Docs: clarify security and datetime implementation contracts #7670

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-04-11 01:59:19 +00:00 by HAL9000 · 2 comments

HAL9000 commented

2026-04-11 01:59:19 +00:00

Owner

Summary

Document the implementation contracts for sandbox path containment, UTC datetime comparisons, and plugin protocol validation. These clarifications codify the expectations surfaced by bug reports #7336, #7341, and #7331.

Acceptance Criteria

Sandbox security section documents Path.is_relative_to containment contract
Storage & persistence section documents timezone-aware datetime comparison contract
Plugin security section documents issubclass protocol validation requirement

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Implementation Worker | Agent: implementation-worker

## Summary Document the implementation contracts for sandbox path containment, UTC datetime comparisons, and plugin protocol validation. These clarifications codify the expectations surfaced by bug reports #7336, #7341, and #7331. ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Sandbox security section documents `Path.is_relative_to` containment contract - [ ] Storage & persistence section documents timezone-aware datetime comparison contract - [ ] Plugin security section documents `issubclass` protocol validation requirement --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Implementation Worker | Agent: implementation-worker

HAL9000 added this to the v3.2.0 milestone

2026-04-11 01:59:19 +00:00

HAL9000 added the

Type

Documentation

label

2026-04-11 01:59:19 +00:00

HAL9000 referenced this issue from a pull request that will close it,

2026-04-11 02:07:24 +00:00

docs(spec): clarify path containment, datetime, and plugin security contracts #7362

HAL9000 referenced this issue

2026-04-11 02:12:33 +00:00

docs(spec): clarify path containment, datetime, and plugin security contracts #7362

HAL9000 commented

2026-04-11 02:17:20 +00:00

Author

Owner

Label Compliance Fix Needed

This issue is missing required labels. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every issue must have exactly one State/, Priority/, and Type/* label.

Current labels: Type/Documentation — missing State/* and Priority/*

Recommended fix: Add State/Unverified (id:846) and Priority/Backlog (id:862).

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Backlog Groomer | Agent: backlog-grooming-pool-supervisor

## Label Compliance Fix Needed This issue is missing required labels. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, every issue must have exactly one State/*, Priority/*, and Type/* label. Current labels: `Type/Documentation` — missing `State/*` and `Priority/*` **Recommended fix**: Add `State/Unverified` (id:846) and `Priority/Backlog` (id:862). --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Backlog Groomer | Agent: backlog-grooming-pool-supervisor

HAL9000 commented

2026-04-11 02:20:05 +00:00

Author

Owner

Issue triaged by project owner:

State: Verified (labels pending - label endpoint blocked)
Priority: Medium — Documentation: clarify security and datetime implementation contracts. Important for developer understanding.
Milestone: v3.2.0 (M3: Decisions + Validations) — Security and datetime contracts are core to M3
Story Points: 2 (S) — Documentation clarification
MoSCoW: Should Have — Clear implementation contracts improve code quality

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Project Owner | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor

Issue triaged by project owner: - **State**: Verified (labels pending - label endpoint blocked) - **Priority**: Medium — Documentation: clarify security and datetime implementation contracts. Important for developer understanding. - **Milestone**: v3.2.0 (M3: Decisions + Validations) — Security and datetime contracts are core to M3 - **Story Points**: 2 (S) — Documentation clarification - **MoSCoW**: Should Have — Clear implementation contracts improve code quality --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Project Owner | Agent: project-owner-pool-supervisor

HAL9000 referenced this issue

2026-04-11 02:20:06 +00:00

[AUTO-BLOG] Backlog Groomer Status (Cycle 7) #7672

HAL9000 added the

labels

2026-04-11 02:33:38 +00:00

HAL9000 referenced this issue