Commit Graph

1459 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
HAL9000 1eca6b1da7 fix(tui): set prompt.value not prompt.text in suggestions query extraction test
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 34s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 56s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m1s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m58s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m41s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m11s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 9m34s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
consume_text() reads self.value (not self.text) on PromptInput.
The step definition was setting prompt.text = text which left
self.value empty, causing on_input_submitted to return early
before the @-token extraction block was reached.

ISSUES CLOSED: #4741
2026-06-10 07:43:02 -04:00
HAL9000 a73fc092f8 fix(tui): add no-@token edge case scenario to TDD regression suite
Adds a 5th scenario to tdd_tui_suggestions_query_extraction_4741.feature
that verifies suggestions() is NOT called when the prompt contains no @token.
This covers the guard condition in on_input_submitted and completes the
regression test suite for issue #4741.
2026-06-10 07:43:02 -04:00
HAL9000 5656ff4892 fix(tui): fix ruff format violations and clarify standalone @token test scenario
- Apply ruff format to tdd_tui_suggestions_query_extraction_4741_steps.py
  (two method signatures reformatted to fit within 88-char line limit)
- Fix redundant wrong value in last TDD scenario: change
  not actor:local/dev → not @actor:local/dev to make the
  assertion error message meaningful and distinguish from the
  correct expected value
2026-06-10 07:43:02 -04:00
HAL9000 e5fb17bf88 fix(tui): replace # type: ignore with setattr in TDD regression test steps 2026-06-10 07:43:02 -04:00
HAL9000 0fe333ea71 fix(tui): extract @token text correctly in on_input_submitted suggestions query
Replace text.replace("@", "").strip() with re.findall(r"@(\S+)", text) to
extract only the last @token text (without the @ sign and without surrounding
non-reference words) as the query passed to suggestions().

Previously, a prompt like "analyse @proj" would pass "analyse proj" as the
query to suggestions(), producing garbage fuzzy matches. Now it correctly
passes "proj".

Add TDD regression tests (tdd_tui_suggestions_query_extraction_4741.feature)
with @tdd_issue and @tdd_issue_4741 tags covering:
- Single @token in multi-word prompt
- @token with category prefix
- Multiple @tokens (uses last token)
- Standalone @token at start of prompt

ISSUES CLOSED: #4741
2026-06-10 07:43:02 -04:00
HAL9000 bcc4400080 style: apply ruff format to fix CI lint failure
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 36s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m26s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m55s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 34s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 38s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 42s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m41s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m34s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m42s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m2s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
2026-06-10 05:05:40 -04:00
HAL9000 97b5424bd2 fix(scripts): validate subprocess path arguments in check-quality-gates.py to prevent command injection
Validate quality-gate subprocess path arguments against a safe allowlist, resolve them inside the project root, and require referenced paths to exist before command execution.

Harden the command-injection regression feature so it loads the script reliably, avoids generic Behave step collisions, verifies path arguments are resolved before subprocess execution, and carries the mandatory TDD issue tag.

ISSUES CLOSED: #7286
2026-06-10 05:05:40 -04:00
HAL9000 59aa5b6898 style(tests): fix ruff format violations in tdd_langgraph_disposables_steps.py
ISSUES CLOSED: #10398
2026-06-10 02:00:43 -04:00
HAL9000 2d87bd88a2 fix(langgraph): store and dispose RxPy subscription Disposables in stop()
LangGraph._setup_node_stream_subscriptions() was discarding the Disposable
returned by observable.subscribe(), making it impossible for stop() to clean
up active subscriptions. This caused resource leaks and prevented garbage
collection of LangGraph instances (the on_error closure captured self.logger).

Changes:
- Add self._subscriptions: list[Any] = [] to LangGraph.__init__
- Store each Disposable returned by observable.subscribe() in _subscriptions
- Dispose all stored subscriptions in stop() using contextlib.suppress(Exception)
- Clear _subscriptions list after disposal
- Add BDD feature and step definitions for TDD issue #10398

ISSUES CLOSED: #10398
2026-06-10 02:00:43 -04:00
HAL9000 5247583e95 fix(tdd): correct type safety and remove unrelated file
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m20s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m4s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m32s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 2m56s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 22m33s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 7s
- Replace invalid typing.T.Any with typing.cast(typing.Any, ...) on lines 111, 130, 148
- Fix ruff formatting issues in tdd_tui_session_store_4739_steps.py
- Remove unrelated bug-hunt-pool-supervisor.md that was mistakenly added
- Ensure all step definitions properly cast context attributes for type safety

ISSUES CLOSED: #10879
2026-06-07 00:48:54 -04:00
HAL9000 9d2763a1e4 test(tui): remove type: ignore violations using typing.cast 2026-06-07 00:48:54 -04:00
HAL9000 f5add6ffa3 test(tui): add TDD failing test for SQLite session persistence
Add BDD scenarios that capture bug #4739 — the missing TUI SQLite
session persistence layer. The cleveragents.tui.session_store module
and TuiSessionStore class do not exist; these tests verify their
absence and will pass once the implementation is in place.

All scenarios are tagged @tdd_expected_fail so CI passes while the
module is absent. The expected-fail mechanism inverts the result:
a failing AssertionError means the bug still exists (CI passes).

ISSUES CLOSED: #10879
2026-06-07 00:48:54 -04:00
HAL9000 086599b670 docs(test): correct registry thread-safety step docstrings to reflect regression-guard semantics
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 54s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 29s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m11s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m4s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 1m7s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m33s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m40s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m24s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 11m2s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m50s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m44s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
The module docstring at lines 8-9 claimed the scenario was tagged
``@tdd_expected_fail`` so CI would invert a failing result while the
bug existed. Both claims are false: the implementation already holds
``_registry_lock`` around all reads and writes (src/cleveragents/
providers/registry.py:800,817), so the scenario passes normally, and
the feature file deliberately does not carry ``@tdd_expected_fail``.

Rewrite the module docstring to describe the current behaviour — the
lock is present, the scenario passes, the tag is intentionally omitted,
and the test now functions as a regression guard against the lock
being removed. Update the two inner step docstrings in the same way so
"this assertion fires when the bug exists" no longer contradicts the
fixed implementation.

No runtime behaviour changes. The lint gate passes.

ISSUES CLOSED: #10409
2026-06-06 20:45:20 -04:00
HAL9000 40137f4f2a fix(test): consolidate registry-thread-safety BDD test files
The PR contained duplicate step definitions and feature files that caused
behave AmbiguousStep errors crashing the unit_tests gate. The underlying
thread-safety fix for get_provider_registry() already landed on master in
commit e1cd306f6, so the scenario now passes as a regression test.

- Delete scripts/fix_registry_steps_tmp.py: temporary debugging script with
  hardcoded /tmp paths that produced 6 ruff errors (F401, UP015, E501 x4).
- Delete features/tdd_registry_thread_safety.feature and
  features/steps/tdd_registry_thread_safety_steps.py: weaker duplicates of
  the canonical files under features/providers/ and features/steps/. Their
  step decorators collided with the elaborate barrier-based steps in
  registry_thread_safety_steps.py, causing AmbiguousStep across the suite.
- Remove @tdd_expected_fail tag from the canonical scenario per the
  CONTRIBUTING.md bug fix workflow: behave's TDD harness explicitly
  instructs removing the tag once the bug appears fixed, so the scenario
  now functions as a normal regression test.
- Apply ruff format to features/steps/registry_thread_safety_steps.py.

ISSUES CLOSED: #10409
2026-06-06 20:45:20 -04:00
HAL9000 b557ddcbb0 fix(providers): resolve ruff SIM105 and SIM117 lint violations in thread-safety steps
Replace try-except-pass blocks with contextlib.suppress() and combine
nested with statements into a single parenthesized context manager.

ISSUES CLOSED: #10409
2026-06-06 20:45:20 -04:00
HAL9000 06b64258e7 test(providers): remove unused imports from registry thread-safety steps 2026-06-06 20:45:20 -04:00
HAL9000 d293a0bc42 test(providers): improve thread-safety test robustness with better barrier handling 2026-06-06 20:45:20 -04:00
HAL9000 16a3fdf8b1 test(providers): add failing BDD scenario for get_provider_registry() thread-safety race condition
Implemented a Behave BDD test to prove the thread-safety race in get_provider_registry():
- Added features/providers/test_registry_thread_safety.feature with a two-thread scenario using a Barrier to trigger an actual race and asserting both threads obtain the same singleton instance. The scenario is tagged @tdd_issue, @tdd_issue_10409, and @tdd_expected_fail.
- Added features/steps/registry_thread_safety_steps.py implementing Given/When/Then steps to coordinate threads and verify singleton identity.
- The scenario currently fails against the unfixed code due to non-thread-safe singleton; the @tdd_expected_fail tag inverts the result so CI passes.

ISSUES CLOSED: #10409
2026-06-06 20:45:20 -04:00
HAL9000 06438a02b1 fix(plans): resolve ambiguous step + ordering issues in scheduler BDD tests
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 28s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 51s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m8s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m49s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m18s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 10m54s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
The parallel_subplan_scheduler_steps.py declared a Then step
`all {count:d} subplans should complete successfully` that collided with
the existing `all {n:d} subplans should complete successfully` in
subplan_execution_steps.py, causing behave AmbiguousStep errors that
cascaded across 8 scenarios in subplan_execution.feature plus several
scenarios in parallel_subplan_scheduler.feature.

Resolved by:

* Removing the duplicate Then step; the @when step in
  parallel_subplan_scheduler_steps.py already sets `context.exec_result`
  so the existing shared assertion handles both feature files.
* Reordering result.statuses back to input order in the scheduler
  @when step (parallel execution returns statuses in completion
  order) so index-based shared assertions are deterministic.
* Binding `context.merge_result` and `context.exec_error` for shared
  assertion-step compatibility.
* Using subplan_id lookup instead of positional access in the
  scheduler-specific Then steps (`the second subplan should complete
  successfully`, `the first subplan should be errored with timeout`).
* Differentiating per-subplan content in the overlapping-file-changes
  step with staggered timing so LAST_WINS merge is deterministic.
* Blocking non-first subplans in the first-failure step so fail_fast
  cascade can actually mark them CANCELLED.
* Using a TimeoutError-raising executor for timeout scenarios to
  exercise the scheduler's timeout-handling path deterministically
  under the in-process parallel test runner.

All 77 scenarios in features/parallel_subplan_scheduler.feature and
features/subplan_execution.feature now pass.
2026-06-06 20:26:28 -04:00
cleveragents-auto 712d773836 chore: worker ruff auto-fix (pre-push lint gate) 2026-06-06 20:26:27 -04:00
HAL9000 428ec07951 fix(plans): derive ULID-compatible subplan IDs in scheduler BDD tests
SubplanStatus.subplan_id is pydantic-validated against ^[0-9A-HJKMNP-TV-Z]{26}$.
The scheduler test fixtures constructed SubplanStatus instances with short logical
IDs ("subplan-001", "subplan-A") which failed validation at fixture-construction
time, erroring 22 of 38 originally-failing scenarios in unit_tests CI before the
behavioural assertions could even run.

Derive a deterministic 26-char Crockford-Base32 ID from each logical name via
SHA-256 and translate fail-id sets, block-second dicts, dependency graphs, and
result-status lookups through the same helper so cross-references stay
consistent.

Also add the missing step definitions unique to the parallel_subplan_scheduler
scenarios (staggered-completion fixture, retry-then-succeed fixture, fail_fast-
disabled scheduler, mode-only scheduler, timeout-errored verifier) and remove
duplicate @then registrations that conflict with shared step definitions in
subplan_execution_steps.py.

ISSUES CLOSED: #9555
2026-06-06 20:26:27 -04:00
HAL9000 ebb543a9c3 fix(plans): resolve CI failures in parallel subplan scheduler BDD tests
- Remove duplicate @then decorator on step_verify_peak_concurrency_limit
  (caused AmbiguousStep error crashing all 8 unit test feature files)
- Rename "the subplans should have been executed in order" to
  "the subplans should have been executed in sequential order" to
  avoid conflict with pre-existing step in subplan_execution_steps.py
- Remove 13 additional @then step definitions that duplicated steps in
  subplan_execution_steps.py; alias context.exec_result and
  context.validation_error in @when steps so pre-existing steps work
- Replace two # type: ignore comments (lines 438, 453) with typed
  Any variables per zero-tolerance policy
- Apply ruff format to fix formatting (long import wrapping, list comps)
- Add CHANGELOG entry and CONTRIBUTORS entry for #9555

ISSUES CLOSED: #9609
2026-06-06 20:26:27 -04:00
HAL9000 8648e17472 fix(lint): address ruff lint failures in parallel_subplan_scheduler_steps.py 2026-06-06 20:26:27 -04:00
CleverAgents Automation 705eb5a969 feat(plans): implement parallel subplan execution scheduler with max_parallel concurrency control
- Add ParallelSubplanScheduler class for managing parallel subplan execution
- Implement SubplanQueue for tracking pending, active, and completed subplans
- Implement SchedulerState for immutable scheduler state tracking
- Support configurable max_parallel concurrency limit (1-50)
- Support sequential, parallel, and dependency-ordered execution modes
- Automatic queuing of subplans when max_parallel limit is reached
- Parent plan blocks until all subplans complete
- Comprehensive failure handling and retry logic
- Merge strategy selection for combining subplan outputs
- Add comprehensive BDD test suite with 50+ scenarios
- Test coverage for concurrency control, queue management, and state tracking
2026-06-06 20:26:27 -04:00
HAL9000 03d2df26ce fix(tests): align CI tests with A2A boundary refactor
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 56s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 56s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 54s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m21s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m21s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 30s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 49s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m11s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 11m31s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 2m54s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m17s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
The shared `format_data` serializer introduced for the CLI→Application
A2A boundary returns raw payloads without the `{"data": ...}` envelope
that the legacy CLI `format_output` wraps around. Two test-step
definitions (`step_artifacts_json_validation`,
`step_artifacts_json_apply_summary`) still unwrapped that envelope and
crashed with `KeyError: 'data'`, errrring the Behave scenarios
`Plan artifacts shows validation results when available` and
`Artifacts include apply summary from metadata`.

Also remove the stale `@tdd_expected_fail` tag from the Robot scenario
`WF02 Mocked Generation Produces Test Artifacts Only`: the scenario
exercises the `_cleveragents/plan/artifacts` A2A dispatch path that this
PR added and now passes naturally; the `tdd_expected_fail_listener`
inverts the passing result to a failure with "Bug appears to be fixed.
Remove the tdd_expected_fail tag".

Adds a CHANGELOG entry covering both the boundary refactor and these
test alignments.

Refs: #9962
Refs: #4253
2026-06-06 19:15:12 -04:00
HAL9000 913c37416e test(a2a): expand output_format coverage scenarios for datetime, enum, list, and table paths 2026-06-06 19:05:19 -04:00
HAL9000 a11cd70547 style: apply ruff formatting to a2a_boundary_enforcement_steps.py
Apply ruff format to fix CI lint gate failure. The format check
(nox -s format -- --check) was failing because implicit string
concatenation and multi-line assert/raise expressions did not
match ruff's canonical formatting.

ISSUES CLOSED: #9962
EOF && git -C /tmp/implementation-worker-1776891830/repo push --force-with-lease origin "refactor/auto-guard-1-cli-a2a-boundary"
2026-06-06 19:05:19 -04:00
HAL9000 f9c308c541 refactor: route CLI→Application communication through A2A boundary
Created src/cleveragents/shared/output_format.py - a new shared module
with format_data() function that provides JSON/YAML/plain/table
serialization without any CLI dependencies.

Fixed reverse dependency in plan_apply_service.py - changed import from
cleveragents.cli.formatting to cleveragents.shared.output_format (the
most critical architectural violation: Application layer importing from
Presentation layer).

Added .importlinter configuration file with rules to enforce:
- No Application->Presentation (CLI) reverse dependencies
- CLI->Application boundary violations (with current exceptions documented)

Added import-linter>=2.0 to dev dependencies in pyproject.toml.

Added BDD feature file features/a2a_boundary_enforcement.feature with
10 scenarios testing the boundary enforcement and step definitions.

ISSUES CLOSED: #9962
2026-06-06 19:05:19 -04:00
HAL9000 5febbbc93b fix(plan-cli): fix lint and BDD step issues for plan rollback command
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 57s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m21s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m32s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m35s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 1m33s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m48s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m50s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m28s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m59s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
- Add list-mode to rollback_plan: when no checkpoint ID given, list
  available checkpoints instead of aborting (fixes feature file scenario)
- Add CleverAgentsError import to rollback_plan function scope
- Rewrite plan_cli_rollback_steps.py with correct mocking pattern:
  patch get_container, use plan_app with ["rollback", ...] args,
  :S parse modifiers to avoid AmbiguousStep, proper exception hierarchy
- Rename 4 conflicting @then step patterns to be rollback-specific:
  "the rollback output should be valid JSON/YAML",
  "the plan rollback should succeed",
  "no rollback confirmation prompt should be shown"
- Fix JSON/YAML assertion steps to check format_output envelope
  structure (data is nested under "data" key in the envelope)
- Update plan_cli_rollback.feature to match renamed step patterns

ISSUES CLOSED: #9612
2026-06-06 16:25:55 -04:00
HAL9000 13413c91a0 fix(cli): use CliRunner for plan rollback tests and fix step definitions
- Replace subprocess.run() with Typer CliRunner in behave step definitions
- Remove unused imports and trailing whitespace
- Fix raise-from exception patterns
- Deduplicate ambiguous step definitions

ISSUES CLOSED: #9561
2026-06-06 16:25:55 -04:00
HAL9000 5e51ab727a feat(cli): implement plan rollback CLI command for checkpoint-based plan state restoration
Adds end-to-end testing support for the new plan rollback CLI feature:
- plan_cli_rollback.feature introduces BDD scenarios for plan rollback, covering both listing a plan's rollbacks and restoring from a specific checkpoint.
- plan_cli_rollback_steps.py provides step definitions necessary to execute the feature tests and validate CLI behavior.
- Tests validate two modes: list mode (agents plan rollback <plan-id>) and restore mode (agents plan rollback <plan-id> <checkpoint-id>), ensuring atomic rollback, proper error handling, and correct output formatting.
- These tests integrate with the CLI testing framework and Milestone v3.3.0, aligning with the CLI component's roadmap.

ISSUES CLOSED: #9561
2026-06-06 16:25:55 -04:00
HAL9000 a757633e27 fix(context): resolve AmbiguousStep crash in semantic_chunking feature
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 44s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 43s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 25s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m34s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m45s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m37s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m31s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
The `{count:d} semantic chunking fragments should be returned` step
patterns collided with the pre-existing `{count} fragments should be
returned` step in advanced_context_strategies_steps.py:365 — behave's
default `{count}` parser matches `.+?` (non-greedy any char) and
captured "N semantic chunking", failing the registry's ambiguity
check at module-load time. The crash aborted load_step_definitions
for the entire unit_tests session, errored all 8 features in the
behave-parallel worker, and produced the CI failure with verdict
"0 features passed, 0 failed, 8 errored".

Rephrase the two ambiguous step patterns to put unique anchor words
first ("the semantic chunking result should contain {count:d}
fragments" / "...should contain at most {count:d} fragments") and
update the feature file's three call sites to match. Also mark two
defensive private-helper early-return branches with `# pragma: no
cover` — they are unreachable through the public ContextStrategy API
(`_default_embedding("")` is gated by `if not self._anchor` in
`assemble`; `_cosine_similarity` size mismatch is impossible because
all `_get_embedding` callers receive same-length vectors from the
same `embedding_fn`).

Local gates: lint, typecheck, full unit_tests (16 scenarios / 56
steps in the semantic_chunking feature pass; full suite passes),
integration_tests — all green.

ISSUES CLOSED: #9996
2026-06-06 15:31:12 -04:00
HAL9000 7568007e9e style(context): apply ruff formatting to semantic_chunking_strategy_steps.py
Applied ruff auto-formatting to fix CI lint gate failure. The format check (ruff format --check) was failing on features/steps/semantic_chunking_strategy_steps.py due to list formatting and line length violations.

ISSUES CLOSED: #9996
2026-06-06 15:31:12 -04:00
HAL9000 67caf9fe26 feat(context): implement SemanticChunkingStrategy using embedding-based similarity
Implementation summary:
- Created semantic_chunking_strategy.py with SemanticChunkingStrategy implementing
  the ContextStrategy protocol with configurable embedding_model and top_k,
  cosine similarity ranking against anchor message, embedding caching, token
  budget enforcement, and relevance fallback when no anchor is provided
- Updated acms_service.py to register SemanticChunkingStrategy in ACMSPipeline
  under key 'semantic_chunking' via lazy import
- Added features/semantic_chunking_strategy.feature with 16 BDD scenarios
  covering all acceptance criteria from issue #9996
- Added features/steps/semantic_chunking_strategy_steps.py with step definitions

ISSUES CLOSED: #9996
2026-06-06 15:31:11 -04:00
HAL9000 82e6a7135e fix(resources): convert ResourceConfig to Pydantic and exercise real registry
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 34s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 43s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m29s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m41s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m3s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m37s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 3s
Resolves the three remaining issues on PR #10784:

1. CI / unit_tests was failing on features/architecture.feature:38
   "Type hints are used throughout". That scenario asserts every
   src/cleveragents class decorated with @dataclass inherits from
   Pydantic BaseModel. Convert ResourceConfig from a dataclass to a
   pydantic.BaseModel; swap dataclasses.field(default_factory=dict)
   for pydantic.Field(default_factory=dict); drop the dataclasses
   import.

2. features/steps/resource_type_extension_interface_steps.py line 127
   used "# type: ignore[abstract]" to test that ResourceType refuses
   direct instantiation. CONTRIBUTING.md prohibits "# type: ignore"
   unconditionally. Replace the suppression with an Any-typed alias
   (resource_type_cls: Any = context.ResourceType); Pyright accepts
   the indirection and the runtime TypeError assertion is unchanged.

3. The previous attempt's diff_coverage gate failed because the step
   file installed a local fake registry on context instead of calling
   the real cleveragents.resources.{register,get,list}_resource_type
   functions, so lines 248-275 of extension.py were never executed by
   the test suite. Wire the steps to the real registry; suffix every
   registered type name with a per-scenario uuid so parallel behave
   processes do not collide.

Also adds the "## [Unreleased]" CHANGELOG entry the reviewer cited as
blocker 3.

Verified locally: local_ci_gate.sh --gate unit_tests against
features/architecture.feature and
features/resource_type_extension_interface.feature - 32 scenarios
pass (was 1 failing).

ISSUES CLOSED: #9998
2026-06-06 14:56:30 -04:00
HAL9000 de2cc75b27 feat(resources): design and implement resource type extension interface
Introduces a stable extension interface for third-party resource type
implementations in CleverAgents. Rebases cleanly onto current master HEAD.

Changes:
- New cleveragents.resources package with ResourceStatus (StrEnum),
  ResourceConfig (dataclass), ResourceType (ABC with 5 abstract methods)
- Registry functions: register_resource_type, get_resource_type,
  list_resource_types with proper type validation and duplicate protection
- 25 BDD scenarios covering all interface contracts with parallel-safe
  local registry isolation per scenario

ISSUES CLOSED: #9998
2026-06-06 14:56:30 -04:00
HAL9000 76fc40ad8d fix(tests): allow empty URL in is_postgresql_url BDD step
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 52s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m17s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 29s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m2s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m47s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 10m2s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m2s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
The default Behave `parse` matcher requires `{url}` to match at least
one character, so the `is_postgresql_url returns False for empty
string` scenario (langgraph_platform_remote_graph.feature:193) raised
an undefined-step error rather than exercising the function. Switch
just this step to the `re` matcher so `""` matches; the implementation
already handles empty input correctly.

ISSUES CLOSED: #10792
2026-06-06 13:54:43 -04:00
HAL9000 16093b53e6 refactor(server): split langgraph platform step definitions and remove subproject artifact
Split the 573-line langgraph_platform_remote_graph_steps.py into three focused files (remote_graph_config_steps.py, remote_graph_manager_steps.py, postgresql_config_steps.py) to comply with the 500-line file limit.
Also removes the unwanted repo subproject entry (merge artifact).
2026-06-06 13:54:43 -04:00
HAL9000 093d993611 style(server): fix ruff format violations in langgraph platform step definitions and robot helper
Applied ruff format auto-fix to resolve line-length formatting violations in:
- features/steps/langgraph_platform_remote_graph_steps.py
- robot/helper_langgraph_platform_integration.py

These files had multi-line assert statements that ruff format collapses to
single lines when they fit within the line length limit.

ISSUES CLOSED: #693
2026-06-06 13:54:43 -04:00
HAL9000 152eddba7f feat(server): integrate LangGraph Platform with RemoteGraph for server execution 2026-06-06 13:54:43 -04:00
HAL9000 81019b0cf7 fix(cli): replace one-liner with structured Rich panel in validation attach output 2026-06-06 12:31:45 -04:00
HAL9000 f86553670b fix(tui): use correct DiffDisplayMode enum members + typed compose() result
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 51s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 55s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 48s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m15s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m7s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m45s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 11m3s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m59s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
The diff-mode cycle in PermissionsScreen referenced DiffDisplayMode.SIDE_BY_SIDE
and DiffDisplayMode.CONTEXT, but the enum only defines UNIFIED / SPLIT / AUTO.
Pyright flagged both as reportAttributeAccessIssue and behave failed to import
the screen module, masking the entire scenario suite under a single
traceback-outside-scenario error.

Also addresses the prior re-review feedback on the same PR:
- compose() return type was Any; tighten to collections.abc.Iterator[Any] so the
  generator shape is exposed to type checkers without taking a hard textual
  dependency at typecheck time (Iterator[Any] is the structural type of a
  Textual ComposeResult; we stay importable when textual is absent).
- The Bug #10488 TDD scenario asserting action methods now also covers
  action_dismiss_screen so a future refactor cannot silently drop the escape
  binding without test failure.

Verified locally on this worktree:
- typecheck gate: 0 errors, 4 unrelated warnings.
- unit_tests gate on features/tui_permissions_screen.feature: 65/65 scenarios
  pass.
- lint gate: clean.

ISSUES CLOSED: #10488
2026-06-06 12:11:44 -04:00
HAL9000 f2b23e397f fix(tui): fix format check and undefined step in execution_environment feature
Applied ruff format fix to tui_permissions_screen_steps.py and corrected the step text mismatch in execution_environment.feature where 'it should not contain' was not updated to 'the container types should not contain' when the step definition was renamed.

ISSUES CLOSED: #10488
2026-06-06 12:11:44 -04:00
HAL9000 d51f3a05ae fix: resolve ambiguous step definition conflict in execution_environment_steps.py
- Renamed 'it should contain' steps to 'the container types should contain' for specificity
- Updated execution_environment.feature to use the new step names
- This fixes the AmbiguousStep error that was preventing unit tests from running
2026-06-06 12:11:44 -04:00
HAL9000 45a7800635 fix(tui): convert PermissionsScreen from Static widget to proper Textual Screen subclass
- Changed PermissionsScreen to inherit from textual.app.Screen instead of textual.widgets.Static
- Added BINDINGS class variable with keyboard bindings for a, A, r, R, j, k, d, escape
- Implemented action methods: action_allow_once, action_allow_always, action_reject_once, action_reject_always, action_nav_next, action_nav_prev, action_cycle_diff, action_dismiss_screen
- Added compose() method for Textual screen layout
- Added update() method for backward compatibility with tests
- Added TDD Behave scenarios tagged @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_10488 to verify the fix
- All 65 unit test scenarios pass

ISSUES CLOSED: #10488
2026-06-06 12:11:44 -04:00
HAL9000 89fc0724df format: reformat ca_continuous_pr_reviewer_steps.py to pass ruff format check
CI lint job runs both ruff check and ruff format --check. The step
definitions file for ca-continuous-pr-reviewer feature needed
reformatting to satisfy the format check gate.

ISSUES CLOSED: #3111
2026-06-06 11:52:49 -04:00
HAL9000 b1140b073d fix(tests): add missing Behave step definitions for ca-continuous-pr-reviewer feature
Add features/steps/ca_continuous_pr_reviewer_steps.py with step definitions for all scenarios in ca_continuous_pr_reviewer.feature. The feature file was added in the original PR but the corresponding step definitions file was missing, causing unit_tests CI gate to fail with undefined step errors.

The step definitions implement and test the milestone-based PR prioritization algorithm from the agent spec:
  priority_score = (milestone_weight * 1000) + (moscow_weight * 100) + (age_weight)

Scenarios covered:
- Prioritize PRs by milestone due date (earlier = higher priority)
- Prioritize by MoSCoW labels within same milestone (Must Have > Should Have > Could Have)
- Use PR age as tie-breaker for same milestone and MoSCoW label (older = higher priority)
2026-06-06 11:52:49 -04:00
HAL9000 bf75791751 chore(agents): add milestone-based PR prioritization to ca-continuous-pr-reviewer
Added new continuous PR reviewer agent (ca-continuous-pr-reviewer) that prioritizes
pull requests based on their associated milestone. The agent:

- Fetches all milestones and open PRs
- Assigns priority scores based on milestone due date, MoSCoW labels, and PR age
- Sorts PRs by priority score (descending)
- Reviews PRs in milestone order, ensuring critical path items are reviewed first

Added comprehensive BDD feature tests for milestone-based prioritization scenarios:
- Prioritize PRs by milestone due date
- Prioritize by MoSCoW labels within milestone
- Use PR age as tie-breaker for same milestone/label

ISSUES CLOSED: #3111
2026-06-06 11:52:49 -04:00
HAL9000 c91a6a252d style(context): apply ruff formatting to SlidingWindowStrategy and step definitions
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 38s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 58s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 1m18s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m34s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 54s
CI / push-validation (pull_request) Successful in 29s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 5m39s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m37s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m40s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m19s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Applied ruff format to sliding_window_strategy.py and
sliding_window_strategy_steps.py to fix CI lint format check failure.

ISSUES CLOSED: #9995
2026-06-06 11:27:30 -04:00
HAL9000 79305dce63 feat(context): implement SlidingWindowStrategy with configurable window size
Implements SlidingWindowStrategy class that satisfies the ContextStrategy
protocol for the ACMS pipeline. The strategy limits token usage by keeping
only the most recent N messages or tokens in context, which is critical for
long-running agent sessions that would otherwise exceed LLM context limits.

Key features:
- Configurable window_size (int) and window_mode ('messages' | 'tokens')
- Messages mode: keeps the most recent window_size non-system fragments
- Tokens mode: keeps the most recent fragments within the token budget
- System prompt preservation: fragments with role='system' are always kept
- Registered in the plugin registry under key 'sliding_window'
- Input validation: window_size must be positive, window_mode must be valid
- Full BDD test coverage with 22 scenarios across all acceptance criteria

ISSUES CLOSED: #9995
2026-06-06 11:27:30 -04:00