fix(resource-type): require letter-start for namespace/name in _NAMESPACED_RE #3290
Dismiss Review
Are you sure you want to dismiss this review?
Labels
Clear labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#3290
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "fix/resource-type-namespaced-re-digit-start"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
Fixes
_NAMESPACED_REinresource_type.pyand_resource_type_validation.pyto require both namespace and name components to start with a letter, consistent with the spec requirement and_BUILTIN_NAME_RE.Problem
The
_NAMESPACED_REpattern used[a-zA-Z0-9]as the first character class, allowing digit-starting names like123abc/my-typeandlocal/456-type. This was inconsistent with:_BUILTIN_NAME_REwhich correctly uses[a-zA-Z]_SERVER_NS_NAME_REinproject.pyChanges
src/cleveragents/domain/models/core/resource_type.py_NAMESPACED_REfrom^[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*/[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*$to^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*/[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*$src/cleveragents/domain/models/core/_resource_type_validation.py_NAMESPACED_REfrom^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+/[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$to^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*/[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*$features/resource_type_digit_start_validation.feature(new)123abc/my-type)local/456-type)1ns/2name)local/my-type,myorg/custom-db,my_org/my_type)inheritsfield valuesfeatures/steps/resource_type_digit_start_validation_steps.py(new)Verification
ResourceTypeSpec(name="123abc/my-type", ...)now raisesValidationError✓ResourceTypeSpec(name="local/456-type", ...)now raisesValidationError✓ResourceTypeSpec(name="local/my-type", ...)still succeeds ✓ResourceTypeSpec(name="myorg/custom-db", ...)still succeeds ✓nox -e lintpasses ✓nox -e typecheckpasses (0 errors, 0 warnings) ✓Closes #2983
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation | Agent: ca-issue-worker
Review Summary
Reviewed PR #3290 with focus on api-consistency, naming-conventions, and code-patterns.
This is a clean, well-scoped bug fix that corrects
_NAMESPACED_REregex patterns in two files to require letter-start for both namespace and name components, aligning with the spec requirement and the existing_BUILTIN_NAME_RE/_SERVER_NS_NAME_REpatterns.Verdict: This PR is ready for approval.
✅ Specification Compliance
[[server:]namespace/]nameand the glossary entry for "Namespace" confirms letter-start convention_SERVER_NS_NAME_REinproject.py(line 32-36) already uses[a-zA-Z]for first character — this PR brings_NAMESPACED_REinto alignment_BUILTIN_NAME_REalready uses[a-zA-Z]— consistency is now restored✅ API Consistency (Focus Area)
_NAMESPACED_REdefinitions (inresource_type.pyand_resource_type_validation.py) are now identical:^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*/[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*$_SERVER_NS_NAME_REinproject.pyand_BUILTIN_NAME_REin both filesvalidate_name()andvalidate_inherits()validators correctly use the updated pattern through the module-level_NAMESPACED_RE✅ Naming Conventions (Focus Area)
_NAMESPACED_RE,_BUILTIN_NAME_RE)resource_type_digit_start_validation.featurefollows project naming patternsresource_type_digit_start_validation_steps.pyfollows the<feature>_steps.pyconvention_make_custom_physical_spec()follows the_prefix convention for internal helpers✅ Code Patterns (Focus Area)
ValidationErrorintocontext.rt_errorgivenstep fromresource_type_model_coverage_steps.pythenstep for "invalid inherits type name" is correctly reused fromresource_type_model_coverage_steps.py(noted in the step file docstring)✅ CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance
fix(resource-type): require letter-start for namespace/name in _NAMESPACED_RE— correct Conventional Changelog format ✓ISSUES CLOSED: #2983✓Closes #2983, milestone v3.7.0 (matches issue),Type/Buglabel ✓# type: ignore, imports at top of file ✓✅ Test Quality
inheritsfield rejection cases✅ Code Correctness
[a-zA-Z0-9]→[a-zA-Z]is correct for the stated requirement_resource_type_validation.py: The old pattern^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+/[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$was even more permissive — it allowed names starting with hyphens or underscores (e.g.,_ns/name,-ns/name). The new pattern correctly prevents this too.Minor Suggestions (Non-blocking)
DRY concern — duplicate
_NAMESPACED_REdefinitions: Bothresource_type.pyand_resource_type_validation.pydefine their own_NAMESPACED_RE(and_BUILTIN_NAME_RE). If someone changes one but not the other in the future, the inconsistency bug could recur. Consider a follow-up issue to consolidate these into a single shared location (e.g., the validation module exports them, andresource_type.pyimports). This is a pre-existing design issue, not introduced by this PR.Additional edge case tests: Since the
_resource_type_validation.pyfix also prevents names starting with hyphens or underscores (which the old[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+pattern allowed), consider adding scenarios for_ns/nameand-ns/namerejection in a follow-up. Again, not blocking for this PR since the issue scope was specifically digit-starting names.Decision: APPROVED ✅
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: ca-pr-self-reviewer
PR Status Update — Awaiting Review
This PR is ready for review. Here is the current status:
✅ CI Checks
All critical CI checks are passing:
The
benchmark-regressionandbenchmark-publishchecks are pending (these are non-blocking performance checks that run asynchronously).✅ Merge Readiness
State/In Review✅Type/Bug✅❌ Blocking: Needs 2 Approving Reviews
Per CONTRIBUTING.md, this PR requires 2 approving reviews from non-author contributors. Currently there are 0 official approvals.
Review requests have been sent to @khird and @drew.
What This PR Does
Fixes
_NAMESPACED_REinresource_type.pyand_resource_type_validation.pyto require both namespace and name components to start with a letter (changing[a-zA-Z0-9]→[a-zA-Z]for the first character class). This aligns with the spec requirement,_BUILTIN_NAME_RE, and_SERVER_NS_NAME_REinproject.py.The fix is minimal, targeted, and includes 8 Behave scenarios covering rejection and acceptance cases.
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation | Agent: ca-issue-worker
Independent Code Review — PR #3290
Reviewed PR #3290 with focus on api-consistency, naming-conventions, and code-patterns.
This is a clean, well-scoped bug fix that corrects
_NAMESPACED_REregex patterns in two files to require letter-start for both namespace and name components, aligning with the spec requirement and the existing_BUILTIN_NAME_REpattern.Verdict: No issues found. This PR is ready for human reviewer approval.
✅ Specification Compliance
[[server:]namespace/]namewith letter-start requirement_BUILTIN_NAME_REalready uses[a-zA-Z]— consistency is now restored across both modules_SERVER_NS_NAME_REinproject.pyalready enforces letter-start — this PR brings_NAMESPACED_REinto alignment✅ API Consistency (Focus Area — Deep Dive)
_NAMESPACED_REdefinitions (inresource_type.pyand_resource_type_validation.py) are now identical:^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*/[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*$_BUILTIN_NAME_REin both filesvalidate_name()andvalidate_inherits()validators correctly use the updated pattern through the module-level_NAMESPACED_RE_resource_type_validation.py: The old pattern^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+/[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$was even more permissive than the one inresource_type.py— it allowed names starting with hyphens or underscores (e.g.,_ns/name,-ns/name). The new pattern correctly prevents this too, bringing both files into perfect alignment.✅ Naming Conventions (Focus Area — Deep Dive)
_NAMESPACED_RE,_BUILTIN_NAME_RE)resource_type_digit_start_validation.featurefollows project naming patternsresource_type_digit_start_validation_steps.pyfollows the<feature>_steps.pyconvention_make_custom_physical_spec()follows the_prefix convention for internal helpersstep_<action>pattern✅ Code Patterns (Focus Area — Deep Dive)
ValidationErrorintocontext.rt_errorgivenstep fromresource_type_model_coverage_steps.pythenstep for "invalid inherits type name" is correctly reused fromresource_type_model_coverage_steps.py(noted in the step file docstring)✅ CONTRIBUTING.md Compliance
fix(resource-type): require letter-start for namespace/name in _NAMESPACED_RE— correct Conventional Changelog format ✓ISSUES CLOSED: #2983✓Closes #2983✓Type/Bug✓# type: ignore, imports at top of file ✓✅ Test Quality
inheritsfield rejection cases (digit-starting namespace and name)✅ Code Correctness
[a-zA-Z0-9]→[a-zA-Z]is correct for the stated requirement*quantifier after the first character class is correct (first char already matched by[a-zA-Z])local/my-type,myorg/custom-db,my_org/my_typestill passMinor Suggestions (Non-blocking)
DRY concern — duplicate
_NAMESPACED_REdefinitions: Bothresource_type.pyand_resource_type_validation.pydefine their own_NAMESPACED_RE(and_BUILTIN_NAME_RE). If someone changes one but not the other in the future, the inconsistency bug could recur. Consider a follow-up issue to consolidate these into a single shared location (e.g., the validation module exports them, andresource_type.pyimports). This is a pre-existing design issue, not introduced by this PR.Additional edge case tests: Since the
_resource_type_validation.pyfix also prevents names starting with hyphens or underscores (which the old[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+pattern allowed), consider adding scenarios for_ns/nameand-ns/namerejection in a follow-up. Not blocking since the issue scope was specifically digit-starting names.Decision: APPROVED ✅
(Note: Posted as COMMENT because the Forgejo API user matches the PR author. Human reviewers @khird and @drew — this PR is ready for your approval.)
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: ca-pr-self-reviewer