feat(qa): enforce coverage >=97% in CI #50

Merged

brent.edwards merged 12 commits from feature/q0-min-coverage into master 2026-02-17 04:01:09 +00:00

Conversation 1 Commits 12 Files Changed 23

+1271 -185

brent.edwards commented 2026-02-13 21:47:06 +00:00

Member

Copy Link

Copy Source

No description provided.

brent.edwards added 1 commit 2026-02-13 21:47:06 +00:00

feat(qa): enforce coverage >=97% in CI 35c74d1a52

brent.edwards added 2 commits 2026-02-14 00:03:44 +00:00

fix(qa): resolve merge conflicts with master and fix coverage threshold test ... bb3c4ffaef

Merged master into feature/q0-min-coverage. Resolved conflicts in:
- benchmarks/coverage_report_bench.py: combined AST and regex benchmarks
- docs/development/testing.md: merged both versions into comprehensive guide
- robot/coverage_threshold.robot: merged test cases from both branches
- implementation_plan.md: kept both Brent and Luis notes

Fixed coverage_threshold_config test that failed because it expected
a literal --fail-under=97 but our noxfile uses the COVERAGE_THRESHOLD
constant via f-string. Updated step to resolve the constant via AST.

Merge branch 'master' into feature/q0-min-coverage 150b54a464

brent.edwards added 1 commit 2026-02-14 01:02:47 +00:00

fix(ci): create build dir before tee in coverage job 9e86e5e866

freemo added 4 commits 2026-02-14 04:03:48 +00:00

feat(qa): align security scans with nox 75dc57845a

fix(qa): merge min-coverage into adv-security and resolve conflicts 89e6bdaf35

Merge branch 'feature/q0-min-coverage' into feature/q0-adv-security 6cffc3376a

Merge branch 'feature/q0-min-coverage' into feature/q0-adv-security 0c8993f257

brent.edwards added 3 commits 2026-02-17 02:28:17 +00:00

chore(merge): integrate master into feature/q0-min-coverage ... 7ddd99b07d

Resolve three merge conflicts from master integration:

- benchmarks/coverage_report_bench.py: remove duplicate PYPROJECT_PATH
  constant (already defined below the conflict region)
- noxfile.py: combine HEAD's os.makedirs('build') guard with master's
  resolved PYTHONPATH (Path('src').resolve())
- implementation_plan.md: take master for completed Q0-min-ci block,
  preserve HEAD's in-progress Q0-min-coverage state, adopt master's
  Q0-Advanced consolidation (no standalone commits)

fix(tests): resolve unit test and benchmark failures ... 122af46305

- Fix project_repository_steps session mismatch: use shared session
  for repos so context.pr_session.commit() commits flushed data
- Fix cli_format_bench setup/teardown to accept fmt parameter for
  parameterized ASV benchmarks
- Fix plan_model_bench PlanPhase.APPLIED -> PlanPhase.APPLY
- Fix benchmark idempotency: use batch counters to generate unique IDs
  across repeated ASV iterations (plan_phase_migration_bench,
  project_migration_bench, resource_registry_migration_bench)
- Fix uow_lifecycle_bench FK constraint by reusing pre-seeded action
- Fix plan_lifecycle_persistence_bench to create fresh plan per iteration

docs(implementation_plan.md): Added what was accomplished 2f681b74ca

brent.edwards added 1 commit 2026-02-17 03:05:02 +00:00

Merge branch 'master' into feature/q0-min-coverage ... 6f7ab08e12

# Conflicts:
#	benchmarks/cli_format_bench.py
#	benchmarks/plan_phase_migration_bench.py
#	benchmarks/project_migration_bench.py
#	benchmarks/resource_registry_migration_bench.py
#	benchmarks/uow_lifecycle_bench.py

brent.edwards merged commit 002eafd6f7 into master 2026-02-17 04:01:09 +00:00

brent.edwards referenced this issue from a commit 2026-02-17 04:01:11 +00:00

Merge pull request 'feat(qa): enforce coverage >=97% in CI' (#50) from feature/q0-min-coverage into master

freemo added a new dependency 2026-02-23 01:11:11 +00:00

#214 feat(qa): enforce coverage >=97% in CI

freemo added this to the v3.0.0 milestone 2026-02-23 17:24:58 +00:00

freemo commented 2026-02-23 17:25:57 +00:00

Owner

Copy Link

Copy Source

Closes #214

Closes #214

freemo removed a dependency 2026-03-03 22:54:42 +00:00

#214 feat(qa): enforce coverage >=97% in CI

freemo added a new dependency 2026-03-03 22:54:42 +00:00

#214 feat(qa): enforce coverage >=97% in CI

CoreRasurae referenced this pull request 2026-03-24 19:41:37 +00:00

feat(validation): implement Fix-then-Revalidate orchestration loop for required validations #711

drew referenced this issue from a commit 2026-05-30 14:18:45 +00:00

feat(telemetry): paginate the PRs tab so all open PRs are visible

HAL9000 referenced this pull request 2026-06-18 15:32:37 +00:00

fix(invariant): persist invariants to database via InvariantRepository and Alembic migration #8684

Sign in to join this conversation.

Reviewers

No Reviewers

Labels

Clear labels

auto/needs-reevaluation

Controller deferred this PR; awaiting Phase 6+ scope-evaluator or operator re-enablement.

controller-managed

Auto-agents controller manages this PR/issue (see tools/controller/deploy/RUNBOOK.md). Remove this label to abandon controller management.

overdue

auto/blocked-by-deps

PR blocked by an open issue dependency. Operator must close the dep (or remove the dependency link) before the merge driver can act. Auto-cleared by merge_drive when no open deps remain.

auto/ci-timeout

Most recent merge cycle hit CI timeout. Driver excludes this PR while last merge_cycle row is < 30 min old; label persists thereafter as visible history.

auto/claimed-implementer

Currently being processed by an implementer worker.

auto/claimed-merge

Currently being processed by the merge driver.

auto/claimed-reviewer

Currently being processed by a reviewer worker.

auto/driver-down

Merge driver heartbeat stale; pipeline halted. Closed automatically on next clean tick.

auto/invariant-violation

Detected master commit violating the strict merge invariant. Tracked as an issue (not a PR label); kept here for label completeness.

auto/last-attempt-tier-0

In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 0 slot (`tier-0`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

auto/last-attempt-tier-1

In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 1 slot (`tier-1`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml.

auto/last-attempt-tier-2

In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier 2 slot (`tier-2`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Gated behind IMPLEMENTER_ESCALATION_TIER2_ENABLED.

auto/last-attempt-tier-min

In-cycle escalation: most recent attempt ran at the Tier -1 slot (`tier-min`). Slot's model defined in .opencode/models/tiers.yaml. Suffix is ``-min`` (not ``--1``) so the Forgejo UI reads naturally.

Automation Tracking

Tracking issues used by the AI Automation system for agents to communicate and report.

auto/needs-conflict-resolution

Rebase conflict needs LLM conflict-resolver.

auto/needs-implementer

Failing CI needs implementer attention.

auto/postmortem

Documenting a driver incident or rollback.

auto/ready-to-merge

Reviewer has APPROVED this PR and no later REQUEST_CHANGES is outstanding. The merge driver requires this label to even consider a PR for merging. Set by the reviewer worker on APPROVE; cleared on REQUEST_CHANGES.

auto/restart-throttled

Train repeatedly lost master-tempo races. Driver excludes via merge_cycle until cooldown elapses; label persists as visible history.

auto/revert

Revert PR backing out an invariant violation. Fast-tracked through the merge driver.

auto/sentinel

Sentinel PR duplicated from upstream into a personal fork by tools/duplicate_prs_to_fork.py for pipeline testing. Lives only in the fork; the canonical pipeline never sees it.

auto/stale-inactivity

No implementer activity for N days. Flagged for human review. Auto-cleared on next push to head branch.

auto/unstable

Repeatedly fails on current master (>= 3 ci-fail-on-rebased-sha releases in 12 h). Excluded from driver until human triage.

Blocked

A ticket in a blocked state and unable to complete until some other task is completed first.

Bounty

$100

A bounty of $100 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

Bounty

$1000

A bounty of $1000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

Bounty

$10000

A bounty of $10000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

Bounty

$20

A bounty of $20 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

Bounty

$2000

A bounty of $2000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

Bounty

$250

A bounty of $250 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

Bounty

$50

A bounty of $50 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

Bounty

$500

A bounty of $500 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

Bounty

$5000

A bounty of $5000 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

Bounty

$750

A bounty of $750 for any open-source contributor who provides a MR that solves this issue

MoSCoW

Could have

Could have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

MoSCoW

Must have

Must have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

MoSCoW

Should have

Should have feature in order to satisfy the epic/legendary.

Needs Feedback

There are questions in the ticket that can not be completed until the project owner provides clarity.

Points

1

1 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Points

13

13 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Points

2

2 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Points

21

21 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Points

3

3 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Points

34

34 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Points

5

5 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Points

55

55 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Points

8

8 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Points

88

88 man-hours worth of work for an expert with no learning curve.

Priority

Backlog

This ticket has backlogged priority and is not to be worked on yet

Priority

CI Blocker

Critical priority issue that blocks CI/CD pipeline and prevents PR merges

Priority

Critical

The priority is critical

Priority

High

The priority is high

Priority

Low

The priority is low

Priority

Medium

The priority is medium

Signed-off: Owner

When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

Signed-off: Scrum Master

When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

Signed-off: Tech Lead

When an epic or legendary is in review it must be signed off by owner, tech lead, and scrum master before being marked as completed.

Spike

A ticket for learning a tool or technology that is needed to be able to do future planning and design.

State

Completed

The ticket has been fully implemented, completed, and merged with the source code. This label should only be applied once a ticket is closed.

State

Duplicate

A ticket that represents the same content as an existing ticket.

State

In Progress

A ticket that is actively being developed.

State

In Review

A ticket that has had some code completed to implement but is waiting to pass peer review and is not yet merged in.

State

Paused

This ticket's work started but wasn't finished. It's on hold (likely in a feature branch) and will be resumed later, either due to a blocker or a delay.

State

Unverified

All new tickets start in this state. A developer may set it to show the ticket is unverified. This means we haven't agreed to work on it. It will either move to a verified state or be closed as wontdo.

State

Verified

The issue has been verified by a developer as legitimate. It will be worked on and verified tickets are now considered part of the backlog.

State

Wont Do

This ticket has been decided it wont be done. This may mean the bug has been determined to not be real (cant verify) or the feature is one we have decided we dont want to adopt.

Type

Automation

Any edits or discussion about the AI automated coding system.

Type

Bug

Something that doesnt work as intended.

Type

Discussion

Anytime a ticket represents a discussion about a subject and doesnt fall into one of the other categories.

Type

Documentation

An error or improvement needed in the documentation.

Type

Epic

Any first tier epic. That is, an epic which contains only issues as children and will not have sub-epics.

Type

Feature

Some new functionality not present.

Type

Legendary

A type of Epic which will contain other Epics.

Type

Refactor

A code change that restructures existing code without changing its external behavior.

Type

Support

Someone needs help using the project.

Type

Task

A generic task that doesnt fit into the other type categories.

Type

Testing

Work exclusively focusing on fixing or expanding testing.

No Label

Milestone

No items

No Milestone v3.0.0

Projects

Clear projects

No project

Assignees

Clear assignees

aditya (Aditya Chhabra) aleenaumair (Aleena Umair) brent.edwards (Brent Edwards) CoreRasurae (Luis Mendes) drew (Drew Morris) eugen.thaci (Eugen Thaci) freemo (Jeffrey Phillips Freeman) HAL9000 (HAL 9000) HAL9001 (HAL9001) hamza.khyari (Hamza Khyari) hurui200320 (Rui Hu) justin.morris khird (Kyle Hird) org.cleveragents

No Assignees

2 Participants

Notifications

Subscribe

Due Date

No due date set.

Blocks

#214 feat(qa): enforce coverage >=97% in CI

cleveragents/cleveragents-core

Reference: cleveragents/cleveragents-core#50