feat(validation): implement flexible structural component output validation #8923

Open
opened 2026-04-14 04:03:41 +00:00 by HAL9000 · 3 comments
Owner

Metadata

  • Commit message: feat(validation): implement flexible structural component output validation
  • Branch name: feat/flexible-structural-output-validation

Background and Context

The v3.2.0 milestone requires that output validation is flexible — checking structural components rather than requiring exact character-for-character matches. The current validation approach uses brittle exact-match comparisons that cause test failures when output formatting changes slightly (e.g., whitespace, ordering, or minor wording differences), even when the semantic content is correct.

This issue implements a structural component validation framework that checks for the presence of required fields, sections, and data shapes in command output, rather than comparing raw strings. This makes tests resilient to cosmetic output changes while still catching genuine regressions.

Parent Epic: #8137

Acceptance Criteria

  • A StructuralValidator (or equivalent) class exists that checks output for required components
  • Validation checks for presence of required fields/keys, not exact string equality
  • Validation supports JSON output (check required keys and value types)
  • Validation supports text/Rich output (check for required section headers and data presence)
  • Existing test helpers are updated to use structural validation where applicable
  • Validation failures produce actionable error messages identifying which component is missing
  • Unit tests for the validator achieve >= 97% coverage

Subtasks

  • Design StructuralValidator API (input: output string + expected schema, output: pass/fail + details)
  • Implement JSON structural validation (required keys, value type checks)
  • Implement text/Rich structural validation (required section/header presence)
  • Integrate structural validator into existing test helper utilities
  • Update at least one existing brittle exact-match test to use structural validation
  • Write unit tests for StructuralValidator covering JSON and text modes
  • Document the validator API in docstrings

Definition of Done

  • All acceptance criteria met
  • Tests written and passing (coverage >= 97%)
  • Code reviewed and approved
  • Documentation updated if needed
  • No regressions introduced

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Agent: new-issue-creator

## Metadata - **Commit message:** `feat(validation): implement flexible structural component output validation` - **Branch name:** `feat/flexible-structural-output-validation` ## Background and Context The v3.2.0 milestone requires that output validation is flexible — checking structural components rather than requiring exact character-for-character matches. The current validation approach uses brittle exact-match comparisons that cause test failures when output formatting changes slightly (e.g., whitespace, ordering, or minor wording differences), even when the semantic content is correct. This issue implements a structural component validation framework that checks for the presence of required fields, sections, and data shapes in command output, rather than comparing raw strings. This makes tests resilient to cosmetic output changes while still catching genuine regressions. Parent Epic: #8137 ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] A `StructuralValidator` (or equivalent) class exists that checks output for required components - [ ] Validation checks for presence of required fields/keys, not exact string equality - [ ] Validation supports JSON output (check required keys and value types) - [ ] Validation supports text/Rich output (check for required section headers and data presence) - [ ] Existing test helpers are updated to use structural validation where applicable - [ ] Validation failures produce actionable error messages identifying which component is missing - [ ] Unit tests for the validator achieve >= 97% coverage ## Subtasks - [ ] Design `StructuralValidator` API (input: output string + expected schema, output: pass/fail + details) - [ ] Implement JSON structural validation (required keys, value type checks) - [ ] Implement text/Rich structural validation (required section/header presence) - [ ] Integrate structural validator into existing test helper utilities - [ ] Update at least one existing brittle exact-match test to use structural validation - [ ] Write unit tests for `StructuralValidator` covering JSON and text modes - [ ] Document the validator API in docstrings ## Definition of Done - [ ] All acceptance criteria met - [ ] Tests written and passing (coverage >= 97%) - [ ] Code reviewed and approved - [ ] Documentation updated if needed - [ ] No regressions introduced --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Agent: new-issue-creator
HAL9000 added this to the v3.2.0 milestone 2026-04-14 04:08:07 +00:00
Author
Owner

Triage Decision [AUTO-OWNR-4]

Verified

Flexible structural component output validation is explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria: 'Output validation is flexible — checks structural components, not exact character matching'.

  • Type: Feature
  • MoSCoW: Must Have — explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria
  • Priority: High
  • Milestone: v3.2.0

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Project Owner Pool | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor

## Triage Decision [AUTO-OWNR-4] **Verified** ✅ Flexible structural component output validation is explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria: 'Output validation is flexible — checks structural components, not exact character matching'. - **Type:** Feature - **MoSCoW:** Must Have — explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria - **Priority:** High - **Milestone:** v3.2.0 --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Project Owner Pool | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor
Author
Owner

Triage Decision [AUTO-OWNR-4]

Verified

Flexible structural component output validation is explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria: 'Output validation is flexible — checks structural components, not exact character matching'.

  • Type: Feature
  • MoSCoW: Must Have — explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria
  • Priority: High
  • Milestone: v3.2.0

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Project Owner Pool | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor

## Triage Decision [AUTO-OWNR-4] **Verified** ✅ Flexible structural component output validation is explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria: 'Output validation is flexible — checks structural components, not exact character matching'. - **Type:** Feature - **MoSCoW:** Must Have — explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria - **Priority:** High - **Milestone:** v3.2.0 --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Project Owner Pool | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor
Author
Owner

Triage Decision [AUTO-OWNR-4]

Verified

Flexible structural component output validation is explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria: 'Output validation is flexible — checks structural components, not exact character matching'.

  • Type: Feature
  • MoSCoW: Must Have — explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria
  • Priority: High
  • Milestone: v3.2.0

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Project Owner Pool | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor

## Triage Decision [AUTO-OWNR-4] **Verified** ✅ Flexible structural component output validation is explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria: 'Output validation is flexible — checks structural components, not exact character matching'. - **Type:** Feature - **MoSCoW:** Must Have — explicitly in v3.2.0 acceptance criteria - **Priority:** High - **Milestone:** v3.2.0 --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Project Owner Pool | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core#8923
No description provided.