forked from cleveragents/cleveragents-core
82 lines
3.2 KiB
Gherkin
82 lines
3.2 KiB
Gherkin
Feature: Comprehensive Config Parser Coverage
|
|
As a developer
|
|
I want to ensure the ReactiveConfigParser is thoroughly tested
|
|
So that all code paths are covered and edge cases are handled
|
|
|
|
Background:
|
|
Given I have a reactive config parser setup
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Parse configuration with merge edge cases
|
|
Given I have configuration files with merge edge cases
|
|
When I parse the configuration files
|
|
Then the configurations should be merged handling all edge cases
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Environment variable interpolation with all types
|
|
Given I have configuration with environment variable patterns
|
|
When I interpolate environment variables
|
|
Then all variable types should be converted correctly
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Template string processing
|
|
Given I have configuration with template strings
|
|
When I process the template strings
|
|
Then template strings should be processed correctly
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Route configuration validation errors
|
|
Given I have invalid route configurations
|
|
When I try to parse the configurations
|
|
Then appropriate configuration errors should be raised
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Bridge configuration edge cases
|
|
Given I have bridge configurations with edge cases
|
|
When I parse the bridge configurations
|
|
Then bridge configurations should be parsed correctly
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Configuration validation comprehensive
|
|
Given I have configurations with validation issues
|
|
When I validate the configurations
|
|
Then all validation scenarios should be tested
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Merge operation validation
|
|
Given I have merge operations with various issues
|
|
When I validate merge operations
|
|
Then merge validation should handle all cases
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Split operation validation
|
|
Given I have split operations with various issues
|
|
When I validate split operations
|
|
Then split validation should handle all cases
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Pipeline validation comprehensive
|
|
Given I have pipeline configurations with issues
|
|
When I validate pipeline configurations
|
|
Then pipeline validation should handle all scenarios
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Template instance creation
|
|
Given I have template instance configurations
|
|
When I create template instances
|
|
Then template instances should be created correctly
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Type conversion comprehensive
|
|
Given I have values requiring type conversion
|
|
When I perform type conversion
|
|
Then all type conversions should work correctly
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Config file with Jinja2 syntax detection
|
|
Given I have files with Jinja2 syntax
|
|
When I detect Jinja2 syntax in files
|
|
Then Jinja2 files should be processed with template engine
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Error handling for missing environment variables
|
|
Given I have configuration with missing environment variables
|
|
When I try to interpolate environment variables
|
|
Then appropriate errors should be raised for missing variables
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Complex nested configuration merging
|
|
Given I have deeply nested configurations to merge
|
|
When I merge the nested configurations
|
|
Then deep merging should work correctly
|
|
|
|
Scenario: Route type validation comprehensive
|
|
Given I have routes with various type issues
|
|
When I validate route types
|
|
Then all route type validation scenarios should be covered |