152eddba7f87239efed42b5f2eb9e04d900dcce6
6 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
8ea00f5185 |
fix: restore CI quality tests to passing state (#4175)
CI / unit_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Has been cancelled
CI / lint (push) Has been cancelled
CI / typecheck (push) Has been cancelled
CI / security (push) Has been cancelled
CI / quality (push) Has been cancelled
CI / integration_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / e2e_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / coverage (push) Has been cancelled
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been cancelled
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
CI / push-validation (push) Has been cancelled
CI / status-check (push) Has been cancelled
CI / docker (push) Has been cancelled
CI / helm (push) Has been cancelled
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me> Co-committed-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me> |
||
|
|
1878998b7a |
refactor(testing): rename tdd_bug/tdd_bug_N tags to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_N
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 25s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m56s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m6s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 4m10s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m20s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m44s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 13m1s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m25s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / build (push) Successful in 26s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3m31s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 3m40s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 3m57s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / security (push) Successful in 4m1s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 8m55s
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 9m14s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 9s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 11m42s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 11m37s
CI / status-check (push) Successful in 4s
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 29m25s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 54m8s
Rename the TDD tag system from tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_<N> across the entire codebase. The tdd_expected_fail tag is unchanged. The TDD expected-failure workflow is not limited to bug fixes — it applies equally to any issue type (features, tasks, refactors). The _bug suffix was misleading and narrowed the perceived scope. The new _issue suffix accurately reflects that the TDD tagging system applies to any Forgejo issue. Changes span 92 files: - features/environment.py: validate_tdd_tags(), should_invert_result(), and apply_tdd_inversion() updated — regex, variables, error messages - robot/tdd_expected_fail_listener.py: _validate_tdd_tags(), _should_invert_result(), start_test(), end_test() updated consistently - 33 Behave .feature files: all @tdd_bug/@tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed - 29 Robot .robot files: all tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed - 3 Robot fixture files renamed (tdd_bug_alone, tdd_missing_tdd_bug, tdd_expected_fail_missing_bug_n) with content and references updated - Tag validation tests and helpers updated (function names, command dispatch keys, output strings, fixture references) - CONTRIBUTING.md: section renamed from 'TDD Bug Test Tags' to 'TDD Issue Test Tags', all tag references and examples updated - noxfile.py: comment references updated - Step definition files, mock helpers, and benchmark files: docstring references updated ISSUES CLOSED: #965 |
||
|
|
3eecb79003 |
test(plan): TDD failing tests for checkpoint real rollback (bug #822)
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 46s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 56s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 56s
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 29s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 2m7s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m8s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 9s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m57s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 7m48s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 40m48s
TDD expected-fail tests proving bug #822 exists: CheckpointService.rollback_to_checkpoint() returns a successful RollbackResult but does not execute git reset --hard. Files modified after the checkpoint remain unchanged after rollback. Also fixes Robot Framework timeout robustness across the entire test suite: all Run Process calls now use on_timeout=kill (prevents SIGTERM-induced -15 exit codes under CI load) and timeouts increased to 120s (prevents premature kills during heavy parallel execution). ISSUES CLOSED: #839 |
||
|
|
5f07316641 |
fix: wire DI persistence and plan execute/apply for M1 lifecycle
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 42s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 46s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 27s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m16s
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m20s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 59s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 6m34s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 20s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 45s
CI / security (push) Successful in 46s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 37s
CI / build (push) Successful in 17s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 52s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 5m9s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 5m32s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 57s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 6m10s
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 20m11s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 38m29s
Fixed 5 bugs preventing the M1 E2E acceptance test from passing: 1. _get_lifecycle_service() in action.py and plan.py bypassed the DI container, creating PlanLifecycleService without UnitOfWork. All plan/action data was in-memory only and lost between subprocess calls. Now uses container.plan_lifecycle_service() for DB persistence. 2. `plan execute` CLI only called service.execute_plan() (a pure state transition) without running PlanExecutor phase processing. Rewrote to detect the plan's current phase/state and dispatch synchronously: Strategize/queued → run_strategize(), Strategize/complete → transition + run_execute(), Execute/queued → run_execute(). 3. `plan apply` CLI had no plan_id argument. Added optional positional plan_id with _lifecycle_apply_with_id() that drives the plan through Apply/queued → Apply/processing → Apply/applied. 4. Preflight guardrail in start_strategize() built action_registry from the in-memory _actions dict only. Added get_action(plan.action_name) call to load the action from DB into cache before the guardrail check. 5. Robot Framework Create File syntax used continuation lines producing 9 arguments instead of 1. Fixed to use Catenate SEPARATOR=\n then pass single variable to Create File. Also fixed --branch main to --branch master (git init default). update mocks for execute_plan CLI changes across unit and integration tests The new execute_plan() command calls _get_plan_executor() and service.get_plan(plan_id) for phase/state detection. Existing tests only mocked _get_lifecycle_service, so MagicMock defaults caused phase/state comparisons to fail. Changes across 14 files: - Patch _get_plan_executor in all test setups that invoke the CLI execute command (Behave step files + Robot helper scripts) - Set service.get_plan.return_value to real Plan objects with correct phase/state so the execute_plan dispatch logic works - Fix error-path tests to use STRATEGIZE/COMPLETE plans so the error side_effects are actually reached - Fix "Multiple plans eligible" → "Multiple plans ready" message text to match existing test expectations increase Robot Framework subprocess timeouts for CI resource contention Three integration tests were timing out in CI due to resource contention when pabot runs multiple test suites in parallel. All three pass locally and the timeouts were simply too tight for constrained CI environments. - tdd_session_create_di.robot: 30s → 90s (DI container init + DB setup) - database_integration.robot: 60s → 120s (Run Python Script keyword) - m3_e2e_verification.robot: 60s → 120s (correction-live-revert spawns 3 sequential CLI subprocesses with full container initialization) ISSUES CLOSED: #789 |
||
|
|
e732c32981 |
fix(cli): handle missing database in session list command
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 14s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 36s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 38s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m3s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m32s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 8m43s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 38m51s
Register PersistentSessionService in the DI Container so that 'agents session list' (and all other session subcommands) no longer throw AttributeError due to a missing 'db' provider. Changes: - Add _build_session_service() factory and session_service provider to Container, with targeted table creation for session/session_messages only (avoids bypassing Alembic for the full schema). - Add auto_commit parameter to SessionRepository and SessionMessageRepository; when True each method commits and closes its own database session, preventing resource leaks in CLI context. - Rewrite _get_session_service() to resolve via container.session_service() with module-level caching. - Add (DatabaseError, AttributeError) error handling with logging to all seven session subcommands (list, create, show, delete, export, import, tell). - Remove @tdd_expected_fail tags from all session test files so they run as proper regression tests. ISSUES CLOSED: #554, #570, #680 |
||
|
|
aa5d5eeaf5 |
test(session): add TDD failing tests for session create DI error
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 18s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 36s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 38s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 2m42s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 3m13s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 39s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 6m15s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 34m51s
Implement TDD bug-capture tests for bug #570 where `agents session create` fails because `_get_session_service()` calls `container.db()` which does not exist on the DI Container class (AttributeError). Same root cause as bug #554. Behave BDD scenarios tagged @tdd_bug @tdd_bug_570 @tdd_expected_fail exercise the real DI path (no mocks). Includes Robot Framework integration smoke tests with self-inverting helper and ASV benchmark baseline. ISSUES CLOSED: #631 |