fix(plan): wrap plan tree JSON/YAML output in spec-required command envelope #11060

Closed
HAL9000 wants to merge 2 commits from fix/plan/tree-envelope-9313 into master
5 changed files with 20 additions and 20 deletions
+9 -17
View File
3
@@ -140,23 +140,15 @@ The format follows [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/).
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
and milestone assignment. This eliminates systemic PR merge blockers caused by workers
omitting required items.
- **Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist** (#9824): Added a mandatory
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
8-item PR Compliance Checklist to the new `implementation-pool-supervisor.md` agent definition.
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Supervisors must enforce that workers complete all 8 checklist items (CHANGELOG.md update,
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
CONTRIBUTORS.md update, commit footer, CI verification, BDD tests, Epic reference, label
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
application, and milestone assignment) before creating any PR. Includes concrete markdown
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
examples for each subsection and compliance verification pseudocode to ensure reproducible
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
adherence.
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
- **ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths** (#10972): Fixed
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
`_path_matches()` in `execute_phase_context_assembler.py` and `_matches_pattern()` in
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
`context_phase_analysis.py` to correctly match absolute paths (e.g. `/app/.opencode/skills/SKILL.md`)
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
against relative glob patterns (e.g. `.opencode/**`, `docs/*`). Previously
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
`PurePath.full_match()` required the entire path to match the pattern, so relative
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
include/exclude filters were silently ineffective for absolute paths in fragment metadata.
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Updated each pattern to be tried as-is via `full_match()`, then with a `**/` prefix so that
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
relative globs also match absolute paths. Added BDD regression tests in
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
`execute_phase_context_assembler_coverage.feature` and `project_context_phase_analysis.feature`.
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
- **`plan tree` JSON/YAML output now includes spec-required command envelope** (#9313):
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Fixed `plan tree --format json` and `plan tree --format yaml` to wrap their output in the
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
spec-required JSON/YAML envelope with the correct `"command": "plan tree"` field. Previously
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
the envelope was created with an empty command name (`""`), causing programmatic consumers of
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
the CLI output to be unable to identify which command produced the result. The fix adds
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
explicit `command="plan tree"`, `status="ok"`, and `exit_code=0` parameters to the
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
`format_output()` call, matching the pattern used by other plan subcommands like
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
`plan prompt` and `plan execute`. Includes BDD test coverage to verify envelope structure
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
for all six required fields (`command`, `status`, `exit_code`, `data`, `timing`, `messages`).
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
### Changed
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch:

  1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one.

  2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent.

How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Two existing CHANGELOG entries from master are still missing (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). Master has these two entries that are absent from this branch: 1. Second #9824 entry — Implementation Pool Supervisor PR Compliance Checklist: master has two separate #9824 entries. The branch retains only the first and deletes the second one. 2. #10972 — ACMS context path matching now handles absolute fragment paths: still completely absent. How to fix: Run git diff master CHANGELOG.md on the branch and restore both deleted entries verbatim. Only the new #9313 entry should be added; all pre-existing entries must be preserved. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
+1
View File
2
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Below are some of the specific details of various contributions.
Review

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced.

This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060.

How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced. This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060. How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced.

This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060.

How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced. This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060. How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
* HAL 9000 has contributed automated specification maintenance, documentation updates, and bot-driven PR authorship.
* This project was made possible thanks to considerable donation of time, money, and resources by CleverThis, Inc.
* HAL 9000 has contributed automated bug fixes, CLI output formatting improvements, and ongoing maintenance as part of the CleverAgents automation system.
* HAL 9000 has contributed the plan tree JSON/YAML command envelope fix (PR #9313): wrapped `plan tree` JSON and YAML outputs in the spec-required envelope with explicit command name, status, and exit code fields to enable proper parsing by programmatic CLI consumers.
Review

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced.

This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060.

How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced. This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060. How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
* HAL 9000 has contributed the file edit encoding parameter fix (PR #8258 / issue #7559).
* HAL 9000 has contributed the architecture-pool-supervisor milestone assignment feature (PR #8188 / issue #7521): added `forgejo_update_pull_request` permission and documented the PR workflow for major spec changes, enabling automatic milestone assignment for specification PRs.
* HAL 9000 has contributed the git worktree TOCTOU race condition fix (PR #8178 / issue #7507): replaced the unsafe mkdtemp() + rmdir() pattern with a parent-directory approach to eliminate the race window in concurrent git worktree operations.
Review

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced.

This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060.

How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced. This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060. How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced.

This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060.

How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

WARNING: Wrong PR number referenced. This line reads PR #9313. The current PR number is #11060. How to fix: Change PR #9313 to PR #11060. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
+1 -1
View File
1
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Feature: Plan explain and decision tree CLI commands
# plan tree - json format
# ------------------------------------------------------------------
@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4254 @tdd_expected_fail
@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4254
Scenario: Tree with json format
Given a set of test decisions forming a tree
When I format the tree as json
+6 -1
View File
2
@@ -402,7 +402,12 @@ def step_roots_no_children(context: Context) -> None:
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
@then("the json tree output should be valid json")
def step_tree_json_valid(context: Context) -> None:
parsed = json.loads(context.pe_tree_json)
assert isinstance(parsed, list), "Expected a JSON array"
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
assert isinstance(parsed, dict), (
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
f"Expected JSON envelope (dict), got {type(parsed).__name__}"
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
)
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
_ENVELOPE_KEYS = {"command", "status", "exit_code", "data", "timing", "messages"}
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
missing = _ENVELOPE_KEYS - set(parsed.keys())
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
assert not missing, f"Envelope missing required fields: {missing}"
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
@then('the json tree output should contain "{text}"')
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365).

Two problems:

  1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd().

  2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree.

How to fix:

Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command:
def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str:
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
from io import StringIO
buf = StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command)
return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n")

Update step_format_tree_json to pass command:
context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree")

Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid():
assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree"
data = parsed.get("data")
assert isinstance(data, dict)
missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys())
assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}"


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: BDD test does not exercise the fixed code path and data sub-structure is not verified (unaddressed from reviews #8346 and #8365). Two problems: 1. _capture_format_output(tree, json) at line 291 calls format_output(data, fmt) with no command argument (line 247). The BDD test produces command: empty string — it does NOT exercise the envelope-producing code path in tree_decisions_cmd(). 2. step_tree_json_valid() checks for the six outer envelope keys but does NOT verify that data contains the spec-required sub-keys (plan_id, tree, summary, child_plans, decision_ids), nor that command equals plan tree. How to fix: Update _capture_format_output to accept and pass command: def _capture_format_output(data, fmt, command: str = "") -> str: from contextlib import redirect_stdout from io import StringIO buf = StringIO() with redirect_stdout(buf): result = format_output(data, fmt, command=command) return result or buf.getvalue().rstrip("\n") Update step_format_tree_json to pass command: context.pe_tree_json = _capture_format_output(tree, "json", command="plan tree") Add assertions in step_tree_json_valid(): assert parsed.get("command") == "plan tree" data = parsed.get("data") assert isinstance(data, dict) missing_keys = {"plan_id", "tree", "summary", "child_plans", "decision_ids"} - set(data.keys()) assert not missing_keys, f"data missing required fields: {missing_keys}" --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
+3 -1
View File
3
@@ -4153,7 +4153,9 @@ def tree_decisions_cmd(
Review

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object.

The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map).

How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output():

tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth)
data = {
    "plan_id": plan_id,
    "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {},
    "summary": {
        "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes),
        "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes),
        "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+",
        "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"),
        "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded),
    },
    "child_plans": [],
    "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions},
}
console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0))

Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object. The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map). How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output(): tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth) data = { "plan_id": plan_id, "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {}, "summary": { "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes), "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes), "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+", "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"), "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded), }, "child_plans": [], "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions}, } console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0)) Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object.

The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map).

How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output():

tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth)
data = {
    "plan_id": plan_id,
    "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {},
    "summary": {
        "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes),
        "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes),
        "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+",
        "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"),
        "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded),
    },
    "child_plans": [],
    "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions},
}
console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0))

Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object. The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map). How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output(): tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth) data = { "plan_id": plan_id, "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {}, "summary": { "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes), "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes), "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+", "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"), "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded), }, "child_plans": [], "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions}, } console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0)) Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
)
if fmt in (OutputFormat.JSON, OutputFormat.YAML):
console.print(format_output(tree_data, fmt))
Review

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object.

The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map).

How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output():

tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth)
data = {
    "plan_id": plan_id,
    "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {},
    "summary": {
        "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes),
        "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes),
        "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+",
        "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"),
        "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded),
    },
    "child_plans": [],
    "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions},
}
console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0))

Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object. The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map). How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output(): tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth) data = { "plan_id": plan_id, "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {}, "summary": { "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes), "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes), "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+", "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"), "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded), }, "child_plans": [], "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions}, } console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0)) Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
console.print(
Review

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object.

The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map).

How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output():

tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth)
data = {
    "plan_id": plan_id,
    "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {},
    "summary": {
        "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes),
        "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes),
        "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+",
        "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"),
        "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded),
    },
    "child_plans": [],
    "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions},
}
console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0))

Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object. The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map). How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output(): tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth) data = { "plan_id": plan_id, "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {}, "summary": { "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes), "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes), "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+", "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"), "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded), }, "child_plans": [], "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions}, } console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0)) Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
format_output(tree_data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0)
Review

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object.

The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map).

How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output():

tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth)
data = {
    "plan_id": plan_id,
    "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {},
    "summary": {
        "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes),
        "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes),
        "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+",
        "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"),
        "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded),
    },
    "child_plans": [],
    "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions},
}
console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0))

Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object. The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map). How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output(): tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth) data = { "plan_id": plan_id, "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {}, "summary": { "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes), "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes), "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+", "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"), "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded), }, "child_plans": [], "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions}, } console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0)) Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
)
Review

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object.

The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map).

How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output():

tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth)
data = {
    "plan_id": plan_id,
    "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {},
    "summary": {
        "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes),
        "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes),
        "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+",
        "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"),
        "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded),
    },
    "child_plans": [],
    "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions},
}
console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0))

Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object. The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map). How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output(): tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth) data = { "plan_id": plan_id, "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {}, "summary": { "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes), "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes), "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+", "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"), "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded), }, "child_plans": [], "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions}, } console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0)) Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
elif fmt == OutputFormat.TABLE:
# Flatten for table view
filtered = (
Review

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object.

The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map).

How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output():

tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth)
data = {
    "plan_id": plan_id,
    "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {},
    "summary": {
        "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes),
        "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes),
        "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+",
        "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"),
        "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded),
    },
    "child_plans": [],
    "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions},
}
console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0))

Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object. The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map). How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output(): tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth) data = { "plan_id": plan_id, "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {}, "summary": { "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes), "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes), "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+", "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"), "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded), }, "child_plans": [], "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions}, } console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0)) Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Review

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365).

build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object.

The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map).

How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output():

tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth)
data = {
    "plan_id": plan_id,
    "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {},
    "summary": {
        "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes),
        "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes),
        "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+",
        "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"),
        "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded),
    },
    "child_plans": [],
    "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions},
}
console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0))

Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: data field is still a raw list, not the spec-required object (unaddressed from reviews #8318, #8346, #8365). build_decision_tree() returns list[dict[str, object]]. Passing tree_data directly as data produces {data: [{...}, ...]} — a JSON array, not a spec-compliant object. The spec requires data to contain: plan_id, tree (single root node object), summary (with nodes/depth/child_plans/invariants/superseded), child_plans (list), decision_ids (map). How to fix — construct the spec-compliant dict before calling format_output(): tree_nodes = build_decision_tree(decisions, show_superseded=show_superseded, max_depth=depth) data = { "plan_id": plan_id, "tree": tree_nodes[0] if tree_nodes else {}, "summary": { "nodes": _count_nodes(tree_nodes), "depth": _max_depth(tree_nodes), "child_plans": str(len([d for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "subplan_spawn"])) + "+", "invariants": sum(1 for d in decisions if str(d.decision_type) == "invariant_enforced"), "superseded": sum(1 for d in decisions if d.is_superseded), }, "child_plans": [], "decision_ids": {str(d.decision_type): d.decision_id for d in decisions}, } console.print(format_output(data, fmt, command="plan tree", status="ok", exit_code=0)) Also add private helpers _count_nodes and _max_depth to compute the summary fields from the tree. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker