cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.1k Pull requests 489 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

feature/aditya-m3-actor-loader #118

Closed
aditya wants to merge 0 commits from feature/aditya-m3-actor-loader into master
pull from: feature/aditya-m3-actor-loader
merge into: cleveragents:master
Conversation 1 Commits - Files changed -
aditya commented 2026-02-19 13:00:26 +00:00
Member
Copy link
No description provided. 
Update implementation_plan.md to reflect that 5 actor YAML example files
have been created under examples/actors/ during C1.schema implementation.

These examples were completed as part of C1.schema task.
Remaining work: documentation, test scenarios, integration tests, and benchmarks.
Create docs/reference/actors_examples.md with detailed examples covering:
- Simple LLM actors (code reviewers, assistants)
- Strategist actors (planning, decomposition)
- Executor actors (implementation, file operations)
- Reviewer actors (quality gates, standards compliance)
- Tool-only actors (reusable tool collections)
- Validation-node actors (linting, security scanning)
- Linear graph workflows (3-step review pipeline)
- Complex graph workflows (TDD with conditionals, retry logic)
- Hierarchical actor graphs (multi-level planning, subgraph composition)

Each example includes purpose, use cases, key features, and alignment
with CleverAgents specification. Documentation references existing
YAML files in examples/actors/ directory.
Create features/actor_examples.feature with 30+ test scenarios covering:
- All 5 example YAML files load and validate successfully
- Strategist actor pattern (planning, large context, read-only tools)
- Executor actor pattern (write-capable tools, implementation focus)
- Reviewer actor pattern (quality gates, linting tools)
- Tool-only actors (no LLM, pure tool collections)
- Validation-node actors (stateless validators, security scanning)
- Linear graph workflows (sequential 3-step pipelines)
- Complex graphs (conditionals, retry logic, tool nodes)
- Hierarchical graphs (subgraph invocation, parallel execution)
- Multi-level patterns (strategic → tactical → execution)
- Invalid example rejection (missing fields, cycles, bad names)
- Documentation completeness verification

Each scenario validates schema correctness, required fields, and
actor-specific patterns aligned with CleverAgents specification.
Create features/steps/actor_examples_steps.py with step implementations:
- Given steps for actor patterns (strategist/executor/reviewer/validator)
- When steps for schema validation from string and file
- Then steps for field validation and pattern verification
- Graph/route validation (nodes, edges, conditionals, subgraphs)
- Error assertions and documentation completeness checks

All steps use unique patterns to avoid AmbiguousStep conflicts.
Create robot/actor_examples.robot with 17 integration test cases:
- Validate all 5 example YAML files load successfully
- Verify actor patterns (strategist, tool-only, graph, hierarchical)
- Check documentation completeness and pattern coverage
- Test invalid example rejection scenarios

Create robot/helper_actor_examples.py with validation commands.
Uses ${PYTHON} and ${CURDIR} per Robot Framework standards.
- Measure file loading throughput for all 5 example YAML files
- Benchmark complex hierarchical graph parsing performance
- Fix ActorType import error in actor_schema_steps.py
- Simplify actor_examples_steps.py to remove duplicate steps
- Add missing Background step and actor validation steps
- Add llm_with_tools.yaml documentation section
- Rename conflicting Given step patterns with 'examples' suffix
- Add comprehensive Then steps for actor config validation
- Fix step patterns to include trailing colons for docstring steps

Test Results:
- 8 scenarios passing (up from 0)
- 138 steps passing (critical path tests working)
- 5 undefined steps remaining (minor edge cases)
- Basic actor example validation fully functional
- Add missing node descriptions in Behave test scenarios
- Fix context_view and parallel execution step definitions
- Update llm_with_tools.yaml max_context_tokens (10000 → 16000)
- Add context.error compatibility for error assertions

Results: Behave 25/25, Robot 16/16, ASV 7/7 all newly added tests passing.
docs(plan): update implementation_plan for completed C1.examples task
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 15s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m6s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 18m21s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 1h11m30s
Details
7a670feed2
 
- Mark all C1.examples checklist items as complete with actual line counts
- Add comprehensive implementation notes section for C1.examples
- Document key decisions: pattern-based organization, test reuse strategy, parallel execution detection, error compatibility
- Add development log entry with commit list and test results
- Document bug fixes: max_context_tokens, missing descriptions, step conflicts

Checklist: 22/22 items complete (docs, tests, benchmarks, quality, git, PR)
Test Results: Behave 25/25, Robot 16/16, ASV 7/7 all passing
Merge branch 'master' into feature/m3-actor-schema-examples
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 16s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 26s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 27s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m16s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m7s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 8m45s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 10m42s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
3ea2413b43
 
# Conflicts:
#	implementation_plan.md
docs(plan): mark C2.loader complete
Some checks failed
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 28s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m15s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m24s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 58s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Failing after 11m13s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m17s
Details
436a4af6d7
aditya closed this pull request 2026-02-23 06:05:48 +00:00
freemo added this to the v3.1.0 milestone 2026-02-23 17:26:07 +00:00
freemo commented 2026-02-23 17:27:04 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Closes #294

Closes #294
Some checks failed
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Required
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Required
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Required
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 28s
Required
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Required
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m15s
Required
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m24s
Required
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 58s
Required
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Failing after 11m13s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m17s
Required
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
v3.1.0
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!118
No description provided.