Feature: Consolidated Security
  Combined scenarios from: security_eval, security_exceptions, security_readonly, security_secrets, security_templates

  # ============================================================
  # Originally from: security_eval.feature
  # Feature: SEC1 - eval/exec removal security
  # ============================================================

  Scenario: Config with code injection attempt is rejected
    Given a SimpleToolAgent configured with a code injection payload
    When I attempt to process content through the injected agent
    Then the agent should reject the code block with a routing error
    And the error message should mention code blocks are not supported


  Scenario: Malicious transform expression does not execute
    Given the CleverAgents reactive system is available
    When I configure a transform with a malicious eval expression
    Then the transform should be rejected with a routing error
    And the error message should mention unknown transform


  Scenario: Valid config still works after eval removal
    Given a SimpleToolAgent configured with a named operation "uppercase"
    When I process "hello" through the named operation agent
    Then the named operation result should be "HELLO"


  Scenario: Named transform from registry works after eval removal
    Given the CleverAgents reactive system is available
    When I configure a transform with a registered named function "uppercase"
    Then the named transform should produce the uppercased result


  Scenario: Code block with import attempt is rejected
    Given a SimpleToolAgent configured with an import injection payload
    When I attempt to process content through the injected agent
    Then the agent should reject the code block with a routing error


  Scenario: Eval expression mimicking registry name is still rejected
    Given the CleverAgents reactive system is available
    When I configure a transform with expression "lambda x: __import__('os').system('rm -rf /')"
    Then the transform should be rejected with a routing error


  Scenario: Custom registered operation works
    Given a SimpleToolAgent with a custom registered operation "reverse"
    When I process "abcde" through the custom operation agent
    Then the custom operation result should be "edcba"


  Scenario: Custom registered transform works
    Given the CleverAgents reactive system is available
    And a custom transform "double" is registered
    When I configure a transform with a registered named function "double"
    Then the custom transform should produce the doubled result


  Scenario: Config scanner detects eval in content
    Given config content containing "value: eval('hack')"
    When I scan the config content for security violations
    Then the scanner should report at least 1 violation
    And the scanner should report a violation with token "eval("
    And the violation severity should be "CRITICAL"


  Scenario: Config scanner detects exec in content
    Given config content containing "action: exec('import os')"
    When I scan the config content for security violations
    Then the scanner should report at least 1 violation
    And the scanner should report a violation with token "exec("


  Scenario: Config scanner passes clean content
    Given config content containing "name: safe-project"
    When I scan the config content for security violations
    Then the scanner should report 0 violations


  Scenario: Config scanner reports correct line numbers
    Given multiline config content with a violation on line 3
    When I scan the config content for security violations
    Then the scanner should report a violation on line 3


  Scenario: Config safety validation raises on dangerous content
    Given config content containing "run: exec('bad')"
    When I validate the config content for safety
    Then a ConfigurationError should be raised


  Scenario: Config safety validation passes clean content
    Given config content containing "name: safe-project"
    When I validate the config content for safety
    Then no configuration error should be raised


  Scenario: Config scanner skips comment lines
    Given config content containing "# eval('this is just a comment')"
    When I scan the config content for security violations
    Then the scanner should report 0 violations


  Scenario: Config scanner skips INI-style semicolon comment lines
    Given config content containing "; eval('this is an INI comment')"
    When I scan the config content for security violations
    Then the scanner should report 0 violations


  Scenario: Config scanner skips inline comments after hash
    Given config content containing "name: safe-project  # eval('just a note')"
    When I scan the config content for security violations
    Then the scanner should report 0 violations


  Scenario: Config scanner preserves hash inside quoted strings
    Given config content containing "value: \"eval('inside quotes') # not a comment\""
    When I scan the config content for security violations
    Then the scanner should report at least 1 violation
    And the scanner should report a violation with token "eval("


  Scenario: Config scanner detects multiple violation types
    Given config content with eval and subprocess patterns
    When I scan the config content for security violations
    Then the scanner should report at least 2 violations


  Scenario: Config scanner scans multiple files
    Given two temporary config files with violations
    When I scan the config files for security violations
    Then the scanner should report at least 2 violations


  Scenario: Config scanner CLI shows usage when no args given
    When I run the config scanner CLI with no arguments
    Then the scanner CLI should return exit code 2


  Scenario: Config scanner CLI reports violations found
    When I run the config scanner CLI with a dirty temp file
    Then the scanner CLI should return exit code 1
    And the scanner CLI output should contain "violation"


  Scenario: Config scanner CLI reports clean file
    When I run the config scanner CLI with a clean temp file
    Then the scanner CLI should return exit code 0


  Scenario: Config scanner scan_file raises for missing file
    When I scan a non-existent file path
    Then a scanner FileNotFoundError should be raised


  Scenario: Config scanner scan_file handles non-UTF-8 files gracefully
    Given a temporary config file with non-UTF-8 encoding
    When I scan the non-UTF-8 file for violations
    Then the scan should complete without crashing


  # ============================================================
  # Originally from: security_exceptions.feature
  # Feature: Explicit exception handling and error classification
  # ============================================================

  Scenario: Classify a ValidationError as 422
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a ValidationError with message "field is invalid"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 422
    And the error code name should be "VALIDATION_FAILED"
    And the error handling category should be "CLIENT"


  Scenario: Classify a ResourceNotFoundError as 404
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a ResourceNotFoundError for resource "plan" with id "01PLAN001"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 404
    And the error code name should be "NOT_FOUND"


  Scenario: Classify an AuthenticationError as 401
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given an AuthenticationError with message "invalid token"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 401
    And the error code name should be "UNAUTHORIZED"


  Scenario: Classify an AuthorizationError as 403
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given an AuthorizationError with message "access denied"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 403
    And the error code name should be "FORBIDDEN"


  Scenario: Classify a RateLimitError as 429
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a RateLimitError with message "slow down"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 429
    And the error code name should be "RATE_LIMITED"


  Scenario: Classify a DatabaseError as 522
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a DatabaseError with message "connection lost"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 522
    And the error handling category should be "SERVER"


  Scenario: Classify a ConfigurationError as 525
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a ConfigurationError with message "missing key"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 525


  Scenario: Classify a NetworkError as 524
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a NetworkError with message "timeout"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 524


  Scenario: Classify a FileSystemError as 523
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a FileSystemError with message "permission denied"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 523


  Scenario: Classify a ProviderError as 520
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a ProviderError with message "model failed"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 520


  Scenario: Classify a TokenLimitExceededError as 526
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a TokenLimitExceededError with message "context too long"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 526


  Scenario: Classify a BusinessRuleViolation as 400
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a BusinessRuleViolation with message "invalid transition"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 400


  Scenario: Classify a PlanError as 400
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a PlanError with message "plan stuck"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 400


  Scenario: Classify an unknown Exception as 500
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a bare Exception with message "something broke"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 500
    And the error handling category should be "SERVER"


  Scenario: Classify an ExecutionError as 521
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given an ExecutionError with message "agent failed"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 521


  Scenario: Classify a StreamRoutingError as 528
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a StreamRoutingError with message "routing failed"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 528


  Scenario: Classify a ModelNotAvailableError as 527
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a ModelNotAvailableError with message "deprecated"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 527


  Scenario: Classify a ResourceConflictError as 409
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a ResourceConflictError with message "already exists"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 409


  Scenario: Classify a MissingConfigurationError as 525
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a MissingConfigurationError with message "key not set"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 525


  Scenario: Classify an ExternalServiceError as 503
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given an ExternalServiceError with message "service down"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error code should be 503

    # -- Secret redaction -----------------------------------------------------


  Scenario: Redact API key from error details
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with key "api_key" and value "sk-abc123secret"
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted detail "api_key" should be "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Redact password from error details
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with key "password" and value "my-secret-pass"
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted detail "password" should be "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Redact OpenAI key pattern from string value
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with key "message" and value "Failed with key sk-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted detail "message" should contain "***REDACTED***"
    And the redacted detail "message" should not contain "sk-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"


  Scenario: Redact JWT token pattern from string value
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with key "log" and value "auth eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9 failed"
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted detail "log" should contain "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Redact nested dict values
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with nested key "config" containing secret_key "abc123"
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted nested detail "config" key "secret_key" should be "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Non-sensitive values pass through unchanged
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with key "plan_id" and value "01PLAN001"
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted detail "plan_id" should be "01PLAN001"


  Scenario: Redact GitHub PAT pattern from string value
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with key "msg" and value "token ghp_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456 expired"
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted detail "msg" should contain "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Redact value with redact_value function
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a redaction test string value "key=sk-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"
    When I redact the string value
    Then the redacted string should contain "***REDACTED***"

    # -- Wrapping unexpected exceptions ----------------------------------------


  Scenario: Wrap a bare Exception into CleverAgentsError
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a bare Exception with message "internal crash"
    When I wrap the unexpected exception
    Then the wrapped error should be a CleverAgentsError
    And the wrapped error message should be "An unexpected error occurred"
    And the wrapped error details should have key "exception_type"


  Scenario: Wrap preserves CleverAgentsError as-is
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a CleverAgentsError with message "known issue"
    When I wrap the unexpected exception
    Then the wrapped error message should be "known issue"


  Scenario: Wrap merges context into CleverAgentsError details
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a CleverAgentsError with message "known issue"
    And a wrapping context with key "plan_id" and value "01PLAN001"
    When I wrap the unexpected exception
    Then the wrapped error details should have key "plan_id"


  Scenario: Wrap with custom safe message
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a bare Exception with message "segfault"
    When I wrap the unexpected exception with message "Operation failed"
    Then the wrapped error message should be "Operation failed"


  Scenario: Wrap redacts secrets in context
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a bare Exception with message "oops"
    And a wrapping context with key "api_key" and value "sk-secret123456789012345"
    When I wrap the unexpected exception
    Then the wrapped error details key "api_key" should be "***REDACTED***"

    # -- CLI formatting -------------------------------------------------------


  Scenario: Format error for CLI output
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a ValidationError with message "name is required"
    When I classify the security exception
    And I format the error for CLI
    Then the error CLI output should contain "422"
    And the error CLI output should contain "VALIDATION_FAILED"
    And the error CLI output should contain "name is required"


  Scenario: Format error with details for CLI output
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a detailed CleverAgentsError "db fail" with detail "table" as "plans"
    When I classify the security exception
    And I format the error for CLI
    Then the error CLI output should contain "table: plans"

    # -- Secret in message (S1) ------------------------------------------------


  Scenario: classify_error redacts secrets embedded in exception message
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a CleverAgentsError with message "key=sk-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz leaked"
    When I classify the security exception
    Then the error info message should contain "***REDACTED***"
    And the error info message should not contain "sk-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"


  Scenario: Format CLI output redacts secrets from message
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a CleverAgentsError with message "tok sk-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz end"
    When I classify the security exception
    And I format the error for CLI
    Then the error CLI output should contain "***REDACTED***"
    And the error CLI output should not contain "sk-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"

    # -- List value redaction (B2/T1) ------------------------------------------


  Scenario: Redact secrets inside list values
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with key "keys" and list values "sk-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" and "normal"
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted detail "keys" should be a list
    And the redacted list "keys" should contain "***REDACTED***"
    And the redacted list "keys" should not contain "sk-abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz"

    # -- Non-string non-dict passthrough (T4) ----------------------------------


  Scenario: Integer values pass through redaction unchanged
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with key "count" and integer value 42
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted detail "count" should be integer 42


  Scenario: Boolean values pass through redaction unchanged
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given redaction test details with key "enabled" and boolean value true
    When I redact the error details
    Then the redacted detail "enabled" should be boolean true

    # -- Non-mutation of original details (B1) ---------------------------------


  Scenario: Wrap does not mutate the original exception details dict
    Given a security exceptions test environment
    Given a tracked CleverAgentsError "original" with details key "a" value "1"
    And a wrapping context with key "b" and value "2"
    When I wrap the unexpected exception
    Then the original exception details reference should not have key "b"
    And the wrapped error details should have key "b"


  # ============================================================
  # Originally from: security_readonly.feature
  # Feature: Read-only action enforcement
  # ============================================================

  Scenario: Read-only plan blocks a write-capable tool with tool name in error
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a tool "builtin/file-write" with writes=True and read_only=False
    And a tool execution context with plan_id "plan-ro-1" and read_only True
    When I enforce capabilities on the tool
    Then a ToolAccessDeniedError should be raised for the tool
    And the access-denied message should contain "builtin/file-write"
    And the access-denied message should contain "read-only"


  Scenario: Read-only plan allows a read-only tool
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a tool "builtin/search" with writes=False and read_only=True
    And a tool execution context with plan_id "plan-ro-2" and read_only True
    When I enforce capabilities on the tool
    Then no enforcement error should be raised


  Scenario: Non-read-only plan allows a write-capable tool
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a tool "builtin/file-write" with writes=True and read_only=False
    And a tool execution context with plan_id "plan-rw-1" and read_only False
    When I enforce capabilities on the tool
    Then no enforcement error should be raised


  Scenario: Tool with writes=True is blocked even when cap.read_only is unset
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a tool "builtin/hybrid-tool" with writes=True and read_only=False
    And a tool execution context with plan_id "plan-ro-3" and read_only True
    When I enforce capabilities on the tool
    Then a ToolAccessDeniedError should be raised for the tool
    And the access-denied message should contain "builtin/hybrid-tool"


  Scenario: Tool with neither read_only nor writes passes on read-only plan
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a tool "builtin/noop" with writes=False and read_only=False
    And a tool execution context with plan_id "plan-ro-4" and read_only True
    When I enforce capabilities on the tool
    Then no enforcement error should be raised

    # ── SkillContext.enforce_write_guard ──────────────────────────────────


  Scenario: SkillContext enforce_write_guard blocks write tool with tool name
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a read-only SkillContext for plan "plan-sk-1"
    When I call enforce_write_guard with tool_name "skill/writer"
    Then a SkillExecutionError should be raised for the guard
    And the write-guard error message should contain "skill/writer"
    And the write-guard error type should be PERMISSION_DENIED


  Scenario: SkillContext enforce_write_guard allows on writable context
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a writable SkillContext for plan "plan-sk-2"
    When I call enforce_write_guard with tool_name "skill/writer"
    Then no write-guard error should be raised

    # ── ChangeSetCapture read-only enforcement ───────────────────────────


  Scenario: ChangeSet builder rejects write entry when plan is read-only
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a ChangeSetCapture with plan_id "plan-cs-1" and read_only True
    When I try to wrap a write-capable tool spec
    Then a ReadOnlyViolationError should be raised for the capture
    And the capture error message should contain "read-only"


  Scenario: ChangeSet builder allows wrapping when not read-only
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a ChangeSetCapture with plan_id "plan-cs-2" and read_only False
    When I try to wrap a write-capable tool spec
    Then no capture error should be raised


  Scenario: ChangeSet builder passes read-only tool through unchanged
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a ChangeSetCapture with plan_id "plan-cs-3" and read_only True
    When I wrap a read-only tool spec
    Then the wrapped tool spec should be returned unchanged

    # ── ExecuteStubActor read-only propagation ─────────────────────────────


  Scenario: ExecuteStubActor propagates read_only to ChangeSetCapture
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    When I execute via ExecuteStubActor with read_only True
    Then the stub actor should create a read-only ChangeSetCapture


  Scenario: ExecuteStubActor allows writes when not read-only
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    When I execute via ExecuteStubActor with read_only False
    Then the stub actor should create a writable ChangeSetCapture

    # ── File write tool blocked ──────────────────────────────────────────


  Scenario: File write tool blocked under read-only plan via ToolRuntime
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a tool "builtin/file-write" with writes=True and read_only=False
    And a tool execution context with plan_id "plan-fw-1" and read_only True
    When I enforce capabilities on the tool
    Then a ToolAccessDeniedError should be raised for the tool
    And the access-denied message should contain "builtin/file-write"

    # ── Git push tool blocked ────────────────────────────────────────────


  Scenario: Git push tool blocked under read-only plan via ToolRuntime
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a tool "git/push" with writes=True and read_only=False
    And a tool execution context with plan_id "plan-gp-1" and read_only True
    When I enforce capabilities on the tool
    Then a ToolAccessDeniedError should be raised for the tool
    And the access-denied message should contain "git/push"

    # ── Read-only SkillContext blocks write tool ───────────────────────────


  Scenario: Read-only SkillContext blocks write tool via enforce_write_guard
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a read-only SkillContext for plan "plan-compat-1"
    When I call enforce_write_guard with tool_name "test/write-tool"
    Then a SkillExecutionError should be raised for the guard
    And the write-guard error message should contain "test/write-tool"


  Scenario: Writable SkillContext allows write tool
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a writable SkillContext for plan "plan-compat-2"
    When I call enforce_write_guard with tool_name "test/write-tool"
    Then no write-guard error should be raised

    # ── Plan -> ToolExecutionContext propagation ──────────────────────────


  Scenario: ToolExecutionContext carries plan_read_only from plan
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a Plan domain model with read_only=True and plan_id "plan-ex-1"
    When I create a ToolExecutionContext from the plan
    Then the propagated context plan_read_only should be True


  Scenario: ToolExecutionContext writable for writable plan
    Given the read-only enforcement modules are available
    Given a Plan domain model with read_only=False and plan_id "plan-ex-2"
    When I create a ToolExecutionContext from the plan
    Then the propagated context plan_read_only should be False


  # ============================================================
  # Originally from: security_secrets.feature
  # Feature: SEC5 - Secrets masking and validation
  # ============================================================

  Scenario: Redact OpenAI API key pattern
    Given a string containing "sk-proj-abc123def456ghi789"
    When I redact the string
    Then the redacted value should be "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Redact Anthropic API key pattern
    Given a string containing "sk-ant-api03-xyzzy1234567890abcdef"
    When I redact the string
    Then the redacted value should be "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Redact token pattern
    Given a string containing "tok_01HXYZ1234567890ABCDEF"
    When I redact the string
    Then the redacted value should be "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Redact Google/Gemini API key pattern
    Given a string containing "AIzaSyA1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q"
    When I redact the string
    Then the redacted value should be "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Mixed text with Gemini API key is partially redacted
    Given a string containing "Using key AIzaSyA1B2C3D4E5F6G7H8I9J0K1L2M3N4O5P6Q for Gemini"
    When I redact the string
    Then the redacted value should contain "***REDACTED***"
    And the redacted value should contain "Using key"
    And the redacted value should contain "for Gemini"
    And the redacted value should not contain "AIzaSy"


  Scenario: Redact generic bearer token
    Given a string containing "Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJz"
    When I redact the string
    Then the redacted value should contain "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Non-secret strings are not redacted
    Given a string containing "hello world this is normal text"
    When I redact the string
    Then the redacted value should be "hello world this is normal text"


  Scenario: Mixed text with embedded secret is partially redacted
    Given a string containing "My key is sk-proj-abc123def456ghi789 and name is Bob"
    When I redact the string
    Then the redacted value should contain "***REDACTED***"
    And the redacted value should contain "My key is"
    And the redacted value should contain "and name is Bob"


  Scenario: Empty string is returned unchanged
    Given a string containing ""
    When I redact the string
    Then the redacted value should be empty

    # --- Dict redaction ---


  Scenario: Dict with sensitive key names are masked
    Given a dict with key "api_key" and value "sk-proj-abc123"
    When I redact the dict
    Then the key "api_key" should have value "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Dict with password key is masked
    Given a dict with key "password" and value "mysecretpass"
    When I redact the dict
    Then the key "password" should have value "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Dict with secret key is masked
    Given a dict with key "secret" and value "topsecretvalue"
    When I redact the dict
    Then the key "secret" should have value "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Dict with token key is masked
    Given a dict with key "token" and value "sometoken123"
    When I redact the dict
    Then the key "token" should have value "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Dict with credential key is masked
    Given a dict with key "credential" and value "cred-value"
    When I redact the dict
    Then the key "credential" should have value "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Dict with non-sensitive key is not masked
    Given a dict with key "username" and value "bob"
    When I redact the dict
    Then the key "username" should have value "bob"


  Scenario: Nested dict values are redacted recursively
    Given a nested dict with inner key "api_key" and value "sk-proj-nested"
    When I redact the dict
    Then the nested key "api_key" should have value "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Dict with pattern-matched value is masked regardless of key name
    Given a dict with key "config_value" and value "sk-ant-api03-somekey123"
    When I redact the dict
    Then the key "config_value" should have value "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Dict redaction respects show_secrets flag
    Given a dict with key "api_key" and value "sk-proj-abc123"
    When I redact the dict with show_secrets enabled
    Then the key "api_key" should have value "sk-proj-abc123"

    # --- Sensitive key detection ---


  Scenario Outline: Sensitive key names are detected
    When I check if "<key>" is a sensitive key
    Then the sensitivity check should be true

    Examples:
      | key             |
      | api_key         |
      | API_KEY         |
      | password        |
      | secret          |
      | token           |
      | credential      |
      | openai_api_key  |
      | ANTHROPIC_API_KEY |
      | access_token    |
      | auth_token      |
      | private_key     |


  Scenario Outline: Non-sensitive key names are not flagged
    When I check if "<key>" is a sensitive key
    Then the sensitivity check should be false

    Examples:
      | key            |
      | username       |
      | email          |
      | name           |
      | description    |
      | project_id     |
      | token_count    |

    # --- Database URL masking ---


  Scenario: SQLite URL is not masked
    Given a database URL "sqlite:///path/to/db.sqlite"
    When I mask the database URL
    Then the masked URL should be "sqlite:///path/to/db.sqlite"


  Scenario: PostgreSQL URL with credentials is masked
    Given a database URL "postgresql://admin:s3cret@localhost:5432/mydb"
    When I mask the database URL
    Then the masked URL should contain "***"
    And the masked URL should contain "localhost"
    And the masked URL should not contain "s3cret"

    # --- Global show_secrets flag ---


  Scenario: Global show_secrets defaults to false
    When I check the global show_secrets flag
    Then the flag should be false


  Scenario: Global show_secrets can be toggled
    When I set the global show_secrets flag to true
    Then the flag should be true
    When I set the global show_secrets flag to false
    Then the flag should be false

    # --- structlog processor ---


  Scenario: Structlog masking processor redacts event dict values
    Given a structlog event dict with key "api_key" and value "sk-proj-secret123"
    When the masking processor is applied
    Then the event dict key "api_key" should be "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Structlog masking processor redacts event message
    Given a structlog event dict with event "Failed with key sk-ant-api03-xyz"
    When the masking processor is applied
    Then the event message should contain "***REDACTED***"
    And the event message should not contain "sk-ant-api03-xyz"


  Scenario: Structlog masking processor passes non-secret events
    Given a structlog event dict with event "User logged in successfully"
    When the masking processor is applied
    Then the event message should be "User logged in successfully"

    # --- CLI error detail redaction ---


  Scenario: Error details with secret values are redacted
    Given error details with key "api_key" and value "sk-proj-leaked"
    When I redact the error details for CLI display
    Then the redacted details key "api_key" should be "***REDACTED***"


  Scenario: Error details with non-secret values are preserved
    Given error details with key "plan_id" and value "01HXR123"
    When I redact the error details for CLI display
    Then the redacted details key "plan_id" should be "01HXR123"

    # --- Secret pattern registration ---


  Scenario: Custom secret pattern can be registered
    Given the default secret patterns
    When I register a custom pattern "custom_[a-z0-9]{16}"
    And I redact the string "my custom_abcdef1234567890 key"
    Then the redacted value should contain "***REDACTED***"
    And the redacted value should not contain "custom_abcdef1234567890"


  # ============================================================
  # Originally from: security_templates.feature
  # Feature: Secure template rendering
  # ============================================================

  Scenario: Render a simple placeholder
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{greeting} {name}"
    And a secure template context key "greeting" with value "Hello"
    And a secure template context key "name" with value "World"
    When I render the secure template
    Then the secure template output should be "Hello World"


  Scenario: Render with missing placeholder leaves it intact
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "Hello {name}, your role is {role}"
    And a secure template context key "name" with value "Alice"
    When I render the secure template
    Then the secure template output should be "Hello Alice, your role is {role}"


  Scenario: Render with empty context returns template as-is
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "No placeholders here"
    When I render the secure template
    Then the secure template output should be "No placeholders here"


  Scenario: Render with numeric values converts to string
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "Count: {count}"
    And a secure template context key "count" with value "42"
    When I render the secure template
    Then the secure template output should be "Count: 42"

    # -- Security rejection ---------------------------------------------------


  Scenario: Reject attribute access in template
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{obj.__class__.__name__}"
    When I render the secure template expecting a security error
    Then the secure template error should mention "Unsafe"


  Scenario: Reject index access in template
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{items[0]}"
    When I render the secure template expecting a security error
    Then the secure template error should mention "Unsafe"


  Scenario: Reject format spec in template
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{value:>10}"
    When I render the secure template expecting a security error
    Then the secure template error should mention "Unsafe"


  Scenario: Reject conversion flag in template
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{value!r}"
    When I render the secure template expecting a security error
    Then the secure template error should mention "Unsafe"


  Scenario: Reject function call in template
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{fn()}"
    When I render the secure template expecting a security error
    Then the secure template error should mention "Unsafe"


  Scenario: Reject Jinja2 expression delimiters
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{{ config }}"
    When I render the secure template expecting a security error
    Then the secure template error should mention "Unsafe"


  Scenario: Reject Jinja2 block delimiters
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{% for x in items %}x{% endfor %}"
    When I render the secure template expecting a security error
    Then the secure template error should mention "Unsafe"

    # -- Size limits -----------------------------------------------------------


  Scenario: Reject template exceeding max length
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given a secure template that is 11000 characters long
    When I render the secure template expecting a size error
    Then the secure template error should mention "exceeds maximum"


  Scenario: Reject output exceeding max length
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{big}"
    And a secure template config with max output length of 20
    And a secure template context key "big" with value "This value is definitely longer than twenty characters"
    When I render the secure template expecting a size error
    Then the secure template error should mention "exceeds maximum"

    # -- Allowlist enforcement ------------------------------------------------


  Scenario: Reject template key not in allowlist
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{name} {secret}"
    And a secure template with allowed keys "name"
    And a secure template context key "name" with value "Alice"
    And a secure template context key "secret" with value "hidden"
    When I render the secure template expecting a validation error
    Then the secure template error should mention "disallowed"


  Scenario: Accept template key that is in allowlist
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{name}"
    And a secure template with allowed keys "name"
    And a secure template context key "name" with value "Alice"
    When I render the secure template
    Then the secure template output should be "Alice"


  Scenario: Open allowlist allows any simple key
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{anything}"
    And the secure template has no key restrictions
    And a secure template context key "anything" with value "works"
    When I render the secure template
    Then the secure template output should be "works"

    # -- Pre-validation -------------------------------------------------------


  Scenario: Validate clean template returns no errors
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{name} {role}"
    When I validate the secure template
    Then the secure template validation should be empty


  Scenario: Validate unsafe template returns errors
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{obj.__class__}"
    When I validate the secure template
    Then the secure template validation should not be empty
    And the secure template validation should mention "Unsafe"


  Scenario: Validate template with unknown keys returns errors
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{name} {secret}"
    And a secure template with allowed keys "name"
    When I validate the secure template
    Then the secure template validation should not be empty
    And the secure template validation should mention "Unknown"


  Scenario: Validate oversized template returns errors
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given a secure template that is 11000 characters long
    When I validate the secure template
    Then the secure template validation should not be empty
    And the secure template validation should mention "exceeds"

    # -- Convenience function -------------------------------------------------


  Scenario: render_template_secure convenience function works
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{greeting}"
    And a secure template context key "greeting" with value "Hi"
    When I render via the secure convenience function
    Then the secure template output should be "Hi"


  Scenario: render_template_secure rejects unsafe input
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{obj.attr}"
    When I render via the secure convenience function expecting an error
    Then the secure template error should mention "Unsafe"

    # -- Config property access ------------------------------------------------


  Scenario: Renderer exposes active configuration
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given a secure template with allowed keys "name"
    When I create a renderer with those settings
    Then the renderer config allowed keys should contain "name"

    # -- Validate with matching allowlist (no unknown keys) -------------------


  Scenario: Validate template where all keys match allowlist
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{name}"
    And a secure template with allowed keys "name"
    When I validate the secure template
    Then the secure template validation should be empty

    # -- Rejected keys without logging ----------------------------------------


  Scenario: Reject unknown key without logging when log_rejected is false
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{name} {secret}"
    And a secure template config with logging disabled
    And a secure template context key "name" with value "Alice"
    And a secure template context key "secret" with value "hidden"
    When I render the secure template expecting a validation error
    Then the secure template error should mention "disallowed"

    # -- reject_unknown_keys=False path ----------------------------------------


  Scenario: Allow unknown keys when reject_unknown_keys is disabled
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{name} {extra}"
    And a secure template config that permits unknown keys
    And a secure template context key "name" with value "Alice"
    And a secure template context key "extra" with value "data"
    When I render the secure template
    Then the secure template output should be "Alice data"

    # -- Legacy renderer with config passthrough --------------------------------


  Scenario: Legacy TemplateRenderer accepts config passthrough
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{name}"
    And a secure template with allowed keys "name"
    And a secure template context key "name" with value "Carol"
    When I render via the legacy TemplateRenderer with config
    Then the secure template output should be "Carol"

    # -- Legacy renderer backward compat --------------------------------------


  Scenario: Legacy TemplateRenderer returns raw on unsafe template
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{obj.__class__}"
    And a secure template context key "obj" with value "test"
    When I render via the legacy TemplateRenderer
    Then the secure template output should be "{obj.__class__}"


  Scenario: Legacy TemplateRenderer renders safe templates
    Given a secure template test environment
    Given the secure template text "{name}"
    And a secure template context key "name" with value "Bob"
    When I render via the legacy TemplateRenderer
    Then the secure template output should be "Bob"