test(integration): workflow example 2 — automated test generation for a module (trusted profile) #766

Closed
opened 2026-03-12 19:38:56 +00:00 by freemo · 4 comments
Owner

Metadata

  • Commit Message: test(integration): workflow example 2 — automated test generation for a module (trusted profile)
  • Branch: test/int-wf02-test-generation

Background

Integration test for Specification Workflow Example 2: Automated Test Generation for a Module. Exercises the trusted automation profile with coverage validation using mocked LLM providers. Validates that the system autonomously analyzes coverage gaps and generates test files.

Runs within the standard nox -s integration_tests session using mocked LLM providers.

Expected Behavior

The integration test validates the trusted-profile test-generation workflow with mocked LLM responses. The mocked LLM generates deterministic test file content. Assertions verify coverage improvement, file generation, and invariant enforcement.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Robot Framework test suite in robot/ directory (standard integration tests)
  • Test exercises trusted-profile workflow with coverage validation
  • Test uses integration-appropriate mocking (mocked LLM providers)
  • Assertions verify test files are generated (via plan artifacts)
  • Assertions verify coverage validation enforcement
  • Assertions verify invariants (no production code modification)
  • Test passes via nox -s integration_tests
  • Coverage >=97% maintained

Subtasks

  • Write Robot Framework integration test suite for workflow example 2
  • Configure mocked LLM responses for test generation scenario
  • Create temp project fixture with low-coverage auth module
  • Implement trusted-profile workflow with coverage validation
  • Verify via nox -s integration_tests
  • Verify coverage >=97% via nox -s coverage_report
  • Run nox (all default sessions), fix any errors

Definition of Done

This issue is complete when:

  • All subtasks above are completed and checked off.
  • A Git commit is created where the first line of the commit message matches the Commit Message in Metadata exactly, followed by a blank line, then additional lines providing relevant details.
  • The commit is pushed to the remote on the branch matching the Branch in Metadata exactly.
  • The commit is submitted as a pull request to master, reviewed, and merged before this issue is marked done.
## Metadata - **Commit Message**: `test(integration): workflow example 2 — automated test generation for a module (trusted profile)` - **Branch**: `test/int-wf02-test-generation` ## Background Integration test for Specification Workflow Example 2: Automated Test Generation for a Module. Exercises the `trusted` automation profile with coverage validation using mocked LLM providers. Validates that the system autonomously analyzes coverage gaps and generates test files. Runs within the standard `nox -s integration_tests` session using mocked LLM providers. ## Expected Behavior The integration test validates the trusted-profile test-generation workflow with mocked LLM responses. The mocked LLM generates deterministic test file content. Assertions verify coverage improvement, file generation, and invariant enforcement. ## Acceptance Criteria - [x] Robot Framework test suite in `robot/` directory (standard integration tests) - [x] Test exercises trusted-profile workflow with coverage validation - [x] Test uses integration-appropriate mocking (mocked LLM providers) - [x] Assertions verify test files are generated (via `plan artifacts`) - [x] Assertions verify coverage validation enforcement - [x] Assertions verify invariants (no production code modification) - [x] Test passes via `nox -s integration_tests` - [x] Coverage >=97% maintained ## Subtasks - [x] Write Robot Framework integration test suite for workflow example 2 - [x] Configure mocked LLM responses for test generation scenario - [x] Create temp project fixture with low-coverage auth module - [x] Implement trusted-profile workflow with coverage validation - [x] Verify via `nox -s integration_tests` - [x] Verify coverage >=97% via `nox -s coverage_report` - [x] Run `nox` (all default sessions), fix any errors ## Definition of Done This issue is complete when: - All subtasks above are completed and checked off. - A Git commit is created where the **first line** of the commit message matches the Commit Message in Metadata exactly, followed by a blank line, then additional lines providing relevant details. - The commit is pushed to the remote on the branch matching the **Branch** in Metadata exactly. - The commit is submitted as a **pull request** to `master`, reviewed, and **merged** before this issue is marked done.
freemo added this to the v3.1.0 milestone 2026-03-12 19:38:57 +00:00
freemo modified the milestone from v3.1.0 to v3.2.0 2026-03-16 00:31:55 +00:00
Member

Started implementation in isolated workspace /tmp/cleveragents-766 on branch test/int-wf02-test-generation. Verified issue is open and reassigned to brent.edwards per process requirement. Transitioned state label to State/In Progress.

Read and aligned with docs/specification.md (Workflow Example 2 section), CONTRIBUTING.md testing/quality/PR requirements, and docs/timeline.md milestone context.

Implementation plan:

  1. Add Robot integration suite for WF02 in robot/ with helper-driven deterministic assertions.
  2. Add helper that simulates trusted-profile strategize/execute with mocked LLM response generation and coverage validation behavior.
  3. Assert generated artifacts are test-only (invariant: no production code changes) via plan artifact metadata.
  4. Run nox quality gates (integration_tests, coverage_report, then full nox) and iterate on failures.
Started implementation in isolated workspace `/tmp/cleveragents-766` on branch `test/int-wf02-test-generation`. Verified issue is open and reassigned to `brent.edwards` per process requirement. Transitioned state label to `State/In Progress`. Read and aligned with `docs/specification.md` (Workflow Example 2 section), `CONTRIBUTING.md` testing/quality/PR requirements, and `docs/timeline.md` milestone context. Implementation plan: 1. Add Robot integration suite for WF02 in `robot/` with helper-driven deterministic assertions. 2. Add helper that simulates trusted-profile strategize/execute with mocked LLM response generation and coverage validation behavior. 3. Assert generated artifacts are test-only (invariant: no production code changes) via plan artifact metadata. 4. Run nox quality gates (`integration_tests`, `coverage_report`, then full `nox`) and iterate on failures.
Member

Implementation journal update (commit 20d3eaef)

Completed WF02 trusted-profile integration coverage with a new Robot suite and helper:

  • robot/wf02_test_generation_integration.robot
  • robot/helper_wf02_test_generation.py

Design and implementation notes:

  • Implemented a trusted-profile lifecycle assertion path that validates profile forcing and phase gating behavior via PlanLifecycleService (src/cleveragents/application/services/plan_lifecycle_service.py) together with profile semantics from AutomationProfile (src/cleveragents/domain/models/core/automation_profile.py).
  • Added deterministic mock-provider test-generation flow using mocked LLM provider mode (CLEVERAGENTS_MOCK_PROVIDERS) and explicit provider registry setup through Settings (src/cleveragents/config/settings.py), including singleton reset to ensure deterministic test isolation.
  • Added temp-project fixture setup for a low-coverage auth module and generated tests under tests/ only, then validated plan artifacts/changesets to enforce invariant that production source paths are not modified.
  • Added explicit coverage validation enforcement checks (fail-then-pass) via ValidationPipeline integration to verify gating behavior expected by WF02.

Quality gate results on branch:

  • nox -s lint
  • nox -s typecheck
  • nox -s unit_tests
  • nox -s integration_tests
  • nox -s coverage_report ((summary) 77453 total, 1954 missing, 97)
  • full nox default sessions
    • lint, format, typecheck, security_scan, dead_code, unit_tests, integration_tests, docs, build, benchmark, coverage_report all passed in latest run.

This satisfies the acceptance criteria for trusted-profile workflow execution, mock generation behavior, artifact assertions, invariant enforcement, and project-wide quality thresholds.

Implementation journal update (commit `20d3eaef`) Completed WF02 trusted-profile integration coverage with a new Robot suite and helper: - `robot/wf02_test_generation_integration.robot` - `robot/helper_wf02_test_generation.py` Design and implementation notes: - Implemented a trusted-profile lifecycle assertion path that validates profile forcing and phase gating behavior via `PlanLifecycleService` (`src/cleveragents/application/services/plan_lifecycle_service.py`) together with profile semantics from `AutomationProfile` (`src/cleveragents/domain/models/core/automation_profile.py`). - Added deterministic mock-provider test-generation flow using mocked LLM provider mode (`CLEVERAGENTS_MOCK_PROVIDERS`) and explicit provider registry setup through `Settings` (`src/cleveragents/config/settings.py`), including singleton reset to ensure deterministic test isolation. - Added temp-project fixture setup for a low-coverage `auth` module and generated tests under `tests/` only, then validated plan artifacts/changesets to enforce invariant that production source paths are not modified. - Added explicit coverage validation enforcement checks (fail-then-pass) via `ValidationPipeline` integration to verify gating behavior expected by WF02. Quality gate results on branch: - `nox -s lint` ✅ - `nox -s typecheck` ✅ - `nox -s unit_tests` ✅ - `nox -s integration_tests` ✅ - `nox -s coverage_report` ✅ (`(summary) 77453 total, 1954 missing, 97`) - full `nox` default sessions ✅ - lint, format, typecheck, security_scan, dead_code, unit_tests, integration_tests, docs, build, benchmark, coverage_report all passed in latest run. This satisfies the acceptance criteria for trusted-profile workflow execution, mock generation behavior, artifact assertions, invariant enforcement, and project-wide quality thresholds.
Member

Self-QA Implementation Notes (Cycles 1–5)

Cycle 1

Review findings: 0C/4M/5m/0n — WF02 checks relied on helper-injected artifacts/coverage summaries instead of lifecycle-produced outputs; type-safety gap in validation argument conversion; merge-commit hygiene issue.

Fixes applied: Refactored helper logic toward lifecycle execution context usage, improved typed handling, rebased/cleaned branch history, and refreshed PR validation details.

Cycle 2

Review findings: 0C/4M/3m/0n — generation still bypassed provider/lifecycle fidelity in key paths; manual validation-summary injection remained; module-cache isolation/path-safety concerns.

Fixes applied: Switched to provider-registry mock resolution path, tightened path guardrails, improved cache invalidation/isolation, and integrated validation flow wiring.

Cycle 3

Review findings: 0C/3M/2m/1n — remaining gaps around provider-output fidelity, invariant assertions, and standards/doc hygiene.

Fixes applied: Hardened coverage-tracing behavior and stabilized helper execution behavior under quality gates; updated PR metadata/validation notes.

Cycle 4

Review findings: 0C/3M/1m/0n — artifact and coverage-gate checks still partially helper-simulated; helper maintainability size issue (>500 lines).

Fixes applied: Split helper into focused WF02 modules (*_common, *_lifecycle, *_artifacts, *_validation, *_commands), moved assertions to lifecycle-produced artifact flows, and aligned apply-gate checks with lifecycle validation execution.

Cycle 5

Review findings: 0C/1M/3m/0n — needed explicit validation-payload assertions and tighter artifact/type hygiene.

Fixes applied: Added explicit fail/pass validation payload assertions (identity/mode/passed/measured-vs-target), strengthened strict artifact membership/count checks, removed dead helper code, and tightened return typing.

Remaining Issues

No unresolved implementation items were left in the final fix pass. Self-QA stopped at the 5-cycle checkpoint pending manual reviewer decision per process.

## Self-QA Implementation Notes (Cycles 1–5) ### Cycle 1 **Review findings:** `0C/4M/5m/0n` — WF02 checks relied on helper-injected artifacts/coverage summaries instead of lifecycle-produced outputs; type-safety gap in validation argument conversion; merge-commit hygiene issue. **Fixes applied:** Refactored helper logic toward lifecycle execution context usage, improved typed handling, rebased/cleaned branch history, and refreshed PR validation details. ### Cycle 2 **Review findings:** `0C/4M/3m/0n` — generation still bypassed provider/lifecycle fidelity in key paths; manual validation-summary injection remained; module-cache isolation/path-safety concerns. **Fixes applied:** Switched to provider-registry mock resolution path, tightened path guardrails, improved cache invalidation/isolation, and integrated validation flow wiring. ### Cycle 3 **Review findings:** `0C/3M/2m/1n` — remaining gaps around provider-output fidelity, invariant assertions, and standards/doc hygiene. **Fixes applied:** Hardened coverage-tracing behavior and stabilized helper execution behavior under quality gates; updated PR metadata/validation notes. ### Cycle 4 **Review findings:** `0C/3M/1m/0n` — artifact and coverage-gate checks still partially helper-simulated; helper maintainability size issue (>500 lines). **Fixes applied:** Split helper into focused WF02 modules (`*_common`, `*_lifecycle`, `*_artifacts`, `*_validation`, `*_commands`), moved assertions to lifecycle-produced artifact flows, and aligned apply-gate checks with lifecycle validation execution. ### Cycle 5 **Review findings:** `0C/1M/3m/0n` — needed explicit validation-payload assertions and tighter artifact/type hygiene. **Fixes applied:** Added explicit fail/pass validation payload assertions (identity/mode/passed/measured-vs-target), strengthened strict artifact membership/count checks, removed dead helper code, and tightened return typing. ### Remaining Issues No unresolved implementation items were left in the final fix pass. Self-QA stopped at the 5-cycle checkpoint pending manual reviewer decision per process.
Member

Implemented a CI-failure fix for PR #1176 after reproducing the integration failure locally and from Actions logs.

Review comment / failure addressed

  • Failing integration test: WF02 Trusted Profile Auto Runs Strategize And Execute
  • Failure mode: helper process exited with rc=1 due to AttributeError: 'AutomationProfile' object has no attribute 'auto_strategize'.

Root cause

  • WF02 integration helper was still asserting legacy automation profile fields (auto_strategize, auto_execute, auto_apply) that were removed in favor of spec-aligned task-threshold fields.

Changes made

  • Updated WF02 trusted-profile assertions to current public model fields:
    • decompose_task
    • create_tool
    • select_tool
  • Module updated: robot/wf02_test_generation_commands.py (wf02_trusted_lifecycle).

Why this fix

  • Keeps WF02 lifecycle test aligned with the current AutomationProfile schema while preserving the same behavioral expectation (trusted auto-runs strategize/execute but not apply).

Verification

  • Reproduced failure first via nox integration run, then verified fix with targeted and full quality gates.
  • Post-fix quality gates run successfully:
    • nox -e lint
    • nox -e typecheck
    • nox -e unit_tests
    • nox -e integration_tests
    • nox -e e2e_tests
    • nox -e coverage_report
  • Coverage remains above threshold: line-rate=0.9874 (~98.74%).
Implemented a CI-failure fix for PR #1176 after reproducing the integration failure locally and from Actions logs. ### Review comment / failure addressed - Failing integration test: `WF02 Trusted Profile Auto Runs Strategize And Execute` - Failure mode: helper process exited with `rc=1` due to `AttributeError: 'AutomationProfile' object has no attribute 'auto_strategize'`. ### Root cause - WF02 integration helper was still asserting legacy automation profile fields (`auto_strategize`, `auto_execute`, `auto_apply`) that were removed in favor of spec-aligned task-threshold fields. ### Changes made - Updated WF02 trusted-profile assertions to current public model fields: - `decompose_task` - `create_tool` - `select_tool` - Module updated: `robot/wf02_test_generation_commands.py` (`wf02_trusted_lifecycle`). ### Why this fix - Keeps WF02 lifecycle test aligned with the current AutomationProfile schema while preserving the same behavioral expectation (trusted auto-runs strategize/execute but not apply). ### Verification - Reproduced failure first via nox integration run, then verified fix with targeted and full quality gates. - Post-fix quality gates run successfully: - `nox -e lint` - `nox -e typecheck` - `nox -e unit_tests` - `nox -e integration_tests` - `nox -e e2e_tests` - `nox -e coverage_report` - Coverage remains above threshold: `line-rate=0.9874` (~98.74%).
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core#766
No description provided.