4 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
hurui200320	f67e8a2e07	fix(testing): document and harden non-AssertionError guard in apply_tdd_inversion to reduce flaky CI ... Surface the non-AssertionError guard warning in standard Behave output by emitting to stderr in addition to the structured logger, and add infrastructure coverage that asserts this guard path is visible during test runs. Document the @tdd_expected_fail expectation that bug-signaling failures must use AssertionError so infrastructure exceptions are not accidentally treated as expected bug failures. ISSUES CLOSED: #8294	2026-04-15 13:37:16 +08:00
hurui200320	1878998b7a	refactor(testing): rename tdd_bug/tdd_bug_N tags to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_N ... Rename the TDD tag system from tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_<N> across the entire codebase. The tdd_expected_fail tag is unchanged. The TDD expected-failure workflow is not limited to bug fixes — it applies equally to any issue type (features, tasks, refactors). The _bug suffix was misleading and narrowed the perceived scope. The new _issue suffix accurately reflects that the TDD tagging system applies to any Forgejo issue. Changes span 92 files: - features/environment.py: validate_tdd_tags(), should_invert_result(), and apply_tdd_inversion() updated — regex, variables, error messages - robot/tdd_expected_fail_listener.py: _validate_tdd_tags(), _should_invert_result(), start_test(), end_test() updated consistently - 33 Behave .feature files: all @tdd_bug/@tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed - 29 Robot .robot files: all tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed - 3 Robot fixture files renamed (tdd_bug_alone, tdd_missing_tdd_bug, tdd_expected_fail_missing_bug_n) with content and references updated - Tag validation tests and helpers updated (function names, command dispatch keys, output strings, fixture references) - CONTRIBUTING.md: section renamed from 'TDD Bug Test Tags' to 'TDD Issue Test Tags', all tag references and examples updated - noxfile.py: comment references updated - Step definition files, mock helpers, and benchmark files: docstring references updated ISSUES CLOSED: #965	2026-03-27 05:58:35 +00:00
Luis Mendes	c8cd7eab82	feat(testing): implement @tdd_expected_fail tag handling in Behave environment ... Implemented the three-tag TDD bug-capture system in Behave environment hooks: - Added tag validation in before_scenario: @tdd_bug_<N> requires @tdd_bug, @tdd_expected_fail requires both @tdd_bug and @tdd_bug_<N> - Added result inversion via Scenario.run() wrapper installed in before_all: scenarios tagged @tdd_expected_fail that fail are reported as passed (expected failure), and scenarios that unexpectedly pass are reported as failed with guidance to remove the tag - Added helper functions validate_tdd_tags() and should_invert_result() - Added inline documentation referencing CONTRIBUTING.md > TDD Bug Test Tags - Added Behave test scenarios for tag validation and inversion behavior - Extract apply_tdd_inversion() as a public, testable function that encapsulates all inversion logic with proper guards - Refactored handle_tdd_expected_fail() to delegate to apply_tdd_inversion() after tag validation, eliminating ~55 lines of duplicated inversion logic - Tag validation errors in handle_tdd_expected_fail() are now logged at WARNING level instead of being silently swallowed - Add hook_failed guard: never invert infrastructure/hook errors - Add was_dry_run guard: skip inversion when no test actually ran - Add non-AssertionError guard: warn and skip inversion for exceptions that likely indicate infrastructure problems, not the captured bug - Log exception details at DEBUG level before clearing (previously discarded silently) - Attach synthetic AssertionError to last step on unexpected pass so the failure reason appears in standard Behave formatter output ISSUES CLOSED: #627	2026-03-12 19:49:11 +00:00
brent.edwards	aa5d5eeaf5	test(session): add TDD failing tests for session create DI error ... Implement TDD bug-capture tests for bug #570 where `agents session create` fails because `_get_session_service()` calls `container.db()` which does not exist on the DI Container class (AttributeError). Same root cause as bug #554. Behave BDD scenarios tagged @tdd_bug @tdd_bug_570 @tdd_expected_fail exercise the real DI path (no mocks). Includes Robot Framework integration smoke tests with self-inverting helper and ASV benchmark baseline. ISSUES CLOSED: #631	2026-03-11 02:42:13 +00:00