cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.0k Pull Requests 115 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

test(wf10_batch.robot): request that LLM not create files #11133

Merged
brent.edwards merged 4 commits from fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test into master 2026-05-13 23:39:16 +00:00
Conversation 8 Commits 4 Files Changed 3
+142 -90
brent.edwards commented 2026-05-11 23:32:06 +00:00
Member
Copy Link
Copy Source

Closes: #11007

Description

Asks LLM to not create files.

Type of Change

  • [ X ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • [ X ] Test improvements

Quality Checklist

  • Code follows the project's coding standards (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • All public/protected methods have argument validation
  • Static typing is complete (no Any unless justified)
  • nox -s typecheck passes with no errors
  • nox -s lint passes with no errors
  • Unit tests written/updated (Behave scenarios in features/)
  • Integration tests written/updated (Robot suites in robot/) if applicable
  • Coverage remains above 85% (nox -s coverage_report)
  • No security issues introduced (nox -s security_scan)
  • No dead code introduced (nox -s dead_code)
  • Documentation updated if behavior changed

Testing

Running in git.cleverthis.com is the only real test possible.

Test Commands Run

nox -s unit_tests       # Behave tests
nox -s typecheck        # Type checking
nox -s lint             # Linting
nox -s coverage_report  # Coverage

Related Issues

Closes #11007

Closes: #11007 ## Description Asks LLM to not create files. ## Type of Change - [ X ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ X ] Test improvements ## Quality Checklist - [ ] Code follows the project's coding standards (see CONTRIBUTING.md) - [ ] All public/protected methods have argument validation - [ ] Static typing is complete (no `Any` unless justified) - [ ] `nox -s typecheck` passes with no errors - [ ] `nox -s lint` passes with no errors - [ ] Unit tests written/updated (Behave scenarios in `features/`) - [ ] Integration tests written/updated (Robot suites in `robot/`) if applicable - [ ] Coverage remains above 85% (`nox -s coverage_report`) - [ ] No security issues introduced (`nox -s security_scan`) - [ ] No dead code introduced (`nox -s dead_code`) - [ ] Documentation updated if behavior changed ## Testing Running in git.cleverthis.com is the only real test possible. ### Test Commands Run ```bash nox -s unit_tests # Behave tests nox -s typecheck # Type checking nox -s lint # Linting nox -s coverage_report # Coverage ``` ## Related Issues Closes https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveragents-core/issues/11007
brent.edwards added the
Type
Testing
 label 2026-05-11 23:32:06 +00:00
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-05-12 00:22:37 +00:00
Dismissed
HAL9001 left a comment
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Review Summary

Thank you for tackling this flaky E2E test. The root-cause diagnosis is correct: the LLM was generating new configuration files (.flake8, pyproject.toml, etc.) that caused add/add merge conflicts during plan apply. Explicitly forbidding file creation in definition_of_done is a sound fix.

However, there are several blocking issues that must be resolved before this PR can be approved.

BLOCKING: CI e2e_tests still failing

The e2e_tests job is reporting failure (Failing after 3m55s) for this PR. This is a required merge gate. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, PRs with failing CI will not be merged. The fix may not be sufficient, or there may be a separate cause for the failure. Please investigate the e2e failure, fix it, and push a new commit.

CI check summary for this PR:

  • PASS: lint, typecheck, security, unit_tests, coverage, integration_tests, build, docker, helm, push-validation
  • FAIL: e2e_tests (required gate)
  • FAIL: benchmark-regression (regression detected)
  • FAIL: status-check (summary gate, blocked by above failures)

BLOCKING: benchmark-regression CI failure

The benchmark-regression job is also failing. While this may be pre-existing and unrelated to this PR change, it still blocks the status-check gate. Please confirm whether this regression is pre-existing on master (in which case a separate issue should track it) or was introduced by this PR. If pre-existing, document this in the PR description so reviewers can verify.

BLOCKING: Missing Forgejo dependency link (PR blocks issue)

Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the PR must appear under "blocks" pointing to issue #11007, so that on the issue, this PR appears under "depends on". Currently only a Closes: text reference in the PR body exists -- no formal Forgejo dependency is registered. Without this link, the correct dependency direction cannot be verified and a deadlock risk exists. Please add the dependency via the PR "blocks" relationship in the Forgejo UI.

BLOCKING: Commit message does not match issue Metadata

The issue #11007 Metadata section prescribes:

Commit message: fix(E2E.WF10) batch test failing in master

The actual commit message first line is:

test(wf10_batch.robot): request that LLM not create files

Per CONTRIBUTING.md: if the issue has a Metadata section with a Commit Message field, that text must be used EXACTLY as the commit first line -- verbatim, no paraphrasing. Please amend the commit to use the prescribed message.

BLOCKING: Commit footer format incorrect

The commit footer uses:

Closes: #11007

The required format per CONTRIBUTING.md is:

ISSUES CLOSED: #11007

Please update the commit footer to use the correct format.

BLOCKING: No milestone assigned to the PR

The linked issue #11007 is on milestone v3.2.0. The PR has no milestone assigned. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the PR must be assigned to the same milestone as its linked issue. Please set the milestone to v3.2.0.

Non-blocking observations

Suggestion: The PR description quality checklist has several items unchecked. If nox sessions were run and passed, please check them off. Also, the coverage threshold listed in the PR description (above 85%) is incorrect -- the actual project hard gate is >= 97% per CONTRIBUTING.md.

Suggestion: The definition_of_done multi-line YAML block scalar (>) approach in Write Action Config is correct and the content is well-chosen. The explicit enumeration of forbidden files is a good defensive measure.

Note on indentation: In the test case documentation block, line 8 has a leading extra space ( ... 8.) compared to the surrounding lines. Cosmetic but worth fixing.

Summary of required changes before approval

  1. Fix the e2e_tests CI failure -- the fix must demonstrably pass E2E
  2. Investigate and address (or document) the benchmark-regression failure
  3. Add the formal Forgejo dependency link: this PR blocks issue #11007
  4. Fix the commit message first line to match Metadata exactly: fix(E2E.WF10) batch test failing in master
  5. Fix the commit footer to use ISSUES CLOSED: #11007
  6. Assign milestone v3.2.0 to the PR

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

## Review Summary Thank you for tackling this flaky E2E test. The root-cause diagnosis is correct: the LLM was generating new configuration files (`.flake8`, `pyproject.toml`, etc.) that caused `add/add` merge conflicts during `plan apply`. Explicitly forbidding file creation in `definition_of_done` is a sound fix. However, there are several blocking issues that must be resolved before this PR can be approved. --- ### BLOCKING: CI `e2e_tests` still failing The `e2e_tests` job is reporting **failure** (`Failing after 3m55s`) for this PR. This is a required merge gate. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, PRs with failing CI will not be merged. The fix may not be sufficient, or there may be a separate cause for the failure. Please investigate the e2e failure, fix it, and push a new commit. CI check summary for this PR: - PASS: lint, typecheck, security, unit_tests, coverage, integration_tests, build, docker, helm, push-validation - FAIL: `e2e_tests` (required gate) - FAIL: `benchmark-regression` (regression detected) - FAIL: `status-check` (summary gate, blocked by above failures) ### BLOCKING: `benchmark-regression` CI failure The `benchmark-regression` job is also failing. While this may be pre-existing and unrelated to this PR change, it still blocks the `status-check` gate. Please confirm whether this regression is pre-existing on `master` (in which case a separate issue should track it) or was introduced by this PR. If pre-existing, document this in the PR description so reviewers can verify. ### BLOCKING: Missing Forgejo dependency link (PR blocks issue) Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the PR must appear under "blocks" pointing to issue #11007, so that on the issue, this PR appears under "depends on". Currently only a `Closes:` text reference in the PR body exists -- no formal Forgejo dependency is registered. Without this link, the correct dependency direction cannot be verified and a deadlock risk exists. Please add the dependency via the PR "blocks" relationship in the Forgejo UI. ### BLOCKING: Commit message does not match issue Metadata The issue #11007 Metadata section prescribes: Commit message: fix(E2E.WF10) batch test failing in master The actual commit message first line is: test(wf10_batch.robot): request that LLM not create files Per CONTRIBUTING.md: if the issue has a Metadata section with a Commit Message field, that text must be used EXACTLY as the commit first line -- verbatim, no paraphrasing. Please amend the commit to use the prescribed message. ### BLOCKING: Commit footer format incorrect The commit footer uses: Closes: #11007 The required format per CONTRIBUTING.md is: ISSUES CLOSED: #11007 Please update the commit footer to use the correct format. ### BLOCKING: No milestone assigned to the PR The linked issue #11007 is on milestone `v3.2.0`. The PR has no milestone assigned. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the PR must be assigned to the same milestone as its linked issue. Please set the milestone to `v3.2.0`. --- ### Non-blocking observations Suggestion: The PR description quality checklist has several items unchecked. If nox sessions were run and passed, please check them off. Also, the coverage threshold listed in the PR description (`above 85%`) is incorrect -- the actual project hard gate is >= 97% per CONTRIBUTING.md. Suggestion: The `definition_of_done` multi-line YAML block scalar (`>`) approach in `Write Action Config` is correct and the content is well-chosen. The explicit enumeration of forbidden files is a good defensive measure. Note on indentation: In the test case documentation block, line 8 has a leading extra space (` ... 8.`) compared to the surrounding lines. Cosmetic but worth fixing. --- ### Summary of required changes before approval 1. Fix the `e2e_tests` CI failure -- the fix must demonstrably pass E2E 2. Investigate and address (or document) the `benchmark-regression` failure 3. Add the formal Forgejo dependency link: this PR blocks issue #11007 4. Fix the commit message first line to match Metadata exactly: `fix(E2E.WF10) batch test failing in master` 5. Fix the commit footer to use `ISSUES CLOSED: #11007` 6. Assign milestone `v3.2.0` to the PR --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
robot/e2e/wf10_batch.robot
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 00:22:37 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

BLOCKING: The definition_of_done change itself is correct and addresses the root cause. However, the commit message first line does not match the issue #11007 Metadata prescription.

Required (from issue Metadata verbatim):

fix(E2E.WF10) batch test failing in master

Actual:

test(wf10_batch.robot): request that LLM not create files

Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the commit first line must be copied verbatim from the issue Metadata section. Please amend the commit.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: The definition_of_done change itself is correct and addresses the root cause. However, the commit message first line does not match the issue #11007 Metadata prescription. Required (from issue Metadata verbatim): fix(E2E.WF10) batch test failing in master Actual: test(wf10_batch.robot): request that LLM not create files Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the commit first line must be copied verbatim from the issue Metadata section. Please amend the commit. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 00:22:41 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

--- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
brent.edwards added this to the v3.2.0 milestone 2026-05-12 01:19:01 +00:00
brent.edwards force-pushed fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test from 7a4e71510c to c65c604eb3 2026-05-12 01:41:59 +00:00 Compare
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-05-12 03:26:39 +00:00
Dismissed
HAL9001 left a comment
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

CI Failure — Blocking Merge

This PR has failing CI checks that must be resolved before it can be approved and merged.

Failing Checks

Check Status Details
CI / benchmark-regression ❌ Failing Failing after 1m7s
CI / e2e_tests ❌ Failing Failing after 4m30s
CI / coverage ❌ Failing Failing after 14m34s

Action Required

Per company policy, all CI gates must pass before a PR can be approved and merged. Please investigate and fix all three failing checks:

  • benchmark-regression: Check if any existing benchmark has regressed due to the test changes.
  • e2e_tests: Review the end-to-end test failure — the Robot Framework changes may have introduced a test assertion issue or test environment problem.
  • coverage: Coverage gate failure is often caused by new code paths without corresponding test coverage, or by e2e/coverage test runner failures cascading from the e2e failure.

A full code review will be conducted once all CI checks are green.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

## CI Failure — Blocking Merge This PR has failing CI checks that must be resolved before it can be approved and merged. ### Failing Checks | Check | Status | Details | |-------|--------|---------| | `CI / benchmark-regression` | ❌ Failing | Failing after 1m7s | | `CI / e2e_tests` | ❌ Failing | Failing after 4m30s | | `CI / coverage` | ❌ Failing | Failing after 14m34s | ### Action Required Per company policy, **all CI gates must pass** before a PR can be approved and merged. Please investigate and fix all three failing checks: - **`benchmark-regression`**: Check if any existing benchmark has regressed due to the test changes. - **`e2e_tests`**: Review the end-to-end test failure — the Robot Framework changes may have introduced a test assertion issue or test environment problem. - **`coverage`**: Coverage gate failure is often caused by new code paths without corresponding test coverage, or by e2e/coverage test runner failures cascading from the e2e failure. A full code review will be conducted once all CI checks are green. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-05-12 03:47:36 +00:00
Dismissed
HAL9001 left a comment
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Code Review — PR #11133

Title: test(wf10_batch.robot): request that LLM not create files
Issue: Closes #11007
Branch: fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test
Head SHA: c65c604e

Code Assessment

The change is minimal and correct: the definition_of_done field in Write Action Config is expanded from a one-liner to a YAML block scalar (>) that explicitly instructs the LLM not to create files. This directly targets the root cause of E2E flakiness — the LLM creating .flake8, .pre-commit-config.yaml, or pyproject.toml during formatting runs, which caused add/add merge conflicts during plan apply. The Clean Workspace Template Files keyword already removes pre-existing templates; this complementary change prevents the LLM from recreating them. The Robot Framework YAML block scalar syntax is valid.

Blocking Issues

BLOCKING 1 — Required CI gates are failing

Two required CI jobs are red on head c65c604e:

Job Status
e2e_tests FAIL (4m30s)
coverage FAIL (14m34s)
status-check FAIL
benchmark-regression FAIL (informational only)

Per CONTRIBUTING.md: PRs with failing CI will NOT be approved. Note that e2e_tests require real LLM API keys — if the definition_of_done change still does not prevent file creation under CI conditions, further prompt engineering may be needed.

BLOCKING 2 — CHANGELOG.md not updated

No entry for this fix exists in CHANGELOG.md under [Unreleased]. Per the PR submission checklist: add an entry under [Unreleased] / ### Fixed describing the E2E test improvement for issue #11007.

BLOCKING 3 — CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated

Per the PR submission checklist: CONTRIBUTORS.md must be updated with a contribution entry if applicable. Add this in the same commit as the fix.

BLOCKING 4 — Forgejo dependency direction not set

Per CONTRIBUTING.md: the PR must explicitly block issue #11007 via the Forgejo dependency interface (PR blocks issue; result: issue shows PR under 'depends on'). Currently GET /issues/11133/blocks returns empty.

Non-Blocking Notes

  • Branch naming: fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test does not match the convention bugfix/m3-wf10-batch-fix for milestone v3.2.0. Informational only — cannot be changed post-creation.
  • Coverage threshold in checklist: The checklist states 85% but the project hard gate is 97% (Slipcover). Confirm coverage is above 97% once e2e_tests pass.
  • Missing State/In Review label: The PR is missing this label.

Summary

The code change is correct and well-targeted. Four blockers must be resolved: CI must pass (especially e2e_tests and coverage), a CHANGELOG.md entry must be added, CONTRIBUTORS.md updated, and the Forgejo dependency link set. Fix CI first, then add documentation in the same commit.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

## Code Review — PR #11133 **Title:** `test(wf10_batch.robot): request that LLM not create files` **Issue:** Closes #11007 **Branch:** `fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test` **Head SHA:** `c65c604e` --- ## Code Assessment The change is minimal and correct: the `definition_of_done` field in `Write Action Config` is expanded from a one-liner to a YAML block scalar (`>`) that explicitly instructs the LLM not to create files. This directly targets the root cause of E2E flakiness — the LLM creating `.flake8`, `.pre-commit-config.yaml`, or `pyproject.toml` during formatting runs, which caused add/add merge conflicts during `plan apply`. The `Clean Workspace Template Files` keyword already removes pre-existing templates; this complementary change prevents the LLM from recreating them. The Robot Framework YAML block scalar syntax is valid. --- ## Blocking Issues ### BLOCKING 1 — Required CI gates are failing Two required CI jobs are red on head `c65c604e`: | Job | Status | |---|---| | `e2e_tests` | FAIL (4m30s) | | `coverage` | FAIL (14m34s) | | `status-check` | FAIL | | `benchmark-regression` | FAIL (informational only) | Per CONTRIBUTING.md: PRs with failing CI will NOT be approved. Note that `e2e_tests` require real LLM API keys — if the definition_of_done change still does not prevent file creation under CI conditions, further prompt engineering may be needed. ### BLOCKING 2 — CHANGELOG.md not updated No entry for this fix exists in `CHANGELOG.md` under `[Unreleased]`. Per the PR submission checklist: add an entry under `[Unreleased] / ### Fixed` describing the E2E test improvement for issue #11007. ### BLOCKING 3 — CONTRIBUTORS.md not updated Per the PR submission checklist: CONTRIBUTORS.md must be updated with a contribution entry if applicable. Add this in the same commit as the fix. ### BLOCKING 4 — Forgejo dependency direction not set Per CONTRIBUTING.md: the PR must explicitly block issue #11007 via the Forgejo dependency interface (PR blocks issue; result: issue shows PR under 'depends on'). Currently `GET /issues/11133/blocks` returns empty. --- ## Non-Blocking Notes - **Branch naming**: `fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test` does not match the convention `bugfix/m3-wf10-batch-fix` for milestone v3.2.0. Informational only — cannot be changed post-creation. - **Coverage threshold in checklist**: The checklist states 85% but the project hard gate is 97% (Slipcover). Confirm coverage is above 97% once e2e_tests pass. - **Missing `State/In Review` label**: The PR is missing this label. --- ## Summary The code change is correct and well-targeted. Four blockers must be resolved: CI must pass (especially `e2e_tests` and `coverage`), a CHANGELOG.md entry must be added, CONTRIBUTORS.md updated, and the Forgejo dependency link set. Fix CI first, then add documentation in the same commit. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 03:47:41 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

--- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
hurui200320 force-pushed fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test from c65c604eb3 to 6eb6bdc2de 2026-05-12 06:05:34 +00:00 Compare
hurui200320 added a new dependency 2026-05-12 06:05:47 +00:00
#11007 E2E.Wf10 Batch :: E2E test for Workflow Example 10
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-05-12 08:46:48 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Re-Review — PR #11133

Title: test(wf10_batch.robot): request that LLM not create files
Issue: Closes #11007
Branch: fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test
Head SHA: 6eb6bdc2
Previous review: #8641 (REQUEST_CHANGES)

Prior Feedback Status

✅ RESOLVED — Forgejo dependency direction

PR now correctly blocks issue #11007 via the Forgejo dependency interface. Confirmed via GET /issues/11133/blocks — issue #11007 is listed. Well done.

✅ RESOLVED — Commit message first line

Commit message now reads fix(E2E.WF10) batch test failing in master, which matches the Metadata field in issue #11007 exactly. ✅

✅ RESOLVED — Commit footer format

Commit footer now reads ISSUES CLOSED: #11007 — correct format per CONTRIBUTING.md. ✅

✅ RESOLVED — Milestone

PR is correctly assigned to milestone v3.2.0. ✅

✅ RESOLVED — CONTRIBUTORS.md

Brent Edwards is already listed in CONTRIBUTORS.md on both master and the PR head. No change was needed and none was required. ✅

Remaining Blocking Issues

BLOCKING 1 — CI gates still failing

The following required CI jobs are still failing on head 6eb6bdc2:

Job Status
CI / e2e_tests ❌ Failing after 3m38s
CI / integration_tests ❌ Failing after 4m49s (NEW — was passing on prior head)
CI / status-check ❌ Failing (summary gate)

Per CONTRIBUTING.md, PRs with failing CI will not be approved or merged. The e2e_tests failure was the primary concern in prior reviews and remains unresolved. Additionally, integration_tests is now newly failing on this head where it was previously passing — this regression must be investigated. Please:

  1. Investigate why e2e_tests is still failing. The definition_of_done prompt change may not be sufficient to prevent the LLM from creating new files under all conditions. Further prompt engineering or a different approach may be needed.
  2. Investigate why integration_tests regressed on this head (it was passing on c65c604e but is now failing on 6eb6bdc2).
  3. Fix both CI failures and push a new commit.

BLOCKING 2 — CHANGELOG.md not updated

The CHANGELOG.md file is identical between master and the PR head (same line count, no WF10/11007-related entry found). Per the PR submission checklist, an entry must be added under ## Unreleased describing this fix for issue #11007. Example entry:

- Fixed E2E.WF10 batch test flakiness (#11007): added explicit prohibition
  against file creation (`.flake8`, `.pre-commit-config.yaml`, `pyproject.toml`)
  in the `definition_of_done` field of the formatting action config to prevent
  add/add merge conflicts during `plan apply`.

Code Quality Assessment

The code change itself remains correct and well-targeted. The definition_of_done YAML block scalar in Write Action Config explicitly forbids file creation, directly addressing the root cause of the E2E flakiness. The Robot Framework YAML block scalar syntax is valid. No new type safety, readability, security, or style issues were introduced.

Summary of Required Changes Before Approval

  1. Fix e2e_tests CI failure — the core fix must demonstrably pass E2E tests
  2. Investigate and fix integration_tests regression — newly failing on this head
  3. Add CHANGELOG.md entry — document the fix under ## Unreleased

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

## Re-Review — PR #11133 **Title:** `test(wf10_batch.robot): request that LLM not create files` **Issue:** Closes #11007 **Branch:** `fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test` **Head SHA:** `6eb6bdc2` **Previous review:** #8641 (REQUEST_CHANGES) --- ## Prior Feedback Status ### ✅ RESOLVED — Forgejo dependency direction PR now correctly blocks issue #11007 via the Forgejo dependency interface. Confirmed via `GET /issues/11133/blocks` — issue #11007 is listed. Well done. ### ✅ RESOLVED — Commit message first line Commit message now reads `fix(E2E.WF10) batch test failing in master`, which matches the Metadata field in issue #11007 exactly. ✅ ### ✅ RESOLVED — Commit footer format Commit footer now reads `ISSUES CLOSED: #11007` — correct format per CONTRIBUTING.md. ✅ ### ✅ RESOLVED — Milestone PR is correctly assigned to milestone `v3.2.0`. ✅ ### ✅ RESOLVED — CONTRIBUTORS.md Brent Edwards is already listed in CONTRIBUTORS.md on both `master` and the PR head. No change was needed and none was required. ✅ --- ## Remaining Blocking Issues ### BLOCKING 1 — CI gates still failing The following required CI jobs are **still failing** on head `6eb6bdc2`: | Job | Status | |-----|--------| | `CI / e2e_tests` | ❌ Failing after 3m38s | | `CI / integration_tests` | ❌ Failing after 4m49s (NEW — was passing on prior head) | | `CI / status-check` | ❌ Failing (summary gate) | Per CONTRIBUTING.md, PRs with failing CI **will not be approved or merged**. The `e2e_tests` failure was the primary concern in prior reviews and remains unresolved. Additionally, `integration_tests` is now **newly failing** on this head where it was previously passing — this regression must be investigated. Please: 1. Investigate why `e2e_tests` is still failing. The `definition_of_done` prompt change may not be sufficient to prevent the LLM from creating new files under all conditions. Further prompt engineering or a different approach may be needed. 2. Investigate why `integration_tests` regressed on this head (it was passing on `c65c604e` but is now failing on `6eb6bdc2`). 3. Fix both CI failures and push a new commit. ### BLOCKING 2 — CHANGELOG.md not updated The `CHANGELOG.md` file is **identical** between `master` and the PR head (same line count, no WF10/11007-related entry found). Per the PR submission checklist, an entry must be added under `## Unreleased` describing this fix for issue #11007. Example entry: ``` - Fixed E2E.WF10 batch test flakiness (#11007): added explicit prohibition against file creation (`.flake8`, `.pre-commit-config.yaml`, `pyproject.toml`) in the `definition_of_done` field of the formatting action config to prevent add/add merge conflicts during `plan apply`. ``` --- ## Code Quality Assessment The code change itself remains correct and well-targeted. The `definition_of_done` YAML block scalar in `Write Action Config` explicitly forbids file creation, directly addressing the root cause of the E2E flakiness. The Robot Framework YAML block scalar syntax is valid. No new type safety, readability, security, or style issues were introduced. --- ## Summary of Required Changes Before Approval 1. **Fix `e2e_tests` CI failure** — the core fix must demonstrably pass E2E tests 2. **Investigate and fix `integration_tests` regression** — newly failing on this head 3. **Add CHANGELOG.md entry** — document the fix under `## Unreleased` --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 08:46:54 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

--- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
brent.edwards added 1 commit 2026-05-13 22:56:00 +00:00
fix(E2E.WF10) batch test failing in master
CI / lint (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / tdd_quality_gate (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
49504da127 
ISSUES CLOSED: #11007
brent.edwards added 1 commit 2026-05-13 22:56:10 +00:00
Merge branch 'master' into fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 53s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m36s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 2m17s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 2m21s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 2m53s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 2m55s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m42s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m24s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has started running
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 3m29s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
d64825bfc6
brent.edwards added 1 commit 2026-05-13 23:16:11 +00:00
fix(plan): output plan results
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 42s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m26s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m38s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m59s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 2m15s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m47s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 20s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m57s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m1s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Details
5775b9d464 
ISSUES UPDATED: #10878
hamza.khyari approved these changes 2026-05-13 23:32:51 +00:00
brent.edwards merged commit d31d9226f9 into master 2026-05-13 23:39:16 +00:00
brent.edwards deleted branch fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test 2026-05-13 23:39:17 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
HAL9001
hamza.khyari
Labels
Clear labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.
 controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.
 overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
 auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
 auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
 auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
 auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
 auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
 auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
 auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
 auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
 auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
 auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
 Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
 auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
 auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
 auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
 auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
 auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
 auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
 auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
 auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
 auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
 Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
 Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
 Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
 Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
No Label
Type
Testing
Milestone
No items
No Milestone v3.2.0
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra) aleenaumair (Aleena Umair) brent.edwards (Brent Edwards) CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes) drew (Drew Morris) eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci) freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman) HAL9000 (HAL 9000) HAL9001 (HAL9001) hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari) hurui200320 (Rui Hu) justin.morris khird (Kyle Hird) org.cleveragents
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
#11007 E2E.Wf10 Batch :: E2E test for Workflow Example 10
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#11133
Delete Branch "fix/e2e.wf10-batch-test"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?