5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
freemo 2b6ac00263 fix(config): resolve database_url relative to CLEVERAGENTS_HOME, not CWD
Ensure that when database_url is a relative path (like sqlite:///cleveragents.db),
it resolves relative to CLEVERAGENTS_HOME instead of the current working directory.
This fixes E2E test isolation where data from previous runs persisted across runs
at CWD, causing UNIQUE constraint failures.

Changes:
- Added _resolve_database_urls model validator in Settings to rewrite relative
  SQLite paths to absolute paths under CLEVERAGENTS_HOME
- Updated get_database_url() in container.py to use CLEVERAGENTS_HOME as base
  directory and create parent directories when CLEVERAGENTS_HOME is explicitly set
- Updated _check_database() in system.py to walk up directory tree for writable
  ancestor check, handling cases where intermediate directories have not yet been
  created
- Removed @tdd_expected_fail from TDD test (now passes genuinely)

ISSUES CLOSED: #1024
2026-04-22 00:45:09 +00:00
hurui200320 2005b8ef82 feat(tests): replace all @skip tags with proper @tdd_expected_fail tags or remove them across the entire codebase (#7221)
CI / push-validation (push) Successful in 18s
CI / build (push) Successful in 19s
CI / helm (push) Successful in 24s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 29s
CI / security (push) Successful in 1m11s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 2m56s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 3m40s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 3m59s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 4m3s
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 4m55s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 10s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 10m44s
CI / status-check (push) Successful in 1s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 1h13m28s
## Summary

Replaces all 234 bare `@skip` occurrences across 82 Behave feature files with the correct TDD issue-capture tagging system described in CONTRIBUTING.md § Bug Fix Workflow.

Previously, the noxfile ran Behave with `--tags=not @skip`, silently excluding all `@skip`-tagged scenarios from every CI run. These tests never ran, never inverted results via the `@tdd_expected_fail` mechanism, and never contributed to coverage — defeating the purpose of TDD issue-capture testing. Every `@skip` occurrence had a commented-out hint line immediately above it showing the intended proper tags (e.g., `# @tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4272 @tdd_expected_fail @skip`), confirming they were all intended for conversion.

## Changes

### Mechanical conversion (234 replacements across 82 files)
- Extracted the proper TDD tags from the comment hint above each `@skip` line, removed `@skip` from the tag set, and replaced the `@skip` line with those tags.
- Removed the now-redundant comment hint lines alongside each replacement.

### Bug-fixed scenarios — `@tdd_expected_fail` removed (84 scenarios)
- After conversion, ran `nox -s unit_tests` to identify which newly-enabled `@tdd_expected_fail` scenarios now **pass** (their referenced bugs have already been fixed). Removed `@tdd_expected_fail` from those 84 scenarios and their corresponding feature-level tags, leaving only the permanent `@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_<N>` regression-guard tags.
- Affected features include: `tdd_tool_runner_env_precedence`, `tdd_automation_profile_session_leak`, `tls_certificate_check`, `project_create_persist`, `resource_type_bootstrap_*`, and 18 others.

### Noxfile cleanup
- Removed all four `--tags=not @skip` arguments from `noxfile.py` (unit_tests and coverage sessions). With zero `@skip` tags remaining in the codebase, this filter was dead code and its presence would mislead future maintainers into thinking `@skip` is still a supported escape mechanism.

### Regression guard files
- Split the regression guards into two focused files:
  - `tdd_regression_guards_exec_env.feature` for bug #4281 (exec-env precedence)
  - `tdd_regression_guards_session_list.feature` for bug #4271 (session list summary)
- Each file carries only its own `@tdd_issue` tags at the feature level, avoiding cross-contamination via Behave tag inheritance. The `Background` step (`session-list-summary mock`) only appears in the session-list file where it is actually needed.

### Duplicate tag cleanup
- Removed duplicate `@tdd_issue @tdd_issue_4287` tag lines in `tdd_skill_add_regression.feature` (lines 20 and 29).

### Inline comment for retained `@tdd_expected_fail`
- Added inline comment in `ci_workflow_validation.feature:134` explaining why this specific #4227 scenario retains `@tdd_expected_fail` despite #4227 being closed (CI YAML does not encode threshold as a machine-readable value).

### Known edge cases — `@tdd_expected_fail` retained (closed issues, fix on master, scenarios still fail)
The following issues are **closed** and their fixes **are on master**, but the specific test assertions still fail because the fixes address other aspects of the bugs. The `@tdd_expected_fail` tags are functionally correct and must remain until the specific scenario assertions pass:
- `tdd_exec_env_resolution_precedence.feature` — bug #1080 (closed 2026-03-31). The precedence-level-2-vs-4 scenario still fails.
- `session_list_summary_dedup.feature` — bug #3046 (closed 2026-04-05). The dedup-consistency scenarios still fail.
- `actor_add_update_enforcement.feature` — bug #2609 (closed 2026-04-05). The enforcement scenarios still fail.
- `ci_workflow_validation.feature:134` — #4227 (closed 2026-04-08). The CI YAML threshold assertion still fails.

## Verification

- `grep -r "@skip" features/ --include="*.feature"` → **zero results** ✓
- `grep -n "tags=not @skip" noxfile.py` → **zero results** ✓
- `nox -s unit_tests` → **629 features passed, 0 failed** ✓ (up from ~545 before this PR)
- CI all green (coverage ≥ 97%) ✓
- Integration tests (Robot Framework) do not use `@skip` — confirmed no action needed ✓
- E2E tests (Robot Framework) do not use `@skip` — confirmed no action needed ✓
- `CHANGELOG.md` updated with entry for this change ✓
- `CONTRIBUTORS.md` — Rui Hu already listed ✓

## Issues Addressed

Closes #7025

Co-authored-by: CleverThis <hal9000@cleverthis.com>
Reviewed-on: #7221
Reviewed-by: HAL 9000 <HAL9000@cleverthis.com>
Reviewed-by: HAL9001 <hal9001@cleverthis.com>
Co-authored-by: Rui Hu <rui.hu@cleverthis.com>
Co-committed-by: Rui Hu <rui.hu@cleverthis.com>
2026-04-13 04:56:01 +00:00
freemo 8ea00f5185 fix: restore CI quality tests to passing state (#4175)
CI / unit_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Has been cancelled
CI / lint (push) Has been cancelled
CI / typecheck (push) Has been cancelled
CI / security (push) Has been cancelled
CI / quality (push) Has been cancelled
CI / integration_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / e2e_tests (push) Has been cancelled
CI / coverage (push) Has been cancelled
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been cancelled
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
CI / push-validation (push) Has been cancelled
CI / status-check (push) Has been cancelled
CI / docker (push) Has been cancelled
CI / helm (push) Has been cancelled
Co-authored-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me>
Co-committed-by: Jeffrey Phillips Freeman <the@jeffreyfreeman.me>
2026-04-08 11:02:14 +00:00
hurui200320 1878998b7a refactor(testing): rename tdd_bug/tdd_bug_N tags to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_N
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 25s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 3m56s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m6s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 4m10s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m20s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m44s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 13m1s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 12m25s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / build (push) Successful in 26s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3m31s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 3m40s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 3m57s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / security (push) Successful in 4m1s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 8m55s
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 9m14s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 9s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 11m42s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 11m37s
CI / status-check (push) Successful in 4s
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 29m25s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 54m8s
Rename the TDD tag system from tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> to tdd_issue/tdd_issue_<N>
across the entire codebase. The tdd_expected_fail tag is unchanged.

The TDD expected-failure workflow is not limited to bug fixes — it applies
equally to any issue type (features, tasks, refactors). The _bug suffix was
misleading and narrowed the perceived scope. The new _issue suffix accurately
reflects that the TDD tagging system applies to any Forgejo issue.

Changes span 92 files:
- features/environment.py: validate_tdd_tags(), should_invert_result(), and
  apply_tdd_inversion() updated — regex, variables, error messages
- robot/tdd_expected_fail_listener.py: _validate_tdd_tags(), _should_invert_result(),
  start_test(), end_test() updated consistently
- 33 Behave .feature files: all @tdd_bug/@tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed
- 29 Robot .robot files: all tdd_bug/tdd_bug_<N> tags renamed
- 3 Robot fixture files renamed (tdd_bug_alone, tdd_missing_tdd_bug,
  tdd_expected_fail_missing_bug_n) with content and references updated
- Tag validation tests and helpers updated (function names, command dispatch
  keys, output strings, fixture references)
- CONTRIBUTING.md: section renamed from 'TDD Bug Test Tags' to
  'TDD Issue Test Tags', all tag references and examples updated
- noxfile.py: comment references updated
- Step definition files, mock helpers, and benchmark files: docstring
  references updated

ISSUES CLOSED: #965
2026-03-27 05:58:35 +00:00
freemo e52c79e958 test: add TDD bug-capture test for #1024 — SQLite DB URL CWD resolution
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 23s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 4m3s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 4m3s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m3s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 6m26s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m57s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m23s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m8s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 11m22s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / build (push) Successful in 19s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3m17s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 3m44s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 3m53s
CI / security (push) Successful in 3m54s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 5m53s
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 6m59s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 1m2s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 8m42s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 9m53s
CI / status-check (push) Successful in 3s
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 26m34s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 55m26s
Add Behave BDD scenarios (tagged @tdd_bug @tdd_bug_1024 @tdd_expected_fail)
that verify the default database_url resolves inside CLEVERAGENTS_HOME rather
than the current working directory.  Two scenarios exercise both the container
get_database_url() helper and the Settings model default.

Add Robot Framework integration tests with a helper script exercising the same
resolution paths via subprocess, verifying database URL resolution and CLI
database file placement relative to CLEVERAGENTS_HOME.

The tests currently fail as expected because the bug in #1024 is still present:
the relative SQLite path sqlite:///cleveragents.db resolves against CWD.  The
@tdd_expected_fail tag inverts the result so CI passes.

ISSUES CLOSED: #1034
2026-03-24 20:29:49 +00:00