test(cli): TDD failing tests for init --yes non-interactive (bug #783) #1049
Merged
hurui200320
merged 2 commits from 2026-03-19 06:31:20 +00:00
tdd/m3-init-yes-no-input into master
Dismiss Review
Are you sure you want to dismiss this review?
Labels
Clear labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
overdue
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
No Label
Type
Testing
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
#842 TDD: `agents init --yes` should not require user input (bug #783)
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#1049
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "tdd/m3-init-yes-no-input"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
Adds TDD bug-capture tests proving that
agents init --yesfails to bypass themigration approval prompt in a TTY environment (bug #783). These tests follow the
mandatory TDD bug-fix workflow defined in CONTRIBUTING.md §Bug Fix Workflow.
Changes
Behave feature (
features/tdd_init_yes_no_input.feature): Two scenariostagged
@tdd_expected_fail @tdd_bug @tdd_bug_783that invokeagents init --yesin a fresh environment with the migration prompt simulated as declining (TTY with
no input). The tests verify the command exits successfully and does not display the
"Apply migrations now?" prompt.
Behave steps (
features/steps/tdd_init_yes_no_input_steps.py): Step definitionsthat create an isolated temp directory, clear auto-apply and database-URL environment
variables, patch
sys.stdinon the realsysmodule (correct mock target per projectconvention), and replace
MigrationRunner._default_prompt_for_migrationwith afunction that returns
False(simulating a TTY prompt where the user declines).Temp directory and env var cleanup is registered via
context.add_cleanup().Robot Framework test (
robot/tdd_init_yes_no_input.robot): Two integration testcases tagged
tdd_bug,tdd_bug_783,tdd_expected_failmatching the Behave scenarios.Robot helper (
robot/helper_tdd_init_yes_no_input.py): Helper script that exercisesthe same code path using the same mock strategy as the Behave steps.
Bug Reproduction Mechanism
The core challenge is that
CliRunnerreplacessys.stdinduringinvoke(), makingdirect
isatty()patching ineffective for controlling the prompt path. The mock strategyaddresses this with a two-pronged approach:
patch.object(sys, "stdin", mock_stdin)— Patchessys.stdindirectly on thereal
sysmodule (correct mock target per the project's established pattern infeatures/steps/migration_runner_steps.py). Documents the intent of simulating a TTY.patch.object(MigrationRunner, "_default_prompt_for_migration", ...)— Replacesthe prompt function with one that returns
False(simulating a TTY user decliningmigration). This is the mechanism that actually exercises the bug path, since
CliRunner's stdin replacement bypasses the
isatty()check.CLEVERAGENTS_DATABASE_URLwith non-template filename — Sets the database URLto a path whose filename does not match the
before_scenariotemplate-DB prefixes,forcing the real Alembic migration path instead of the test fast-path.
With bug #783 present,
require_confirmation=Trueis hardcoded inUnitOfWork._ensure_database_initialized(), so the prompt fires, returnsFalse,causing
MigrationNotApprovedErrorand a non-zero exit code. After the fix,--yesshould bypass the prompt entirely.
Root Cause (for the bug fix developer)
init_command()incleveragents.cli.commands.projectreceives the--yesflag butonly uses it to control output format. It does not forward
yesto the migration runner.The migration runner's
init_or_upgrade()is called viaunit_of_work._ensure_database_initialized()withrequire_confirmation=Truehardcoded.Scenario 2 Limitation
While the bug is present, Scenario 2's first assertion (exit code 0) fails and Behave
skips subsequent steps. The "contains Initialized" assertion is only evaluated after the
bug is fixed, providing distinct post-fix regression value.
Quality Gate Results
nox -s lint— ✅ passednox -s typecheck— ✅ passed (0 errors)nox -s unit_tests— ✅ passed (387 features, 11121 scenarios, 0 failed)nox -s integration_tests— ✅ passed (1561 tests, 0 failed)nox -s e2e_tests— ✅ passed (16 tests, 0 failed)nox -s coverage_report— ✅ passed (97% coverage)Closes #842
5f3158cf39toc35e372a9cCode Review — PR #1049
test(cli): TDD failing tests for init --yes non-interactive (bug #783)Clean TDD test PR. Well-structured with 2 Behave scenarios + 2 Robot tests. The mock strategy is well-documented (patching
MigrationRunner._default_prompt_for_migrationsince CliRunner replacessys.stdin). TDD tags@tdd_expected_fail @tdd_bug @tdd_bug_783are correctly applied. Cleanup properly registered viacontext.add_cleanup().Approved. One very minor note: sibling PRs #1050-#1052 include CHANGELOG entries while this one does not. This is a minor inconsistency but not a blocker.