Specification contradiction: atomic vs partial apply in sandbox commit_all #10560

Open
opened 2026-04-18 17:15:38 +00:00 by HAL9000 · 0 comments
Owner

Metadata

Commit Message: fix: resolve specification contradiction in sandbox commit_all atomicity

Branch Name: fix/sandbox-commit-all-spec-contradiction

Background and Context

The commit_all() method in src/cleveragents/infrastructure/sandbox/manager.py (lines 245-250) contains a documented specification contradiction that creates ambiguity about the expected behavior of the apply phase.

Code Evidence:

.. note:: Specification contradiction

   Line 45938 requires atomicity ("all or none"), while line
   19193 states "partial apply" is possible.  This method
   implements the atomicity requirement from line 45938 per
   issue #925.  A spec update for line 19193 may be needed.

The Contradiction:

  • Line 45938 (Specification): Requires atomic commit behavior — "all or none" semantics
  • Line 19193 (Specification): Allows partial apply — some sandboxes can commit while others fail
  • Current Implementation: Enforces atomicity (follows line 45938)

This contradiction creates uncertainty about:

  1. Whether the implementation correctly matches the intended specification
  2. What users should expect when some sandboxes fail during commit
  3. Whether future changes might break the contract

Expected Behavior

The specification should be unambiguous and the implementation should clearly align with it. Users should understand whether:

  • Atomic Mode: All sandboxes commit successfully, or the entire operation fails and is rolled back
  • Partial Mode: Some sandboxes can commit while others fail, with partial success reported to the caller

Acceptance Criteria

  • Specification lines 45938 and 19193 are reviewed and reconciled
  • A decision is made: atomic OR partial apply (not both)
  • The chosen behavior is documented in the specification
  • The implementation is updated to match the specification (if needed)
  • Code comments in commit_all() are updated to reflect the final decision
  • The decision is documented in an ADR or design document
  • All related tests verify the chosen behavior

Subtasks

  • Review specification lines 45938 and 19193 to understand original intent
  • Review issue #925 to understand the atomicity requirement context
  • Consult with team on intended behavior (atomic vs partial)
  • Document the decision in an ADR or design document
  • Update specification line 19193 to align with chosen behavior
  • Update code comments in commit_all() method
  • Add/update tests to verify the chosen behavior
  • Update any related documentation or user guides

Definition of Done

This issue is complete when:

  1. The specification contradiction is resolved (one behavior chosen)
  2. Both specification lines 45938 and 19193 are consistent
  3. The implementation matches the specification
  4. Code comments clearly explain the chosen behavior and why
  5. Tests verify the chosen behavior
  6. An ADR or design document explains the decision and rationale
  7. No contradictory notes remain in the codebase

Automated by CleverAgents Bot
Agent: new-issue-creator

## Metadata **Commit Message:** fix: resolve specification contradiction in sandbox commit_all atomicity **Branch Name:** fix/sandbox-commit-all-spec-contradiction ## Background and Context The `commit_all()` method in `src/cleveragents/infrastructure/sandbox/manager.py` (lines 245-250) contains a documented specification contradiction that creates ambiguity about the expected behavior of the apply phase. **Code Evidence:** ```python .. note:: Specification contradiction Line 45938 requires atomicity ("all or none"), while line 19193 states "partial apply" is possible. This method implements the atomicity requirement from line 45938 per issue #925. A spec update for line 19193 may be needed. ``` **The Contradiction:** - **Line 45938 (Specification):** Requires atomic commit behavior — "all or none" semantics - **Line 19193 (Specification):** Allows partial apply — some sandboxes can commit while others fail - **Current Implementation:** Enforces atomicity (follows line 45938) This contradiction creates uncertainty about: 1. Whether the implementation correctly matches the intended specification 2. What users should expect when some sandboxes fail during commit 3. Whether future changes might break the contract ## Expected Behavior The specification should be unambiguous and the implementation should clearly align with it. Users should understand whether: - **Atomic Mode:** All sandboxes commit successfully, or the entire operation fails and is rolled back - **Partial Mode:** Some sandboxes can commit while others fail, with partial success reported to the caller ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Specification lines 45938 and 19193 are reviewed and reconciled - [ ] A decision is made: atomic OR partial apply (not both) - [ ] The chosen behavior is documented in the specification - [ ] The implementation is updated to match the specification (if needed) - [ ] Code comments in `commit_all()` are updated to reflect the final decision - [ ] The decision is documented in an ADR or design document - [ ] All related tests verify the chosen behavior ## Subtasks - [ ] Review specification lines 45938 and 19193 to understand original intent - [ ] Review issue #925 to understand the atomicity requirement context - [ ] Consult with team on intended behavior (atomic vs partial) - [ ] Document the decision in an ADR or design document - [ ] Update specification line 19193 to align with chosen behavior - [ ] Update code comments in `commit_all()` method - [ ] Add/update tests to verify the chosen behavior - [ ] Update any related documentation or user guides ## Definition of Done This issue is complete when: 1. The specification contradiction is resolved (one behavior chosen) 2. Both specification lines 45938 and 19193 are consistent 3. The implementation matches the specification 4. Code comments clearly explain the chosen behavior and why 5. Tests verify the chosen behavior 6. An ADR or design document explains the decision and rationale 7. No contradictory notes remain in the codebase --- **Automated by CleverAgents Bot** Agent: new-issue-creator
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
cleveragents/cleveragents-core#10560
No description provided.