507c8faa90
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 35s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 48s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 24s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m44s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m56s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 16m41s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 22m54s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m18s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 57m47s
Approved proposal: #2443 Pattern: workflow_fix Evidence: PR #1513 contained only a single comment line as its entire diff, yet passed all quality gates (lint, typecheck, tests, coverage) and was submitted for review, consuming 8 independent reviewer slots. All quality gates verify code quality, not code existence — a change that adds only comments passes every gate. Fix: Add Step 1.5 (Meaningful Change Verification) between the implementer invocation and test-writing step. This checks git diff output for functional code changes and rejects attempts that produce empty, comment-only, or trivially small diffs (< 3 functional lines), immediately escalating to the next tier without wasting quality gate and reviewer capacity. ISSUES CLOSED: #2443