feat(actor): make built-in actors virtual, resolved on-demand from provider registry #10927
Labels
Clear labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
No Label
Type
Task
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
#10923 Make built-in actors virtual (resolved on-demand from provider registry, not persisted to database)
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#10927
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "feature/m3-virtual-built-in-actors"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
ProviderRegistryagents actor listnow shows built-in actors immediately afterinitwithout any prior write operationensure_built_in_actors()removed entirely;is_built_incolumn dropped fromactorstable via Alembic migrationActorRegistry.update_actor()added to guard virtual built-in actors from being modified via the update pathMotivation
Before this change,
agents actor listshowed "No actors configured" after a freshinit --yeseven when providers were configured with valid API keys. Built-in actors were only materialised lazily on the first write operation, creating the confusing UX described in the specification. This was tracked as a known architectural contradiction (bug #797).Approach
Virtual resolution pattern: Built-in actors are now
Actordomain objects created in-memory fromProviderRegistry.get_configured_providers()at query time. They haveis_built_in=Trueandid=None— never persisted.Actor resolution order (DB-first):
service.get_actor(name)— custom DB actors_resolve_virtual_builtin_by_name(name)— virtual built-ins from provider registryNotFoundErrorif neitherDefault actor preference (
actor_preferencessingleton table):set_default_actorfor a virtual built-in stores just the name string.get_default_actorreads the preference, resolves via the chain, returns withis_default=True.Built-in actor protection:
ActorRegistry.update_actor()rejects virtual built-in actor names with aValidationError, mirroring theremove()guard. The CLIactor updatecommand now routes throughupdate_actor()instead ofupsert_actor()directly.is_built_inbypass removed:ActorService.upsert_actor()no longer accepts anis_built_inparameter or bypasses thelocal/namespace guard. All custom actors must uselocal/<id>naming; non-local names are always rejected.Key Files Changed
src/cleveragents/actor/registry.pyupdate_actor()guard; fixdatetime.now(UTC); fixasdict()None guardsrc/cleveragents/application/services/actor_service.pyset/get_default_actor_name()preference methods; removeis_built_inbypass fromupsert_actor(); fixdatetime.now(UTC)src/cleveragents/infrastructure/database/repositories.pyupsert_built_in(),is_built_inpersistence; addset/get_default_name(); fix race condition inset_default_name()with try/except IntegrityErrorsrc/cleveragents/infrastructure/database/models.pyis_built_infromActorModel; addActorPreferencesModelsrc/cleveragents/cli/commands/actor.pyensure_built_in_actors()calls; routeactor updatethroughregistry.update_actor()src/.../m10_001_virtual_builtin_actors.pyis_built_in, addactor_preferencestable; fix docstring/down_revisionmismatch; fix downgrade to preserve default actor preferencefeatures/virtual_builtin_actors.feature+ stepsfeatures/database_repository_coverage.feature+ stepsActorPreferencesModelsingleton table directlyrobot/helper_tdd_actor_list_no_db_update.pycheck-no-set-default-namesubcommandrobot/tdd_actor_list_no_db_update.robotset_default_actor_namenot called duringactor listtests/actor/test_registry_builtin_yaml.pyTestEnsureBuiltInActors*→TestResolveVirtualBuiltinActors+ new test classesReview Fixes Applied (PR #10927 review)
Critical
ActorRegistry.update_actor()method that rejects virtual built-in actors withValidationError. CLIactor updatecommand now routes through this method instead ofupsert_actor()directly, closing the path that could silently convert a virtual built-in to a persisted custom actor.contextlib.suppressanti-pattern inactor_registry_full_coverage_steps.pyandactor_registry_new_coverage_steps.pywith explicittry/exceptthat captures exceptions intocontext.<op>_error, allowing Then steps to assert on the correct exception type.Major
Revises: m9_002_plan_resume_fields→Revises: a5_006_action_invariants_unique_constraintto match the actualdown_revisionvalue.remove_actorscenario inconsolidated_actor.featurewith two scenarios: one that explicitly assertsValidationErroris raised for virtual built-ins, and one that tests custom actor removal delegation.step_service_defaultfallback (which conflated "actor exists" with "actor is default") with a precise assertion on the stored preference name.ActorPreferencesModelscenarios todatabase_repository_coverage.featurewith real repository layer coverage: get when empty, set/get round-trip, update existing row, and fallback to legacyis_defaultactor row.check-no-set-default-namesubcommand to the Robot helper and a corresponding Robot test case verifyingset_default_actor_nameis not called duringactor list.set_default_name()race condition: the INSERT path now catchesIntegrityErrorand falls back to a re-fetch + UPDATE, preventing unhandled errors under concurrent access.set_default_actorscenario inconsolidated_actor.featureto explicitly callget_default_actorafterset_default_actorand assert on the returned actor name, eliminating the stalecontext.returned_defaultdependency.WIP:prefix from PR title.Minor / Nit
if info.capabilities else Noneguard aroundasdict(info.capabilities)in_resolve_virtual_builtin_actors().datetime.now()todatetime.now(UTC)inregistry.pyandactor_service.pyfor timezone-aware consistency.downgrade()to copydefault_actor_namefromactor_preferencesback tois_default=Trueon the actor row before dropping the table, preventing data loss on rollback.is_built_inparameter and itslocal/namespace bypass fromActorService.upsert_actor(). Non-local actor names are now always rejected, eliminating the footgun.allow_unsafeentry fromadd()docstring.step_verify_builtin_overwrite_errorstep definition.consolidated_actor.feature.Quality Gate Results
nox -e lintnox -e typechecknox -e unit_testsnox -e integration_testsnox -e e2e_testsnox -e coverage_reportCloses #10923
c7ad9bb70etoc892f8d7e4c892f8d7e4toedfb5b158bReview Summary
This PR implements a well-scoped architectural change: replacing DB-persisted built-in actors with in-memory virtual resolution from
ProviderRegistry. Theensure_built_in_actors()persistence path is fully removed. All CI gates pass (lint, typecheck, security, unit_tests, integration_tests, coverage@97.10%).What was reviewed
registry.py(full rewrite),actor_service.py(default_actor_name split),models.py(is_built_in drop + new ActorPreferencesModel),repositories.py(upsert_built_in removal + preferences CRUD)m10_001_virtual_builtin_actors.py— drops is_built_in, adds actor_preferences singleton tablefeatures/virtual_builtin_actors.featurewith comprehensive step definitions10-Category Checklist
CORRECTNESS: All acceptance criteria are met. Actor resolution order (DB → virtual → NotFoundError) is correct. Custom actors take precedence over virtual built-ins in list(). Remove/update reject built-in names. Default set/get for virtual actors stores only the name preference.
SPECIFICATION ALIGNMENT: Aligns with the spec showing built-in actors alongside custom actors in
agents actor listoutput. Removedensure_built_in_actors()persistence which the spec did not actually mandate.TEST QUALITY: New 8-scenario feature file covers all new behavior paths. Edge cases handled: no providers → empty list; custom overrides virtual; no default; removal rejection. Integration test helper (
robot/helper_tdd_actor_list_validation.py) correctly updated to use list_actors() instead of ensure+upsert. Existing 4 feature files + 9 step modules + test module properly adapted.TYPE SAFETY: No new
# type: ignorecomments introduced. All new methods have proper type annotations. The existing# type: ignorecomments in repositories.py are pre-existing project-wide patterns, not introduced by this PR.READABILITY: Naming is clean and descriptive.
ActorPreferencesModel,set_default_actor_name/get_default_actor_name,_resolve_virtual_builtin_actors,_is_virtual_builtin_name,_get_by_name_or_virtual— all self-documenting. Docstrings are comprehensive.PERFORMANCE: No performance concerns. Virtual resolution reads from ProviderRegistry (in-memory) and is efficient. List() merges two in-memory lists and sorts — O(n log n) where n is small. No N+1 patterns.
SECURITY: No new security concerns. No hardcoded secrets, injection vectors, or unsafe patterns. External inputs (actor names) are validated through
_normalize_name.CODE STYLE: SOLID principles followed — separation of concerns between registry (virtual resolution), service (preference persistence), and repository (DB operations). Files are well under 500 lines. ruff conventions followed (lint CI passes).
DOCUMENTATION: Module-level docstrings in
registry.pyclearly document the new architecture. NewActorPreferencesModelclass has a thorough docstring explaining why a separate table is needed. Inline comments explain backward compatibility paths.COMMIT AND PR QUALITY: PR description is thorough, well-structured, and references the issue. Quality gate numbers provided. One suggestion: PR title prefix "WIP:" is non-standard for Conventional Changelog format. Recommend removing it for the final merge if commits have been cleaned up.
Observations / Minor Suggestions
PR is still a draft (
draft: true). The code appears complete — consider marking as ready for review.Merge conflicts: The PR has
has_conflicts: true. This is a branch-level issue, not a code quality concern. Author should rebase on latest master before merge.Regression test tag: The behavioral change (built-in removal now raises
ValidationErrorinstead of silently overwriting) would benefit from a@tdd_issue_Ntag on a dedicated regression scenario, since the old behavior was permissive and the new behavior is strict.Verdict
APPROVED. All acceptance criteria met, all CI gates passing, clean code quality, comprehensive tests. The architectural shift from persistence-based to virtual resolution is well-executed and aligns with the intended design.
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
edfb5b158bto9413cff3f69413cff3f6tof11327fe15f11327fe15tofcf2c3009bfcf2c3009bto9413cff3f69413cff3f6to0f0902bc8a0f0902bc8ato95352a4d7b95352a4d7bto6fe4eb079a6fe4eb079ato8dc55655e9