cleveragents/cleveragents-core

Fork 3

Validate that all examples load correctly. #1572

New issue

Open

opened 2026-04-02 21:59:21 +00:00 by brent.edwards · 4 comments

brent.edwards commented

2026-04-02 21:59:21 +00:00

Member

Create a test (or series of tests) that verifies that each of the examples loads in the current project.

This should prevent problems like #1504 from happening.

Create a test (or series of tests) that verifies that each of the examples loads in the current project. This should prevent problems like https://git.cleverthis.com/cleveragents/cleveragents-core/issues/1504 from happening.

brent.edwards added this to the v3.2.0 milestone

2026-04-02 21:59:21 +00:00

brent.edwards added the

labels

2026-04-02 21:59:21 +00:00

freemo self-assigned this

2026-04-02 22:10:53 +00:00

freemo commented

2026-04-02 22:59:25 +00:00

Owner

Thank you for filing this, Brent. This is a solid preventive measure — having automated validation that all examples load correctly would catch issues like #1504 before they reach users.

Triage Assessment:

The intent is clear and valuable: create tests that verify each example in the project loads without errors. This directly prevents regressions where examples ship with missing required fields or incorrect identifiers.

Items needed to fully conform to CONTRIBUTING.md format:

Metadata section: Please add a commit message first line (e.g., test(examples): add validation tests for all example files) and branch name (e.g., test/validate-example-loading).
Subtasks checklist: Suggest:
1. Enumerate all example files in examples/ that should be validated
2. Write integration test(s) using Robot Framework that attempt to load each example
3. Ensure test failures produce clear messages identifying which example failed and why
4. Verify all existing examples pass the new tests (fix any that don't, or file separate issues)
Definition of Done: e.g., "An integration test exists that validates every example file in examples/ loads without errors. All existing examples pass. CI runs this test as part of the standard pipeline."

Label observation: This issue currently has three conflicting state labels: State/In progress, State/Unverified, and State/Verified. Per the project's ticket lifecycle, an issue should have exactly one State/* label at a time. This needs to be resolved — please confirm the correct current state so the conflicting labels can be cleaned up.

Relationship to #1504: This issue is a natural follow-up to #1504 (fixing the specific broken examples). It would make sense for #1504 to be completed first (fix the known broken examples), then this issue adds the preventive test infrastructure. Consider whether this should depend on #1504.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Human Liaison | Agent: ca-human-liaison

Thank you for filing this, Brent. This is a solid preventive measure — having automated validation that all examples load correctly would catch issues like #1504 before they reach users. **Triage Assessment:** The intent is clear and valuable: create tests that verify each example in the project loads without errors. This directly prevents regressions where examples ship with missing required fields or incorrect identifiers. **Items needed to fully conform to CONTRIBUTING.md format:** - [ ] **Metadata section**: Please add a commit message first line (e.g., `test(examples): add validation tests for all example files`) and branch name (e.g., `test/validate-example-loading`). - [ ] **Subtasks checklist**: Suggest: 1. Enumerate all example files in `examples/` that should be validated 2. Write integration test(s) using Robot Framework that attempt to load each example 3. Ensure test failures produce clear messages identifying which example failed and why 4. Verify all existing examples pass the new tests (fix any that don't, or file separate issues) - [ ] **Definition of Done**: e.g., "An integration test exists that validates every example file in `examples/` loads without errors. All existing examples pass. CI runs this test as part of the standard pipeline." **Label observation**: This issue currently has three conflicting state labels: `State/In progress`, `State/Unverified`, and `State/Verified`. Per the project's ticket lifecycle, an issue should have exactly one `State/*` label at a time. This needs to be resolved — please confirm the correct current state so the conflicting labels can be cleaned up. **Relationship to #1504**: This issue is a natural follow-up to #1504 (fixing the specific broken examples). It would make sense for #1504 to be completed first (fix the known broken examples), then this issue adds the preventive test infrastructure. Consider whether this should depend on #1504. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Human Liaison | Agent: ca-human-liaison

freemo removed the

State

Unverified

label

2026-04-02 23:00:22 +00:00

freemo commented

2026-04-02 23:00:48 +00:00

Owner

Label compliance fix applied:

Removed conflicting labels: State/Unverified, State/Verified
Reason: Issue had three conflicting State/* labels. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, each issue must have exactly one State/* label. State/In progress is the most advanced active state and was retained.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Backlog Grooming | Agent: ca-backlog-groomer

Label compliance fix applied: - Removed conflicting labels: `State/Unverified`, `State/Verified` - Reason: Issue had three conflicting `State/*` labels. Per CONTRIBUTING.md, each issue must have exactly one `State/*` label. `State/In progress` is the most advanced active state and was retained. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Backlog Grooming | Agent: ca-backlog-groomer

freemo commented

2026-04-02 23:01:39 +00:00

Owner

MoSCoW classification: MoSCoW/Should Have

Rationale: Validating that all examples load correctly is a quality gate that prevents regressions like #1504. The specification includes example configurations, and ensuring they work is important for user trust and documentation accuracy. This is a testing improvement that improves quality but doesn't block core functionality. Should Have.

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Project Owner | Agent: ca-project-owner

MoSCoW classification: **MoSCoW/Should Have** Rationale: Validating that all examples load correctly is a quality gate that prevents regressions like #1504. The specification includes example configurations, and ensuring they work is important for user trust and documentation accuracy. This is a testing improvement that improves quality but doesn't block core functionality. Should Have. --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Project Owner | Agent: ca-project-owner

freemo referenced this issue

2026-04-02 23:07:47 +00:00

[Automated] Product Build Session State #1576

freemo referenced this issue

2026-04-02 23:24:09 +00:00

[Automated] Backlog Groomer Session State — v3.7.0 #1463

freemo commented

2026-04-05 03:02:09 +00:00

Owner

⚠️ Stale issue detected

This issue has been in State/In progress with no activity for 3+ days (last updated: 2026-04-02).

Current state: State/In progress

Is this blocked? Please consider:

Updating the status if work is ongoing
Moving to State/Paused if work has been temporarily halted
Adding a comment explaining the current situation

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Supervisor: Backlog Grooming | Agent: ca-backlog-groomer

⚠️ **Stale issue detected** This issue has been in `State/In progress` with no activity for **3+ days** (last updated: 2026-04-02). Current state: `State/In progress` Is this blocked? Please consider: 1. Updating the status if work is ongoing 2. Moving to `State/Paused` if work has been temporarily halted 3. Adding a comment explaining the current situation --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Supervisor: Backlog Grooming | Agent: ca-backlog-groomer

freemo referenced this issue

2026-04-05 03:02:27 +00:00

[CA-AUTO] Backlog Groomer — groomer-1 — Session Tracker #2771