6 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
hurui200320	2005b8ef82	feat(tests): replace all @skip tags with proper @tdd_expected_fail tags or remove them across the entire codebase (#7221) ... ## Summary Replaces all 234 bare `@skip` occurrences across 82 Behave feature files with the correct TDD issue-capture tagging system described in CONTRIBUTING.md § Bug Fix Workflow. Previously, the noxfile ran Behave with `--tags=not @skip`, silently excluding all `@skip`-tagged scenarios from every CI run. These tests never ran, never inverted results via the `@tdd_expected_fail` mechanism, and never contributed to coverage — defeating the purpose of TDD issue-capture testing. Every `@skip` occurrence had a commented-out hint line immediately above it showing the intended proper tags (e.g., `# @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4272 @tdd_expected_fail @skip`), confirming they were all intended for conversion. ## Changes ### Mechanical conversion (234 replacements across 82 files) - Extracted the proper TDD tags from the comment hint above each `@skip` line, removed `@skip` from the tag set, and replaced the `@skip` line with those tags. - Removed the now-redundant comment hint lines alongside each replacement. ### Bug-fixed scenarios — `@tdd_expected_fail` removed (84 scenarios) - After conversion, ran `nox -s unit_tests` to identify which newly-enabled `@tdd_expected_fail` scenarios now **pass** (their referenced bugs have already been fixed). Removed `@tdd_expected_fail` from those 84 scenarios and their corresponding feature-level tags, leaving only the permanent `@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_<N>` regression-guard tags. - Affected features include: `tdd_tool_runner_env_precedence`, `tdd_automation_profile_session_leak`, `tls_certificate_check`, `project_create_persist`, `resource_type_bootstrap_*`, and 18 others. ### Noxfile cleanup - Removed all four `--tags=not @skip` arguments from `noxfile.py` (unit_tests and coverage sessions). With zero `@skip` tags remaining in the codebase, this filter was dead code and its presence would mislead future maintainers into thinking `@skip` is still a supported escape mechanism. ### Regression guard files - Split the regression guards into two focused files: - `tdd_regression_guards_exec_env.feature` for bug #4281 (exec-env precedence) - `tdd_regression_guards_session_list.feature` for bug #4271 (session list summary) - Each file carries only its own `@tdd_issue` tags at the feature level, avoiding cross-contamination via Behave tag inheritance. The `Background` step (`session-list-summary mock`) only appears in the session-list file where it is actually needed. ### Duplicate tag cleanup - Removed duplicate `@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4287` tag lines in `tdd_skill_add_regression.feature` (lines 20 and 29). ### Inline comment for retained `@tdd_expected_fail` - Added inline comment in `ci_workflow_validation.feature:134` explaining why this specific #4227 scenario retains `@tdd_expected_fail` despite #4227 being closed (CI YAML does not encode threshold as a machine-readable value). ### Known edge cases — `@tdd_expected_fail` retained (closed issues, fix on master, scenarios still fail) The following issues are **closed** and their fixes **are on master**, but the specific test assertions still fail because the fixes address other aspects of the bugs. The `@tdd_expected_fail` tags are functionally correct and must remain until the specific scenario assertions pass: - `tdd_exec_env_resolution_precedence.feature` — bug #1080 (closed 2026-03-31). The precedence-level-2-vs-4 scenario still fails. - `session_list_summary_dedup.feature` — bug #3046 (closed 2026-04-05). The dedup-consistency scenarios still fail. - `actor_add_update_enforcement.feature` — bug #2609 (closed 2026-04-05). The enforcement scenarios still fail. - `ci_workflow_validation.feature:134` — #4227 (closed 2026-04-08). The CI YAML threshold assertion still fails. ## Verification - `grep -r "@skip" features/ --include="*.feature"` → **zero results** ✓ - `grep -n "tags=not @skip" noxfile.py` → **zero results** ✓ - `nox -s unit_tests` → **629 features passed, 0 failed** ✓ (up from ~545 before this PR) - CI all green (coverage ≥ 97%) ✓ - Integration tests (Robot Framework) do not use `@skip` — confirmed no action needed ✓ - E2E tests (Robot Framework) do not use `@skip` — confirmed no action needed ✓ - `CHANGELOG.md` updated with entry for this change ✓ - `CONTRIBUTORS.md` — Rui Hu already listed ✓ ## Issues Addressed Closes #7025 Co-authored-by: CleverThis <hal9000@cleverthis.com> Reviewed-on: #7221 Reviewed-by: HAL 9000 <HAL9000@cleverthis.com> Reviewed-by: HAL9001 <hal9001@cleverthis.com> Co-authored-by: Rui Hu <rui.hu@cleverthis.com> Co-committed-by: Rui Hu <rui.hu@cleverthis.com>	2026-04-13 04:56:01 +00:00
freemo	8ea00f5185	fix: restore CI quality tests to passing state (#4175) ... Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me> Co-committed-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me>	2026-04-08 11:02:14 +00:00
brent.edwards	f324575a3b	fix(test): remove lingering @tdd_expected_fail tags for closed bugs #821 and #932 (#1229) ... The @tdd_expected_fail tag was already absent from the tag lines of both features/tdd_context_tier_runtime.feature (bug #821) and features/tdd_plan_apply_yes_flag.feature (bug #932). However, the feature description and step-definition docstring for bug #821 still referenced the @tdd_expected_fail tag and described the bug as unfixed. Updated the feature description in tdd_context_tier_runtime.feature and the module docstring in tdd_context_tier_runtime_steps.py to reflect that bug #821 has been fixed and these tests now serve as permanent regression guards. No changes were needed for bug #932 as its files had no stale references. Permanent tags @tdd_issue / @tdd_issue_821 and @tdd_issue / @tdd_issue_932 remain in place per the CONTRIBUTING.md TDD Issue Test Tags convention. ISSUES CLOSED: #1206 Co-authored-by: Brent E. Edwards <brent.edwards@cleverthis.com> Co-committed-by: Brent E. Edwards <brent.edwards@cleverthis.com>	2026-04-02 16:51:15 +00:00
hurui200320	1878998b7a	refactor(testing): rename tdd_bug/tdd_bug_N tags to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_N ... Rename the TDD tag system from tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_<N> across the entire codebase. The tdd_expected_fail tag is unchanged. The TDD expected-failure workflow is not limited to bug fixes — it applies equally to any issue type (features, tasks, refactors). The _bug suffix was misleading and narrowed the perceived scope. The new _issue suffix accurately reflects that the TDD tagging system applies to any Forgejo issue. Changes span 92 files: - features/environment.py: validate_tdd_tags(), should_invert_result(), and apply_tdd_inversion() updated — regex, variables, error messages - robot/tdd_expected_fail_listener.py: _validate_tdd_tags(), _should_invert_result(), start_test(), end_test() updated consistently - 33 Behave .feature files: all @tdd_bug/@tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed - 29 Robot .robot files: all tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed - 3 Robot fixture files renamed (tdd_bug_alone, tdd_missing_tdd_bug, tdd_expected_fail_missing_bug_n) with content and references updated - Tag validation tests and helpers updated (function names, command dispatch keys, output strings, fixture references) - CONTRIBUTING.md: section renamed from 'TDD Bug Test Tags' to 'TDD Issue Test Tags', all tag references and examples updated - noxfile.py: comment references updated - Step definition files, mock helpers, and benchmark files: docstring references updated ISSUES CLOSED: #965	2026-03-27 05:58:35 +00:00
Luis Mendes	34c2acc354	fix(acms): implement context tier runtime promotion/demotion/eviction ... Implement the missing runtime logic for the ACMS context tier service. Previously only data models and manual promote()/demote()/evict_lru() methods existed. This commit adds: - Auto-promotion on access: get() now promotes fragments one tier up when access_count reaches the configurable promotion_threshold (default: 5 accesses). The access counter resets after each successful promotion so fragments must accumulate fresh accesses before the next tier transition. - Staleness enforcement: new enforce_staleness() method demotes hot fragments older than hot_ttl (default: 24h) to warm, and warm fragments older than warm_ttl to cold. A snapshot of existing warm-tier IDs prevents double-demotion in a single pass. - Budget enforcement on store and promote: store() and promote() now enforce TierBudget.max_tokens_hot by evicting LRU hot-tier fragments until the token budget is met. The eviction loop uses incremental token tracking to avoid recomputing the sum. - Event emission: Added TIER_PROMOTED, TIER_DEMOTED, TIER_EVICTED event types to EventType enum. All tier transitions emit DomainEvent instances through the optional EventBus. - Configuration: Added context_tier_promotion_threshold, context_tier_hot_ttl_hours, context_tier_warm_ttl_hours settings. The warm TTL setting also accepts the spec-defined env var CLEVERAGENTS_CTX_WARM_HOURS as an alias. - DI wiring: container.py now injects event_bus into context_tier_service. Review fixes applied (code review on PR #1150): - C1: Reset access_count to 0 after each auto-promotion to prevent chain promotion that bypassed the warm tier. - C2: Call _enforce_hot_budget() inside promote() warm-to-hot path so auto-promoted fragments respect the token budget. - H1: Corrected _enforce_hot_budget() docstring: actual complexity is O(n + n*k) not O(n), since min() scans remaining entries on each eviction. - M1: Added CLEVERAGENTS_CTX_WARM_HOURS as an additional env var alias for context_tier_warm_ttl_hours per specification line 30555. Review fixes applied (second code review on PR #1150): - B-CRIT-1: Fixed data loss in promote() warm-to-hot: emit TIER_PROMOTED before _enforce_hot_budget(), and if the promoted fragment is evicted by budget, restore it to the warm tier instead of silently losing it. - B-HIGH-1: Fixed self-eviction on store(): fragments whose token_count exceeds the entire hot-tier budget are now redirected to the warm tier with a warning log. - B-MED-1: Wrapped _emit_tier_event() in try/except so a failing event bus does not break tier operations (best-effort emission). - B-MED-2: Fixed event ordering so TIER_PROMOTED fires before any budget-triggered TIER_EVICTED events. - D-LOW-1: Fixed type hint in Robot helper (dict[str, Callable]). - D-LOW-2: Added __all__ export to context_tiers.py. - S-LOW-1: Added thread-safety docstring note to ContextTierService. Review fixes applied (third code review on PR #1150): - B-MED-1: Added TIER_DEMOTED event emission for oversized fragment redirect in store(), closing the observability gap where the only tier transition without event emission was the hot-to-warm redirect for fragments exceeding the entire hot-tier budget. - S-LOW-1: Added CLEVERAGENTS_CTX_HOT_HOURS as an additional env var alias for context_tier_hot_ttl_hours, for consistency with the warm-tier alias CLEVERAGENTS_CTX_WARM_HOURS. - S-LOW-2: Added docstring note to enforce_staleness() reconciling the hot-tier TTL with the specification statement that hot-tier retention is "Until resource removed" (TTL controls tier placement, not data retention). Review fixes applied (fourth code review on PR #1150): - B-HIGH-1: Reset access_count to 0 on demotion so that demoted fragments must accumulate fresh accesses before re-promotion. Without this reset, a previously popular fragment whose access_count already exceeded the promotion threshold would be re-promoted on the very next get() call, making staleness enforcement ineffective. Review fixes applied (freemo APPROVED review on PR #1150): - #1: Removed all # type: ignore annotations from test files. Fixed _EventCollector, _FailingBus, and _NullBus subscribe() signatures to use Callable[[DomainEvent], None] matching the EventBus protocol. Replaced dict-spread TieredFragment construction with explicit keyword arguments and post-construction assignment. - #2: Extracted runtime policy logic (enforce_staleness, _maybe_auto_promote, _re_fetch_after_promotion, _enforce_hot_budget, _emit_tier_event) into TierRuntimeMixin in tier_runtime.py to reduce context_tiers.py toward the 500-line guideline. - #3: Added fragment_id non-empty validation guard to promote() and demote() per CONTRIBUTING.md argument validation policy. - #8: Renamed _resolve to _re_fetch_after_promotion for clarity. Removed @tdd_expected_fail from TDD tests (Behave + Robot) as the bug is now fixed. All 3 TDD scenarios pass normally. Tests: 27 Behave scenarios (24 feature + 3 TDD), 4 Robot integration tests, 4 ASV benchmark suites. ISSUES CLOSED: #821	2026-03-25 17:49:06 +00:00
brent.edwards	202c9bfe75	test(acms): TDD failing tests for context tier runtime logic (bug #821) (#1058) ... ## Summary TDD expected-fail tests proving bug #821 exists: `ContextTierService` has data models for hot/warm/cold tiers but **no runtime logic** for automatic promotion, demotion, or eviction. - **Promotion on access**: Accessing a cold-tier fragment repeatedly via `get()` does NOT auto-promote it — `get()` updates `access_count`/`last_accessed` but never calls `promote()` - **Demotion on staleness**: No staleness enforcement method exists — tried `enforce_staleness()`, `apply_tier_policy()`, `tick()`, etc. — none are implemented - **Eviction on budget overflow**: `store()` does NOT enforce `TierBudget.max_tokens_hot` — the hot tier grows without bound ### Files Added | File | Purpose | |------|---------| | `features/tdd_context_tier_runtime.feature` | 3 Behave scenarios tagged `@tdd_expected_fail @tdd_bug @tdd_bug_821 @mock_only` | | `features/steps/tdd_context_tier_runtime_steps.py` | Type-annotated step definitions exercising real `ContextTierService` | | `robot/tdd_context_tier_runtime.robot` | 3 Robot Framework integration tests tagged `tdd_expected_fail` | | `robot/helper_tdd_context_tier_runtime.py` | Helper script for Robot tests with 3 subcommands | ### Verification - `nox -s lint` — passed - `nox -s typecheck` — passed (0 errors) - `nox -s unit_tests -- features/tdd_context_tier_runtime.feature` — **3 scenarios passed** (all assertions fail as expected, `@tdd_expected_fail` inverts to CI pass) ISSUES CLOSED: #840 Reviewed-on: #1058 Co-authored-by: Brent Edwards <brent.edwards@cleverthis.com> Co-committed-by: Brent Edwards <brent.edwards@cleverthis.com>	2026-03-19 22:24:41 +00:00