master
9 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
f808abff86 |
chore(ci): fix pre-commit hook failures
Fix JSON syntax errors in .devcontainer/devcontainer.json (removed
invalid JS-style // comments) and .devcontainer/opencode.json (removed
90+ trailing commas). Apply auto-fixes for end-of-file and trailing
whitespace issues across 100+ files. Fix SIM105 ruff violations in
benchmarks/core_circuit_breaker_bench.py (use contextlib.suppress).
Note: The security fix from issue #7478 (validate_path startswith bypass)
was already delivered to master in commit
|
||
|
|
007af498b8
|
refactor(autonomy): rename automation profile task flags to spec names
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / helm (pull_request) Successful in 33s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 3m42s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 4m8s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 4m9s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 4m20s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m2s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m55s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 8m46s
CI / e2e_tests (pull_request) Successful in 16m1s
CI / status-check (pull_request) Successful in 1s
CI / build (push) Successful in 17s
CI / helm (push) Successful in 22s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 31s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3m28s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 3m54s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / security (push) Successful in 4m5s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 6m13s
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 6m28s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 1m34s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 12m5s
CI / e2e_tests (push) Successful in 18m47s
CI / status-check (push) Successful in 1s
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 28m0s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 59m48s
Renamed all 11 task-type confidence threshold fields in AutomationProfile from phase-transition semantics to spec-defined task-type semantics. Updated all 8 built-in profiles, CLI formatting, YAML schema, services, and all Behave/Robot tests referencing the old field names. Post-review fixes: - Fixed 24 stale old field names in M6 fixture files (automation_profiles.json, autonomy_guardrails.json) - Added model_validator(mode='before') to detect legacy field names and raise actionable ValueError with rename mapping - Added semantic bridge comments in PlanLifecycleService mapping task-type thresholds to phase-transition gates - Added threshold_field to structured log messages for observability - Restored categorised CLI automation-profile show output to match spec (Phase Transitions / Decision Automation / Self-Repair / Execution Controls) instead of flat list - Added missing access_network field to spec show output examples (Rich, Plain, JSON, YAML variants) - Aligned ADR-017 profile fields table to all 11 fields with descriptions matching spec Automatable Tasks table - Aligned automation_profiles.md threshold descriptions with spec - Added spec section references in phase_reversion.md, error_recovery.md, and plan_execute.md for field naming context - Extended repository roundtrip test to assert all 11 threshold fields - Fixed benchmark _make_profile() passing safety fields as top-level kwargs instead of via SafetyProfile sub-model (incompatible with extra="forbid") - Aligned CLI JSON/YAML output structure for automation-profile show with the specification grouped format (phase_transitions, decision_automation, self_repair, execution_controls) - Moved safety boolean fields into the Execution Controls section of Rich output per spec examples - Reverted auto profile description to "Fully automatic except apply" per specification (line 16703, line 28406) - Improved bridge comments in test steps with semantic context for threshold-to-gate mappings ISSUES CLOSED: #902 |
||
|
|
bb8175aa11 |
feat(resource): add resource type inheritance and polymorphic tool matching
Implement ADR-042 single-inheritance for resource types with polymorphic tool and handler resolution. Core changes: - Add `inherits` field to ResourceTypeConfigSchema, ResourceTypeSpec, and ResourceTypeModel with chain depth validation (max 5), circular inheritance detection, and built-in-from-custom guard - New inheritance.py module (390 lines): resolve_inheritance_chain(), validate_chain(), is_subtype_of(), resolve_fields(), find_subtypes() - Wire inheritance into ResourceRegistryService: chain validation on register_type(), resolve_type_inheritance_chain(), is_subtype_of() - Add find_tools_for_resource() to ToolRegistry with polymorphic matching that walks the inheritance chain - Add resolve_handler_polymorphic() to handler resolver - Alembic migration m6_004_resource_type_inherits adds inherits column and index to resource_types table CLI changes: - `agents resource type list` shows Inherits column - `agents resource type show` displays inheritance chain Tests: - 30 BDD scenarios in resource_type_inheritance.feature (all pass) - 18 Robot Framework test cases - 14 ASV benchmark timing methods across 4 suites Docs: - docs/reference/resource_type_inheritance.md (full reference) - Updated docs/schema/resource_type.schema.yaml - CHANGELOG entry for #513 ISSUES CLOSED: #513 |
||
|
|
c825935309 |
docs(spec): recognize SafetyProfile as composed sub-model of AutomationProfile
CI / benchmark-publish (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 24s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 24s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 50s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 57s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 20s
CI / quality (push) Successful in 25s
CI / build (push) Successful in 20s
CI / security (push) Successful in 55s
CI / typecheck (push) Successful in 57s
CI / benchmark-regression (push) Has been skipped
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m28s
CI / integration_tests (push) Successful in 3m46s
CI / benchmark-publish (push) Successful in 12m12s
CI / benchmark-regression (pull_request) Successful in 22m12s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 28m31s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI / unit_tests (push) Successful in 29m45s
CI / docker (push) Successful in 1m0s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 1h25m45s
CI / coverage (push) Successful in 1h29m24s
Add SafetyProfile as a first-class concept in the specification, composed within AutomationProfile via a 'safety' field. This eliminates the dual-authority problem where both AutomationProfile and a separate SafetyProfile defined the same three safety booleans (require_sandbox, require_checkpoints, allow_unsafe_tools) with no spec-defined resolution. Changes: - specification.md: Add Safety Profile glossary entry, split Automatable Tasks into thresholds + Safety Profile sub-section, update built-in profile matrix with safety.* prefix, update YAML examples - ADR-041 (new): Document composition decision, field schema, relationship to Guards, constraints, consequences, rejected alternatives (inheritance, mixin, flat) - ADR-017: Update profile fields table, built-in profiles, constraints, risks, and cross-reference to ADR-041 - reference/automation_profiles.md: Rename Safety Fields to Safety Profile sub-section, expand built-in matrix, update YAML examples - schema/automation_profile.schema.yaml: Nest safety fields under safety object with all SafetyProfile fields - adr/index.md: Add ADR-041 to Tier 3 inventory Resolves spec gap identified in issue #332. |
||
|
|
24866b2244 | Merge branch 'master' into develop-20260217 | ||
|
|
c41581b7c4
|
docs(skill): add skill YAML schema and examples
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 15s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 31s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 22s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Failing after 3m46s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Failing after 9m57s
CI / docker (pull_request) Has been skipped
|
||
|
|
1f06bb2f76 |
feat(resource): add resource type model + schema loader
CI / lint (push) Waiting to run
CI / typecheck (push) Waiting to run
CI / security (push) Waiting to run
CI / quality (push) Waiting to run
CI / unit_tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / integration_tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / coverage (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / build (push) Waiting to run
CI / docker (push) Blocked by required conditions
|
||
|
|
dfb91781aa |
feat(tool): add tool and validation domain models
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 14s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 21s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m10s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 8m23s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 39s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 6m21s
CI / lint (push) Waiting to run
CI / typecheck (push) Waiting to run
CI / security (push) Waiting to run
CI / quality (push) Waiting to run
CI / unit_tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / integration_tests (push) Waiting to run
CI / coverage (push) Blocked by required conditions
CI / build (push) Waiting to run
CI / docker (push) Blocked by required conditions
|
||
|
|
8da7bd1e56
|
docs(action): add action YAML schema and examples
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 22s
CI / quality (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI / integration_tests (pull_request) Successful in 4m17s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI / unit_tests (pull_request) Successful in 7m45s
CI / docker (pull_request) Successful in 44s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 5m38s
|