cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.0k Pull requests 115 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

fix(tui): convert PermissionsScreen from Static widget to proper Textual Screen subclass #11116

Closed
HAL9000 wants to merge 5 commits from agents/fix-10866-permissions-screen-to-textual-screen into master
pull from: agents/fix-10866-permissions-screen-to-textual-screen
merge into: cleveragents:master
Conversation 6 Commits 5 Files changed -
HAL9000 commented 2026-05-11 03:59:42 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Convert PermissionsScreen class from inheriting textual.widgets.Static (_StaticBase) to a proper textual.screen.Screen subclass. The key changes are:

  • Import textual.screen.Screen instead of textual.widgets.Static
  • Add compose() method yielding a Static child widget for rendering
  • Keep the _text attribute for backward compatibility with existing tests
  • Full API maintained - load_request(), clear(), navigate_next/prev(), cycle_diff_mode/set_diff_mode(), allow_once/always/reject_once/always() all unchanged
Convert PermissionsScreen class from inheriting textual.widgets.Static (_StaticBase) to a proper textual.screen.Screen subclass. The key changes are: - Import textual.screen.Screen instead of textual.widgets.Static - Add compose() method yielding a Static child widget for rendering - Keep the _text attribute for backward compatibility with existing tests - Full API maintained - load_request(), clear(), navigate_next/prev(), cycle_diff_mode/set_diff_mode(), allow_once/always/reject_once/always() all unchanged
fix(tui): convert PermissionsScreen from Static widget to proper Textual Screen subclass
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 56s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 53s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 44s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 44s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 58s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Failing after 1m18s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m38s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m10s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 6m21s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 3s
Details
3f49b5f901 
Replace _StaticBase (textual.widgets.Static) with a proper textual.screen.Screen
base class. Add compose() method yielding a Static child widget for rendering,
keeping backward-compatible _text attribute for existing tests that access it directly.

Maintains full API compatibility: load_request(), clear(), navigate_next/prev(),
cycle_diff_mode(), set_diff_mode(), allow_once/always(), reject_once/always(),
and all read-only properties.

Resolves PR #10866.
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-05-12 03:12:12 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

Review Summary

This PR partially implements the fix for converting PermissionsScreen from a Static widget to a proper Textual Screen subclass. The core architectural change — switching the base class from _StaticBase (Static widget) to _ScreenBase (Screen) and adding compose() — is correct and aligns with the specification.

However, there are 5 blocking issues that must be resolved before this can be approved.

BLOCKER 1 — CI failing: lint job

Failing check: CI / lint (pull_request) — Failing after 56s

The lint failure is caused by two # noqa: ARG002 suppressions added in this PR (lines 33 and 51 of screen.py). The ARG rule set is not enabled in the project ruff configuration (select = ["E", "F", "W", "B", "UP", "I", "SIM", "RUF"]). The RUF ruleset (which IS enabled) includes RUF100, which reports an error when a noqa comment suppresses a rule that is not in the active rule set. These are unused noqa directives and must be removed.

Fix: Remove the # noqa: ARG002 comment from both _FallbackScreen.__init__ (line 33) and _FallbackStatic.__init__ (line 51). No ARG lint rule is enabled, so no suppression is needed.

BLOCKER 2 — CI failing: unit_tests job

Failing check: CI / unit_tests (pull_request) — Failing after 6m21s

Unit tests are failing. This is likely related to Blocker 3 (missing BINDINGS and action methods) and the change in how _refresh() updates the render widget. In tests that instantiate PermissionsScreen() without a running Textual app, query_one() will raise an exception that is swallowed by except Exception: pass — but this changes the rendering behaviour that tests may depend on.

BLOCKER 3 — Missing BINDINGS class variable and action_*() methods

Issue #10488 has the following acceptance criteria that are NOT met by this PR:

  • Keyboard bindings a, A, r, R, j, k, d, escape are functional: NOT DONE
  • BINDINGS class variable with 8 keyboard shortcuts: NOT DONE
  • 8 action_*() methods (action_allow_once, action_allow_always, action_reject_once, action_reject_always, action_navigate_next, action_navigate_prev, action_cycle_diff_mode, action_dismiss): NOT DONE

Without BINDINGS and the corresponding action_*() adapters, the keyboard shortcuts documented in the docstring are non-functional in the Textual runtime. This is the same problem that existed before this PR.

Fix: Add a BINDINGS class variable and all 8 action_*() delegate methods. The implementation already exists in the origin/fix-10866-permissions-screen branch.

BLOCKER 4 — PR body missing Closes #N issue reference

The PR description does not contain a Closes #N or Fixes #N reference to any issue. Per CONTRIBUTING.md: PRs without an issue reference will not be reviewed.

The issue being fixed is #10488 (via the chain: this PR re-attempts PR #10866 which closes #10744 which closes #10488).

Fix: Add Closes #10488 to the PR body.

BLOCKER 5 — Commit footer missing ISSUES CLOSED: #N

The single commit footer contains Resolves PR #10866. which references a PR number, not an issue number. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every commit footer must include ISSUES CLOSED: #N or Refs: #N referencing the actual issue.

Fix: Amend the commit to include ISSUES CLOSED: #10488 in the footer.

Non-blocking suggestions

Suggestion: The compose() method is typed -> Any. Textual's Screen.compose() returns ComposeResult. Consider using a TYPE_CHECKING guard to type this more precisely: -> "ComposeResult".

Suggestion: The if TYPE_CHECKING: ... else: ... block at module level that re-assigns _ScreenChildWidget = _StaticWidget in both branches is a no-op at runtime. The simpler _ScreenChildWidget = _StaticWidget without the conditional would be clearer.

Suggestion: No CHANGELOG.md entry was included. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the changelog should have one entry per commit.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

## Review Summary This PR partially implements the fix for converting `PermissionsScreen` from a `Static` widget to a proper Textual `Screen` subclass. The core architectural change — switching the base class from `_StaticBase` (`Static` widget) to `_ScreenBase` (`Screen`) and adding `compose()` — is correct and aligns with the specification. However, there are **5 blocking issues** that must be resolved before this can be approved. --- ### BLOCKER 1 — CI failing: `lint` job **Failing check:** `CI / lint (pull_request)` — Failing after 56s The lint failure is caused by two `# noqa: ARG002` suppressions added in this PR (lines 33 and 51 of `screen.py`). The `ARG` rule set is **not enabled** in the project ruff configuration (`select = ["E", "F", "W", "B", "UP", "I", "SIM", "RUF"]`). The `RUF` ruleset (which IS enabled) includes `RUF100`, which reports an error when a `noqa` comment suppresses a rule that is not in the active rule set. These are unused noqa directives and must be removed. **Fix:** Remove the `# noqa: ARG002` comment from both `_FallbackScreen.__init__` (line 33) and `_FallbackStatic.__init__` (line 51). No ARG lint rule is enabled, so no suppression is needed. --- ### BLOCKER 2 — CI failing: `unit_tests` job **Failing check:** `CI / unit_tests (pull_request)` — Failing after 6m21s Unit tests are failing. This is likely related to Blocker 3 (missing BINDINGS and action methods) and the change in how `_refresh()` updates the render widget. In tests that instantiate `PermissionsScreen()` without a running Textual app, `query_one()` will raise an exception that is swallowed by `except Exception: pass` — but this changes the rendering behaviour that tests may depend on. --- ### BLOCKER 3 — Missing `BINDINGS` class variable and `action_*()` methods Issue #10488 has the following acceptance criteria that are **NOT met** by this PR: - Keyboard bindings `a`, `A`, `r`, `R`, `j`, `k`, `d`, `escape` are functional: NOT DONE - `BINDINGS` class variable with 8 keyboard shortcuts: NOT DONE - 8 `action_*()` methods (`action_allow_once`, `action_allow_always`, `action_reject_once`, `action_reject_always`, `action_navigate_next`, `action_navigate_prev`, `action_cycle_diff_mode`, `action_dismiss`): NOT DONE Without `BINDINGS` and the corresponding `action_*()` adapters, the keyboard shortcuts documented in the docstring are non-functional in the Textual runtime. This is the same problem that existed before this PR. **Fix:** Add a `BINDINGS` class variable and all 8 `action_*()` delegate methods. The implementation already exists in the `origin/fix-10866-permissions-screen` branch. --- ### BLOCKER 4 — PR body missing `Closes #N` issue reference The PR description does not contain a `Closes #N` or `Fixes #N` reference to any issue. Per CONTRIBUTING.md: PRs without an issue reference will not be reviewed. The issue being fixed is #10488 (via the chain: this PR re-attempts PR #10866 which closes #10744 which closes #10488). **Fix:** Add `Closes #10488` to the PR body. --- ### BLOCKER 5 — Commit footer missing `ISSUES CLOSED: #N` The single commit footer contains `Resolves PR #10866.` which references a PR number, not an issue number. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every commit footer must include `ISSUES CLOSED: #N` or `Refs: #N` referencing the actual issue. **Fix:** Amend the commit to include `ISSUES CLOSED: #10488` in the footer. --- ### Non-blocking suggestions **Suggestion:** The `compose()` method is typed `-> Any`. Textual's `Screen.compose()` returns `ComposeResult`. Consider using a `TYPE_CHECKING` guard to type this more precisely: `-> "ComposeResult"`. **Suggestion:** The `if TYPE_CHECKING: ... else: ...` block at module level that re-assigns `_ScreenChildWidget = _StaticWidget` in both branches is a no-op at runtime. The simpler `_ScreenChildWidget = _StaticWidget` without the conditional would be clearer. **Suggestion:** No `CHANGELOG.md` entry was included. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the changelog should have one entry per commit. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
src/cleveragents/tui/permissions/screen.py Outdated
@ -24,3 +24,3 @@
def _load_static_base() -> type[Any]:
def _load_screen_base() -> type[Any]:
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 03:12:12 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

BLOCKER — Unused noqa directive causes RUF100 lint failure.

The # noqa: ARG002 comment suppresses the ARG002 rule, but ARG rules are NOT in the project ruff select list (["E", "F", "W", "B", "UP", "I", "SIM", "RUF"]). The RUF100 rule (part of RUF, which IS selected) flags unused noqa directives — directives that suppress rules not in the active rule set.

Fix: Remove the # noqa: ARG002 comment. Since ARG002 is not an enabled rule, there is nothing to suppress here.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

**BLOCKER — Unused noqa directive causes RUF100 lint failure.** The `# noqa: ARG002` comment suppresses the `ARG002` rule, but `ARG` rules are NOT in the project ruff select list (`["E", "F", "W", "B", "UP", "I", "SIM", "RUF"]`). The `RUF100` rule (part of `RUF`, which IS selected) flags unused noqa directives — directives that suppress rules not in the active rule set. **Fix:** Remove the `# noqa: ARG002` comment. Since `ARG002` is not an enabled rule, there is nothing to suppress here. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
src/cleveragents/tui/permissions/screen.py Outdated
@ -27,0 +42,4 @@
def _load_static_widget() -> type[Any]:
"""Load ``textual.widgets.Static`` (with a minimal fallback)."""
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 03:12:12 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

BLOCKER — Unused noqa directive causes RUF100 lint failure.

Same issue as in _FallbackScreen.__init__ above. The # noqa: ARG002 suppresses a rule (ARG002) not in the ruff select list. RUF100 will flag this as an unused noqa directive.

Fix: Remove the # noqa: ARG002 comment.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

**BLOCKER — Unused noqa directive causes RUF100 lint failure.** Same issue as in `_FallbackScreen.__init__` above. The `# noqa: ARG002` suppresses a rule (`ARG002`) not in the ruff select list. `RUF100` will flag this as an unused noqa directive. **Fix:** Remove the `# noqa: ARG002` comment. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
src/cleveragents/tui/permissions/screen.py Outdated
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 03:12:12 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

BLOCKER — Missing BINDINGS class variable and 8 action_*() methods required by acceptance criteria (issue #10488).

The class docstring documents keyboard shortcuts but they are not wired up. For Screen keyboard shortcuts to work in Textual, the class MUST define:

  1. A BINDINGS class variable with all 8 keys (a, A, r, R, j, k, d, escape).
  2. Eight action adapter methods delegating to the existing public API:
def action_allow_once(self) -> None: self.allow_once()
def action_allow_always(self) -> None: self.allow_always()
def action_reject_once(self) -> None: self.reject_once()
def action_reject_always(self) -> None: self.reject_always()
def action_navigate_next(self) -> None: self.navigate_next()
def action_navigate_prev(self) -> None: self.navigate_prev()
def action_cycle_diff_mode(self) -> None: self.cycle_diff_mode()
def action_dismiss(self) -> None: self.dismiss()

Without these, pressing the documented keys in the TUI has no effect. This is the core bug the issue was filed to fix.

Fix: Add BINDINGS and all 8 action_*() methods. The complete implementation already exists in branch origin/fix-10866-permissions-screen and can be cherry-picked or adapted.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

**BLOCKER — Missing BINDINGS class variable and 8 action_*() methods required by acceptance criteria (issue #10488).** The class docstring documents keyboard shortcuts but they are not wired up. For Screen keyboard shortcuts to work in Textual, the class MUST define: 1. A BINDINGS class variable with all 8 keys (a, A, r, R, j, k, d, escape). 2. Eight action adapter methods delegating to the existing public API: ```python def action_allow_once(self) -> None: self.allow_once() def action_allow_always(self) -> None: self.allow_always() def action_reject_once(self) -> None: self.reject_once() def action_reject_always(self) -> None: self.reject_always() def action_navigate_next(self) -> None: self.navigate_next() def action_navigate_prev(self) -> None: self.navigate_prev() def action_cycle_diff_mode(self) -> None: self.cycle_diff_mode() def action_dismiss(self) -> None: self.dismiss() ``` Without these, pressing the documented keys in the TUI has no effect. This is the core bug the issue was filed to fix. **Fix:** Add BINDINGS and all 8 action_*() methods. The complete implementation already exists in branch origin/fix-10866-permissions-screen and can be cherry-picked or adapted. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 03:12:18 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Review submitted: REQUEST_CHANGES (Review ID: 8635)

5 blocking issues identified:

  1. Unused # noqa: ARG002 directives cause RUF100 lint failure — remove them
  2. unit_tests CI job failing — likely related to missing BINDINGS/action methods
  3. Missing BINDINGS class variable and 8 action_*() methods (acceptance criteria not met)
  4. PR body missing Closes #10488 issue reference
  5. Commit footer uses Resolves PR #10866 instead of ISSUES CLOSED: #10488

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

Review submitted: REQUEST_CHANGES (Review ID: 8635) 5 blocking issues identified: 1. Unused `# noqa: ARG002` directives cause `RUF100` lint failure — remove them 2. `unit_tests` CI job failing — likely related to missing BINDINGS/action methods 3. Missing `BINDINGS` class variable and 8 `action_*()` methods (acceptance criteria not met) 4. PR body missing `Closes #10488` issue reference 5. Commit footer uses `Resolves PR #10866` instead of `ISSUES CLOSED: #10488` --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-10 22:32:31 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

[CONTROLLER-DEFER:Gate 1:full_duplicate]

This PR has been deferred for re-evaluation. The controller has stepped back
from processing it. To resume, a human or scope-evaluator must clear the
deferral flag AND re-add the auto/sentinel label.

Decision:

  • Gate: Gate 1
  • Reason category: full_duplicate
  • Canonical: #10866
  • LLM confidence: high
  • LLM reasoning: PR #11116 and PR #10866 have identical titles and scope: both convert PermissionsScreen from Static widget to Textual Screen. The anchor's branch reference (fix-10866-...) suggests awareness of the prior work. PR #10866 is more comprehensive with 121 additions vs 72, indicating it is the more complete canonical version. No unique enhancements or different approaches detected in the anchor.

To clear the deferral (SQL):
UPDATE workflows SET deferred_reason=NULL,
deferred_at=NULL,
deferred_target_workflow_id=NULL
WHERE workflow_id = 491;

INSERT INTO controller_events
  (workflow_id, ts, event_type, payload, cause, forgejo_write_pending, replay_attempts)
VALUES (491, datetime('now'), 'deferral_cleared',
        json_object('cleared_by', 'operator', 'reason', '<your reason>'),
        'operator', 0, 0);

Audit ID: 172053

Automated by the CleverAgents controller pipeline.
Identity: HAL9000 (pipeline action)

[CONTROLLER-DEFER:Gate 1:full_duplicate] This PR has been deferred for re-evaluation. The controller has stepped back from processing it. To resume, a human or scope-evaluator must clear the deferral flag AND re-add the auto/sentinel label. Decision: - Gate: Gate 1 - Reason category: full_duplicate - Canonical: #10866 - LLM confidence: high - LLM reasoning: PR #11116 and PR #10866 have identical titles and scope: both convert PermissionsScreen from Static widget to Textual Screen. The anchor's branch reference (fix-10866-...) suggests awareness of the prior work. PR #10866 is more comprehensive with 121 additions vs 72, indicating it is the more complete canonical version. No unique enhancements or different approaches detected in the anchor. To clear the deferral (SQL): UPDATE workflows SET deferred_reason=NULL, deferred_at=NULL, deferred_target_workflow_id=NULL WHERE workflow_id = 491; INSERT INTO controller_events (workflow_id, ts, event_type, payload, cause, forgejo_write_pending, replay_attempts) VALUES (491, datetime('now'), 'deferral_cleared', json_object('cleared_by', 'operator', 'reason', '<your reason>'), 'operator', 0, 0); Audit ID: 172053 --- Automated by the CleverAgents controller pipeline. Identity: HAL9000 (pipeline action) <!-- controller:fingerprint:7815af27b6774e71 -->
drew referenced this pull request from a commit 2026-06-11 00:26:35 +00:00
ci: stop master workflow on PR updates
ci: stop master workflow on PR updates
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
19c65fc4c1 
Remove the stale pull_request trigger from master.yml so PR branch commits do not launch the master workflow.

Maintenance patch for PR #11116.
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 34s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 47s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 48s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 3m6s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m33s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 4m10s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 3s
Details
73383f6995
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-11 12:34:07 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

📋 Estimate: tier 1.

2-file TUI refactor converting PermissionsScreen from Static to Screen subclass. Lint failures are trivial (remove 2 unused noqa directives). However, there is a directly-related failing unit test (tui_permissions_screen.feature:260 "PermissionsScreen clear resets state") that requires understanding the Textual Screen API lifecycle and how the new compose() method interacts with existing test setup — not purely mechanical. Other failures (actor_run_signature, plan_service_coverage, tdd_memory_service_entity_persistence) appear unrelated/pre-existing. Multi-file scope with new logic branch (compose() method) and a test failure to diagnose puts this solidly at tier 1.

**📋 Estimate: tier 1.** 2-file TUI refactor converting PermissionsScreen from Static to Screen subclass. Lint failures are trivial (remove 2 unused noqa directives). However, there is a directly-related failing unit test (tui_permissions_screen.feature:260 "PermissionsScreen clear resets state") that requires understanding the Textual Screen API lifecycle and how the new compose() method interacts with existing test setup — not purely mechanical. Other failures (actor_run_signature, plan_service_coverage, tdd_memory_service_entity_persistence) appear unrelated/pre-existing. Multi-file scope with new logic branch (compose() method) and a test failure to diagnose puts this solidly at tier 1. <!-- controller:fingerprint:fd15e80ad830a1db -->
HAL9000 force-pushed agents/fix-10866-permissions-screen-to-textual-screen from 73383f6995
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 34s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 47s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 48s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m16s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 3m6s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m33s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 4m10s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 3s
Details
to e5db90d4f0
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 43s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 33s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 36s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 48s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m28s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m40s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Failing after 14m23s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Failing after 14m24s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Failing after 14m25s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
2026-06-12 16:34:09 +00:00 Compare
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 0s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 43s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m50s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
2a1b2db63f
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-13 15:14:18 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

(attempt #8, tier 1)

🔧 Implementer attempt — blocked.

Blockers:

  • agent-side push detected: remote agents/fix-10866-permissions-screen-to-textual-screen is at 2a1b2db63f but dispatch base was e5db90d4f0. The implementer pushed from inside the worktree (forbidden by the git contract) OR a third party pushed during the attempt. Re-dispatch will re-prefetch and pick up the new head.
_(attempt #8, tier 1)_ **🔧 Implementer attempt — `blocked`.** Blockers: - agent-side push detected: remote agents/fix-10866-permissions-screen-to-textual-screen is at 2a1b2db63f78 but dispatch base was e5db90d4f06a. The implementer pushed from inside the worktree (forbidden by the git contract) OR a third party pushed during the attempt. Re-dispatch will re-prefetch and pick up the new head. <!-- controller:fingerprint:48f2f5aadbcc9fa1 -->
HAL9000 force-pushed agents/fix-10866-permissions-screen-to-textual-screen from 2a1b2db63f
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 0s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 43s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m50s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
to 777ae1b290
Some checks failed
CI / quality (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 0s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 0s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 47s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 59s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m38s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
2026-06-13 15:29:45 +00:00 Compare
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
Some checks failed
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Failing after 0s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Failing after 0s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 47s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m21s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m41s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Failing after 0s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m36s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
d26b74c875
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
Some checks failed
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Failing after 0s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 0s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 40s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 44s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m20s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
8b6a296a97
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 38s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 42s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 42s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 57s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m23s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m47s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 8m47s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Details
abc61893e7
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-13 18:07:56 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

[CONTROLLER-CLOSE:Gate 3:obsoleted_by_other_merged_work]

Gate 3 reviewer-abandon: obsoleted_by_other_merged_work. The PermissionsScreen Screen-subclass implementation described in this PR is already present in master. git diff origin/master..HEAD is empty; the branch contains only two empty CI re-trigger commits and no code changes. The fix was merged to master via another path (likely the implementer's first push at 2a1b2db63f).

Decision:

  • Gate: Gate 3

  • Reason category: obsoleted_by_other_merged_work

  • LLM confidence (when applicable): high

Audit ID: 199820

Automated by the CleverAgents controller pipeline.
Identity: HAL9000 (pipeline action)

[CONTROLLER-CLOSE:Gate 3:obsoleted_by_other_merged_work] Gate 3 reviewer-abandon: obsoleted_by_other_merged_work. The PermissionsScreen Screen-subclass implementation described in this PR is already present in master. git diff origin/master..HEAD is empty; the branch contains only two empty CI re-trigger commits and no code changes. The fix was merged to master via another path (likely the implementer's first push at 2a1b2db63f78). Decision: - Gate: Gate 3 - Reason category: obsoleted_by_other_merged_work - LLM confidence (when applicable): high Audit ID: 199820 --- Automated by the CleverAgents controller pipeline. Identity: HAL9000 (pipeline action) <!-- controller:fingerprint:b10a7d54a27833de -->
HAL9000 closed this pull request 2026-06-13 18:07:56 +00:00
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 38s
Required
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 42s
Required
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 42s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
Required
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 57s
Required
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
Required
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m23s
Required
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
Required
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m47s
Required
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 8m47s
Required
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
HAL9001
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
overdue
  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!11116
No description provided.