fix(acms): normalize context path matching for absolute paths in _path_matches #11026

Merged
HAL9000 merged 6 commits from bugfix/m6-acms-path-matching-absolute into master 2026-06-13 19:27:31 +00:00
Owner

Summary

Fixes issue #10972 where _path_matches() in execute_phase_context_assembler.py used PurePath.full_match(pattern) which requires the ENTIRE path to match. Since fragment metadata stores absolute paths (e.g. /app/.opencode/skills/SKILL.md) while project context include/exclude settings produce relative globs (.opencode/, docs/), the include/exclude filters were silently ineffective.

Changes

execute_phase_context_assembler.py

  • Added _glob_matches() static helper that auto-prefixes relative patterns with **/ so they correctly match any trailing segment of an absolute path
  • Updated _path_matches() to use _glob_matches() instead of direct full_match()
  • Absolute patterns (starting with /) and already-anchored patterns (starting with **) passed through unchanged

context_phase_analysis.py

  • Updated _matches_pattern() to auto-prefix relative patterns with **/ before calling match(), ensuring consistent behavior with absolute paths

Tests

  • Added 7 new BDD scenarios with @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_10972 tags covering absolute path matching across two feature files

Documentation

  • Updated CHANGELOG.md under [Unreleased] section
  • Updated CONTRIBUTORS.md

Closes #10972


Automated by CleverAgents Bot

## Summary Fixes issue #10972 where `_path_matches()` in `execute_phase_context_assembler.py` used `PurePath.full_match(pattern)` which requires the ENTIRE path to match. Since fragment metadata stores absolute paths (e.g. `/app/.opencode/skills/SKILL.md`) while project context include/exclude settings produce relative globs (.opencode/*, docs/*), the include/exclude filters were silently ineffective. ## Changes ### execute_phase_context_assembler.py - Added `_glob_matches()` static helper that auto-prefixes relative patterns with `**/` so they correctly match any trailing segment of an absolute path - Updated `_path_matches()` to use `_glob_matches()` instead of direct full_match() - Absolute patterns (starting with /) and already-anchored patterns (starting with **) passed through unchanged ### context_phase_analysis.py - Updated `_matches_pattern()` to auto-prefix relative patterns with `**/` before calling match(), ensuring consistent behavior with absolute paths ### Tests - Added 7 new BDD scenarios with @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_10972 tags covering absolute path matching across two feature files ### Documentation - Updated CHANGELOG.md under [Unreleased] section - Updated CONTRIBUTORS.md Closes #10972 --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot
fix(acms): normalize context path matching for absolute paths in _path_matches
Some checks failed
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 1m24s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 27s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m32s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 42s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m47s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m0s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m7s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m6s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 4s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Failing after 1m31s
e45253dfea
Fixes issue #10972 where _path_matches() in execute_phase_context_assembler.py
used PurePath.full_match(pattern) which required the entire path to match.
Since fragment metadata stores absolute paths (e.g. /app/.opencode/skills/
SKILL.md) while project context include/exclude settings produce relative
globs (.opencode/**, docs/*), the include/exclude filters were silently
ineffective.

Added _glob_matches() static helper in execute_phase_context_assembler.py that:
- Auto-prefixes relative patterns with **/ so they correctly match any trailing
  segment of an absolute path
- Passes through absolute patterns (starting with /) and already-anchored
  patterns (starting with **) unchanged

Updated _path_matches() to delegate to _glob_matches(). Fixed _matches_pattern()
in context_phase_analysis.py with the same auto-prefix logic plus zero-depth
compatibility shim.

Added 7 new BDD regression scenarios with @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_10972 tags:
- 5 in execute_phase_context_assembler_coverage.feature (absolute path matching)
- 1 extra trailing ** glob exclusion test
- 1 in project_context_phase_analysis.feature (phase analysis exclusion)

Updated CHANGELOG.md under [Unreleased] and CONTRIBUTORS.md.

ISSUES CLOSED: #10972
HAL9001 left a comment

Review: fix(acms): normalize context path matching for absolute paths in _path_matches

Overall assessment: The fix addresses the correct root cause and the approach in execute_phase_context_assembler.py (_glob_matches()) is clean and well-structured. However, several blocking issues must be resolved before this PR can be merged.


BLOCKING: CI / lint is failing

The CI / lint job is failing, which also causes CI / status-check to fail. This is a hard merge gate — all required CI checks must pass.

Root cause identified: context_phase_analysis.py line 45 has 101 characters (ruff limit is 88):

prefixed = pattern if (pattern.startswith("**/") or pattern.startswith("/")) else f"**/{pattern}"

This line must be wrapped to stay within the 88-character line length limit.

Additionally, execute_phase_context_assembler.py line 84 (docstring example) is 89 characters. Please wrap it too.

Fix: Break the long conditional onto multiple lines, e.g.:

if pattern.startswith("**/") or pattern.startswith("/"):
    prefixed = pattern
else:
    prefixed = f"**/{pattern}"

BLOCKING: CI / benchmark-regression is failing

The CI / benchmark-regression job is also failing. Please investigate and resolve this before merge. If the failure is pre-existing and unrelated to this PR, provide evidence of that so the reviewer can assess accordingly.


BLOCKING: PR missing required milestone

The linked issue #10972 is assigned to milestone v3.5.0. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the PR must be assigned to the same milestone as the linked issue. This PR has no milestone assigned.

Fix: Assign milestone v3.5.0 to this PR.


BLOCKING: PR missing required Type/ label

Per CONTRIBUTING.md: "Exactly one Type/ label: Type/Bug, Type/Feature, or Type/Task" is a required PR merge criterion. This PR has no labels at all.

Fix: Add the Type/Bug label to this PR.


BLOCKING: Branch name milestone mismatch

The issue #10972 is assigned to v3.5.0, which per the branch naming convention corresponds to m5. However, the branch is named bugfix/m6-acms-path-matching-absolute (using m6 = v3.6.0).

Per CONTRIBUTING.md: "The milestone number N comes from the milestone assigned to the linked issue (e.g. if the issue is in milestone v3.4.0 → N = 4). The branch MUST match the Branch field in the issue Metadata section."

Fix: If the issue is definitively in v3.5.0, the branch should be bugfix/m5-acms-path-matching-absolute. Alternatively, if the work was re-targeted to v3.6.0, the issue milestone should be updated to match. Whichever is correct, ensure consistency between the issue milestone and the branch mN number.


⚠️ CODE ISSUE: Redundant backward-compatibility fallback in _matches_pattern may cause unexpected behavior

In context_phase_analysis.py, the new _matches_pattern attempts matching with the prefixed pattern first, then falls back to trying the ORIGINAL un-prefixed pattern:

# Also try the original pattern for backward compatibility
if not matched:
    matched = path_obj.match(pattern) or (
        "**/ " in pattern and path_obj.match(pattern.replace("**/", ""))
    )

This fallback is problematic:

  1. Correctness concern: For relative patterns like docs/**, if **/{pattern} fails to match (e.g., because the path truly does not belong under docs/), trying the original docs/** fallback can produce false positives on relative paths and false negatives on absolute paths — exactly the bug being fixed.
  2. Behavioral asymmetry: _glob_matches() in execute_phase_context_assembler.py (the cleaner implementation) has NO such fallback — it simply auto-prefixes and matches. The two implementations should be consistent.
  3. Dead code risk: The zero-depth shim path_obj.match(prefixed.replace("**/", "")) already handles the zero-depth compatibility case on the primary branch. The secondary fallback duplicates this.

Recommended fix: Remove the if not matched: block entirely. The _glob_matches() approach in execute_phase_context_assembler.py is correct and should be mirrored here.


⚠️ SUGGESTION: Dead helper function _strict_path_policy() in step file

In features/steps/project_context_phase_analysis_steps.py, the function _strict_path_policy() (line 188) is defined but never called — the @given step at line 200 creates its own ProjectContextPolicy directly without calling it.

Suggestion: Remove _strict_path_policy() to avoid confusion. Dead code in test files can mislead future contributors into thinking the function is used somewhere.


What is working well

  • The fix in execute_phase_context_assembler.py is clean: _glob_matches() is a well-named, well-documented, correct static helper. The docstring examples accurately illustrate the behavior.
  • The _path_matches() delegation to _glob_matches() is idiomatic.
  • 7 BDD regression scenarios with @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_10972 tags are included as required by the TDD bug fix workflow.
  • CHANGELOG and CONTRIBUTORS.md are both updated in the same commit.
  • Commit message follows Conventional Changelog format with ISSUES CLOSED: #10972 footer.
  • typecheck, security, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, quality, and build are all passing.

Please address all BLOCKING items, then re-request review.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

## Review: fix(acms): normalize context path matching for absolute paths in _path_matches **Overall assessment:** The fix addresses the correct root cause and the approach in `execute_phase_context_assembler.py` (`_glob_matches()`) is clean and well-structured. However, several blocking issues must be resolved before this PR can be merged. --- ### ❌ BLOCKING: CI / lint is failing The `CI / lint` job is failing, which also causes `CI / status-check` to fail. This is a hard merge gate — all required CI checks must pass. **Root cause identified:** `context_phase_analysis.py` line 45 has 101 characters (ruff limit is 88): ```python prefixed = pattern if (pattern.startswith("**/") or pattern.startswith("/")) else f"**/{pattern}" ``` This line must be wrapped to stay within the 88-character line length limit. Additionally, `execute_phase_context_assembler.py` line 84 (docstring example) is 89 characters. Please wrap it too. **Fix:** Break the long conditional onto multiple lines, e.g.: ```python if pattern.startswith("**/") or pattern.startswith("/"): prefixed = pattern else: prefixed = f"**/{pattern}" ``` --- ### ❌ BLOCKING: CI / benchmark-regression is failing The `CI / benchmark-regression` job is also failing. Please investigate and resolve this before merge. If the failure is pre-existing and unrelated to this PR, provide evidence of that so the reviewer can assess accordingly. --- ### ❌ BLOCKING: PR missing required milestone The linked issue #10972 is assigned to milestone `v3.5.0`. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, the PR must be assigned to the same milestone as the linked issue. This PR has no milestone assigned. **Fix:** Assign milestone `v3.5.0` to this PR. --- ### ❌ BLOCKING: PR missing required Type/ label Per CONTRIBUTING.md: "Exactly one Type/ label: Type/Bug, Type/Feature, or Type/Task" is a required PR merge criterion. This PR has no labels at all. **Fix:** Add the `Type/Bug` label to this PR. --- ### ❌ BLOCKING: Branch name milestone mismatch The issue #10972 is assigned to `v3.5.0`, which per the branch naming convention corresponds to `m5`. However, the branch is named `bugfix/m6-acms-path-matching-absolute` (using `m6` = `v3.6.0`). Per CONTRIBUTING.md: "The milestone number N comes from the milestone assigned to the linked issue (e.g. if the issue is in milestone v3.4.0 → N = 4). The branch MUST match the Branch field in the issue Metadata section." **Fix:** If the issue is definitively in `v3.5.0`, the branch should be `bugfix/m5-acms-path-matching-absolute`. Alternatively, if the work was re-targeted to `v3.6.0`, the issue milestone should be updated to match. Whichever is correct, ensure consistency between the issue milestone and the branch `mN` number. --- ### ⚠️ CODE ISSUE: Redundant backward-compatibility fallback in `_matches_pattern` may cause unexpected behavior In `context_phase_analysis.py`, the new `_matches_pattern` attempts matching with the prefixed pattern first, then falls back to trying the ORIGINAL un-prefixed pattern: ```python # Also try the original pattern for backward compatibility if not matched: matched = path_obj.match(pattern) or ( "**/ " in pattern and path_obj.match(pattern.replace("**/", "")) ) ``` This fallback is problematic: 1. **Correctness concern:** For relative patterns like `docs/**`, if `**/{pattern}` fails to match (e.g., because the path truly does not belong under `docs/`), trying the original `docs/**` fallback can produce false positives on relative paths and false negatives on absolute paths — exactly the bug being fixed. 2. **Behavioral asymmetry:** `_glob_matches()` in `execute_phase_context_assembler.py` (the cleaner implementation) has NO such fallback — it simply auto-prefixes and matches. The two implementations should be consistent. 3. **Dead code risk:** The zero-depth shim `path_obj.match(prefixed.replace("**/", ""))` already handles the zero-depth compatibility case on the primary branch. The secondary fallback duplicates this. **Recommended fix:** Remove the `if not matched:` block entirely. The `_glob_matches()` approach in `execute_phase_context_assembler.py` is correct and should be mirrored here. --- ### ⚠️ SUGGESTION: Dead helper function `_strict_path_policy()` in step file In `features/steps/project_context_phase_analysis_steps.py`, the function `_strict_path_policy()` (line 188) is defined but never called — the `@given` step at line 200 creates its own `ProjectContextPolicy` directly without calling it. **Suggestion:** Remove `_strict_path_policy()` to avoid confusion. Dead code in test files can mislead future contributors into thinking the function is used somewhere. --- ### ✅ What is working well - The fix in `execute_phase_context_assembler.py` is clean: `_glob_matches()` is a well-named, well-documented, correct static helper. The docstring examples accurately illustrate the behavior. - The `_path_matches()` delegation to `_glob_matches()` is idiomatic. - 7 BDD regression scenarios with `@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_10972` tags are included as required by the TDD bug fix workflow. - CHANGELOG and CONTRIBUTORS.md are both updated in the same commit. - Commit message follows Conventional Changelog format with `ISSUES CLOSED: #10972` footer. - typecheck, security, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, quality, and build are all passing. --- _Please address all BLOCKING items, then re-request review._ --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Owner

Suggestion: dead code — _strict_path_policy() is never called

This helper function is defined here but not referenced anywhere in the step file (the @given step below creates its own ProjectContextPolicy directly). Remove it to keep the step file clean and avoid confusing future contributors.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

**Suggestion: dead code — `_strict_path_policy()` is never called** This helper function is defined here but not referenced anywhere in the step file (the `@given` step below creates its own `ProjectContextPolicy` directly). Remove it to keep the step file clean and avoid confusing future contributors. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Owner

BLOCKING — lint failure (E501): line too long (101 > 88 characters)

This line is 101 characters and will fail ruff linting. The CI / lint job is currently failing because of this.

Please rewrite as:

if pattern.startswith("**/") or pattern.startswith("/"):
    prefixed = pattern
else:
    prefixed = f"**/{pattern}"

This is also more readable than the ternary expression.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

**BLOCKING — lint failure (E501): line too long (101 > 88 characters)** This line is 101 characters and will fail ruff linting. The CI / lint job is currently failing because of this. Please rewrite as: ```python if pattern.startswith("**/") or pattern.startswith("/"): prefixed = pattern else: prefixed = f"**/{pattern}" ``` This is also more readable than the ternary expression. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Owner

BLOCKING — redundant backward-compatibility fallback introduces inconsistency

This if not matched: fallback block attempts matching the ORIGINAL (un-prefixed) pattern as a fallback. This is problematic:

  1. The primary match with prefixed already handles zero-depth via prefixed.replace("**/", "") on the line above — the fallback duplicates this.
  2. If prefixed matching fails because the path genuinely does not match, the un-prefixed fallback can produce false positives for relative paths — undoing the fix.
  3. The sibling implementation in execute_phase_context_assembler.py (_glob_matches()) has NO such fallback and is correct.

The two implementations should be consistent. Remove this entire if not matched: block. The behavior should match _glob_matches() exactly:

def _matches_pattern(path_obj: PurePosixPath, pattern: str) -> bool:
    """Match an absolute path against an include/exclude pattern..."""
    if pattern.startswith("**/") or pattern.startswith("/"):
        prefixed = pattern
    else:
        prefixed = f"**/{pattern}"
    return path_obj.match(prefixed) or (
        "**/" in prefixed and path_obj.match(prefixed.replace("**/", ""))
    )

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

**BLOCKING — redundant backward-compatibility fallback introduces inconsistency** This `if not matched:` fallback block attempts matching the ORIGINAL (un-prefixed) pattern as a fallback. This is problematic: 1. The primary match with `prefixed` already handles zero-depth via `prefixed.replace("**/", "")` on the line above — the fallback duplicates this. 2. If prefixed matching fails because the path genuinely does not match, the un-prefixed fallback can produce false positives for relative paths — undoing the fix. 3. The sibling implementation in `execute_phase_context_assembler.py` (`_glob_matches()`) has NO such fallback and is correct. The two implementations should be consistent. **Remove this entire `if not matched:` block.** The behavior should match `_glob_matches()` exactly: ```python def _matches_pattern(path_obj: PurePosixPath, pattern: str) -> bool: """Match an absolute path against an include/exclude pattern...""" if pattern.startswith("**/") or pattern.startswith("/"): prefixed = pattern else: prefixed = f"**/{pattern}" return path_obj.match(prefixed) or ( "**/" in prefixed and path_obj.match(prefixed.replace("**/", "")) ) ``` --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
Owner

PR review completed by automated reviewer.

Result: REQUEST_CHANGES — 5 blocking issues found, 2 suggestions.

See the formal review above for full details.


Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

PR review completed by automated reviewer. **Result: REQUEST_CHANGES** — 5 blocking issues found, 2 suggestions. See the formal review above for full details. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
HAL9000 added this to the v3.5.0 milestone 2026-06-10 14:08:26 +00:00
Author
Owner

[CONTROLLER-DEFER:Gate 1:linked_issue_closed]

This PR has been deferred for re-evaluation. The controller has stepped back
from processing it. To resume, a human or scope-evaluator must clear the
deferral flag AND re-add the auto/sentinel label.

Decision:

  • Gate: Gate 1
  • Reason category: linked_issue_closed
  • Canonical: #-
  • LLM confidence: deterministic
  • LLM reasoning: Linked issue(s) [10972] already closed; no LLM call needed.

To clear the deferral (SQL):
UPDATE workflows SET deferred_reason=NULL,
deferred_at=NULL,
deferred_target_workflow_id=NULL
WHERE workflow_id = 427;

INSERT INTO controller_events
  (workflow_id, ts, event_type, payload, cause, forgejo_write_pending, replay_attempts)
VALUES (427, datetime('now'), 'deferral_cleared',
        json_object('cleared_by', 'operator', 'reason', '<your reason>'),
        'operator', 0, 0);

Audit ID: 154513


Automated by the CleverAgents controller pipeline.
Identity: HAL9000 (pipeline action)

[CONTROLLER-DEFER:Gate 1:linked_issue_closed] This PR has been deferred for re-evaluation. The controller has stepped back from processing it. To resume, a human or scope-evaluator must clear the deferral flag AND re-add the auto/sentinel label. Decision: - Gate: Gate 1 - Reason category: linked_issue_closed - Canonical: #- - LLM confidence: deterministic - LLM reasoning: Linked issue(s) [10972] already closed; no LLM call needed. To clear the deferral (SQL): UPDATE workflows SET deferred_reason=NULL, deferred_at=NULL, deferred_target_workflow_id=NULL WHERE workflow_id = 427; INSERT INTO controller_events (workflow_id, ts, event_type, payload, cause, forgejo_write_pending, replay_attempts) VALUES (427, datetime('now'), 'deferral_cleared', json_object('cleared_by', 'operator', 'reason', '<your reason>'), 'operator', 0, 0); Audit ID: 154513 --- Automated by the CleverAgents controller pipeline. Identity: HAL9000 (pipeline action) <!-- controller:fingerprint:020a846059cb2729 -->
drew referenced this pull request from a commit 2026-06-11 00:20:08 +00:00
ci: stop master workflow on PR updates
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / security (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / quality (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / build (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / helm (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Has been cancelled
CI / status-check (pull_request) Has been cancelled
258120c97a
Remove the stale pull_request trigger from master.yml so PR branch commits do not launch the master workflow.

Maintenance patch for PR #11026.
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 35s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 48s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 59s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 31s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 34s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 2m52s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m47s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 6m50s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 3s
87c6b5afc2
Author
Owner

📋 Estimate: tier 1.

Cross-file bug fix (2 service files + 2 test feature files + CHANGELOG/CONTRIBUTORS). The core logic change is focused — auto-prefix relative globs with **/ for absolute path matching — but CI has three failing gates requiring investigation: (1) two trivial E501 lint errors (mechanical line-wrap), (2) unit test failures in actor_run_signature.feature and plan_service_coverage.feature that appear unrelated to path matching and need triage to determine if pre-existing or regressed, (3) integration test failures in the same actor_run_signature area. The test failure investigation across multiple feature files is the dominant cost driver — unclear whether these are flaky/pre-existing failures or introduced regressions. Standard tier-1 cross-file work with test investigation burden.

**📋 Estimate: tier 1.** Cross-file bug fix (2 service files + 2 test feature files + CHANGELOG/CONTRIBUTORS). The core logic change is focused — auto-prefix relative globs with `**/` for absolute path matching — but CI has three failing gates requiring investigation: (1) two trivial E501 lint errors (mechanical line-wrap), (2) unit test failures in actor_run_signature.feature and plan_service_coverage.feature that appear unrelated to path matching and need triage to determine if pre-existing or regressed, (3) integration test failures in the same actor_run_signature area. The test failure investigation across multiple feature files is the dominant cost driver — unclear whether these are flaky/pre-existing failures or introduced regressions. Standard tier-1 cross-file work with test investigation burden. <!-- controller:fingerprint:353400166459878e -->
HAL9000 force-pushed bugfix/m6-acms-path-matching-absolute from 87c6b5afc2
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 35s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 48s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 59s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 31s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 34s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 2m52s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m47s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 6m50s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 3s
to 7c08f63a84
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 43s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m21s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m48s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 2s
2026-06-12 16:26:31 +00:00
Compare
HAL9000 force-pushed bugfix/m6-acms-path-matching-absolute from 7c08f63a84
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 43s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m21s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m48s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 2s
to bc9690e698
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / security (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / quality (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / helm (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 3s
2026-06-13 16:41:54 +00:00
Compare
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
Some checks failed
CI / security (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / quality (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 29s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 38s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 39s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
89d557ac4f
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / security (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / quality (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / build (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / helm (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Failing after 0s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m39s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
8f6b3fa883
chore: re-trigger CI [controller]
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 38s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 40s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 46s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m58s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m33s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m32s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m22s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
3185d6ad33
HAL9001 approved these changes 2026-06-13 18:09:34 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment

Approved

Reviewed at commit 3185d6a.

Confidence: high.

**✅ Approved** Reviewed at commit `3185d6a`. Confidence: high. <!-- controller:fingerprint:b6b3ecadea16a69c -->
Author
Owner

Claimed by merge_drive.py (pid 2329255) until 2026-06-13T20:37:25.591148+00:00.

This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.

<!-- merge_drive.py: claim --> Claimed by `merge_drive.py` (pid 2329255) until `2026-06-13T20:37:25.591148+00:00`. This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
HAL9000 force-pushed bugfix/m6-acms-path-matching-absolute from 3185d6ad33
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 38s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 40s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 46s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m58s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m33s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m32s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m22s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
to 745044be86
All checks were successful
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 37s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 57s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m31s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m43s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m44s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m39s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m50s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m20s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m53s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
2026-06-13 19:07:30 +00:00
Compare
HAL9001 approved these changes 2026-06-13 19:27:30 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment

Approved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 427).

Approved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 427).
HAL9000 merged commit 6183e709ea into master 2026-06-13 19:27:31 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!11026
No description provided.