TEST-INFRA: [ci-pipeline-design] Centralize and manage tool versions #10953
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!10953
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "task/ci-centralize-tool-versions"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
Centralized tool version management into a single
.tool-versionsfile to serve as the single source of truth for all tool versions used in the CI pipeline.Changes
.tool-versionsfile containing UV_VERSION, PYTHON_VERSION, HELM_VERSION, and KUBECONFORM_VERSION.forgejo/workflows/ci.ymlto include a newload-versionsjob that reads from.tool-versionsand exports versions as outputsload-versionsand use the exported version outputs instead of hardcoded valuesfeatures/ci_workflow_validation.featureto verify versions are sourced from the central filescripts/load-tool-versions.shfor local version loadingBenefits
.tool-versions)Testing
load-versionsjob exists and outputs the correct versionsload-versionsand use the exported outputsCloses #1918
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation | Agent: implementation-worker
Review of PR #10953: TEST-INFRA: [ci-pipeline-design] Centralize and manage tool versions
Linked Issue: Closes #1918 — Centralize tool version management into a single source of truth
CI Status (BLOCKING)
CI is failing on 3 required gate checks:
lint— FAILING after 46sunit_tests— FAILING after 9m20scoverage— SKIPPED (due to unit_tests failure)Per company policy, all 5 required CI gates (lint, typecheck, security, unit_tests, coverage) must pass before a PR can be approved and merged. This is the primary blocker.
Blocking Issues
Missing type annotations on all 6 new step functions — The project enforces zero-tolerance for untyped parameters (Pyright strict). Every function signature must have typed
context(type: Any), typed positional arguments, and typed return values.CI lint job is failing — This will be resolved once type annotations are added, as ruff flags untyped parameters (per project conventions). The CI lint check is a required-for-merge gate.
CI unit_tests is failing — Likely cascading from the test infrastructure unable to handle the new step definitions without proper signatures, or the Behave runner encountering errors during scenario execution. Needs investigation and fix.
Missing PR labels — The PR has zero labels. Per checklist requirement #12, exactly one
Type/label is mandatory (e.g.,Type/Taskfor infrastructure work). Additionally, aPriority/label should be applied based on triage guidance.Non-Blocking Observations
Branch naming — The branch
task/ci-centralize-tool-versionsdoes not match any prescribed prefix in the contributing guidelines (which requirefeature/mN-,bugfix/mN-, ortdd/mN-). Chore/infrastructure changes should usefeature/mN-format.Redundant dependency declarations — In
ci.yml, bothcoverageanddockerincludeload-versionsin theirneeds:arrays (e.g.,[load-versions, lint, typecheck, ...]). Since those jobs already depend on all the same sub-jobs that requireload-versions, this is transitively satisfied and unnecessary.Feature file scenario scope — The new BDD scenarios (
Tool versions file exists, etc.) validate YAML file structure (presence of keys, outputs, dependencies in .yml parsing) rather than exercising runtime behaviors. These read more like implementation smoke tests than living documentation. Consider whether these test actual user-facing capabilities or just assert that the files are well-formed.Incomplete job dependency assertions — The scenario "CI workflow jobs depend on load-versions" checks lint, typecheck, unit_tests, integration_tests, e2e_tests, helm, and build — but does not assert push-validation (which also depends on
load-versionsin the diff).Overall Assessment
The architectural approach of centralizing tool versions into
.tool-versionsis sound and directly addresses issue #1918. Theload-versionsjob pattern is reasonable. However, the missing type annotations create a cascade failure across lint → unit_tests → coverage that blocks all required CI gates from passing.Fix the three items above (type annotations, add PR labels) and re-push for a fresh CI run.
@ -0,0 +2,4 @@# This file is the single source of truth for tool versions used in the CI pipeline.# Format: TOOL_NAME=versionUV_VERSION=0.8.0Good approach. The format is clean: key=value pairs with a comment header explaining the convention. No issues here.
Automated review completed for PR #10953.
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
Key blockers:
See full review body for detailed findings and non-blocking suggestions.
Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.
(check
no_duplicates, categoryno_duplicates)Anchor PR #10953 focuses specifically on centralizing tool version management into a single
.tool-versionsfile, including modifications to CI workflows and comprehensive BDD tests. Scanned 355 open PRs; no duplicate found. Related CI/test-infra PRs (#10954 Dockerfile security, #1618 reusable workflows, #10845–#10959 performance optimizations) address distinct aspects of the CI pipeline. No other PR targets tool version centralization or.tool-versionsfile creation. Topical differentiation is clear.📋 Estimate: tier 1.
Multi-file CI infra change (5 files, +241/-22): new .tool-versions, ci.yml load-versions job, BDD feature scenarios, step definitions, helper script. Two CI failures require cross-file reasoning: (1) ruff format fix on ci_workflow_validation_steps.py is mechanical but (2) two failing BDD scenarios need understanding of how step definitions inspect the ci.yml YAML — the hardcoded python3.13/UV_VERSION references were replaced with ${{ needs.load-versions.outputs.X }} variables, and the step definitions need to be updated to match this new syntax. Requires holding feature file + step definitions + ci.yml context simultaneously. Standard tier-1 engineering work.
(attempt #4, tier 1)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
rebase-failed.Blockers:
c9c4f154c795b816dd44d0a0b450a2d8b4823b75(attempt #30, tier 2)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
ci-not-ready.(attempt #31, tier 2)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
blocked.Blockers:
830099ac97but dispatch base wasd8b4823b75. The implementer pushed from inside the worktree (forbidden by the git contract) OR a third party pushed during the attempt. Re-dispatch will re-prefetch and pick up the new head.830099ac97d28778f91a🌱 Grooming: proceed — PR cleared for processing.
(check
no_duplicates, categoryno_duplicates)Scanned 253 open PRs for duplicate coverage of centralized tool version management. Anchor PR #10953 addresses a unique requirement: creating .tool-versions as single source of truth for UV, Python, Helm, and Kubeconform versions, plus CI workflow integration and test coverage. No other open PR targets this infrastructure consolidation pattern. Nearby CI improvement PRs (#10845, #10846, #10959, #10954) address execution time, security scanning, or reusable workflows — distinct from version centralization.
📋 Estimate: tier 1.
5-file multi-file change: new .tool-versions config, CI YAML restructured with a new load-versions job and updated dependencies across all existing jobs, new BDD feature scenarios, new step definitions, and a new shell helper script. Additive test work (BDD features + steps) pushes this firmly past tier 0. Reasoning complexity is low (string centralization + YAML dependency wiring), but the cross-file review surface and test fixture additions are characteristic tier-1 work. Not tier 2 — no algorithmic, concurrency, or multi-subsystem complexity. CI is green.
d28778f91a4aa812cba9(attempt #34, tier 1)
🔧 Implementer attempt —
rebased.Pushed 1 commit:
4aa812c.✅ Approved
Reviewed at commit
4aa812c.Confidence: high.
Claimed by
merge_drive.py(pid 2329255) until2026-06-15T07:33:55.375656+00:00.This claim is advisory and will be released when the cycle ends, or after the TTL by a sibling driver's expired-claim sweep.
4aa812cba94ef9e17feaApproved by the controller reviewer stage (workflow 380).