validation, retry decoration via@database_retry, and proper error wrapping intoDatabaseError.ToolInvocationRepository-- CRUD forToolInvocationrecords. Serialises complex fields (arguments, results, change IDs, resource refs, provider metadata) to JSON text columns. Methods:save_invocation,get_invocations_for_plan,delete_for_plan.SqliteChangeSetStore-- Implements theChangeSetStoreprotocol fromcleveragents.domain.models.core.change. Methods:start,record,get,get_for_plan,summarize,delete_for_plan. This is the entry point used by the service layer.Alembic migration (
alembic/versions/d0_001_changeset_artifacts.py)changeset_entriesandtool_invocationstables with the column definitions matching the ORM models. Adds indexes onchangeset_id,plan_id,path, andtool_name. Includes adowngrade()that drops both tables.Service layer (
src/cleveragents/application/services/plan_apply_service.py)cleanup_changeset()method toPlanApplyService. Delegates toChangeSetStore.delete_for_plan()to remove all persisted changeset entries and invocations for a given plan. Called on plan cancel and apply failure paths to reclaim storage. Validatesplan_idis non-empty and logs the number of records deleted.Documentation (
docs/reference/changeset.md)Tests
features/changeset_persistence.feature+features/steps/changeset_persistence_steps.py): 17 Behave scenarios coveringSqliteChangeSetStorestart/record/get round-trips,get_for_planretrieval, summarize counts,ChangeSetEntryRepositoryCRUD,ToolInvocationRepositoryCRUD, cleanup viaPlanApplyService, and argument validation (rejectingNonesession factories, empty plan IDs, and empty changeset IDs). Step definitions use in-memory SQLite for isolation.robot/changeset_persistence.robot): 5 test cases verifying CLI-level artifact output fields, help text, and exit codes for changeset-related commands.benchmarks/changeset_persistence_bench.py): Benchmarks for single-entry persistence, batch persistence (100 entries), retrieval by changeset ID, retrieval by plan ID, and store cleanup. Uses in-memory SQLite to measure persistence overhead without I/O variance.Changelog
## Unreleaseddescribing the new changeset persistence and diff artifact storage capability, with issue reference(#163).Dependencies
dcd026c312to9fe6425f07CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance Review for PR #429
Issues Fixed (pushed to branch)
CHANGELOG.md — Mixed concerns in version header (Atomic Commits violation)
The commit changed
## Unreleased→## v3.0.0, bundling a version release designation with the feature addition. Per CONTRIBUTING.md §Atomic Commits: "Never bundle cosmetic changes with functional changes in the same commit." The## Unreleasedheader has been restored. The version designation should be done in a separate, dedicated commit when v3.0.0 is actually released.CHANGELOG.md — Missing issue reference
The new changelog entry did not include an issue reference
(#163), which all other entries in the file consistently use. Added(#163)for consistency.Issue #163 — Ref field was empty
Per CONTRIBUTING.md §Creating Issues: "the Ref field must be set to the same branch named in the issue body's Metadata section." The Metadata section specifies
feature/m2-changeset-persistencebut the Ref field was blank. Updated the issue Ref field tofeature/m2-changeset-persistence.Issues Requiring Author Attention
Commit message footer format
The first commit uses
Closes #163as the footer reference. CONTRIBUTING.md §Commit Message Format specifies theISSUES CLOSED: #163format (see the examples in that section). WhileCloses #163is a valid Forgejo closing keyword, the project convention isISSUES CLOSED: #163. This cannot be fixed without rewriting history; please use the correct format in future commits.# type: ignore[misc]on new model classes (models.pylines 2474, 2508)CONTRIBUTING.md §Type Safety states: "never use inline comments or annotations to suppress individual type checking errors (e.g., no
type: ignore)." The two new model classes (ChangeSetEntryModel,ToolInvocationModel) both use# type: ignore[misc]. This follows the existing codebase pattern (20+ existing models use the same suppression due todeclarative_base()returningAny), so it is a pre-existing codebase-wide issue. However, new code should ideally not perpetuate violations. A separate task should be created to migrate theBasedefinition to SQLAlchemy 2.0'sDeclarativeBaseto eliminate all# type: ignore[misc]suppressions.Compliance Summary
Closes #163)Type/Featurelabelfeatures/robot/benchmarks/docs/State/In Reviewlabel4b6a6e4478to2d9d751d792d9d751d79toe3fcce413b