eba947bd0f298aa1b1ae0704b2ba54f6931c1fbb
6 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
eba947bd0f | chore(ci): centralize tool version management into a single source of truth | ||
|
|
2005b8ef82 |
feat(tests): replace all @skip tags with proper @tdd_expected_fail tags or remove them across the entire codebase (#7221)
CI / push-validation (push) Successful in 18s
CI / build (push) Successful in 19s
CI / helm (push) Successful in 24s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 29s
CI / security (push) Successful in 1m11s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 2m56s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 3m40s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 3m59s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 4m3s
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 4m55s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 10s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 10m44s
CI / status-check (push) Successful in 1s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 1h13m28s
## Summary Replaces all 234 bare `@skip` occurrences across 82 Behave feature files with the correct TDD issue-capture tagging system described in CONTRIBUTING.md § Bug Fix Workflow. Previously, the noxfile ran Behave with `--tags=not @skip`, silently excluding all `@skip`-tagged scenarios from every CI run. These tests never ran, never inverted results via the `@tdd_expected_fail` mechanism, and never contributed to coverage — defeating the purpose of TDD issue-capture testing. Every `@skip` occurrence had a commented-out hint line immediately above it showing the intended proper tags (e.g., `# @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4272 @tdd_expected_fail @skip`), confirming they were all intended for conversion. ## Changes ### Mechanical conversion (234 replacements across 82 files) - Extracted the proper TDD tags from the comment hint above each `@skip` line, removed `@skip` from the tag set, and replaced the `@skip` line with those tags. - Removed the now-redundant comment hint lines alongside each replacement. ### Bug-fixed scenarios — `@tdd_expected_fail` removed (84 scenarios) - After conversion, ran `nox -s unit_tests` to identify which newly-enabled `@tdd_expected_fail` scenarios now **pass** (their referenced bugs have already been fixed). Removed `@tdd_expected_fail` from those 84 scenarios and their corresponding feature-level tags, leaving only the permanent `@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_<N>` regression-guard tags. - Affected features include: `tdd_tool_runner_env_precedence`, `tdd_automation_profile_session_leak`, `tls_certificate_check`, `project_create_persist`, `resource_type_bootstrap_*`, and 18 others. ### Noxfile cleanup - Removed all four `--tags=not @skip` arguments from `noxfile.py` (unit_tests and coverage sessions). With zero `@skip` tags remaining in the codebase, this filter was dead code and its presence would mislead future maintainers into thinking `@skip` is still a supported escape mechanism. ### Regression guard files - Split the regression guards into two focused files: - `tdd_regression_guards_exec_env.feature` for bug #4281 (exec-env precedence) - `tdd_regression_guards_session_list.feature` for bug #4271 (session list summary) - Each file carries only its own `@tdd_issue` tags at the feature level, avoiding cross-contamination via Behave tag inheritance. The `Background` step (`session-list-summary mock`) only appears in the session-list file where it is actually needed. ### Duplicate tag cleanup - Removed duplicate `@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4287` tag lines in `tdd_skill_add_regression.feature` (lines 20 and 29). ### Inline comment for retained `@tdd_expected_fail` - Added inline comment in `ci_workflow_validation.feature:134` explaining why this specific #4227 scenario retains `@tdd_expected_fail` despite #4227 being closed (CI YAML does not encode threshold as a machine-readable value). ### Known edge cases — `@tdd_expected_fail` retained (closed issues, fix on master, scenarios still fail) The following issues are **closed** and their fixes **are on master**, but the specific test assertions still fail because the fixes address other aspects of the bugs. The `@tdd_expected_fail` tags are functionally correct and must remain until the specific scenario assertions pass: - `tdd_exec_env_resolution_precedence.feature` — bug #1080 (closed 2026-03-31). The precedence-level-2-vs-4 scenario still fails. - `session_list_summary_dedup.feature` — bug #3046 (closed 2026-04-05). The dedup-consistency scenarios still fail. - `actor_add_update_enforcement.feature` — bug #2609 (closed 2026-04-05). The enforcement scenarios still fail. - `ci_workflow_validation.feature:134` — #4227 (closed 2026-04-08). The CI YAML threshold assertion still fails. ## Verification - `grep -r "@skip" features/ --include="*.feature"` → **zero results** ✓ - `grep -n "tags=not @skip" noxfile.py` → **zero results** ✓ - `nox -s unit_tests` → **629 features passed, 0 failed** ✓ (up from ~545 before this PR) - CI all green (coverage ≥ 97%) ✓ - Integration tests (Robot Framework) do not use `@skip` — confirmed no action needed ✓ - E2E tests (Robot Framework) do not use `@skip` — confirmed no action needed ✓ - `CHANGELOG.md` updated with entry for this change ✓ - `CONTRIBUTORS.md` — Rui Hu already listed ✓ ## Issues Addressed Closes #7025 Co-authored-by: CleverThis <hal9000@cleverthis.com> Reviewed-on: #7221 Reviewed-by: HAL 9000 <HAL9000@cleverthis.com> Reviewed-by: HAL9001 <hal9001@cleverthis.com> Co-authored-by: Rui Hu <rui.hu@cleverthis.com> Co-committed-by: Rui Hu <rui.hu@cleverthis.com> |
||
|
|
8ea00f5185 |
fix: restore CI quality tests to passing state (#4175)
CI / unit_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Has been cancelled
CI / lint (push) Has been cancelled
CI / typecheck (push) Has been cancelled
CI / security (push) Has been cancelled
CI / quality (push) Has been cancelled
CI / integration_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / e2e_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / coverage (push) Has been cancelled
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been cancelled
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
CI / push-validation (push) Has been cancelled
CI / status-check (push) Has been cancelled
CI / docker (push) Has been cancelled
CI / helm (push) Has been cancelled
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me> Co-committed-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me> |
||
|
|
4e3b4180fc |
feat(ci): add Helm chart lint and template validation to CI
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 14s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 45s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m18s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 3m43s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m9s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 4m25s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 9m27s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m42s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Failing after 15m11s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 13m27s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 25m8s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Failing after 1s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 54m54s
Add kubeconform manifest validation to the existing helm CI job. The helm job already had helm lint and helm template steps (added in #1085). This commit completes the optional acceptance criterion from #1089 by adding kubeconform v0.7.0 to validate rendered manifests against the Kubernetes 1.29.0 schema in strict mode. Changes: - Install kubeconform v0.7.0 in the helm CI job - Add 'Validate rendered manifests with kubeconform' step after helm template smoke render (strict mode, ignore-missing-schemas, kubernetes-version 1.29.0) - Add 5 BDD scenarios to ci_workflow_validation.feature covering: - helm job existence - helm lint step - helm template step - kubeconform validation step - status-check dependency on helm job ISSUES CLOSED: #1089 |
||
|
|
00897be24a |
feat(ci): CI/CD pipeline definitions (#983)
CI / build (push) Successful in 21s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3m30s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 3m55s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / security (push) Successful in 3m57s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 3m59s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 5m52s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 8m15s
CI / coverage (push) Failing after 13m33s
CI / unit_tests (push) Failing after 17m29s
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 19m11s
CI / docker (push) Has been skipped
CI / status-check (push) Failing after 3s
## Summary Complete CI/CD pipeline definitions: release workflow, caching, status-check consolidation, and documentation. ### Changes **New: Release pipeline** (`.forgejo/workflows/release.yml`): - Triggered on `v*` tags - 3 jobs: `build-wheel` → `build-docker` → `create-release` - Builds wheel via `nox -s build`, Docker image via multi-stage Dockerfile - Creates Forgejo release via API with wheel artifact attached - Configurable registry push via `REGISTRY_*` secrets **Updated: CI pipeline** (`.forgejo/workflows/ci.yml`): - Added `actions/cache@v3` for `~/.cache/uv` on all 8 primary jobs (keyed on `pyproject.toml` hash) - Added `status-check` consolidation job depending on all required checks — single gate for branch protection **Updated: CONTRIBUTING.md**: - New CI/CD section: pipeline overview, job table, required merge checks, release process, secrets documentation **Tests**: - 13 new Behave scenarios validating workflow YAML structure, tag triggers, job definitions, dependencies - 9 new Robot tests validating file existence, content, nox session references ### Quality Gates | Session | Result | |---|---| | `nox -s lint` | PASS | | `nox -s typecheck` | PASS (0 errors) | | `nox -s unit_tests` | PASS (10,819 scenarios) | | `nox -s coverage_report` | 97.9% (>= 97%) | Closes #858 Reviewed-on: #983 Co-authored-by: Brent E. Edwards <brent.edwards@cleverthis.com> Co-committed-by: Brent E. Edwards <brent.edwards@cleverthis.com> |
||
|
|
e801eb1ee8 |
feat(ci): add nox-based PR validation workflow
- Rewrite .forgejo/workflows/ci.yml to route all jobs through nox sessions - Fix coverage_report nox session: serial behave mode replaces broken parallel mode (22% -> 97% accuracy), raise fail-under from 85% to 97% - Pass posargs through format nox session for CI --check support - Add 11 CI workflow validation scenarios (Behave) + Robot smoke test + ASV bench - Add 108 new Behave scenarios covering 6 largest coverage gaps to reach 97%: yaml_template_engine, actor/config, actor/registry, message_router, context_analysis, context_service - Update docs/development/ci-cd.md with nox-based CI docs and 97% threshold - Restore implementation_plan.md verbose style, check off completed CI tasks Verified: 1673 scenarios pass, 97% coverage, lint clean, typecheck clean |