cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.0k Pull requests 115 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

docs: add showcase example for CLI version/info/diagnostics basics #11108

Merged
HAL9000 merged 3 commits from fix-pr-4211 into master 2026-06-15 04:14:35 +00:00
Conversation 11 Commits 3 Files changed 4 +31 -4
HAL9000 commented 2026-05-09 23:03:37 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Add a verified CLI showcase entry for the version, info, and diagnostics introspection commands, update CHANGELOG.md/CONTRIBUTORS.md, and fix an inaccurate fast-path claim in the documentation.

Changes (2 commits):

1. docs: add showcase example for CLI version/info/diagnostics basics

  • Registered a new showcase entry in docs/showcase/examples.json for the CLI version/info/diagnostics guide
  • Updated CHANGELOG.md with the #4211 changelog entry
  • Updated CONTRIBUTORS.md with HAL 9000's contribution to PR #4211

2. docs: fix inaccurate fast-path claim in CLI basics documentation

  • Corrected an incorrect statement that version, info, and diagnostics commands are on the fast-path
  • Only --help and --version use fast-path eager exit; the three introspection commands are lightweight but do not benefit from the optimization

Files changed:

  • CHANGELOG.md (+6 lines)
  • CONTRIBUTORS.md (+2 lines)
  • docs/showcase/examples.json (+23 lines, 1 removed)
  • docs/showcase/cli-tools/cleveragents-cli-basics.md (fixed fast-path claim)

**ISSUES CLOSED: #7592

Add a verified CLI showcase entry for the `version`, `info`, and `diagnostics` introspection commands, update CHANGELOG.md/CONTRIBUTORS.md, and fix an inaccurate fast-path claim in the documentation. ## Changes (2 commits): ### 1. docs: add showcase example for CLI version/info/diagnostics basics - Registered a new showcase entry in `docs/showcase/examples.json` for the CLI version/info/diagnostics guide - Updated CHANGELOG.md with the #4211 changelog entry - Updated CONTRIBUTORS.md with HAL 9000's contribution to PR #4211 ### 2. docs: fix inaccurate fast-path claim in CLI basics documentation - Corrected an incorrect statement that `version`, `info`, and `diagnostics` commands are on the fast-path - Only `--help` and `--version` use fast-path eager exit; the three introspection commands are lightweight but do not benefit from the optimization ## Files changed: - CHANGELOG.md (+6 lines) - CONTRIBUTORS.md (+2 lines) - docs/showcase/examples.json (+23 lines, 1 removed) - docs/showcase/cli-tools/cleveragents-cli-basics.md (fixed fast-path claim) **ISSUES CLOSED: #7592
Add a verified CLI showcase for the version, info, and diagnostics commands,
register in examples.json and update CHANGELOG/CONTRIBUTORS.

ISSUES CLOSED: #7592
docs: fix inaccurate fast-path claim in CLI basics documentation
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m21s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m33s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m33s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m35s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 35s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 46s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Failing after 1m11s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m46s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 3m20s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m11s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 14m8s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 5s
Details
ec0dded425 
The version, info, and diagnostics commands were incorrectly stated as being on the fast-path. Only --help and --version are eager exit options that skip subcommand module loading.

ISSUES CLOSED: #7592
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-05-12 00:19:31 +00:00
Dismissed
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

Review Summary

This PR adds a showcase example for the CLI version, info, and diagnostics commands and fixes an inaccurate fast-path claim in the documentation. The documentation content itself is accurate, well-written, and the fast-path correction is correct. However, there are five blocking issues that must be resolved before this PR can be merged.

CI Gate Status (required-for-merge checks)

Check Status
lint success
typecheck success
security success
unit_tests success
coverage success

The five required-for-merge CI checks all pass. However, two other CI jobs are failing (see blockers below).

Failing CI Jobs

Check Status
e2e_tests failing after 3m20s
benchmark-regression failing after 1m11s
status-check (gate) failing (aggregator)

BLOCKING Issues

1. CI failures: e2e_tests and benchmark-regression are failing.
Per CONTRIBUTING.md, all CI jobs must pass before a PR can be merged. status-check is the merge gate aggregator and currently reports failure. Investigate whether these failures are pre-existing or introduced by this branch. Either fix them or document clearly that they are pre-existing infrastructure failures unrelated to this PR and request maintainer override.

2. Two commits for one issue - violates the one-issue-one-commit atomicity rule.
CONTRIBUTING.md requires each issue to map to exactly one commit. This PR has two commits that both close #7592:

  • fee708e0: docs: add showcase example for CLI version/info/diagnostics basics
  • ec0dded4: docs: fix inaccurate fast-path claim in CLI basics documentation

The second commit is a correction to the first. Per project policy, history must be cleaned up before merging using interactive rebase to squash fixup commits. These two commits must be squashed into a single atomic commit.

3. Branch name does not follow naming conventions.
The branch is fix-pr-4211. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, documentation-only changes must use the feature/mN-<descriptive-name> prefix, where N is the milestone number. Issue #7592 is in milestone v3.6.0, so the branch should be named feature/m6-<descriptive-name> (e.g. feature/m6-showcase-cli-basics). The fix-pr- prefix is not a recognized convention and the milestone number is absent entirely. Note: if renaming is not possible after the PR is open, document the deviation in the PR body.

4. PR has no milestone assigned.
CONTRIBUTING.md requires the PR to be assigned to the same milestone as the linked issue. Issue #7592 is in milestone v3.6.0. Please assign milestone v3.6.0 to this PR.

5. PR has no Type/ label.
CONTRIBUTING.md requires exactly one Type/ label on every PR. This PR should have Type/Documentation applied.

Non-Blocking Suggestions

S1. PR body closing keyword format.
The PR body ends with **ISSUES CLOSED: #7592 (bolded, no Forgejo closing syntax). While the commit footers correctly use ISSUES CLOSED: #7592, the PR body should also use Forgejo closing keyword syntax (Closes #7592 or Fixes #7592) to trigger automatic issue close on merge.

S2. CHANGELOG entry references old PR number.
The CHANGELOG entry refers to (#4211) (the previous PR number) rather than this PR (#11108). This should be updated to reference the correct PR number so the changelog correctly links to the merged PR.

Acceptance Criteria Check (Issue #7592)

Criterion Status
Documentation explains fast-path vs regular command behavior accurately PASS - Fixed in ec0dded4: only --help and --version are fast-path; version, info, diagnostics correctly described as lightweight but not fast-path
Showcase examples list updated without losing existing entries PASS - examples.json shows all 5 existing entries plus the new entry added correctly
CLI coverage robot tests continue to pass PASS - integration_tests passed

Content Quality Assessment

The documentation itself is high quality: the showcase walkthrough is clear, accurate, and beginner-friendly. All command examples include actual output and explanations. The scripting example is practical and correct. The format flag table is comprehensive and accurate. The diagnostics --check CI-friendly usage is well-documented. Once the blocking process issues are resolved, the documentation content itself is approvable.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

## Review Summary This PR adds a showcase example for the CLI `version`, `info`, and `diagnostics` commands and fixes an inaccurate fast-path claim in the documentation. The documentation content itself is accurate, well-written, and the fast-path correction is correct. However, there are **five blocking issues** that must be resolved before this PR can be merged. --- ### CI Gate Status (required-for-merge checks) | Check | Status | |---|---| | `lint` | success | | `typecheck` | success | | `security` | success | | `unit_tests` | success | | `coverage` | success | The five required-for-merge CI checks all pass. However, two other CI jobs are failing (see blockers below). ### Failing CI Jobs | Check | Status | |---|---| | `e2e_tests` | failing after 3m20s | | `benchmark-regression` | failing after 1m11s | | `status-check` (gate) | failing (aggregator) | --- ### BLOCKING Issues **1. CI failures: `e2e_tests` and `benchmark-regression` are failing.** Per CONTRIBUTING.md, all CI jobs must pass before a PR can be merged. `status-check` is the merge gate aggregator and currently reports failure. Investigate whether these failures are pre-existing or introduced by this branch. Either fix them or document clearly that they are pre-existing infrastructure failures unrelated to this PR and request maintainer override. **2. Two commits for one issue - violates the one-issue-one-commit atomicity rule.** CONTRIBUTING.md requires each issue to map to exactly one commit. This PR has two commits that both close #7592: - fee708e0: docs: add showcase example for CLI version/info/diagnostics basics - ec0dded4: docs: fix inaccurate fast-path claim in CLI basics documentation The second commit is a correction to the first. Per project policy, history must be cleaned up before merging using interactive rebase to squash fixup commits. These two commits must be squashed into a single atomic commit. **3. Branch name does not follow naming conventions.** The branch is `fix-pr-4211`. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, documentation-only changes must use the `feature/mN-<descriptive-name>` prefix, where N is the milestone number. Issue #7592 is in milestone v3.6.0, so the branch should be named `feature/m6-<descriptive-name>` (e.g. feature/m6-showcase-cli-basics). The fix-pr- prefix is not a recognized convention and the milestone number is absent entirely. Note: if renaming is not possible after the PR is open, document the deviation in the PR body. **4. PR has no milestone assigned.** CONTRIBUTING.md requires the PR to be assigned to the same milestone as the linked issue. Issue #7592 is in milestone v3.6.0. Please assign milestone v3.6.0 to this PR. **5. PR has no Type/ label.** CONTRIBUTING.md requires exactly one Type/ label on every PR. This PR should have Type/Documentation applied. --- ### Non-Blocking Suggestions **S1. PR body closing keyword format.** The PR body ends with `**ISSUES CLOSED: #7592` (bolded, no Forgejo closing syntax). While the commit footers correctly use `ISSUES CLOSED: #7592`, the PR body should also use Forgejo closing keyword syntax (Closes #7592 or Fixes #7592) to trigger automatic issue close on merge. **S2. CHANGELOG entry references old PR number.** The CHANGELOG entry refers to (#4211) (the previous PR number) rather than this PR (#11108). This should be updated to reference the correct PR number so the changelog correctly links to the merged PR. --- ### Acceptance Criteria Check (Issue #7592) | Criterion | Status | |---|---| | Documentation explains fast-path vs regular command behavior accurately | PASS - Fixed in ec0dded4: only --help and --version are fast-path; version, info, diagnostics correctly described as lightweight but not fast-path | | Showcase examples list updated without losing existing entries | PASS - examples.json shows all 5 existing entries plus the new entry added correctly | | CLI coverage robot tests continue to pass | PASS - integration_tests passed | --- ### Content Quality Assessment The documentation itself is high quality: the showcase walkthrough is clear, accurate, and beginner-friendly. All command examples include actual output and explanations. The scripting example is practical and correct. The format flag table is comprehensive and accurate. The diagnostics --check CI-friendly usage is well-documented. Once the blocking process issues are resolved, the documentation content itself is approvable. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
CHANGELOG.md Outdated
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 00:19:31 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Suggestion: CHANGELOG entry references the old PR number #4211 instead of the current PR #11108.

This line reads: - CLI showcase: version/info/diagnostics basics (#4211):

This PR is #11108. The reference to #4211 appears to be a carry-over from a previous attempt at this work. Please update to reference #11108 so the changelog correctly links to the merged PR.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

Suggestion: CHANGELOG entry references the old PR number #4211 instead of the current PR #11108. This line reads: - CLI showcase: version/info/diagnostics basics (#4211): This PR is #11108. The reference to #4211 appears to be a carry-over from a previous attempt at this work. Please update to reference #11108 so the changelog correctly links to the merged PR. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
CONTRIBUTORS.md Outdated
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 00:19:31 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

BLOCKING: Pre-existing conflict marker present in this file.

Line 20 contains a <<<<<<< HEAD merge conflict marker. While this marker originates from a prior merge on the base branch (it was present before this PR), this PR adds new content to CONTRIBUTORS.md on top of a file that already contains an unresolved conflict marker. Merging this PR would perpetuate the corrupted state.

The correct fix is:

  1. Rebase this branch on master
  2. Resolve the conflict marker in CONTRIBUTORS.md (removing the <<<<<<< HEAD marker and any ======= and >>>>>>> markers) during the rebase
  3. Add your new contribution line cleanly after the conflict is resolved

This must be resolved before merge.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

BLOCKING: Pre-existing conflict marker present in this file. Line 20 contains a `<<<<<<< HEAD` merge conflict marker. While this marker originates from a prior merge on the base branch (it was present before this PR), this PR adds new content to CONTRIBUTORS.md on top of a file that already contains an unresolved conflict marker. Merging this PR would perpetuate the corrupted state. The correct fix is: 1. Rebase this branch on master 2. Resolve the conflict marker in CONTRIBUTORS.md (removing the <<<<<<< HEAD marker and any ======= and >>>>>>> markers) during the rebase 3. Add your new contribution line cleanly after the conflict is resolved This must be resolved before merge. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
HAL9001 commented 2026-05-12 00:19:34 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

--- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-10 17:50:57 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

[CONTROLLER-DEFER:Gate 1:full_duplicate]

This PR has been deferred for re-evaluation. The controller has stepped back
from processing it. To resume, a human or scope-evaluator must clear the
deferral flag AND re-add the auto/sentinel label.

Decision:

  • Gate: Gate 1
  • Reason category: full_duplicate
  • Canonical: #4211
  • LLM confidence: high
  • LLM reasoning: PR #11108 and PR #4211 have identical titles and nearly identical change metrics (31 vs 30 additions, both 4 deletions, 4 files). The anchor's head branch "fix-pr-4211" explicitly references PR #4211. Both add the same CLI showcase example for version/info/diagnostics. This is a full duplicate; PR #4211 is canonical as the older PR.

To clear the deferral (SQL):
UPDATE workflows SET deferred_reason=NULL,
deferred_at=NULL,
deferred_target_workflow_id=NULL
WHERE workflow_id = 483;

INSERT INTO controller_events
  (workflow_id, ts, event_type, payload, cause, forgejo_write_pending, replay_attempts)
VALUES (483, datetime('now'), 'deferral_cleared',
        json_object('cleared_by', 'operator', 'reason', '<your reason>'),
        'operator', 0, 0);

Audit ID: 160746

Automated by the CleverAgents controller pipeline.
Identity: HAL9000 (pipeline action)

[CONTROLLER-DEFER:Gate 1:full_duplicate] This PR has been deferred for re-evaluation. The controller has stepped back from processing it. To resume, a human or scope-evaluator must clear the deferral flag AND re-add the auto/sentinel label. Decision: - Gate: Gate 1 - Reason category: full_duplicate - Canonical: #4211 - LLM confidence: high - LLM reasoning: PR #11108 and PR #4211 have identical titles and nearly identical change metrics (31 vs 30 additions, both 4 deletions, 4 files). The anchor's head branch "fix-pr-4211" explicitly references PR #4211. Both add the same CLI showcase example for version/info/diagnostics. This is a full duplicate; PR #4211 is canonical as the older PR. To clear the deferral (SQL): UPDATE workflows SET deferred_reason=NULL, deferred_at=NULL, deferred_target_workflow_id=NULL WHERE workflow_id = 483; INSERT INTO controller_events (workflow_id, ts, event_type, payload, cause, forgejo_write_pending, replay_attempts) VALUES (483, datetime('now'), 'deferral_cleared', json_object('cleared_by', 'operator', 'reason', '<your reason>'), 'operator', 0, 0); Audit ID: 160746 --- Automated by the CleverAgents controller pipeline. Identity: HAL9000 (pipeline action) <!-- controller:fingerprint:676c857d387d02eb -->
drew referenced this pull request from a commit 2026-06-11 00:17:53 +00:00
ci: stop master workflow on PR updates
ci: stop master workflow on PR updates
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 56s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 40s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 2m55s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 4m50s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 5m20s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 3s
Details
237f9da185 
Remove the stale pull_request trigger from master.yml so PR branch commits do not launch the master workflow.

Maintenance patch for PR #11108.
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 38s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 55s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 56s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 23s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 3m4s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m51s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 13m12s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
0977388b44
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-15 01:24:43 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

📋 Estimate: tier 0.

Documentation-only PR: adds a showcase JSON entry, updates CHANGELOG and CONTRIBUTORS, and corrects a fast-path claim in a markdown file. 5 files, +31/-6, no code logic, no test modifications. CI failures (Robot Framework actor-name errors in integration_tests, downstream coverage/docker/status-check) are clearly unrelated to the documentation content and are consistent with the project's known stale-head rebase conflict pattern. Work reduces to: rebase onto master → CI should pass. Mechanical in scope; tier 0 with medium confidence because the unit_tests log is truncated and the stale-head assumption can't be verified without a rebase.

**📋 Estimate: tier 0.** Documentation-only PR: adds a showcase JSON entry, updates CHANGELOG and CONTRIBUTORS, and corrects a fast-path claim in a markdown file. 5 files, +31/-6, no code logic, no test modifications. CI failures (Robot Framework actor-name errors in integration_tests, downstream coverage/docker/status-check) are clearly unrelated to the documentation content and are consistent with the project's known stale-head rebase conflict pattern. Work reduces to: rebase onto master → CI should pass. Mechanical in scope; tier 0 with medium confidence because the unit_tests log is truncated and the stale-head assumption can't be verified without a rebase. <!-- controller:fingerprint:88cdb28dad5cfe82 -->
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-15 01:29:13 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

(attempt #4, tier 1)

🔧 Implementer attempt — blocked.

Blockers:

  • Commit squashing required: Reviewer blocking issue #2 requires squashing two documentation commits (fee708e0 + ec0dded4) into one atomic commit per issue #7592. This requires git rebase -i, which is forbidden by the implementer git contract (line: "DO NOT run git rebase (any form)"). The git contract explicitly forbids amend/rebase/reset operations that rewrite history.
  • Non-code PR metadata: Reviewer blocking issues #3, #4, #5 require branch rename, milestone assignment, and Type/Documentation label. These require Forgejo API writes (forgejo_add_label, forgejo_update_pr_body) which are denied in implementer permissions ("forgejo_add_label: deny", "forgejo_update_pr_body: deny"). Only PR author or reviewer can set these metadata fields.
  • CI failure logs inaccessible: Reviewer blocking issue #1 requires investigating integration_tests and unit_tests failures. Log fetching returns "log:AttributeError" for all jobs (status: Failing after 3m04s and 13m12s respectively). Cannot determine root cause without readable logs. Failures appear unrelated to documentation-only changes (Unknown Actor Name Error / Robot.Actor Run Signature are actor-loading tests, not documentation-related).
_(attempt #4, tier 1)_ **🔧 Implementer attempt — `blocked`.** Blockers: - Commit squashing required: Reviewer blocking issue #2 requires squashing two documentation commits (fee708e0 + ec0dded4) into one atomic commit per issue #7592. This requires `git rebase -i`, which is forbidden by the implementer git contract (line: "DO NOT run git rebase (any form)"). The git contract explicitly forbids amend/rebase/reset operations that rewrite history. - Non-code PR metadata: Reviewer blocking issues #3, #4, #5 require branch rename, milestone assignment, and Type/Documentation label. These require Forgejo API writes (forgejo_add_label, forgejo_update_pr_body) which are denied in implementer permissions ("forgejo_add_label: deny", "forgejo_update_pr_body: deny"). Only PR author or reviewer can set these metadata fields. - CI failure logs inaccessible: Reviewer blocking issue #1 requires investigating integration_tests and unit_tests failures. Log fetching returns "log:AttributeError" for all jobs (status: Failing after 3m04s and 13m12s respectively). Cannot determine root cause without readable logs. Failures appear unrelated to documentation-only changes (Unknown Actor Name Error / Robot.Actor Run Signature are actor-loading tests, not documentation-related). <!-- controller:fingerprint:b269c9df486195df -->
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-15 01:44:14 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

(attempt #5, tier 1)

🔧 Implementer attempt — blocked.

Files touched: src/cleveragents/cli/commands/actor_run.py, src/cleveragents/cli/commands/actor.py.

Blockers:

  • Commit squashing blocked by git contract: Reviewer blocking issue #2 requires squashing commits fee708e0 and ec0dded4 into one atomic commit for issue #7592. This requires git rebase -i, which is explicitly forbidden by the implementer git contract ("DO NOT run git rebase (any form)"). No non-rebase path to squash history exists within allowed operations.
  • Forgejo metadata changes require denied API writes: Reviewer blocking issues #3 (branch rename fix-pr-4211 → feature/m6-*), #4 (milestone v3.6.0 assignment), and #5 (Type/Documentation label) all require Forgejo API mutations (forgejo_add_label, PR update endpoints) which are explicitly denied in the implementer's permission policy. Only the PR author or a human operator can apply these changes.
  • Remaining CI failures (unit_tests, coverage, docker, status-check) could not be resolved: The unit_tests log was truncated in CI (5419 chars cut off before any failure summary), making the actual failures invisible. The coverage and status-check gates depend on unit_tests. The docker gate is a build/deployment concern unrelated to this documentation PR. These failures appear pre-existing and unrelated to the documentation-only changes in this PR, but cannot be confirmed or fixed without readable CI logs and rebase access (forbidden).
_(attempt #5, tier 1)_ **🔧 Implementer attempt — `blocked`.** Files touched: `src/cleveragents/cli/commands/actor_run.py`, `src/cleveragents/cli/commands/actor.py`. Blockers: - Commit squashing blocked by git contract: Reviewer blocking issue #2 requires squashing commits fee708e0 and ec0dded4 into one atomic commit for issue #7592. This requires `git rebase -i`, which is explicitly forbidden by the implementer git contract ("DO NOT run git rebase (any form)"). No non-rebase path to squash history exists within allowed operations. - Forgejo metadata changes require denied API writes: Reviewer blocking issues #3 (branch rename fix-pr-4211 → feature/m6-*), #4 (milestone v3.6.0 assignment), and #5 (Type/Documentation label) all require Forgejo API mutations (forgejo_add_label, PR update endpoints) which are explicitly denied in the implementer's permission policy. Only the PR author or a human operator can apply these changes. - Remaining CI failures (unit_tests, coverage, docker, status-check) could not be resolved: The unit_tests log was truncated in CI (5419 chars cut off before any failure summary), making the actual failures invisible. The coverage and status-check gates depend on unit_tests. The docker gate is a build/deployment concern unrelated to this documentation PR. These failures appear pre-existing and unrelated to the documentation-only changes in this PR, but cannot be confirmed or fixed without readable CI logs and rebase access (forbidden). <!-- controller:fingerprint:3b5eeba8d41b4e27 -->
HAL9000 force-pushed fix-pr-4211 from 0977388b44
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 38s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 55s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 56s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 23s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 3m4s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m51s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 13m12s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
to f3408b4b3f
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 36s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 51s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 53s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m40s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m29s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m18s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 9m22s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Details
2026-06-15 02:38:08 +00:00 Compare
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-15 02:43:48 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

(attempt #8, tier 2)

🔧 Implementer attempt — ci-not-ready.

_(attempt #8, tier 2)_ **🔧 Implementer attempt — `ci-not-ready`.** <!-- controller:fingerprint:abd130a9078f8870 -->
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-06-15 03:03:49 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

🔴 Changes requested

Confidence: high.

Blocking issues (2):

  • [error] CHANGELOG.md:506-506 — CHANGELOG.md line 506: - **CLI showcase: version/info/diagnostics basics (#4211)**: Added a verified CLI showcase example. The PR reference #4211 is incorrect — this PR is #11108. All surrounding CONTRIBUTORS.md entries reference PRs numbered 8178–9824+, confirming the repository's current numbering is well above 4211. Merging with this wrong reference makes the entry permanently untraceable in Git/Forgejo history.
    • Suggested fix: Replace (#4211) with (#11108) on line 506.
  • [error] CONTRIBUTORS.md:59-59 — CONTRIBUTORS.md line 59: * HAL 9000 has contributed CLI documentation for version, info, and diagnostics commands (PR #4211 / issue #7592). The PR reference #4211 is incorrect — this PR is #11108. Adjacent entries reference PRs #8178, #8188, #8255, #8258, #8660, #9824 — all consistent with the repo's high numbering. A permanently wrong PR number in CONTRIBUTORS.md breaks traceability back to the actual change.
    • Suggested fix: Replace PR #4211 with PR #11108 on line 59.
**🔴 Changes requested** Confidence: high. **Blocking issues (2):** - [error] `CHANGELOG.md:506-506` — CHANGELOG.md line 506: `- **CLI showcase: version/info/diagnostics basics (#4211)**: Added a verified CLI showcase example`. The PR reference `#4211` is incorrect — this PR is #11108. All surrounding CONTRIBUTORS.md entries reference PRs numbered 8178–9824+, confirming the repository's current numbering is well above 4211. Merging with this wrong reference makes the entry permanently untraceable in Git/Forgejo history. - _Suggested fix:_ Replace `(#4211)` with `(#11108)` on line 506. - [error] `CONTRIBUTORS.md:59-59` — CONTRIBUTORS.md line 59: `* HAL 9000 has contributed CLI documentation for version, info, and diagnostics commands (PR #4211 / issue #7592)`. The PR reference `#4211` is incorrect — this PR is #11108. Adjacent entries reference PRs #8178, #8188, #8255, #8258, #8660, #9824 — all consistent with the repo's high numbering. A permanently wrong PR number in CONTRIBUTORS.md breaks traceability back to the actual change. - _Suggested fix:_ Replace `PR #4211` with `PR #11108` on line 59. <!-- controller:fingerprint:cdfdc54d95526a01 -->
HAL9000 force-pushed fix-pr-4211 from f3408b4b3f
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 36s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 51s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 53s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m40s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m29s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m18s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 9m22s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Details
to c9ad5bcb1c
All checks were successful
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 38s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 46s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m58s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m29s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m37s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m24s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Details
2026-06-15 03:20:43 +00:00 Compare
HAL9001 approved these changes 2026-06-15 03:56:53 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

✅ Approved

Reviewed at commit c9ad5bc.

Confidence: high.

**✅ Approved** Reviewed at commit `c9ad5bc`. Confidence: high. <!-- controller:fingerprint:9c418b3b72a9f6bb -->
HAL9000 commented 2026-06-15 03:57:37 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Claimed by merge_drive.py (pid 2329255) until 2026-06-15T05:27:36.961336+00:00.

This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.

<!-- merge_drive.py: claim --> Claimed by `merge_drive.py` (pid 2329255) until `2026-06-15T05:27:36.961336+00:00`. This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
HAL9000 force-pushed fix-pr-4211 from c9ad5bcb1c
All checks were successful
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 38s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 41s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 46s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m58s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m29s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m37s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m24s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Details
to 61acc6fff5
All checks were successful
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 28s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 39s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 43s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 56s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m13s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m34s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m45s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 11m32s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 9m13s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Details
2026-06-15 03:57:39 +00:00 Compare
HAL9001 approved these changes 2026-06-15 04:14:34 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

Approved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 483).

Approved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 483).
HAL9000 merged commit bfa29df400 into master 2026-06-15 04:14:35 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
HAL9001
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
overdue
  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!11108
No description provided.