5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
hurui200320 2005b8ef82 feat(tests): replace all @skip tags with proper @tdd_expected_fail tags or remove them across the entire codebase (#7221)
CI / push-validation (push) Successful in 18s
CI / build (push) Successful in 19s
CI / helm (push) Successful in 24s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 29s
CI / security (push) Successful in 1m11s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 2m56s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 3m40s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 3m59s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 4m3s
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 4m55s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 10s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 10m44s
CI / status-check (push) Successful in 1s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 1h13m28s
## Summary

Replaces all 234 bare `@skip` occurrences across 82 Behave feature files with the correct TDD issue-capture tagging system described in CONTRIBUTING.md § Bug Fix Workflow.

Previously, the noxfile ran Behave with `--tags=not @skip`, silently excluding all `@skip`-tagged scenarios from every CI run. These tests never ran, never inverted results via the `@tdd_expected_fail` mechanism, and never contributed to coverage — defeating the purpose of TDD issue-capture testing. Every `@skip` occurrence had a commented-out hint line immediately above it showing the intended proper tags (e.g., `# @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4272 @tdd_expected_fail @skip`), confirming they were all intended for conversion.

## Changes

### Mechanical conversion (234 replacements across 82 files)
- Extracted the proper TDD tags from the comment hint above each `@skip` line, removed `@skip` from the tag set, and replaced the `@skip` line with those tags.
- Removed the now-redundant comment hint lines alongside each replacement.

### Bug-fixed scenarios — `@tdd_expected_fail` removed (84 scenarios)
- After conversion, ran `nox -s unit_tests` to identify which newly-enabled `@tdd_expected_fail` scenarios now **pass** (their referenced bugs have already been fixed). Removed `@tdd_expected_fail` from those 84 scenarios and their corresponding feature-level tags, leaving only the permanent `@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_<N>` regression-guard tags.
- Affected features include: `tdd_tool_runner_env_precedence`, `tdd_automation_profile_session_leak`, `tls_certificate_check`, `project_create_persist`, `resource_type_bootstrap_*`, and 18 others.

### Noxfile cleanup
- Removed all four `--tags=not @skip` arguments from `noxfile.py` (unit_tests and coverage sessions). With zero `@skip` tags remaining in the codebase, this filter was dead code and its presence would mislead future maintainers into thinking `@skip` is still a supported escape mechanism.

### Regression guard files
- Split the regression guards into two focused files:
  - `tdd_regression_guards_exec_env.feature` for bug #4281 (exec-env precedence)
  - `tdd_regression_guards_session_list.feature` for bug #4271 (session list summary)
- Each file carries only its own `@tdd_issue` tags at the feature level, avoiding cross-contamination via Behave tag inheritance. The `Background` step (`session-list-summary mock`) only appears in the session-list file where it is actually needed.

### Duplicate tag cleanup
- Removed duplicate `@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4287` tag lines in `tdd_skill_add_regression.feature` (lines 20 and 29).

### Inline comment for retained `@tdd_expected_fail`
- Added inline comment in `ci_workflow_validation.feature:134` explaining why this specific #4227 scenario retains `@tdd_expected_fail` despite #4227 being closed (CI YAML does not encode threshold as a machine-readable value).

### Known edge cases — `@tdd_expected_fail` retained (closed issues, fix on master, scenarios still fail)
The following issues are **closed** and their fixes **are on master**, but the specific test assertions still fail because the fixes address other aspects of the bugs. The `@tdd_expected_fail` tags are functionally correct and must remain until the specific scenario assertions pass:
- `tdd_exec_env_resolution_precedence.feature` — bug #1080 (closed 2026-03-31). The precedence-level-2-vs-4 scenario still fails.
- `session_list_summary_dedup.feature` — bug #3046 (closed 2026-04-05). The dedup-consistency scenarios still fail.
- `actor_add_update_enforcement.feature` — bug #2609 (closed 2026-04-05). The enforcement scenarios still fail.
- `ci_workflow_validation.feature:134` — #4227 (closed 2026-04-08). The CI YAML threshold assertion still fails.

## Verification

- `grep -r "@skip" features/ --include="*.feature"` → **zero results** ✓
- `grep -n "tags=not @skip" noxfile.py` → **zero results** ✓
- `nox -s unit_tests` → **629 features passed, 0 failed** ✓ (up from ~545 before this PR)
- CI all green (coverage ≥ 97%) ✓
- Integration tests (Robot Framework) do not use `@skip` — confirmed no action needed ✓
- E2E tests (Robot Framework) do not use `@skip` — confirmed no action needed ✓
- `CHANGELOG.md` updated with entry for this change ✓
- `CONTRIBUTORS.md` — Rui Hu already listed ✓

## Issues Addressed

Closes #7025

Co-authored-by: CleverThis <hal9000@cleverthis.com>
Reviewed-on: #7221
Reviewed-by: HAL 9000 <HAL9000@cleverthis.com>
Reviewed-by: HAL9001 <hal9001@cleverthis.com>
Co-authored-by: Rui Hu <rui.hu@cleverthis.com>
Co-committed-by: Rui Hu <rui.hu@cleverthis.com>
2026-04-13 04:56:01 +00:00
freemo 8ea00f5185 fix: restore CI quality tests to passing state (#4175)
CI / unit_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Has been cancelled
CI / lint (push) Has been cancelled
CI / typecheck (push) Has been cancelled
CI / security (push) Has been cancelled
CI / quality (push) Has been cancelled
CI / integration_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / e2e_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / coverage (push) Has been cancelled
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been cancelled
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
CI / push-validation (push) Has been cancelled
CI / status-check (push) Has been cancelled
CI / docker (push) Has been cancelled
CI / helm (push) Has been cancelled
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me>
Co-committed-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me>
2026-04-08 11:02:14 +00:00
hurui200320 1878998b7a refactor(testing): rename tdd_bug/tdd_bug_N tags to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_N
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 25s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m56s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m6s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 4m10s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m20s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m44s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 13m1s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m25s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / build (push) Successful in 26s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3m31s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 3m40s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 3m57s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / security (push) Successful in 4m1s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 8m55s
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 9m14s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 9s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 11m42s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 11m37s
CI / status-check (push) Successful in 4s
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 29m25s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 54m8s
Rename the TDD tag system from tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_<N>
across the entire codebase. The tdd_expected_fail tag is unchanged.

The TDD expected-failure workflow is not limited to bug fixes — it applies
equally to any issue type (features, tasks, refactors). The _bug suffix was
misleading and narrowed the perceived scope. The new _issue suffix accurately
reflects that the TDD tagging system applies to any Forgejo issue.

Changes span 92 files:
- features/environment.py: validate_tdd_tags(), should_invert_result(), and
  apply_tdd_inversion() updated — regex, variables, error messages
- robot/tdd_expected_fail_listener.py: _validate_tdd_tags(), _should_invert_result(),
  start_test(), end_test() updated consistently
- 33 Behave .feature files: all @tdd_bug/@tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed
- 29 Robot .robot files: all tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed
- 3 Robot fixture files renamed (tdd_bug_alone, tdd_missing_tdd_bug,
  tdd_expected_fail_missing_bug_n) with content and references updated
- Tag validation tests and helpers updated (function names, command dispatch
  keys, output strings, fixture references)
- CONTRIBUTING.md: section renamed from 'TDD Bug Test Tags' to
  'TDD Issue Test Tags', all tag references and examples updated
- noxfile.py: comment references updated
- Step definition files, mock helpers, and benchmark files: docstring
  references updated

ISSUES CLOSED: #965
2026-03-27 05:58:35 +00:00
Brent E. Edwards d0689573e0 test(cli): add failing tests for session create DI container error
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 13s
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 18s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 32s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 48s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 55s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 2m41s
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m25s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m56s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 33m35s
Add TDD regression tests for bug #570 where `_get_session_service()`
calls `container.db()` but the DI `Container` class has no `db`
provider, raising `AttributeError`.  Same root cause as bug #554.

Includes 4 Behave BDD scenarios tagged `@tdd_bug @tdd_bug_570
@tdd_expected_fail`, Robot Framework integration smoke tests with
`--format plain`, and ASV service-layer benchmarks.  Tests exercise the
real DI path by resetting `_service = None` and using a file-based
SQLite database.

Implements the `@tdd_expected_fail` inversion infrastructure:
- Behave: `after_scenario` hook in `features/environment.py` inverts
  pass/fail for scenarios tagged `@tdd_expected_fail`
- Robot: `robot/tdd_expected_fail_listener.py` listener (API v3)
  performs the same inversion for Robot test cases
- `noxfile.py`: registers the listener via `--listener` in both the
  `integration_tests` and `slow_integration_tests` sessions

Migrates 18 existing TDD scenarios across 5 feature files from the old
`@tdd @bugNNN` convention to the standardised `@tdd_bug @tdd_bug_NNN`
tags per CONTRIBUTING.md § TDD Bug Test Tags.

Refs: #570
2026-03-10 21:39:31 +00:00
brent.edwards 16dc4ab18d fix(project): show created project after creation (#593)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 16s
CI / build (push) Successful in 16s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 19s
CI / security (push) Successful in 34s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 38s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 2m24s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 40s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 3m20s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 5m25s
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 16m50s
## Summary

Fix `agents project show` not finding a project immediately after creation. Extends the `session.commit()` fix from #589 to also cover `update()` and `delete()` in `NamespacedProjectRepository`.

## Changes

**Production fix** (`src/cleveragents/infrastructure/database/repositories.py`):
- Add `session.commit()` to `create()`, `update()`, and `delete()` methods
- Add `finally: session.close()` guard to all three methods
- Update class docstring to reflect commit-per-method pattern

**Tests & benchmarks**:
- 3 Behave BDD regression scenarios (`features/project_show_after_create.feature`)
- Robot Framework integration smoke tests with "not found" assertion (`robot/project_show_after_create.robot`)
- ASV benchmarks for create-then-show round-trip (`benchmarks/project_show_after_create_bench.py`)

## Review feedback addressed

- **F1**: Removed unrelated em-dash CHANGELOG edits — wrote clean entry from scratch
- **F2**: Kept Suite Setup/Teardown (required for `${PYTHON}` variable); updated stale docs
- **F3**: Added "not found" string assertion to Robot negative test case
- **F4**: Removed redundant `Base.metadata.create_all()` from `_make_fresh_repo()` helper
- Updated all stale TDD "expected to fail" comments — this PR includes the fix

## Process

- Single squashed commit, rebased onto `master` (no merge commits)
- Prescribed commit message from issue #590 metadata

ISSUES CLOSED: #590

Reviewed-on: #593
Reviewed-by: Rui Hu <rui.hu@cleverthis.com>
Co-authored-by: Brent E. Edwards <brent.edwards@cleverthis.com>
Co-committed-by: Brent E. Edwards <brent.edwards@cleverthis.com>
2026-03-09 07:56:38 +00:00