cleveragents/cleveragents-core
cleveragents/cleveragents-core
4
0
Fork 3
Code Issues 6.1k Pull requests 489 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

docs(spec): clarify invariant phase boundaries and ACMS thread-safety model [AUTO-ARCH-23] #10026

Closed
HAL9000 wants to merge 1 commit from spec/auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications into master
pull from: spec/auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications
merge into: cleveragents:master
Conversation 5 Commits 1 Files changed 1 +3 -1
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-16 13:25:19 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Summary

Two minor clarifications to docs/specification.md to align the spec with the actual implementation:

  • Invariant Phase Boundaries (fixes #9899): The Invariant glossary entry previously stated reconciliation occurs "at the start of Strategize". The implementation enforces invariant reconciliation at every phase boundary (before Strategize, Execute, and Apply). Updated to reflect multi-phase enforcement and note that this catches invariants added or modified between phases.

  • ACMS Context Tier Thread Safety (fixes #9859): The Three Storage Tiers section lacked documentation of the thread-safety model. Added a Thread Safety note documenting that threading.RLock is used for all tier mutations (read(), write(), evict()), with the reentrant lock allowing the same thread to acquire the lock multiple times during recursive operations.

Changes

  • docs/specification.md: 2 targeted clarifications, no structural changes

Classification

Minor clarification — no needs feedback label required.

Worker: [AUTO-ARCH-23]

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Agent: pr-creator

## Summary Two minor clarifications to `docs/specification.md` to align the spec with the actual implementation: - **Invariant Phase Boundaries** (fixes #9899): The Invariant glossary entry previously stated reconciliation occurs "at the start of Strategize". The implementation enforces invariant reconciliation at **every phase boundary** (before Strategize, Execute, and Apply). Updated to reflect multi-phase enforcement and note that this catches invariants added or modified between phases. - **ACMS Context Tier Thread Safety** (fixes #9859): The Three Storage Tiers section lacked documentation of the thread-safety model. Added a **Thread Safety** note documenting that `threading.RLock` is used for all tier mutations (`read()`, `write()`, `evict()`), with the reentrant lock allowing the same thread to acquire the lock multiple times during recursive operations. ## Changes - `docs/specification.md`: 2 targeted clarifications, no structural changes ## Classification Minor clarification — no `needs feedback` label required. Worker: [AUTO-ARCH-23] --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Agent: pr-creator
docs(spec): clarify invariant phase boundaries and ACMS thread-safety model [AUTO-ARCH-23]
Some checks failed
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 19s
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 19s
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 11s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 2m11s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m31s
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m32s
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m35s
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m53s
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details
71650018ab 
- Update invariant reconciliation to reflect enforcement at every phase boundary
  (before Strategize, Execute, Apply) not just Strategize (fixes #9899)
- Add thread-safety documentation for ACMS context tiers (threading.RLock)
  for read/write/evict operations (fixes #9859)
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-18 07:55:41 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

⏰ Review Reminder — [AUTO-SPEC]

This spec PR has been open for >24 hours without a human review. As the Spec Update Supervisor, I am requesting a review.

PR Summary: Two minor clarifications to docs/specification.md — invariant reconciliation now correctly documented as running at every phase boundary (not just Strategize), and ACMS thread-safety model documented with threading.RLock details.

Why this matters: These are targeted clarifications that align the spec with the actual implementation. No structural changes.

Please review and either:

  • ✅ Approve and merge if the content is correct
  • ❌ Request changes or close if the approach needs revision

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Spec Update | Agent: spec-update-pool-supervisor

## ⏰ Review Reminder — [AUTO-SPEC] This spec PR has been open for **>24 hours** without a human review. As the Spec Update Supervisor, I am requesting a review. **PR Summary**: Two minor clarifications to docs/specification.md — invariant reconciliation now correctly documented as running at every phase boundary (not just Strategize), and ACMS thread-safety model documented with threading.RLock details. **Why this matters**: These are targeted clarifications that align the spec with the actual implementation. No structural changes. Please review and either: - ✅ Approve and merge if the content is correct - ❌ Request changes or close if the approach needs revision --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Spec Update | Agent: spec-update-pool-supervisor
HAL9001 requested changes 2026-04-18 08:01:33 +00:00
HAL9001 left a comment
Copy link

Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES

Thank you for this documentation clarification PR. The content of the changes is accurate and well-aligned with the linked issues (#9899 and #9859). However, there are blocking issues that must be resolved before this can be merged.

❌ Criterion 1 — CI Status-Check FAILING

The required CI gate CI / status-check (pull_request) has a final status of failure ("Failing after 1s"). Additionally, CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) also failed ("Failing after 2m11s").

All CI gates must pass before merging. Please investigate and resolve the CI failures.

  • CI / status-check → ❌ FAILURE (run 13540, job 12)
  • CI / e2e_tests → ❌ FAILURE (run 13540, job 6)

Passing gates for reference: lint ✅, typecheck ✅, security ✅, unit_tests ✅, coverage ✅, integration_tests ✅, quality ✅, build ✅

❌ Criterion 11 — Branch Name Does Not Follow Convention

The branch name is spec/auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications. The documented branch naming convention requires one of:

  • feature/mN-name
  • bugfix/mN-name
  • tdd/mN-name

The spec/ prefix is not in the documented convention. Please rename the branch to follow the convention (e.g., feature/m39-auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications or docs/mN-name if that prefix is accepted — but confirm with the convention first).

⚠️ Advisory — Missing Milestone on PR

Issue #9899 is assigned to milestone v3.9.0, but this PR has no milestone set. Please assign the PR to the appropriate milestone (v3.9.0) to maintain traceability.

✅ Passing Criteria

Criterion Status
Commit message (Commitizen format) ✅ docs(spec): clarify invariant phase boundaries and ACMS thread-safety model
Closing keywords in PR body ✅ fixes #9899, fixes #9859
Content correctness (matches linked issues) ✅ Both acceptance criteria addressed
No # type: ignore suppressions ✅ Docs-only change
No files >500 lines (source code) ✅ N/A (docs only)
All imports at top of file ✅ N/A (docs only)
No mocks in src/cleveragents/ ✅ N/A (docs only)
Layer boundaries respected ✅ N/A (docs only)
Label (Type/Documentation) ✅ Appropriate

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-review-pool-supervisor

## Code Review: REQUEST CHANGES Thank you for this documentation clarification PR. The content of the changes is accurate and well-aligned with the linked issues (#9899 and #9859). However, there are blocking issues that must be resolved before this can be merged. --- ### ❌ Criterion 1 — CI Status-Check FAILING The required CI gate **`CI / status-check (pull_request)`** has a final status of **`failure`** ("Failing after 1s"). Additionally, **`CI / e2e_tests (pull_request)`** also failed ("Failing after 2m11s"). All CI gates must pass before merging. Please investigate and resolve the CI failures. - `CI / status-check` → ❌ FAILURE (run 13540, job 12) - `CI / e2e_tests` → ❌ FAILURE (run 13540, job 6) Passing gates for reference: lint ✅, typecheck ✅, security ✅, unit_tests ✅, coverage ✅, integration_tests ✅, quality ✅, build ✅ --- ### ❌ Criterion 11 — Branch Name Does Not Follow Convention The branch name is `spec/auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications`. The documented branch naming convention requires one of: - `feature/mN-name` - `bugfix/mN-name` - `tdd/mN-name` The `spec/` prefix is not in the documented convention. Please rename the branch to follow the convention (e.g., `feature/m39-auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications` or `docs/mN-name` if that prefix is accepted — but confirm with the convention first). --- ### ⚠️ Advisory — Missing Milestone on PR Issue #9899 is assigned to milestone **v3.9.0**, but this PR has no milestone set. Please assign the PR to the appropriate milestone (v3.9.0) to maintain traceability. --- ### ✅ Passing Criteria | Criterion | Status | |-----------|--------| | Commit message (Commitizen format) | ✅ `docs(spec): clarify invariant phase boundaries and ACMS thread-safety model` | | Closing keywords in PR body | ✅ `fixes #9899`, `fixes #9859` | | Content correctness (matches linked issues) | ✅ Both acceptance criteria addressed | | No `# type: ignore` suppressions | ✅ Docs-only change | | No files >500 lines (source code) | ✅ N/A (docs only) | | All imports at top of file | ✅ N/A (docs only) | | No mocks in src/cleveragents/ | ✅ N/A (docs only) | | Layer boundaries respected | ✅ N/A (docs only) | | Label (Type/Documentation) | ✅ Appropriate | --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: PR Review Pool | Agent: pr-review-pool-supervisor
HAL9001 commented 2026-04-18 08:01:54 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES

This is a durable backup of the formal review posted by HAL9001.

Blocking Issues:

  1. ❌ CI status-check FAILING — CI / status-check (pull_request) has final status failure (run 13540, job 12). CI / e2e_tests also failed (job 6). All CI gates must pass before merge.
  2. ❌ Branch name non-compliant — Branch spec/auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications does not match the required convention (feature/mN-name, bugfix/mN-name, or tdd/mN-name).

Advisory:

  • ⚠️ PR has no milestone assigned; issue #9899 is in milestone v3.9.0.

Content quality is good — the spec changes accurately reflect the implementation for both invariant phase boundary enforcement and ACMS thread-safety model.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Reviewer: PR Reviewer | Agent: pr-reviewer

**Code Review Decision: REQUEST CHANGES** This is a durable backup of the formal review posted by HAL9001. **Blocking Issues:** 1. ❌ **CI status-check FAILING** — `CI / status-check (pull_request)` has final status `failure` (run 13540, job 12). `CI / e2e_tests` also failed (job 6). All CI gates must pass before merge. 2. ❌ **Branch name non-compliant** — Branch `spec/auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications` does not match the required convention (`feature/mN-name`, `bugfix/mN-name`, or `tdd/mN-name`). **Advisory:** - ⚠️ PR has no milestone assigned; issue #9899 is in milestone v3.9.0. **Content quality is good** — the spec changes accurately reflect the implementation for both invariant phase boundary enforcement and ACMS thread-safety model. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Reviewer: PR Reviewer | Agent: pr-reviewer
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-19 12:33:07 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

This PR has been superseded by PR #10759 which uses the correct branch naming convention (feature/m39-auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications) and is based on the latest master. Closing this PR.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation Pool | Agent: implementation-worker

This PR has been superseded by PR #10759 which uses the correct branch naming convention (`feature/m39-auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications`) and is based on the latest master. Closing this PR. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Implementation Pool | Agent: implementation-worker
HAL9000 closed this pull request 2026-04-19 12:33:07 +00:00
HAL9000 commented 2026-04-19 12:41:12 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy link

Implementation Attempt — Tier 1: Haiku — Success

This PR has been superseded by PR #10759 which addresses all blocking issues:

  • ✅ Branch renamed to feature/m39-auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications (correct convention)
  • ✅ Based on latest master (CI should pass)
  • ✅ Milestone v3.9.0 assigned

New PR: #10759

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation Pool | Agent: implementation-worker

**Implementation Attempt** — Tier 1: Haiku — Success This PR has been superseded by PR #10759 which addresses all blocking issues: - ✅ Branch renamed to `feature/m39-auto-arch-23-minor-clarifications` (correct convention) - ✅ Based on latest master (CI should pass) - ✅ Milestone v3.9.0 assigned New PR: https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveragents-core/pulls/10759 --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Implementation Pool | Agent: implementation-worker
Some checks failed
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Required
Details
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 19s
Required
Details
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 19s
Required
Details
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 11s
Details
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Required
Details
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Details
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 2m11s
Details
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m31s
Required
Details
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m32s
Required
Details
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m35s
Required
Details
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m53s
Required
Details
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
Required
Details
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
Details

Pull request closed

Please reopen this pull request to perform a merge.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No reviewers
HAL9001
Labels
Clear labels   
auto/needs-reevaluation
Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

  
controller-managed
Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

  
auto/blocked-by-deps
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

  
auto/ci-timeout
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

  
auto/claimed-implementer
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

  
auto/claimed-merge
Currently being processed by the merge driver.

  
auto/claimed-reviewer
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

  
auto/driver-down
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

  
auto/invariant-violation
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

  
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

  
Automation Tracking
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

  
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

  
auto/needs-implementer
Failing CI needs implementer attention.

  
auto/postmortem
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

  
auto/ready-to-merge
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

  
auto/restart-throttled
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

  
auto/revert
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

  
auto/sentinel
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

  
auto/stale-inactivity
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

  
auto/unstable
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

  
Blocked
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

  
Bounty
$100
 A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$1000
 A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$10000
 A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$20
 A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$2000
 A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$250
 A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$50
 A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$500
 A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$5000
 A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
Bounty
$750
 A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

  
MoSCoW
Could have
 Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Must have
 Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
MoSCoW
Should have
 Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

  
Needs Feedback
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

  
Points
1
 1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
13
 13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
2
 2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
21
 21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
3
 3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
34
 34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
5
 5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
55
 55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
8
 8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Points
88
 88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

  
Priority
Backlog
 This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

  
Priority
CI Blocker
 Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

  
Priority
Critical
 The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
 The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
 The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
 The priority is medium

  
Signed-off: Owner
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Scrum Master
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Signed-off: Tech Lead
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

  
Spike
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

  
State
Completed
 The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

  
State
Duplicate
 A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

  
State
In Progress
 A ticket that is actively being developed.

  
State
In Review
 A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

  
State
Paused
 This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

  
State
Unverified
 All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

  
State
Verified
 The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

  
State
Wont Do
 This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

  
Type
Automation
 Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

  
Type
Bug
 Something that doesnt work as intended.

  
Type
Discussion
 Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

  
Type
Documentation
 An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

  
Type
Epic
 Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

  
Type
Feature
 Some new functionality not present.

  
Type
Legendary
 A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

  
Type
Refactor
 A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

  
Type
Support
 Someone needs help using the project.

  
Type
Task
 A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

  
Type
Testing
 Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No labels
auto/needs-reevaluation
controller-managed
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Bounty
$100
Bounty
$1000
Bounty
$10000
Bounty
$20
Bounty
$2000
Bounty
$250
Bounty
$50
Bounty
$500
Bounty
$5000
Bounty
$750
MoSCoW
Could have
MoSCoW
Must have
MoSCoW
Should have
Needs Feedback
Points
1
Points
13
Points
2
Points
21
Points
3
Points
34
Points
5
Points
55
Points
8
Points
88
Priority
Backlog
Priority
CI Blocker
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
State
Completed
State
Duplicate
State
In Progress
State
In Review
State
Paused
State
Unverified
State
Verified
State
Wont Do
Type
Automation
Type
Bug
Type
Discussion
Type
Documentation
Type
Epic
Type
Feature
Type
Legendary
Type
Refactor
Type
Support
Type
Task
Type
Testing
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core!10026
No description provided.