Files
cleveragents-core/features/context_tier_runtime.feature

180 lines
9.3 KiB
Gherkin

@mock_only
Feature: Context tier runtime promotion, demotion, and eviction logic
As an ACMS developer
I want the ContextTierService to automatically manage fragment lifecycle
So that frequently accessed fragments are promoted, stale fragments are
demoted, and budget limits are enforced without manual intervention
Background:
Given a context tier service with default settings
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# Auto-promotion on access
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario: Fragment promoted from cold to warm after reaching access threshold
Given a fragment "frag-cold-01" stored in the cold tier with 50 tokens
When I access "frag-cold-01" via get 5 times
Then fragment "frag-cold-01" should be in the warm tier
Scenario: Fragment promoted from warm to hot after reaching access threshold
Given a fragment "frag-warm-01" stored in the warm tier with 50 tokens
When I access "frag-warm-01" via get 5 times
Then fragment "frag-warm-01" should be in the hot tier
Scenario: Fragment not promoted before reaching access threshold
Given a fragment "frag-cold-02" stored in the cold tier with 50 tokens
When I access "frag-cold-02" via get 3 times
Then fragment "frag-cold-02" should be in the cold tier
Scenario: Promoted fragment requires fresh accesses for next promotion
Given a fragment "frag-chain-01" stored in the cold tier with 50 tokens
When I access "frag-chain-01" via get 5 times
Then fragment "frag-chain-01" should be in the warm tier
When I access "frag-chain-01" via get 1 times
Then fragment "frag-chain-01" should be in the warm tier
When I access "frag-chain-01" via get 5 times
Then fragment "frag-chain-01" should be in the hot tier
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# Staleness enforcement
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario: Stale hot fragment demoted to warm on staleness enforcement
Given a fragment "frag-stale-hot" stored in the hot tier with stale timestamp of 25 hours
When I invoke enforce_staleness on the service
Then fragment "frag-stale-hot" should be in the warm tier
Scenario: Fresh hot fragment not demoted on staleness enforcement
Given a fragment "frag-fresh-hot" stored in the hot tier with fresh timestamp
When I invoke enforce_staleness on the service
Then fragment "frag-fresh-hot" should be in the hot tier
Scenario: Stale warm fragment demoted to cold on staleness enforcement
Given a fragment "frag-stale-warm" stored in the warm tier with stale timestamp of 25 hours
When I invoke enforce_staleness on the service
Then fragment "frag-stale-warm" should be in the cold tier
Scenario: Staleness enforcement returns list of demoted fragment IDs
Given a fragment "frag-stale-a" stored in the hot tier with stale timestamp of 25 hours
And a fragment "frag-stale-b" stored in the hot tier with stale timestamp of 30 hours
When I invoke enforce_staleness on the service
Then the staleness result should contain 2 fragment IDs
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# Budget enforcement on store
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario: Storing in hot tier when budget allows does not evict
Given a service with hot tier budget of 200 tokens
And a fragment "frag-a" stored in the hot tier with 50 tokens
When I store fragment "frag-b" in the hot tier with 50 tokens
Then fragment "frag-a" should be in the hot tier
And fragment "frag-b" should be in the hot tier
Scenario: Storing in hot tier over budget evicts oldest fragment
Given a service with hot tier budget of 100 tokens
And a fragment "frag-old" stored in the hot tier with 50 tokens and old timestamp
And a fragment "frag-new" stored in the hot tier with 50 tokens and recent timestamp
When I store fragment "frag-overflow" in the hot tier with 50 tokens
Then fragment "frag-old" should not be in any tier
And fragment "frag-new" should be in the hot tier
And fragment "frag-overflow" should be in the hot tier
Scenario: Oversized fragment redirected to warm tier instead of hot
Given a service with hot tier budget of 100 tokens
When I store fragment "frag-oversized" in the hot tier with 200 tokens
Then fragment "frag-oversized" should be in the warm tier
Scenario: Promotion to hot falls back to warm when budget evicts promoted fragment
Given a context tier service with an event bus and hot budget of 100 tokens
And a fragment "frag-resident" stored in the hot tier with 80 tokens and recent timestamp
And a fragment "frag-to-promote" stored in the warm tier with 80 tokens and old timestamp
When I promote fragment "frag-to-promote"
Then fragment "frag-to-promote" should be in the warm tier
And a TIER_PROMOTED event should have been emitted for "frag-to-promote"
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# Event emission
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario: Promotion emits TIER_PROMOTED event with correct tier details
Given a context tier service with an event bus
And a fragment "frag-evt-01" stored in the cold tier with 50 tokens
When I promote fragment "frag-evt-01"
Then a TIER_PROMOTED event should have been emitted for "frag-evt-01"
And the last TIER_PROMOTED event should have from_tier "cold" and to_tier "warm"
Scenario: Demotion emits TIER_DEMOTED event with correct tier details
Given a context tier service with an event bus
And a fragment "frag-evt-02" stored in the hot tier with 50 tokens
When I demote fragment "frag-evt-02"
Then a TIER_DEMOTED event should have been emitted for "frag-evt-02"
And the last TIER_DEMOTED event should have from_tier "hot" and to_tier "warm"
Scenario: Budget eviction emits TIER_EVICTED event
Given a context tier service with an event bus and hot budget of 100 tokens
And a fragment "frag-evt-03" stored in the hot tier with 60 tokens and old timestamp
When I store fragment "frag-evt-04" in the hot tier with 60 tokens
Then a TIER_EVICTED event should have been emitted for "frag-evt-03"
Scenario: Explicit evict_lru emits TIER_EVICTED events
Given a context tier service with an event bus
And a fragment "frag-evict-01" stored in the hot tier with 50 tokens and old timestamp
And a fragment "frag-evict-02" stored in the hot tier with 50 tokens and recent timestamp
When I evict 1 LRU fragment from the hot tier
Then a TIER_EVICTED event should have been emitted for "frag-evict-01"
Scenario: Oversized fragment redirect emits TIER_DEMOTED event
Given a context tier service with an event bus and hot budget of 100 tokens
When I store fragment "frag-oversized-evt" in the hot tier with 200 tokens
Then fragment "frag-oversized-evt" should be in the warm tier
And a TIER_DEMOTED event should have been emitted for "frag-oversized-evt"
Scenario: Event emission failure does not break tier operation
Given a context tier service with a failing event bus
And a fragment "frag-evt-safe" stored in the cold tier with 50 tokens
When I promote fragment "frag-evt-safe"
Then fragment "frag-evt-safe" should be in the warm tier
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# Edge cases
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario: Getting a nonexistent fragment returns nothing
When I access "no-such-fragment" via get 1 times
Then fragment "no-such-fragment" should not be in any tier
Scenario: Promoting a hot-tier fragment has no effect
Given a fragment "frag-already-hot" stored in the hot tier with 50 tokens
When I promote fragment "frag-already-hot"
Then fragment "frag-already-hot" should be in the hot tier
Scenario: Demoting a cold-tier fragment has no effect
Given a fragment "frag-already-cold" stored in the cold tier with 50 tokens
When I demote fragment "frag-already-cold"
Then fragment "frag-already-cold" should be in the cold tier
Scenario: Staleness enforcement with mixed stale hot and warm fragments
Given a context tier service with default settings
And a fragment "mixed-hot" stored in the hot tier with stale timestamp of 25 hours
And a fragment "mixed-warm" stored in the warm tier with stale timestamp of 25 hours
When I invoke enforce_staleness on the service
Then fragment "mixed-hot" should be in the warm tier
And fragment "mixed-warm" should be in the cold tier
And the staleness result should contain 2 fragment IDs
Scenario: Demoted fragment requires fresh accesses before re-promotion
Given a context tier service with default settings
And a fragment "frag-pop" stored in the hot tier with 50 tokens
When I access "frag-pop" via get 10 times
And I invoke enforce_staleness on the service with a hot TTL of 0 hours
And I access "frag-pop" via get 1 times
Then fragment "frag-pop" should be in the warm tier
Scenario: Promotion threshold of 1 promotes on first access without chain promotion
Given a context tier service with promotion threshold 1
And a fragment "frag-thresh" stored in the cold tier with 50 tokens
When I access "frag-thresh" via get 1 times
Then fragment "frag-thresh" should be in the warm tier