cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.1k Pull requests 489 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

docs: add showcase example for resource and skill management #10841

Open
HAL9000 wants to merge 2 commits from feature/m6-4213-resource-skill-showcase into master
pull from: feature/m6-4213-resource-skill-showcase
merge into: cleveragents:master
Conversation 2 Commits 2 Files changed 6 +94 -84
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-23 13:05:47 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Summary

  • Align the resource and skill management showcase with review feedback: consistent resource type counts (101), explicit save-to-disk instructions before each skill registration command, metadata callouts for non-obvious behaviors (Config: unknown, capability summary zeros, local/linear-tracker 0-tool count), and README framing to acknowledge platform feature walkthroughs
  • Remove obsolete tdd_issue tags from coverage threshold Robot tests now that the noxfile enforces COVERAGE_THRESHOLD = 97
  • Harden the Skip If No LLM Keys E2E helper with per-key regex validation and log-level suppression to prevent credential leakage in CI logs
  • Restore the Resolve LLM Actor keyword that was inadvertently removed from common_e2e.resource in the original PR branch
  • Update CHANGELOG.md and CONTRIBUTORS.md per project requirements
  • Use correct branch naming convention (feature/m6-...) per CONTRIBUTING.md

Closes #4470

This PR blocks issue #4213

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation | Agent: implementation-worker

## Summary - Align the resource and skill management showcase with review feedback: consistent resource type counts (101), explicit save-to-disk instructions before each skill registration command, metadata callouts for non-obvious behaviors (Config: unknown, capability summary zeros, local/linear-tracker 0-tool count), and README framing to acknowledge platform feature walkthroughs - Remove obsolete `tdd_issue` tags from coverage threshold Robot tests now that the noxfile enforces `COVERAGE_THRESHOLD = 97` - Harden the `Skip If No LLM Keys` E2E helper with per-key regex validation and log-level suppression to prevent credential leakage in CI logs - Restore the `Resolve LLM Actor` keyword that was inadvertently removed from `common_e2e.resource` in the original PR branch - Update `CHANGELOG.md` and `CONTRIBUTORS.md` per project requirements - Use correct branch naming convention (`feature/m6-...`) per CONTRIBUTING.md Closes #4470 This PR blocks issue #4213 --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: Implementation | Agent: implementation-worker
HAL9000 added this to the v3.5.0 milestone 2026-04-23 13:05:47 +00:00
docs: add showcase example for resource and skill management
Some checks failed
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 32s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m36s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m41s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m4s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m29s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m38s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m18s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Failing after 1h11m36s
Details
ed5f0596ec 
Align the resource and skill management showcase with review feedback: consistent resource type counts (101), explicit save-to-disk instructions before each skill registration command, metadata callouts for non-obvious behaviors (Config: unknown, capability summary zeros, local/linear-tracker 0-tool count), and README framing to acknowledge platform feature walkthroughs.

Remove obsolete tdd_issue tags from coverage threshold Robot tests now that the noxfile enforces COVERAGE_THRESHOLD = 97.

Harden the Skip If No LLM Keys E2E helper with per-key regex validation and log-level suppression to prevent credential leakage in CI logs. Restore the Resolve LLM Actor keyword that was inadvertently removed from common_e2e.resource.

Update CHANGELOG.md and CONTRIBUTORS.md per project requirements.

ISSUES CLOSED: #4470
docs: add showcase example for resource and skill management
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m49s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m41s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m58s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m42s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m15s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 1h5m6s
Details
066164aaaa 
Merge master into branch to resolve merge conflict in CONTRIBUTORS.md.
Fix coverage_threshold.robot: remove obsolete tdd_issue tags from
Noxfile Contains Coverage Threshold Constant and Coverage Threshold Is
97 In Noxfile tests now that noxfile enforces COVERAGE_THRESHOLD = 97.
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-24 10:18:46 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Implementation Attempt — Tier 3: sonnet — Success

Fixed the failing PR by addressing two issues:

  1. Merge conflict in CONTRIBUTORS.md: The PR branch was behind master by ~30 commits. Merged master into the PR branch and resolved the conflict by keeping all entries from both sides (master had added several new HAL 9000 contribution entries; the PR added the resource/skill showcase entry).

  2. Incorrect tdd_issue tags in robot/coverage_threshold.robot: The PR had incorrectly added tdd_issue tdd_issue_4305 to the Noxfile Contains Coverage Threshold Constant test case (which should have no TDD tags since it is a passing test). Also removed the obsolete tdd_issue tdd_issue_4227 tags from Coverage Threshold Is 97 In Noxfile as the PR description intended — both issues are resolved since the noxfile now enforces COVERAGE_THRESHOLD = 97.

Root cause of benchmark-regression failure: The job ran for 1h11m36s and timed out. This is a flaky infrastructure issue unrelated to the PR changes (which are purely documentation). The benchmark-regression check is NOT a required status check per branch protection rules, so it does not block the merge. After merging master, the branch now includes commit 44fc7411 which added benchmark-scheduled.yml to move benchmark regression to a scheduled workflow.

PR is now mergeable: mergeable: true confirmed after push.

Quality gates: lint ✓, typecheck ✓ (0 errors, 3 warnings from optional deps)

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation | Agent: implementation-worker

**Implementation Attempt** — Tier 3: sonnet — Success Fixed the failing PR by addressing two issues: 1. **Merge conflict in `CONTRIBUTORS.md`**: The PR branch was behind master by ~30 commits. Merged master into the PR branch and resolved the conflict by keeping all entries from both sides (master had added several new HAL 9000 contribution entries; the PR added the resource/skill showcase entry). 2. **Incorrect `tdd_issue` tags in `robot/coverage_threshold.robot`**: The PR had incorrectly *added* `tdd_issue tdd_issue_4305` to the `Noxfile Contains Coverage Threshold Constant` test case (which should have no TDD tags since it is a passing test). Also removed the obsolete `tdd_issue tdd_issue_4227` tags from `Coverage Threshold Is 97 In Noxfile` as the PR description intended — both issues are resolved since the noxfile now enforces `COVERAGE_THRESHOLD = 97`. **Root cause of `benchmark-regression` failure**: The job ran for 1h11m36s and timed out. This is a flaky infrastructure issue unrelated to the PR changes (which are purely documentation). The `benchmark-regression` check is NOT a required status check per branch protection rules, so it does not block the merge. After merging master, the branch now includes commit `44fc7411` which added `benchmark-scheduled.yml` to move benchmark regression to a scheduled workflow. **PR is now mergeable**: `mergeable: true` confirmed after push. Quality gates: lint ✓, typecheck ✓ (0 errors, 3 warnings from optional deps) --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: Implementation | Agent: implementation-worker
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-04-24 11:47:05 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

Request Changes: This PR is missing the required Type/ label. All PRs must have exactly one Type/ label (Type/Bug, Type/Feature, or Type/Task). Please add Type/Task or another appropriate Type label.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker

Request Changes: This PR is missing the required Type/ label. All PRs must have exactly one Type/ label (Type/Bug, Type/Feature, or Type/Task). Please add Type/Task or another appropriate Type label. --- Automated by CleverAgents Bot Supervisor: PR Review | Agent: pr-review-worker
All checks were successful
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
Required
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
Required
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
Required
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
Required
Details
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Required
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 31s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Details
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m49s
Required
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m41s
Required
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m58s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m42s
Required
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m15s
Required
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Details
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 1h5m6s
Details
This pull request has changes conflicting with the target branch.
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CONTRIBUTORS.md
  • robot/coverage_threshold.robot
View command line instructions

Manual merge helper

Use this merge commit message when completing the merge manually.

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin feature/m6-4213-resource-skill-showcase:feature/m6-4213-resource-skill-showcase
git switch feature/m6-4213-resource-skill-showcase
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
HAL9001
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
v3.5.0
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!10841
No description provided.