test(runtime): add BDD coverage tests for runtime Executor API #34
Merged
CoreRasurae
merged 1 commits from 2026-06-05 23:05:07 +00:00
test/m1-coverage-increase into master
Dismiss Review
Are you sure you want to dismiss this review?
Labels
Clear labels
auto/blocked-by-deps
auto/ci-timeout
auto/claimed-implementer
auto/claimed-merge
auto/claimed-reviewer
auto/driver-down
auto/invariant-violation
auto/last-attempt-tier-0
auto/last-attempt-tier-1
auto/last-attempt-tier-2
auto/last-attempt-tier-min
Automation Tracking
auto/needs-conflict-resolution
auto/needs-implementer
auto/postmortem
auto/ready-to-merge
auto/restart-throttled
auto/revert
auto/sentinel
auto/stale-inactivity
auto/unstable
Blocked
Needs Feedback
Signed-off: Owner
Signed-off: Scrum Master
Signed-off: Tech Lead
Spike
PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.
Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.
Currently being processed by an implementer worker.
Currently being processed by the merge driver.
Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.
Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.
Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.
In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.
Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.
Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.
Failing CI needs implementer attention.
Documenting a driver incident or rollback.
Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.
Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.
Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.
Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.
No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.
Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.
A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.
Bounty
$100
A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$1000
A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$10000
A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$20
A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$2000
A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$250
A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$50
A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$500
A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$5000
A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
Bounty
$750
A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue
MoSCoW
Could have
Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Must have
Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
MoSCoW
Should have
Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.
There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.
Points
1
1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
13
13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
2
2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
21
21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
3
3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
34
34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
5
5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
55
55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
8
8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Points
88
88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.
Priority
Backlog
This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet
Priority
CI Blocker
Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.
A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.
State
Completed
The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.
State
Duplicate
A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.
State
In Progress
A ticket that is actively being developed.
State
In Review
A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.
State
Paused
This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.
State
Unverified
All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.
State
Verified
The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.
State
Wont Do
This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.
Type
Automation
Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.
Type
Bug
Something that doesnt work as intended.
Type
Discussion
Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.
Type
Documentation
An error or improvement needed in the documentation.
Type
Epic
Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.
Type
Feature
Some new functionality not present.
Type
Legendary
A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.
Type
Refactor
A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.
Type
Support
Someone needs help using the project.
Type
Task
A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.
Type
Testing
Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
aditya (Aditya Chhabra)
aleenaumair (Aleena Umair)
brent.edwards (Brent Edwards)
CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes)
drew (Drew Morris)
eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci)
freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman)
HAL9000 (HAL 9000)
HAL9001 (HAL9001)
hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari)
hurui200320 (Rui Hu)
justin.morris
khird (Kyle Hird)
org.cleveragents
Clear assignees
No Assignees
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
#33 test: Coverage increase
cleveragents/cleveractors-core
Reference: cleveragents/cleveractors-core#34
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Delete Branch "test/m1-coverage-increase"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
Add 16 Behave BDD scenarios covering the router-facing
runtime.ExecutorAPI, increasing code coverage from 94.66% to 96.94% (214 fewer uncovered lines).What is covered
create_executor()factory function andExecutorinitializationExecutor.execute()dispatch to LLM, graph, tool, and multi-actor agents_execute_llm()credential injection (provider-specific + openai_compatible fallback) and error handling_execute_graph()PureGraphConfig construction from route definitions_execute_tool()tool configuration from config blocks_execute_multi_actor()routing with default_actor resolution and empty-actor error_build_factory_config()credential and limit injection into agent configs_estimate_tokens()with tiktoken and heuristic fallbackNodeUsageandActorResultdataclass field storageVerification
nox -s unit_tests→ 1838 scenarios, 0 failednox -s coverage_report→ 96.94% (passes 96.5% threshold)nox -s lint→ all checks passednox -s typecheck→ 0 errorsnox -s security_scan→ 0 findingsnox -s dead_code→ cleanCloses #33
@@ -0,0 +500,4 @@assert isinstance(context.test_result, ActorResult)@then("the ActorResult response should contain the expected reply")This description doesn't match the code. "the expected reply" implies that there is only one reply. The code allows any reply that isn't empty.
@@ -0,0 +556,4 @@@then("the LLM agent should be initialized with the injected api key")def step_assert_injected_key(context):assert context.test_result is not NoneAgain -- the description and the assertion do not match. Check that the API key is in the LLM agent.
@@ -0,0 +57,4 @@"edges": [],"entry_node": "start","exit_nodes": ["end"],}The above config dict doesn't look valid for two reasons:
@@ -0,0 +98,4 @@"edges": [],"entry_node": "start","exit_nodes": ["end"],}See
step_config_graph_route.@@ -0,0 +281,4 @@"name": "test_auto_multi","actors": {"default": {"type": "llm",Here's the type field that's supposed to be missing.
@@ -0,0 +526,4 @@@then("the node usage IDs should be prefixed with the default actor name")def step_assert_node_prefix(context):for node in context.test_result.nodes:assert "." in node.node_id or node.node_id.startswith("default")This doesn't match the description.
It should be
assert node.node_id.startsWith("default.")A few things to fix.
6225775878to866e08751cThanks for the thorough review, Brent. Here is my response to each comment:
1. Review 9484 — "expected reply" mismatch
Fixed. The step description has been updated from "the ActorResult response should contain the expected reply" to "the ActorResult response should be non-empty." The assertion checks
len(context.test_result.response) > 0, which accurately verifies that a non-empty reply was produced by the mocked LLM agent. The name now matches the code.2. Review 9485 — "injected api key" assertion
Fixed. The step now verifies that the executor's credentials dictionary contains the OpenAPI API key
"sk-test-injected"rather than just checkingtest_result is not None. The assertion chain now confirms: the result exists, the executor exists, credentials exist, the openai key is present, and its api_key value matches the injected key.3. Review 9486 — Invalid graph route config (step_config_graph_route)
Fixed. The nodes list now includes
{"id": "end", "type": "end"}alongside the existing start node, so theexit_nodes: ["end"]reference resolves correctly. The config dict now represents a valid trivial graph with a start-to-end structure.4. Review 9487 — Same issue in step_config_graph_openai
Fixed identically to #9486. The
step_config_graph_openairoute now also includes theendnode in its nodes list.5. Review 9488 — Type field in actors_no_type config
Not changed. The step description says "a config dict with actors key but no type field" — this correctly refers to the top-level config dict, which has
actors,name, andcleveragentskeys but notypefield at the top level. The"type": "llm"insideactors.defaultis the sub-actor's own type, which is required and correct for the sub-actor config within a multi-actor bundle. The test is doing exactly what its description says.6. Review 9489 — Node prefix assertion
Fixed. The assertion has been changed from
"." in node.node_id or node.node_id.startswith("default")tonode.node_id.startswith("default."). This correctly verifies that node IDs are prefixed with the default actor name followed by a dot separator, matching the step description.All changes verified with:
nox -s unit_tests— 1838 scenarios, 0 failuresnox -s lint— all checks passednox -s format -- --check— all files already formattedFixed. The step description has been updated from "the ActorResult response should contain the expected reply" to "the ActorResult response should be non-empty." The assertion checks
len(response) > 0, which accurately verifies that a non-empty reply was produced by the mocked LLM agent. The name now matches the code.Fixed. The step now verifies that the executor's credentials dictionary contains the OpenAI API key
"sk-test-injected"rather than just checkingtest_result is not None. The assertion chain now confirms: the result exists, the executor exists, credentials exist, the openai key is present, and its api_key value matches the injected key.Fixed. The nodes list now includes
{"id": "end", "type": "end"}alongside the existing start node, so theexit_nodes: ["end"]reference resolves correctly. The config dict now represents a valid trivial graph with a start-to-end structure.Fixed identically to the previous comment. The
step_config_graph_openairoute now also includes theendnode in its nodes list.Not changed. The step description says "a config dict with actors key but no type field" — this correctly refers to the top-level config dict, which has
actors,name, andcleveragentskeys but notypefield at the top level. The"type": "llm"insideactors.defaultis the sub-actor's own type, which is required and correct for the sub-actor config within a multi-actor bundle. The test is doing exactly what its description says.Fixed. The assertion has been changed from
"." in node.node_id or node.node_id.startswith("default")tonode.node_id.startswith("default."). This correctly verifies that node IDs are prefixed with the default actor name followed by a dot separator, matching the step description.Approved!
866e08751ctoab17407576